Feedback on a banner design
-
I was hoping to get some feedback from you guys regarding some banner redesign we are working on for our website. We are currently using the blue one, but we werent happy with the logo we had of the hat and hands shaking. So once we started working on a new logo, that logo doesnt match at all with the current design so we were messing around with the banner and came up with these ideas.
Id appreciate some feedback good or bad
edit: sorry guess [img] doesnt work in here
Current Banner
http://i403.photobucket.com/albums/pp120/jimrawr/banner_zpse92b853f.jpg
New 1
http://i403.photobucket.com/albums/pp120/jimrawr/21-03-banner_zpsfc224501.jpg
New 2
http://i403.photobucket.com/albums/pp120/jimrawr/19-03-banner_zps17c3f2f1.jpg
New 3
http://i403.photobucket.com/albums/pp120/jimrawr/20-03-banner_zps966bb780.jpg
-
I apologize for not seeing this somehow it passed right over me.
The large advantages for using a managed WordPress host our primarily speed, security in the form of powerful firewalls and if they get through that which they do very rarely do every one of them uses http://sucuri.net/ this allows them to know if there's any malware on your site and have it cleaned and running perfectly at no cost to you. You get hosting that is built around just WordPress an incredible abundance of WordPress knowledge at your fingertips and the idea of you have enough toward about without having to spend what would amount to a real lot of money in order to get a WordPress site to load in under one or two seconds consistently both nationally and internationally. I highly encourage you to read not just the pages I've sent you, but everything on the sites that are about the host.http://wpengine.com/fast-page-loads/
https://www.zippykid.com/benefits/speed-fast-wordpress-host/
https://www.zippykid.com/benefits/
http://websynthesis.com/features/
https://page.ly/features/For instance I'm currently writing a Moz blog post on the subject so I can't give out too much information or I'd be self plagiarizing I know it's unfortunate. I best advice is go to their websites I think everyone of them has a done a wonderful job of informing people of their benefits. I also should tell you that I have an account with every company am about to mention. You cannot go wrong with any of them. Pay attention to the band with and page views you are allotted and know that some of them are maybe a better value than others. Regardless you can rest assured that all of them will do a great job.
My other piece of advice is contact them and ask them why they're the one you should pick. Take a lot into account as to how much time they take to get back to you I will mention this is public knowledge automatic has invested in both WP engine and Zippykid. However web synthesis is still an excellent choice as is Page.ly
All of them run on top-quality hardware and are built only to host WordPress because WordPress has a database unlike a pure HTML website the time it takes to access the database with caching on the server where somebody has spent a great deal of money to have that website cache so in the event of a person going to another page you have removed what made WordPress slower in the 1st place many of them have content delivery networks built-in the ones that have CDN's built-in also have a lot more going on on the server side meaning you have a faster host the more solid website.all of them use Nginx instead of Apache you can run a website with 10,000 visitors on Nginx with merely 2 MB of RAM Apache uses far more than that for 5 people.
I hope you can do some more research I recommend using this as a research tool as well because I cannot use my own content look at the hosting section on my website there's an FAQ at the top as well just click the FAQ you may also private message me of course if you have any particular questions that I cannot answer here I'm sorry for that.
http://www.blueprintmarketing.com/hosting/ -
I agree with Thomas on the hosting. I haven't personally used Zippy Kid, Pagely, or Presslabs, but I do use WPEngine and Synthesis. I am in the process of migrating 2 more sites over to Synthesis this week.
There are lots of great benefits to host your wordpress on these servers. They are built very specifically for Wordpress and have gotten rid of the bloat of a traditional server. Your sites will load faster, even without a CDN. They keep everything backed up and secure too. Peace of mind is what I always look for in a web host and that is what you get when you host with a team that loves wordpress and only do wordpress.
There is not enough room to cover all the benefits and details. Just look them up and be sure to read the FAQs on each.
-
Thomas thanks again for the information. I took a look at those sites and it looks like webdevstudios does build nice wordpress sites.
Why do you recommend those hosts rather than anyold host? I dont get the reason. We currently use godaddy and are satisfied with their service. Is there some benefit of using a WP host that I am not aware of?
-
well I can give you some very professional companies to hire.
Is an amazing studio they do a lot of incredible work and they start
Reasonable price
A another way is to use 99 designs and build it on a quality framework like Genesis
have looked at WP engines developers link and you will see some very good developers list.
