Why do weaker competitors on open site explorer outrank me on SERP
-
Hi I am new to the whole SEO + marketing and was just wondering why the competition is doing better in SERP they are all in the top 1-5 positions; however i am 5th on page 2 ?? after doing a site explorer analysis i found that I am beating them in all aspects, my site is sparrowmakeup.com.au keyword is "makeup artist sydney' any suggestions on how to increase my SERP would be helpfull.
-
A couple of things to keep in mind:
(1) Our authority metrics factor in link strength and try to model ranking ability, but they don't model things like spam factors. If you have a lot of links that look strong on the surface but have been devalued or penalized, we often won't catch that. We're working on spam modeling, but it's extremely complex.
(2) As soon as you add "sydney" to the mix, this becomes as much a local SEO puzzle as an organic SEO puzzle. It's entirely possible that the competition is weaker on things like links or social signals, but has solid local ranking factors (like reviews and citations).
-
I'm sorry, but I think "onpage SEO has almost nothing to do with SEO anymore" is a very, very misguided statement. On-page covers a lot of ground, including using keywords in your content and titles, technical SEO, etc. I can absolutely guarantee that on-page can have a dramatic impact on rankings. It's also highly situational - your one case doesn't speak to the many thousands of variations of competitive niches out there. That's why I wrote this post a while back:
http://moz.com/blog/whats-better-on-page-seo-or-link-building
Google has said that site speed is a ranking factor, but our best guess is that it's probably mild right now. A site that is very slow could suffer problems and a site that's very fast could get a small boost. There are also indirect impacts. If your site is slow and people bounce, it could harm dwell time, which may be a ranking signal. There's a mountain of data to show that site speed impacts conversion, so I'd never want to suggest that site speed isn't important, no matter what it's weight as a ranking factor.
-
Hi Mathew,
Thanks for all your input, I would love to learn what works and what doesn't I do the SEO for my wifes business and she makes a living from it so any help on what works and what doesnt would be great, you mentioned your tactics got buried, I would love to know how your ranking, please PM me or email me if you feel inclined to share
Thanks
-
Thomas,
Lets move this to a private chat please. My issue is that you rank for 0 terms for your own personal marketing firm and that raises large flags for me. This is the only reason I asked you questions. Your SEM traffic is $2 and mine is $36k. Lets talk in private chat about more, I was just trying to help you realize that there is more to SEO than what you read or watch. Do you ever think that others cover up what really works?
I have had detailed explications on how to rank for keywords that just got buried on here, because others don't want the average everyday person to know how to rank anything up.
You said "Unfortunately, your answers to not have anything to do with the questions" I was the first person to post the reason he wasn't ranking good. Did you miss this? Again lets take this to private chat. No need for this anymore.
Have a great night.
-
Matthew,
Moz is TAGFEE
Unfortunately, your answers to not have anything to do with the questions and I don't want to argue with you that's not what I'm here for. I am sensing that you are here to pick fights and I don't want to be a part of what you are doing. I don't do this for you I do it for the people that will read this in the future.
To anyone reading this. I am not anti-shared hosting in fact I use it myself I speak about that more in this primarily for managed WordPress.
I am going to address the question asked of me I did not know that those companies used any particular type of hosting and nor did I ask for that information. I appreciate you telling me things like that but I don't see how it pertains to the question asked and just to keep this short in the future I don't really have an interest in your rankings nor your telling me statistics about things I don't think pertain to anything being discussed in this Q&A. I really want to stay on topic I, and I am not talking about this economy nor am I talking about the average person. I'm speaking to people asking advice about search engine optimization primarily, and when I mentioned hosting you stated that you did not agree and thought it was funny that I even believed Google does have it in its algorithm.
I'm going to stand by everything I've said, and I have proven by showing the actual links to Google stating they use Page speed as part of their algorithm.
If you do not want to optimize your site or have it run on a quality host that is not my business nor is it something I wish to entertain talking with you about.
However you obviously have given me thumbs down for other people giving me thumbs up and that's not okay.
