On Link Analysis tab I my best pages are 301 and 404 pages.
-
I looked on my redirrect file and found that /* redirects to /v/404.asp.
However if you look below at the link analysis the 404 page is getting a 404 error.
The homepage ecowindchimes.com/ is getting a 301 (but I don't know where it is going to).
The third one is also redirected.1. [No Data] ecowindchimes.com/ ||| 301 ||| 2 ||| 36 2.
2. [No Data] ecowindchimes.com/v/404.asp ||| 404 ||| 2 ||| 34 3. [No Data]
3. ecowindchimes.com/index.html?lang=en-us&target=d2.html ||| 301 ||| 1 ||| 33
So I have 2 questions: 1) should this be fixed? and 2) how?
This is a volusion site and I believe the "catchall" redirect was done by them
-
Answered in order, Stephen:
1. Normally, the fact that ecowindchimes.com/ is getting redirected is a good thing. But in this case, there's a problem with how it's been done. If you want to see where it's redirecting to, just enter that exact address in your browser's address bar and watch what happens to the address. It will change to www.ecowindchimes.com/default.asp. Done correctly, it should redirect to www.ecowindchimes.com (no default.asp extension)
This is called canonicalisation and it's designed to make sure your site's pages only get indexed under 1 URL. As far as the search engines are concerned, ecowindchimes.com/ and www.ecowindchimes.com/ are separate sites, even though the pages themselves are the same. By redirecting one to the other, you remove this problem.
The problem here is that www.ecowindchimes.com/default.asp is yet another way to refer to what is simply the home page of your site. This means that now, instead of www.ecowindchimes.com/ and www.ecowindchimes.com/ being duplicates of each other you have www.ecowindchimes.com and www.ecowindchimes.com**/default.asp** being dupes of each other. This needs to be corrected in your .htaccess file using 301 redirects.
You need to make ecowindchimes.com/ use a proper canonical redirect to www.ecowindchimes.com. This will catch ALL version of your pages that start without the www and redirect them to the correct URL with the www. (You'll need to delete the existing redirect as it's incorrect)
Then you need to 301-redirect www.ecowindchimes.com/default.asp directly to www.ecowindchimes.com/.
2. I've answered your question # 2 as fully as I can on your followup question. in short, your Volusion system is faking that 404 status as a hack to deal with the fact they don't handle 404 errors in the normal way. The page exists fine and that particular error can be ignored.
3. For your last question, this demonstrates why the hacked method for 404s being used is a problem. URLs that should be 404s will show up looking like 301 redirects instead, because of the hack in use.
To test this URL, again just put it in your address bar and watch where it gets redirected to. In this case, it's going to your 404 page (See answer to your followup question as linked above for explanation why this happening)
So, yes you need to try to fix these kinds of errors. It's saying that somewhere, there is a page linking to ecowindchimes.com/index.html?lang=en-us&target=d2.html. That is a URL from your old site before you migrated to the Volusion system. It likely means that there are pages on another web sites still linking to your old page addresses. It's also possible these are outdated links from within your own pages.
By entering that URL in the Wayback Machine I can see that it was for a page for Gracenote windchimes, so you'll want to redirect it to your Gracenotes category page.
If you want to figure out what pages those broken links are coming from, you can use Webmaster Tools 404 error report and SEOmoz's 404 error report as starting points. NOTE! You'll need to actually download the SEOmoz report as a CSV in order to see the Referrer column at the right side of the report.
Hope all that helps, more than confuses? If anything's not clear, be sure to holler.
Paul
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Best Approach to compete the competitor?
what is the best approach to beat my competitor in ranking, suppose my competitor got a backlink from a website like OEM Skin Care that has low DA but related to the same niche, but If i will get a backlink from a site that has 90+ DA like CNN, then which backlink has great impact on SERP Ranking, A- Backlink with LOW DA but same Niche,
Moz Pro | | akhter8761
B- Backlink with 90+ DA but different Niche, I need your suggestion before buying a guest post..
Thanks in advance.1 -
403 error but page is fine??
