When should I dofollow a link?
-
I know I should have all my affiliate links as nofollow but when should I dofollow a link? When will it HELP me to have a dofollow link?
Right now - all my links are nofollow because I haven't figured out how to have nofollow and dofollow in the same blog post.
Any info appreciated!
-
Thanks!
-
Hello,
Here is a plugin that can take care of the job for you:
http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/nofollow/
Just install it, and set it up. You can use it when you add affiliate links, too... just check the nofollow box and voila, you're done.
-
Ok I see. So basically I should follow all my links except for affiliate links?
Is there a plugin that can help me do that? Because right now, the only thing I know how to do is follow or nofollow the entire page. I don't want to deal with code because it would take a long time for me to do. I am a deal blog and link have a lot of amazon affiliate links.
Edit: I am using Thesis.
-
Actually, dealaholic, the question is better answered if you ask it in reverse - when should links be nofollowed?.
All links on a website should be do-follow except in specific circumstances. Essentially, the only time you nofollow a link is if it is commercial in nature, or should be untrusted.
Typical example of commercial is the example you use of affiliate links. Another would be if the link was part of a paid advertisement, for example. (Google claims it can recognize aff links, but it's a safe bet to nofollow them anyway to be sure, and to account for the other SEs which may not handle them the same way.)
Untrustworthy links are things like links within user-generated content where the site author isn't actually responsible for creating, nor is vouching for the links, even though they appear on their site. (Links from within comments or profiles are a perfect example of this.)
Search engines expect that hyperlinks are to be followed - that's the premise the web was built on. A site that extensively uses nofollow on what should be natural links will appear to be trying to manipulate the natural flow of the web - something the search engines have been going to great lengths to discourage and even penalize.
In addition to looking unnatural if a site unnecessarily uses nofollow, it can make the site very hard for the SEs to crawl. One of the most common ways a SE discovers the pages on a site, especially the new ones, is by following the links from pages it knows about, to those it doesn't know about yet. If you nofollow the internal links in your navigation and post contents, you severely interfere with the SEs' ability to crawl and index your site. (There are a few examples where you can help the engines make better use of their crawling time by not following links that are truly pointless to the SE on your site - like a link to your account signup page, which the crawler couldn't submit to anyway.)
So, TL:DR leave everything as followed except if the links are paid/commercial. or or are to site's you don't personally vouch for.
Hope that makes sense?
Paul
P.S. Found this direct from Matt Cutts on using nofollow.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
No followed links, what happens to the PR?
Hi, I have read a few times, on here and other places that when a website applies a no follow tag to a link the PR is not retained but instead disappears (evaporates) thus neither website benefiting. Is that true? If so what is the actual benefit of no following a link?
On-Page Optimization | | Bondara0 -
Are My footer links bad?
I started working here recently, they said the footer links were to help with navigation of their most popular products. I am curious after reading http://www.seomoz.org/blog/internal-linking-strategies-for-2012-and-beyond if having these footer links could hurt the ranking of those key words after the penguin update. I am looking more into the analytics, and have not seen a negative impact yet.
On-Page Optimization | | DoRM0 -
Internal Followed Links and Total Internal Links as 1
It is showing Internal Followed Links and Total Internal Links as 1 in OpenSiteExplorer Tool http://www.expresscasket.com/ http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/comparisons?site=www.expresscasket.com Not able to understand and identify the problem and fix it. But when i check in google webmasters tool, it is showing lots of internal links. Does it differ those internal links and your trace of internal links
On-Page Optimization | | expresscasket0 -
Google found bad links delete them or 301 redirect?
we went into our google account and saw about 70 bad links that they found on our site. what's the best thing to do, seo-wise: should we go into the pages that have the bad links and delete them from the html code, or re-direct them in our htaccess script?
On-Page Optimization | | DerekM880 -
Do anchor links pointing to bottom/top of page count as link?
As the title says: Do anchor links pointing to bottom/top of page count as link? This page: http://www.betxpert.com/forum/bookmakere/vis/ladbrokes-kommentar I has over 300 links, but I don't see that many links. Is it the "#15" and the top/bottom of page anchors that count? Is this harmful in terms of link juice? -Rasmus
On-Page Optimization | | rasmusbang0 -
Is there a SEO penalty for multi links on same page going to same destination page?
Hi, Just a quick note. I hope you are able to assist. To cut a long story short, on the page below http://www.bookbluemountains.com.au/ -> Features Specials & Packages (middle column) we have 3 links per special going to the same page.
On-Page Optimization | | daveupton
1. Header is linked
2. Click on image link - currently with a no follow
3. 'More info' under the description paragraph is linked too - currently with a no follow Two arguments are as follows:
1. The reason we do not follow all 3 links is to reduce too many links which may appear spammy to Google. 2. Counter argument:
The point above has some validity, However, using no follow is basically telling the search engines that the webmaster “does not trust or doesn’t take responsibility” for what is behind the link, something you don’t want to do within your own website. There is no penalty as such for having too many links, the search engines will generally not worry after a certain number.. nothing that would concern this business though. I would suggest changing the no follow links a.s.a.p. Could you please advise thoughts. Many thanks Dave Upton [long signature removed by staff]0 -
Too many on page links
I'm having trouble interpreting this data. It says several of my blog pages have too many on page links, some as high as 140 and there is no example of a blog post that they are referring to. What am I missing? I never post more than a handful (5-7) in our 600-1000wd blogs. When I drill down, it doesn't give me very much information except "Found over 41 years ago" off to the right. When I click on the "too many on page links" URL, it provides a long list of website pages that are renamed with the blog name. huh? A lot of this stuff isn't very intuitive, SEOMoz.
On-Page Optimization | | amandahx20 -
SEO value of "in the news" links on home page?
Notice more sites have an "in the News" section on the home page, or something similar like press releases... Apart from providing users fresh content, is there an SEO value to this? What is the explanation for this? Have a feeling the answer is obvious but just not too sure Thanks a lot.
On-Page Optimization | | inhouseninja0