This is Moz I stand by my statement and people can judge by reading what each of us has said what is correct.
However I cannot believe you are actually behaving in this manner.
We have a disagreement and that's all I'm going to say it's not like there's anything personal I don't dislike you.
This is a discussion about the best way for him to figure out why a competitor that should possibly not be beating him is.
It's most likely if they have a lot of spam links they're just not caught yet. However without that competitors domain like I said I really think the guide is a great step it talks about quite a bit to do with penalties and will explain this very well. In fact I read the new guide the day I found it came out.
It is good for every person involved in search engine optimization.
I think that the actions taken are distracting but more sad.
I hope you guys will read on your own as well as the vast knowledge that Moz Q&A provides already send you will understand that site speed matters quite a bit if you want to convert.
I will even let you in on a secret some of the fastest WordPress sites right now our shared why they do so much work in on the front and the backend that to make them a VPS would be in some cases in the thousands a month. So they make them shared but very few people I won't really get into it all. However shared hosting does not mean slow every single time.
However there are limits to shared environments if you guys have any hosting questions I love to talk hosting so let me know. I promise you I'm not going to send you to an affiliate or anything like that in fact I encourage people to Google what others suggest and if they post a link. Because sometimes it will be disguised as an affiliate link. Which is not okay here.
Well I trust Google to give the correct answers. I believe I know why I'm being challenged if it is because of a service that is not the reason they would change actually give out the newsletter stating we have changed our algorithm to incorporate page speed into our ranking.
I take conversion optimization very seriously it is the most important because if you can get the client to convert obviously you've got them to take the paths that we use all these different tools and methods to achieve rather that be a Tweet or a purchase.
I will be able to answer any of your questions at any time please feel free to private message me or send them here however I think I've cleared up everything so far. If I have not please let me know, and I would be happy to answer.
Sincerely,
Thomas
-
He meant that he should lower the links containing the anchor text "makeup artist sydney" to something more natural.
its important to have a natural and clean link profile, the same goes for anchor text. Google will frown upon and also take action with overly optimized anchor text.
Best regards!
-
Thomas,
I checked over every link and none of them have anything to do with proof of site speed making your SEO better in any way. I think your getting web site design and user experience confused with SEO and it's common for beginners. I highly encourage you to take some time and read those over yourself again. Also look at the dates 2010, this is 2013 your stuck in the past. This happens to beginners that start out or people that think they know it all and stop learning the new tactics. I don't follow by anything that doesn't have 2013 on it, because SEO changes every 3 months.
I do understand we all have to start somewhere and we make mistakes. However I didn't make a mistake above when I said that. You said " it is not proof when you are the one that is using your own opinion written by you as proof." Proof is proof lol, if I am ranking for the competitive terms I am ranking for, then I would call this proof lol. How else do you generally get your proof? I know you know how to check that everything I said is accurate.
I too wasn't being a jerk, that is just the first time I have ever heard anyone say anything like that and be serious. I thought others knew that this was something very old that possibly one day many years ago they looked at, but no longer do at all. Again unless your sites not loading or taking half a minute. If Google is not showing you have errors due to your web server in WMT then you have nothing to worry about and getting anything over a shared is a waste of money and time.
It honestly looked as if you just came into this chat to get some points and nothing more. I didn't know you were being serious. I thought maybe you didn't read it good enough.
Please remember the average person doesn't have a lot of money to spend. This is a terrible economy for millions right now and no one wants to spend more money than they have. So when I hear comments like you said above that could make someone waste an extra $30 per month on hosting telling people you don't like cheap hosting, I tend to think that your not living in reality right now. You must think about the average person that wants to try SEO like a plumber, electrician, siding, roofing, etc.. These people are starting out and don't make a lot of money. 90% of them don't even have the budget past $150 a month let alone waste $30 extra on hosting when they could put it towards a press release or guest post for their website.
Everything I say and do comes from the reality that the average person doesn't want to waste money on a myth and I proved that it is a myth. No matter a fact, 2,000 of the 4400 clients we work for are on a shared host that we host for them. We hold 1000's of great rankings for them.
