Best Way to Promote Self Hosted Videos?
-
We are soon to launch 25 short videos on one of our websites. They are a little bit different and I think they have a particularly good chance of going viral.
The videos will be scattered over the website on our actual sales pages (not tucked away on our blog). We are hoping (expecting) that customers will click on them and subsequently share them mainly due to the surprise / fun factor.
I've got a lot of experience promoting our (linkbait) blog posts which usually get between 10,000 and 100,000 hits via social media blogs, however, I have no experience promoting video.
We will do the offsite social blog promotions as normal, however, my two main concerns are:
1. I'm unsure how best to use the social buttons (facebook like/share tweet and G+). As I understand it (I could very much be wrong), I can either embed the social buttons on the videos so that they are easily shared across facebook etc... or I can make the the social button make the user 'Like' / 'Share' the page that the video is on.
I assume that the latter option is better for website promotion but maybe not good for people sharing the video on Facebook etc. some of the videos do not have pride of place on our pages.
An explanation or examples on the best option would be appreciated.
2. Should we hold off from putting the videos on YouTube until the website has earned some of the juice first? Or are we missing out on and opportunity by not offering all avenues at once?
Any other tips would be greatly appreciated too!
They will hopefully be up and running by the end of the month so I'll come back and let you know how it went.
Thank you for your time guys and gals!
Richard (Moz Customer 2391745)
PS. If it is of interest we are using JW Player
-
Thanks for your answer and useful tips. Totally agree with your point about seeing the content. However, we really want to keep it under wraps until the launch.
The vast majority of the videos are very funny in the context of the website and not necessarily as amazing as a stand alone YouTube video.
After some consideration and further research we are going self hosted. I think that going for a slow burning approach will benefit our site more, hopefully bringing in social/links over a period of time.
Any viral instances would be a bonus!
Thanks again.
Richard
-
Hi Richard,
Great set of questions. The main thing I want to highlight is that it's actually completely impossible for anyone to answer the questions you ask with any level of quality or detail without first spending some time looking into your content.
The decisions you make regarding YouTube vs self-hosted and how you promote the content absolutely have to be driven by the content itself and there's no strategy relevant without first looking into this. Would you be willing to share some of the content within this question so I can have a look at it?
All that said - there's a few principles here that are relevant to your situations. If you're trying to make something "go viral" in the social sense, YouTube is going to be more or less the only platform that will allow you to do this. However, if you're trying to drive traffic to your own product pages on your site - having the content self hosted and not putting it on YouTube at all is the right way to go. This is because YouTube can outrank you for your own content, but more importantly, the kind of content that will help to drive traffic and conversions on your site is almost never the kind of content that will also go viral. The two approaches are mutually exclusive.
If you're using JW player - the social buttons will point back to the page, which is cool, but make sure you're also including open graph tags and including all of the relevant meta data for that - e.g. video thumbnail so that the videos share nicely across facebook.
Cheers,
Phil.
-
Thank you for your detailed answer.
We initially had a Vimeo Pro Account, and was tittering on switching to youtube and following a similar pattern as you describe.
Amongst the reasons that we decided to self-host was that we would get the direct benefit of people embedding the videos rather that the 3rd party site.
There was also a bit of functionality (as you mention) that we want to add
There was also a fear of youtube ads appearing on the video (which may be an unfounded opinion).Thanks again.
-
Richard --
How about a hybrid solution?:
- Post exclusively on YouTube
- Embed YouTube video on your web page
- Add social media voting mechanisms on the web page
Benefits
- Key Benefit: Google SERP's promote YouTube videos most heavily, (e.g. "how to use microsoft pro charm bar")
- YouTube takes the bandwidth
- Searchable on YouTube
- Still gives you a linkable web page
Unless there's another reason that you want this video stored exclusively on your servers, or if you have advanced video playing features that you want to make available to your users, I think YouTube is the way to go.