I noticed you are running WordPress with Apache as a server you might want to look into
WP engine, Zippy kid, web synthesis, Pagely & Presslabs they are all dedicated to WordPress and will make an excellent host for your website.
The way I would do it is make the site from Photoshop and have a developer build it.
Either that or find a theme that you like and have it constructed on a high quality framework if you're using WordPress if you're not you can still have it turned into HTML or most other platforms.
However if you want guaranteed quality Webdevstudios did LEXISNEXIS.com & happy cog does Fortune 100 websites mostly. I didn't want to give you the name of the studio that I thought would let you down so I gave you once I know will do well. Web dev studios is much more reasonable, and I would encourage you to give them a try. I currently have a time set up to meet with them and plan on having my site rebuilt by them.
I would also grab the .co of your domain and believe if you could help your rankings.
I hope I have been of help,
Thomas
-
Thanks Thomas and please, we welcome real feedback and that means negative as well The funny part is the guy who designed this for us is a regular on 99designs, but yeah it may be better to see lots of options rather than a few.
Maybe its time for me to think more about a complete redesign (we just built our current page one month ago for $1,250). We aren't really happy with the way it came out we want a more professional feel. Its difficult figuring out who to hire for something like this. Guess thats going a bit off topic for now.
-
Thanks for the feedback Tim. We would love to try to split test though we don't currently have a webmaster that can help us with that and our budget is pretty low (new company, only a couple months old).
-
PS. You might get a lot of more free advice if you go on Twitter and then put #WebDesign then simply ask people for their opinion..
-
I too am not a web designer and if I want to get the same disclaimer
However
I don't understand why you guys are trying to force the social media into the web banner I think that makes it look a lot worse. If anything the social media should be customized to blend with the banner if you're going to put it into the banner or it should be a different part of the site as it is in right below or above.
I would go to use only number three honestly I wouldn't use any of the other ones in my humble opinion.
I agree with the other gentleman I don't like the other ones 12 are really not very well put together in my opinion compared to number three. However I think you should plan the social media world lose it on the banner and just an idea and this is not criticism at all as I think you did a great job with everything maybe you should have a professional have a crack at it it's very inexpensive services below and this is just if you want to go that way not that your work is bad at all.
If you want to know a very inexpensive way to get all these things blended and have multiple different designers take a crack at it 99designs.com and designcrowd.com Will allow you to have professionals make a new banner for you for approximately anywhere from hundred dollars and up. You get more than 30 designs to look at and you don't have to pay if you don't like it.
Please don't think of that I think any of the designs are bad in any way shape or form. However if you want something that looks extremely professional this is my best advice. So it blend and social media. I hope I've been of help to you
sincerely,
Thomas
Second disclaimer. I have dictated all of this on mobile phone so if there's any spelling or glaring grammar errors or words that don't belong where they do please excuse them.
-
Disclaimer: I am not a graphic artist/ designer.
New 1 and 2 seem unremarkable and kind of disappear on the page. New 3 stands out a bit more. I guess I am not clear on what your new logo is. In # 1&2, it seems to be the USA map with arrows and SDR. On 3, there isn't one, unless the grad cap icon is it. #1 actually has both the map and the grad cap.
On 1& 2 you use a sans-serif font on the SDR, but a serif font on the words spelled out. Was that intentional? Nothing wrong with using 2 different fonts in a logo, but going from sans-serif to serif when switching from the initials to the full words seems a bit strange. I personally prefer sans-serif fonts online, but I get the connection between serif and academia for a student targeted ad.
Have you tried swapping the logo with the words spelled out in options #1 and #2. Put the words spelled out on the left and the logo in the center? Even if this looked better, I will still try to get some attention-getting color in there like you did in your current one and #3.
The best way to decide is to run a split test and see what behaviors occur with each one. My guess is that #3 would outperform #1 and 2 simply because it stands out more. This is a perfect thing to split test and keep tweaking until you get the best results.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Need An Honest Opinion Of My Design
Just looking to get an honest opinion on my website design for my scuba diving client. Trying to decrease bounce rate and have seen some results from tweaking design. Honest opinions appreciated. Recommendations appreciated even more 😉
Web Design | | InfinityTechnologySolutions0 -
Javascript with Responsive Web Design
The company I work for are looking to go responsive which is high up the list on our development plans. Further on down the development plan they want to add more javascript into the website. Is this recommended as we plan to go responsive ?