Did you know that dicks sporting goods has part of their website on a shared host? Did you know that Avon does as well? Not the full site of course, but they do have parts of their business sites.. When angieslist started out they were on a shared host.
Anyways, I have 11 SEO companies/websites and all of them are on shared hosts. They rank from ranges of Cheap SEO to seo services, seo company, business SEO, and 489 more as of today, just checked to be accurate. 256 of them are from 2 cheap sites for cheap SEO terms and the others are from top dollar terms where the SEO is pointed towards larger businesses.
To make a long story short, nothing you gave above makes any sense at all in regards to a fact that hosting helps SEO. I actually feel sorry that your wasting the extra money per month when it isn't needed.
Have a great day.
-
Hi Matthew,
I really want to make one thing clear before I go on to everyone following this just in case you're referencing this information I wanted it to be right The right answer not one you've written and used a link to a guest blog post that you have written as the proof.
We are discussing this on Moz people take this seriously and make purchasing decisions and optimization decisions based on information we supply. I wish you had spent a minute on Google to make sure you were correct prior to posting something that is wrong. Acording to Google WMT's & Matt Cutt's
p am not trying to go overboard with this however I want to make sure that the people I speak to know they're not wasting money when they use quality hosting that accelerates their website along with keeping Moz as the place to go for the correct information.
I truly am not trying to be a jerk about this but did not appreciate the way you handled my informing you of what Google and many others agree with that site speed does affect Google's ranking of websites.
You stated** "you said I don't know where you're getting your information Thomas lol"**
I get my information from Google Webmaster tools and Matt Cutts on this I hope you will spend some time getting familiar with the links I am going to give you to back up my statement.
Matthew disagrees with you. what to I disagree with you about does cite speed affect search engine optimization does Google take it into affect when their ranking a site?
The answer is yes your site speed does make a difference in search engine optimization as well as Google taking into account when you rank.
I am getting my information from Google Webmaster tools as well as Matt Cutts I hope that will serve as an authority and
How do I know this for certain well Google tells you right here the link I'm going to paste and without taking the trouble to make a live.
Http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.ca/2010/04/using-site-speed-in-web-search-ranking.html
http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/site-speed/
Here is some more data that comes from respected sources
http://moz.com/ugc/13-questions-and-answers-about-google-site-speed-and-seo
http://www.quicksprout.com/2012/12/10/how-load-time-affects-google-rankings/
http://www.copyblogger.com/website-speed-matters/
http://thestrategicmama.com/increase-website-speed/
http://www.copyblogger.com/site-design-improvements/
http://www.strangeloopnetworks.com/resources/
Aside from being a genuinely used as part of Google's search algorithm there are other large benefits to having your website on a fast server.
would never use myself as an authority in the manner you did by stating you are correct because you wrote that guest blog on somebody else's site stating you are correct.
I would also be very careful about how you state on page search engine optimization and keyword density have nothing to do with ranking. That's wrong and you know it. I don't believe there is a magical formula that I know however I do know if I start typing like in the shining all work and no play makes Jack a dull boy and that is my entire website it looks a little bit more like I went crazy or keyword stuffing something Google does take into effect
Please next time you say something that along these lines can affect other users impression of the truth at least go to Google and take a look without sending me something you wrote as an authority when you are the one stating something that is blatantly incorrect
Please know I am not trying to be harsh however I do not want anyone to read this and believe that Slow/junk hosting is something that you should do with your site.
Appreciate you sending a link and asking me "where I get my information" without actually consulting a true authority such as Google as well because they're the ones to make the rules.
I included some of the normal high lead regarded and often taken answers given by everyone in the community here at Moz to show this is not a normal thing to have somebody not actually check something before answering.
Hore information from Moz as well as more from Google when they announced that it is part of their algorithm over 2 years ago. you want it's right here where I get my information Google not referencing myself as the one with the answers guest blogging on another person site
I included a couple other references for your information and so hopefully everyone else that's reading this does not take your word for fit and use junk hosting.
