1 page crawled - again
-
Just had to let you know that it happend again. So right now we are at 2 out of the last 4 crawls.
Uptime here is 99,8% for the last 30 days, with a small downtime due to an update process at the 18/5 from around 2:30 to 4:30 GMT
In relation to: http://moz.com/community/q/1-page-crawled-and-other-errors
-
3 weeks in a row
-
Thanks.
But Gordon Ramsey is one hell of a nice chef, right? ;o)
-
Okay, I am sorry to hear you cancelled your subscription.
I'll try to address everything one at a time.The Moz tools are working correctly so far for me so I can't really help you with the issues that you have. As said before the Q&A is still not the place to talk about technical difficulties.
I think the reason that your thread was closed was because Joel answered your question on a couple of subjects and told you that you should contact je technical support because you were asking it in the wrong place (Q&A). It's a shame that after so many mailing with SEOmoz they haven't been able to solve your problems.
About the respect thing. I wasn't talking about use of different words but more the reference to Gordan Ramsey. Gordan Ramsey is not known for his polite way of saying things and this reference was not necessary in my opinion.
-
Hi Wesley
First, this has been an ongoing problem for the last 6 months. I've had tons of emails back and forth between the Seomoz team and have had my staff look at all traffic to find problems on our side. There is no problem on our side that would cause this. All other services crawling our site is working just fine.
Our robots.txt is being read and obeyed by all other crawl-bots. But not Rogerbot ... And for the hole period of time, the signal to me from Seomoz has been: It is not us. It is you - or Apple, Google, Twitter og Google.
To answer your question: Old thread is locked, so i could not add a reply there. Another strange thing from Semoz. Thread is marked "answered", but my problems it yet not resolved. It never has been. Why then mark it as answered? (as in "done")?
I've cancelled my subscription, so i'm not here to make things right. I'm past that. Seomoz is broken, and the support team blames google, twitter, facebook, apple. This is the reasons i've been given:
Google: Googlebot does not read robots.txt right. It's not Seomoz
Google: GA is loosing connectivity to Seomoz. It's not Seomoz
Apple: IOS creates an errors on semoz forum when posting replies. It's not Seomoz
Twitter: They have a flaw with their API. It's not Semoz
Facebook: They are not reporting data correctly. It's a problem with their API. It's not Seomoz
I like the Semoz tools and the community - but their tools just dont work. And it's pricy paying JUST for the community part. The Semoz team once gave me a month for free because they realized there was a problem, but they could/would not fix it and charged me the following month - even though the problem still existed.
The respect-issue you are mentioning must be a language and cultural difference. Where i come from respect is an action - not just written words. I can write here many times that i do respect Joel and the support-team, but it means nothing if it is not followed up by action that shows the same respect, right?. English is not my primary language, therefore i may often choose different words (with a slighty different meaning) than ie Joel and the support team.
-
Alsvik, in your previous post Joel Day tried to help you by addressing your questions one by one.
His reply was very helpful and polite, you didn't give him that respect back.He also meant that the issues you are having are technical and this is not the right section for that.
This is for community based questions. Not questions to Moz.You started a new question. Make sure it is a question.
Your previous questions were answered correctly. If you would have listened you might have been been helped already by Moz technical support.My answer is exactly the same as Joel's. E-mail Moz about your issues.
I mean no disrespect with this answer.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Duplicate Pages
Hello, we have an issue which I'm hoping someone can help with. Our Moz system is saying that this page http://www.indigolittle.com/fees/ Is a duplicate page. We use this page purely for mobiles and we have added code to say This has been on for over a month now however Moz is still picking the page us as a High Priority Issue.
Moz Pro | | popcreativeltd0 -
Campaign. Only 1 page is crawled
I have a campaign setup a couple weeks ago and noticed that only 1 page has been crawled. Is there something I need to do to get all pages crawled?
Moz Pro | | priceseo0 -
Page authority questions?
I've been analyzing some IT communities ...in order to check how relevant is the page authority vs PageRank. I found one main site which is organized by "communities'..and every community is a sub-domain. The root domain has an authority of 90/100 which it should be great......so the sub-domains "inherit" part of this authority.... Until here everything seems to be perfect. However, I went deeper and I picked one of these communities. Analyzing the "Linking Root Domain" I discovered it only has only 5 root domains pointing to its home page. Those 5 Root Domains have generated more than 134k links. That doesn't seem to be "natural". Checking those 5 Root Domains I discovered that they have been registered by the same Root Domain site. Ex: Main domain: Domain.com Community1.domain.com Community2.domain.com.... Linking Root Domains: DomainXY.com DomainABC.com DomainRST.com DomainFGH.com DomainOPQ.com It seems to me that it is easy to cheat the authority domain score. Just creating others sites developing the same topic and generating back links to your main domain
Moz Pro | | SherWeb0 -
Too Many On-Page Links
The SeoMoz site crawler says all my pages have too many links. I am using Dreamweaver with a horizontal Spry drop-down menu bar. My site has several hundred pages and about 100 of them show up in this Spry menu bar. I believe that this would be considered a false positive for too many links - am I right? Or is Google seeing this also as too many links per page? I am trying to get my Google rankings back after being hurt badly by the Penguin. I am using php but don't see another way to do the site links without going to a CMS type site. Thanks for any help you can give.
Moz Pro | | johnsearles0 -
Is it possible to exclude pages from Crawl Diagnostic?
I like the crawl diagnostic but it shows many errors due to a forum that I have. I don't care about the SEO value of this forum and would like to exclude any pages in the /forum/ directory. Is it possible to add exclusions to the crawl diagnostic tool?
Moz Pro | | wfernley2 -
404 errors in SEOMoz crawl tool
I currently have several 404 errors in the latest crawls from SEOMoz. Here is an example of the error. http://dealerplatform.com/blog/2011/10/23/videos-for-auto-dealers/www.dealerplatform.com/ In all cases the error is a result of www.dealerplatform.com being added to the real url. Anyone seen this before? The site is a wordpress mutlisite. I don't see where this incorrect link is showing up anywhere on the website. Any advice would be helpful. Thanks
Moz Pro | | Chris_Gregory0 -
Crawl still in progress ...
Hi guys, New crawl on one of my campaigns is still in progress since November 27th, i didn't get new data since November 19th 2011 ... What should i do ?
Moz Pro | | DavidEichholtzer0 -
Why do pages with canonical urls show in my report as a "Duplicate Page Title"?
eg: Page One
Moz Pro | | DPSSeomonkey
<title>Page one</title>
No canonical url Page Two
<title>Page one</title> Page two is counted as being a page with a duplicate page title.
Shouldn't it be excluded?0