Web Design | | jmurphy70 -
Duplicate Content? Designing new site, but all content got indexed on developer's sandbox
An ecommerce I'm helping is getting a complete redesign. Their developer had a sandbox version of their new site for design & testing. Several thousand products were loaded into the sandbox site. Then Google/Bing crawled and indexed the site (because developer didn't have a robots.txt), picking up and caching about 7,200 pages. There were even 2-3 orders placed on the sandbox site, so people were finding it. So what happens now?
Web Design | | trafficmotion
When the sandbox site is transferred to the final version on the proper domain, is there a duplicate content issue?
How can the developer fix this?0 -
Trying a completely new design on our .co.uk should I have it on a different IP to my .com
We have just relaunched http://www.gobananas.co.uk/ and made the site much smaller than .com and dissallowed robots on 98% of the site. The goal with this site is to get users to use the search facility rather than go through our menus like we have on .com Should I host the UK site on a different IP number to the .com?Thanks
Web Design | | PottyScotty0 -
How do I optimize a site designed to be one scrolling page of content?
Our website uses section ID's as its navigation so all the content is on one page. When you click About Us, the page scrolls down to About Us. Products, the page scrolls to Products section, and etc. I am getting crawl errors for meta descriptions but will this go away once the main domain has this info? We just added the meta keywords and description to the header and since the navigation sections use the same page, I assume it will correct the errors. Any other advice on optimizing for site designs like ours would be great. www.theicecubekit.com is the site. Thanks,
Web Design | | bangbang
Chris0 -
Footer Links For Web Design Agencies - Bad?
So today Google have updated their Webmaster Guidelines and they have drawn particular attention to their update relating to Link Schemes. http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=66356 Unless you have had your eyes closed and your fingers in your ears since February then most people are aware of the types of link schemes that the updated is refering to but there is one area that isn't so black and white for me. "Here are a few common examples of unnatural links that violate our guidelines: Widely distributed links in the footers of various sites" We are a design agency and we design and build lots of websites for our clients. It is pretty standard practice for agencies to add a credit to the footer of websites and we pick up a lot of work from people that see a site that they like and click through the footer link to our site. Our footer credit is standard on all of the websites that we create:- Website by Teapot Creative Only the 'Teapot Creative' part of the credit is anchor text so we are only linking using our brand name with no intention of manipulating search results. Is this going to hurt us? or will the fact that we are only linking using our branded term and without any SEO intent keep us in the clear? Thanks.
Web Design | | AdeLewis
Ade.0 -
What do web designers consider to be SEO
I'm putting together an article about Web Designers and SEO. The basic crux is that most designers will at most (if you are lucky) add in title tags, maybe pretty URL's and HTML links and call it SEO friendly. (lot's who don't probably but also lot's who are even worse) Of course I want it to be a bit controversial so please feel free to let rip. My argument is clients who have previously had site's that have had "SEO on them", know think that all SEO is a waste of time as their previous experience didn't produce the traffic and sales they were expecting. I don't know many designers who independently consider a site marketing strategy and how a site is going to generate links in the long term. I'm sure most of us have read this post on SEO responsiblities but becasue the first port of call for most business owners are the web designers, our offering is undermined by their misunderstandings and in some cases mis-sellings. So under the working title, "Why Web Designers Are Bad For SEO", any care to share some imput.
Web Design | | FDC1 -
Footer Links for Design Shops - Do They Help or Hurt?
I work on SEO for a number of clients at our agency, including our in-house SEO for our own website. I use Open Site Explorer all the time to analyze my competition in the SERPs and try to gain links from this insight. However, I've noticed a number of agencies and design shops that place a link in the footer of websites they've designed and created. For example "Site design by ABC Agency (hyperlinked to the agency's home page). Or I've seen small logos or graphics that link to the designer's site and use the "alt tag" to get stronger anchor text. From a design perspective, I don't care for this, but as a SEO...I can see why. We've designed a number of websites and have more in the pipeline, but have not used this tactic before. It seems like an irrelevant link from a content/user standpoint, however, it seems to work for a lot of agencies and design shops. Any input from the SEOmoz community would be great. Is it a short-lived strategy? Does it help or hurt your link-building and "rapport" with Google, Bing, Yahoo? Thanks everyone.
Web Design | | PHDL0