This is a quote from Google please note the date
"
Using site speed in web search ranking
Friday, April 09, 2010 at 11:00 AM
Webmaster Level: All
You may have heard that here at Google we're obsessed with speed, in our products and on the web. As part of that effort, today we're including a new signal in our search ranking algorithms: site speed. Site speed reflects how quickly a website responds to web requests.
Speeding up websites is important — not just to site owners, but to all Internet users. Faster sites create happy users, and we've seen in our internal studies that when a site responds slowly, visitors spend less time there. But faster sites don't just improve user experience; recent data shows that improving site speed also reduces operating costs. Like us, our users place a lot of value in speed — that's why we've decided to take site speed into account in our search rankings. We use a variety of sources to determine the speed of a site relative to other sites.
If you are a site owner, webmaster or a web author, here are some free tools that you can use to evaluate the speed of your site:"
I 1st off want to tell you I do not condone cheap hosting I don't care it to work well for you in the past it is generally not a good thing if you actually want to have a conversion rate. But moreover let me make sure that you're not spreading misinformation.
It's been two years since Google announced that page speed is a factor in its search ranking, and one of the most-asked questions I still receive is: How exactly do they do it? The second-most-asked question I hear is: How much do I need to care about this?
If you sorry I did not get to respond to this earlier I just saw it.
everyone takes mistakes gosh I know I do. However, in this situation if I could really stress googling the question because it pertains to the search engine you would query there would be a very easy way to know if you're right or if you're wrong.
I also want to know why you think I'm going to take the answer you supplied as research or proof of your answer when you're the one who wrote what's supposed to be the objective proof. All you did was present me a link to guest blog post that you have written. How is that in any way proof? I wish you would not laugh at something I considered a quality answer.
it is not proof when you are the one that is using your own opinion written by you as proof.
Respectfully,
Thomas
-
perhaps a beginner's question on this: why does he need to lower the anchor text diversity to such a low ratio? Isn't it important to keep many anchor text links across his website, containing those keywords (makeup artist sydney) in order to rank for this? Thanks!
-
Majestic SEO to me is the best for quickly gathering an analysis of ratios. You can even see it with a free account. They have a Pie chart that shows it all.
Have a great night.
-
A faster host has nothing to do with rank Thomas unless we are talking about a page that won't load at all. I am not sure where you got this info, but I am ranking 3rd for cheap SEO on a shared server lol http://dailyseotip.com/what-other-marketing-firms-want-you-to-believe-that-isnt-true/3356/ BTW, the server was so old, that I received a message 7 days ago from hostgator that they are going to update it next week. If you would like to contact them for proof feel free. Onpage SEO has almost nothing to do with SEO anymore hence my case study to prove it. Now it could change later on, but it's not now.
Have a great night.
-
I wish I had an easier answer for you and click on all of those things however if you look to the right of the board almost everything listed is a reason why somebody could outrank another person. Regardless of links that could be content it could be that they're on a faster host and converting more it could be so many things that I could stay here and type forever. Because you said you are new I would like to say welcome to Moz I strongly suggest reading this
it is an outstanding guide, and it is something everyone should read regardless of skill level.
http://static.seomoz.org/files/SEOmoz-The-Beginners-Guide-To-SEO-2012.pdf
Respectfully,
Thomas
-
did you use OSE for the anchor text report? or another tool? what is best way to obtain your anchor text diversity?
Thanks!!
-
This is an easy one.
Your anchor text diversity is terrible you have built 33% of your anchor texts to makeup artist sydney and 15.04% to Sydnety makeup artist. Try to lower this to around a 2%.
I would look into a lot of press releases, use natural terms, brand names, your urls. Don't use your keywords at all in them ever. Try that and see if you come up in the serps. When you get a press release done by someone ask what the syndication is. Generally my press releases have a 10k to 30k syndication i perform. Also ask the quality of them. I would use prwebs premium + a few other syndication's out their as well.
Please note: I am not saying this is the only factor that is wrong, but it's the biggest. It would take a while to look into all of your link types you used, etc..
