Can i send a disavow if a detect a spam link
-
I have detected than one web domain is generating 2400 links to my site
should a use a disavow tools, as it is imposible to have contact from webmaster and no response to your emails
My web as not been warned or penalized, but i dont like this link, and i want to inform google of that,.
If google acepts the disavow file, should i still see on my webmaster tools that web links, or will they desapear
thanks
-
Hi,
Yes you are right, that's not the best link you can hope for but what you did is good and enough. You don't have to worry about it anymore.
The disavow file will only inform Google that you want that link to be disregarded (as far as sending Page Rank) and they will do that once you submitted the disavow file so no worries there.
You will still see the link in other tools as a dofollow as, again, what you did is only informing google about it. So you can still get referral traffic from those links, you don't care how many are there as there are all nofollow basically so no danger for you as far as algorithmic or manual penalties.
Cheers.
-
I have in total 3786 links to my site of those 2405 are generated to that unique domain to the same url (home page). I send a disavow on month ago, but i still see that linking url.
How can i check if that link has became unfollow or not?
**http://undirectorio.com/Salud/dentistas/ **
were the original link is
here is were the link is, but i dont know how it generates 2405. It would be a good link as is my field if it just gave a link, but it generates 2405 on webmaster tools
page authority 25, domain autority 45
http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/links?site=www.propdental.es
It appears this link**, but i see it as follow**, should i send another disavow to google? or
undirectorio.com/index.php?list=latest
www.undirectorio.com/page-1.html?s=P&search=y
www.undirectorio.com/page-1.html?s=H&search=-
www.undirectorio.com/page-1.html?s=A&search=y
-
Hi,
I have detected than one web domain is generating 2400 links to my site
** Are those links spamy ? can you post the domain and links ? Maybe those links are helping you - if you disavow them you will lose any Page Rank those links are sending - if any.
should a use a disavow tools, as it is imposible to have contact from webmaster and no response to your emails
** You should use the disavow file for this only if you are 100% that those links are bad and also if your link profile is not strong enough to "eat up" those links so they won't raise any flags on Google's side - again, if the links are bad.
My web as not been warned or penalized, but i dont like this link, and i want to inform google of that,.
** Then this is the easiest way to flag this link and be stress-less.
If google acepts the disavow file, should i still see on my webmaster tools that web links, or will they desapear
** Yes, you will still see the links in Web master Tools as Web master Tools displays both follow and no follow links. (and since the disovow dosen't do anything but adding on google side the nofollow atribute to the link - even if that's not on the actual link / code).
Hope it helps.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
spam score
I start blogging a few months ago and start SEO by watching some tutorials and start making backlinks now I realize that I made backlinks on some spammy site which increase my spam score from 1 to 7 now I remove my links from that spammy site but my spam score is still 7.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | lorosing
can someone assist me to decrease my spam score site URL
https://lbctracking.net1 -
Canonicalize vs Link Juice
I recently wrote (but have not published) a very comprehensive original article for my new website (which has pretty much no domain authority). I've been talking to the publisher of a very high Domain Authority site and they are interested in publishing it. The article will include 2-3 follow backlinks to my website. My question is should I: Repost the article in my own site and then request a "rel=canonical" from the high authority site Not re-post the article on my own site and just collect the link juice from the high authority site Which would be better for my overall SEO? Assume in case 1) that the high authority site would add a rel=canonical if I asked for it.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | wlingke20 -
Value / Risk of links in comments (nofollow)
Recently I noticed a couple of comments on our blog that seemed nice and relevant so I approved them. The site is wordpress and comments are configured nofollow. We don't get many comments so I thought "why not?". Today I got one and noticed they are all coming from the same IP. They all include urls to sites in the same industry as us, relevant sites and all different. Looks like an SEO is doing it for various clients. My question is what is the value of these nofollow links for the poster? Are these seen as "mentions" and add value to Google? And am I better off trashing them so my site is not associated? Thanks
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Chris6610 -
Why do these links violate Google's Quality Guideline?
My reconsideration request was declined by Google. Google said that some of the links to my site (www.pianomother.com) are still outside its quality guidelines. We provide piano lessons and sheet music on the site. Three samples are given. 1. http://www.willbeavis.com/links.htm 2. http://vivienzone.blogspot.com/2009/06/learning-how-to-play-piano.html 3. http://interiorpianoservice.com/links/ The first one is obvious because it is a link exchange page. I don't understand why the 2nd and 3rd ones are considered "inorganic links" by Google. The 2nd link is a blog that covers various topics including music, health, computer, etc. The 3rd one is a page of the site that provides piano related services. Other resources related to piano including my website are listed on the page. Please help. Thanks. John
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | pianomother0 -
Who's still being outranked by spam?
Over the past few months, through Google Alerts, I've been watching one of our competitors kick out crap press releases, and links to their site have been popping up all over blog networks with exact match anchor text. They now outrank us for that anchor text. Why is this still happening? Three Penguin updates later and this still happens. I'm trying so hard to do #RCS and acquire links that will ensure our site's long-term health in the SERPs. Is anyone else still struggling with this crap?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | UnderRugSwept2 -
Can a Page Title be all UPPER CASE?
My clients wants to use UPPER CASE for all his page titles. Is this okay? Does Google react badly to this?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | petewinter0 -
Opinions Wanted: Links Can Get Your Site Penalized?
I'm sure by now a lot of you have had a chance to read the Let's Kill the "Bad Inbound Links Can Get Your Site Penalized" Myth over at SearchEngineJournal. When I initially read this article, I was happy. It was confirming something that I believed, and supporting a stance that SEOmoz has taken time and time again. The idea that bad links can only hurt via loss of link juice when they get devalued, but not from any sort of penalization, is indeed located in many articles across SEOmoz. Then I perused the comments section, and I was shocked and unsettled to see some industry names that I recognized were taking the opposite side of the issue. There seems to be a few different opinions: The SEOmoz opinion that bad links can't hurt except for when they get devalued. The idea that you wouldn't be penalized algorithmically, but a manual penalty is within the realm of possibility. The idea that both manual and algorithmic penalties were a factor. Now, I know that SEOmoz preaches a link building strategy that targets high quality back links, and so if you completely prescribe to the Moz method, you've got nothing to worry about. I don't want to hear those answers here - they're right, but they're missing the point. It would still be prudent to have a correct stance on this issue, and I'm wondering if we have that. What do you guys think? Does anybody have an opinion one way or the other? Does anyone have evidence of it being one way or another? Can we setup some kind of test, rank a keyword for an arbitrary term, and go to town blasting low quality links at it as a proof of concept? I'm curious to hear your responses.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | AnthonyMangia0 -
Ditching of spammy links - will it be of benefit?
Hi there. We have recently taken over the SEO for a five-star hotel who rank very well already for a lot of their main terms, largely down to the fact they have decent off-site strength (as yet very little on-page optimisation has been done, so they aren't appearing for some quite key terms). This off-page strength includes around 2000 links, giving the home page an authority of 63 in the OSE tool. However, upon looking at the links to check they were pointing to the most relevant page etc, I notice they have A LOT of spammy links, pointing to their site with anchor text like 'cheap cialis' or 'buy valium'. Clearly these aren't the kinds of links that should be pointing to a five-star hotel, but should I expect to see much of a drop by attempting to remove these links? We obviously want to clean their link portfolio up, but I'm not sure they would be too happy if all their top rankings disappeared - even if only temporarily, and even if done with the best intentions. I ask as none of the other sites we handle SEO for have had such a proliferation of these links, so I've not seen the ramifications in full. Any help would be much appreciated, along with advice on the best way to remove these links.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | themegroup0