Hi, on my report im getting 4xx error. When i look into it it says the error is crital fo4r 403 error on this page https://gaspipes.co.uk/contact-us/ i can get to the page and see it fine but no idea why its showing a 403 error or how to fix it. This is the only page that the error is coming up on, is there anything i can check/do to get this resolved? Thanks
Moz Pro | | JU-Mark0 -
Moz is treating my pages as duplicate content but the pages have different content in reality
Attached here is a screenshot of links with duplicate content. Here are some links that is also based on the screenshot http://federalland.ph/construction_updates/paseo-de-roces-as-of-october-2015 http://federalland.ph/construction_updates/sixsenses-residences-tower-2-as-of-october-2015/ http://federalland.ph/construction_updates/sixsenses-residences-tower-3-as-of-october-2015 The links that I have placed here have different content. So I don't why they are treated as duplicates BWWJuvQ
Moz Pro | | clestcruz0 -
Found hidden pages of outbound links created via ex-SEO consultant. Best way to detect other possible problems?
We paid for an SEO contract in addition to our new website design (same company did both) and after 12 months cancelled the SEO. I have been very suspicious ever since of our bad page rank and general lack of traffic (despite my efforts) and today found a hidden page of outbound links. Currently in shock that this happened although my own fault for lack of due diligence. The SEO consultants were very unhappy that I cancelled the contract so I am worried about the extent of bad links or negative google juice they may have created (god knows what else they may have done). So my questions are: How can I detect any other (potentially hidden) problems? How can I recover from this - any right/wrong way to approach google? What is the best way to bring this up with the SEO consultants? Thank you in advance.
Moz Pro | | marketing-gal0 -
Duplicate page report
We ran a CSV spreadsheet of our crawl diagnostics related to duplicate URLS' after waiting 5 days with no response to how Rogerbot can be made to filter. My IT lead tells me he thinks the label on the spreadsheet is showing “duplicate URLs”, and that is – literally – what the spreadsheet is showing. It thinks that a database ID number is the only valid part of a URL. To replicate: Just filter the spreadsheet for any number that you see on the page. For example, filtering for 1793 gives us the following result: | URL http://truthbook.com/faq/dsp_viewFAQ.cfm?faqID=1793 http://truthbook.com/index.cfm?linkID=1793 http://truthbook.com/index.cfm?linkID=1793&pf=true http://www.truthbook.com/blogs/dsp_viewBlogEntry.cfm?blogentryID=1793 http://www.truthbook.com/index.cfm?linkID=1793 | There are a couple of problems with the above: 1. It gives the www result, as well as the non-www result. 2. It is seeing the print version as a duplicate (&pf=true) but these are blocked from Google via the noindex header tag. 3. It thinks that different sections of the website with the same ID number the same thing (faq / blogs / pages) In short: this particular report tell us nothing at all. I am trying to get a perspective from someone at SEOMoz to determine if he is reading the result correctly or there is something he is missing? Please help. Jim
Moz Pro | | jimmyzig0 -
Redirect analysis tool
I'm looking for a tool like this: http://www.internetofficer.com/seo-tool/redirect-check/ that can check hundreds/thousands of URLs and give me a report as to which ones have been redirected. Does anyone know of something that can do this?
Moz Pro | | glass010 -
Current on-page best practices
Given all the recent talk about over optimization, when was the last time SEOMoz updated the on-page report card tool? Rand wrote an excellent piece on Perfect On-Page Optimization (which is great, and thanks) in summer 2009. Is that still best practice 3 years later (and post-Penguin/Panda)? If not, has the SEOMoz on-page report card tool been updated to reflect current thinking for on-page best-practices? I know the higher level concept is "write for humans, not for bots" but if you can do both (and not create an unreadable seo-frankenpage) then why not? Does getting an "A" grade wreak of over optimization now? Should I use the key phrase at the start of the title, h1, and strong (or bold) elements on a page? Should have an image with file name and alt text equal to (or containing at the start) the key phrase?
Moz Pro | | scanlin2 -
Why is Followed Linking Root Domains higher than External Followed Links?
Surely there must be at least one external link for each linking root domain? Some results for smaller sites give a higher number of domains linking in than incoming links - e.g. www.forbesandsawyer.co.uk Under Subdomain metrics: External Followed Links - 1 Followed Linking Root Domains - 2 Surely 2 root domains would mean AT LEAST 2 external followed links? Thanks, Andrew
Moz Pro | | Silktide0