Have a great day.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Is "Author Rank," User Comments Driving Losses for YMYL Sites?
Hi, folks! So, our company publishes 50+ active, disease-specific news and perspectives websites -- mostly for rare diseases. We are also tenacious content creators: between news, columns, resource pages, and other content, we produce 1K+ pieces of original content across our network. Authors are either PhD scientists or patients/caregivers. All of our sites use the same design. We were big winners with the August Medic update in 2018 and subsequent update in September/October. However, the Medic update in March and de-indexing bug in April were huge losers for us across our monetized sites (about 10 in total). We've seen some recovery with this early June update, but also some further losses. It's a mixed bag. Take a look at this attached MOZ chart, which shows the jumps and falls around the various Medic updates. The pattern is very similar on many of our sites. As per JT Williamson's stellar article on EAT, I feel like we've done a good job in meeting those criteria, which has left we wondering what isn't jiving with the new core updates. I have two theories I wanted to run past you all: 1. Are user comments on YMYL sites problematic for Google now? I was thinking that maybe user comments underneath health news and perspectives articles might be concerning on YMYL sites now. On one hand, a healthy commenting community indicates an engaged user base and speaks to the trust and authority of the content. On the other hand, while the AUTHOR of the article might be a PhD researcher or a patient advocate, the people commenting -- how qualified are they? What if they are spouting off crazy ideas? Could Google's new update see user comments such as these as degrading the trust/authority/expertise of the page? The examples I linked to above have a good number of user comments. Could these now be problematic? 2. Is Google "Author Rank" finally happening, sort of? From what I've read about EAT -- particularly for YMYL sites -- it's important that authors have “formal expertise” and, according to Williamson, "an expert in the field or topic." He continues that the author's expertise and authority, "is informed by relevant credentials, reviews, testimonials, etc. " Well -- how is Google substantiating this? We no longer have the authorship markup, but is the algorithm doing its due diligence on authors in some more sophisticated way? It makes me wonder if we're doing enough to present our author's credentials on our articles, for example. Take a look -- Magdalena is a PhD researcher, but her user profile doesn't appear at the bottom of the article, and if you click on her name, it just takes you to her author category page (how WordPress'ish). Even worse -- our resource pages don't even list the author. Anyhow, I'd love to get some feedback from the community on these ideas. I know that Google has said there's nothing to do to "fix" these downturns, but it'd sure be nice to get some of this traffic back! Thanks! 243rn10.png
Algorithm Updates | | Michael_Nace1 -
If we have all products on-site for indexing, do we get dinged by Google for not transacting on-site?
I am trying to do research on the SEO impact of having an off-site transactional website. For example, Pepsi.com lists all product information on their site but guides visitors to transact on Amazon or Walmart. What impact, if any, does guiding the customer to a separate transactional site have on SEO? In short, if we have all products on-site for indexing, do we get dinged by Google for not transacting on-site?
Algorithm Updates | | KaylaV0 -
Bad Dates in SERPs, YouTube & Rankings (Nov. 10-18)
We've seen a lot of reports, including Q&A questions, of sites showing bad dates in Google SERPs. I've verified this bug in the wild. There are also reports of bad dates being caused by YouTube embeds, with Google taking the video date instead of the page date. I can also confirm this is happening, although I don't know if it accounts for all of the bad dates. Some people are reporting that these bad dates showing up corresponded with ranking drops. Usually, I would treat that as a coincidence (Google could easily launch an update and have a glitch on the same day), but in some of the reported cases, removing YouTube embeds led to ranking recovery soon after. I can't verify this, but I can't disregard it. There seem to be multiple reports of this recovery. I'm in communication with a Google rep, and they are unaware of any direct connection between a bad date and ranking (such as some kind of QDF effect). I've passed along some data, and they are investigating, but there may have been multiple updates in play that are making for noisy data (even for Google). There did seem to be heavy algorithm flux on November 10th and 18th, with some people speculating the latter spike was a reversal of the former. I have no evidence to support this, but MozCast data and chatter do seem to support both spikes. If you've been affected by this problem and the ranking drops are severe, it's worth temporarily removing YouTube embeds (if feasible). Replace them with direct links (or maybe a linked thumbnail) and have Google re-fetch the page. I can't guarantee it will work, but the risks are low. It's easy to restore the embed. Update (11/22) - Gary Illyes is saying on Twitter that the date problems have been fixed. If you see the proper dates cached, but have not seen rankings recover, then these may be unrelated events.
Algorithm Updates | | Dr-Pete2 -
My competitor pushed me down the SERP out of nowhere. How do I fix this?
Hi, my ecommerce site used to rank #2 (my homepage) for my primary keyword on Google for over a year. #1 has always been my competitor's homepage. Since Monday 10/10, my competitor's Shop page -- which uses this keyword only 6x within the content of that page and has NEVER been ranked -- is #2 bumping me down to #3 😞 I feel this is a result of the last Penguin update. My best guess is their homepage popularity -- due to backlinks and being #1 SERP rank -- has transferred popularity to their Shop page. Is that normal for Google to do that? Any advice or guidance would be much appreciated.
Algorithm Updates | | Taylorw0 -
Site´s Architecture - Categories . What´s the best in my case?
My Dear friends of MOZ, I´ve got you a case that has been driving me crazy for 2 weeks, Im doing an SEO audit for big brand that sells electronics. Since they sell all kind of electronics, and are very popular the site is quite big and has several categories. Now...Im working particularly in a kind of micro-site that sells two kind of products that are very similar but not the same. Lets say in this site they are selling super-light-weight-Laptops and tablets, so if you look the site its a Laptop/Tablet site. But the site is not under a laptop/tablet directory, some pages are under laptop and others in Tablet directory . For example : Home page URL: /light-laptops/home.asp ; Products general page page URL is light-pads/products.asp ; and each single product page is under laptops or pads according the type of product. From my point of view, they should create a new directory called /light-laptops-pads/ and single directories for products, and case studies, etc.. Since they want to show both products together when you click in products (off course they will be creating sub-directories for the two types of products). At the begining I thought they were really mistaken, but now that I see that all light-pad content is in one folder and light-laptops content is in another, and the site jumps from one category to the other I am a little bit confused. PLEASE HELP ME PD: I want to make clear that general categories like products, case studies , contact us, solutions pages are in some cases under /light-pad/ directory and in other cases under /light-laptops / directory PLEASE PARDON MY ENGLISH!
Algorithm Updates | | facupp10 -
SERP's & Search Engine Differences
Hey, I recently modified my pages to conform more closely to the "A" page rankings for MOZ's on-page report card but saw declines in my keyword rankings. They keywords in question appear in my title tag, description, one image alt tag, either an h1 or h2 tag, and 4 times throughout the text of the document. I don't think MOZ would recommend these changes if it was seen as stuffing - is there any other reason why my rankings might have dropped by 1-4 positions? Also, does anyone know of a good article/book for Yahoo/Bing SEO? My Yahoo & Bing rankings are far below Google's in most cases. Any help would be appreciated! -Michael
Algorithm Updates | | Stew2220 -
Increased importance given to spammy/educational domains in SERPs!?
Hey guys, Can anyone shed some light on these bizarre and confusing SERPs which Google seems to be producing following their latest update?? For example, we have a client who targets "payday loans" with another targeting "IT services". However, since the update, the former keyword brings back a host of spammy domain results while the latter seems to have given all focus to educational institutions like universities. This just seems utterly ludicrous considering that if I'm searching for "IT services" I don't want the help desk of a local university - that's completely irrelevant, right? Can anyone provide some information on what seems to be going on? Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | Webrevolve0 -
Is there a utility that can tell me what keywords my site already ranks high for?
Ok... so I'm looking for a way to understand what my site already ranks high for.. I don't necessarily want to have to manually type in keywords. The purpose of this exercise is to demonstrate to a client what keywords they're already ranking high for. Is there an easy way / tool to go about doing this? Thanks in advance, Gene
Algorithm Updates | | BGroup0