--Andrew
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Best free twitter monitoring tool to monitor who is not following you back
Hello Mozers Could someone recommend a free monitoring tool to keep a handle on who is not following you back on Twitter?
Social Media | | Catherine_Selectaglaze0 -
An interesting way to deal with comment spam? (just 4 fun)
About two weeks back I set up a new website called www.gamsatsamplequestions.co.uk. It's a blog where, once a day, I post a set of verbal comprehension-style questions to help students prepare for the GAMSAT (the graduate entry to medicine exam used by universities in UK, Ireland and Australia.) Along with rising traffic, I've recently started to receive spam comments. Before going ahead and activating Akismet or some other spam-blocking app I thought I might have a bit of fun with them.. I took my favourite spam comment (one allegedly about SEO) and wrote up some questions to turn it into a sample GAMSAT reading comprehension It's not the most efficient way of moderating spam comments, and my not-so-subtle bitter rantings are unlikely to deter any future spammers, but I nonetheless had a little bit of fun doing it.. So, my question is, has anybody else experimented with interesting or unique ways of dealing with comment spam? E.g. created a directory of all the people who spam commented you / donated their email addresses to hordes of email marketers / replied with a kindly worded email expressing concern for their well being.. Has anyone stumbled upon anything more fun/efficient than the akismet-style plugins?
Social Media | | Devin_Anderson0 -
Just trying to find out everyones opinion on twitter and the best way to use it?
Just trying to find out everyones opinion on twitter and the best way to use it? What is your opinion on Twitter, should i include customers past work, to develop a portfolio? Keep it relevant, or just use hundreds of ###!! Will this not just become spammy?
Social Media | | samr2170 -
Best practices to add Facebook comments to wordpress blog?
Our website (noahsdad.com) has a very large and active Facebook group (http://facebook.com/noahsdadcom). Often there are more comments on the Facebook posting of a link, than on the blog post itself. I try to get people go and leave comments on the blog, but they don't get it. So I'd like to try to find a way to get Facebook comments to transfer to our site. I"m not sure the best way to do this....either via a plug in, or via these instructions https://developers.facebook.com/attachment/Comments_Best_Practices_FINAL.pdf/ I'd just like to get it going..and not mess up the comment's I have now. (Also not everyone has Facebook, so I'd like them to still be able to comment the 'old' way (name/email). Hoping someone can help point me in the right direction with this. Thanks.
Social Media | | NoahsDad0 -
Do facebook shares pass share juice the same way links pass link juice?
If i have a page on my domain say PAGE-A and let's say it's located at: http://www.mydomain.com/something/page-a and this page has quite a lot of page authority from many many inbound links. It is my understanding that if i "sculpt" the internal links on PAGE-A to point at only my primary targets, let's call the PAGE-B, PAGE-C, and PAGE-D; then those pages would gain some benefit from this link juice flowing through. Consider a similar situation where i have a page, say PAGE-F located at: http://www.mydomain.com/anotherpage/page-F and page-F gets 150 facebook shares. would the links on page-F pass this benefit on in any way? Or is only the direct target of the facebook share gaining benefit from this facebook sharing? Furthermore, lets consider a scenario where there are 30 or 40 similar pages like PAGE-F all with links out to my primary targets. Would these primary targets gain anything as these 30 or 40 pages gained facebook shares? Repeat above question, replace 'facebook' with 'twitter'. repeat again for 'google+' ?
Social Media | | adriandg0 -
Where is the best place to put your FB 'like' and G+1 buttons??
Do you guys think there is a more strategic place to place these buttons? below the fold, above, in the top nav menus...?? I would love to hear your thoughts..
Social Media | | robertrRSwalters0 -
How do I get searchable image hosting in the cloud?
My company currently uses Picasa to host our images and links to them on our website. However, we'd really love to have our images start showing up in searches. Is there a way to get maintain our Picasa (or use another, similar site) and get the images searched by webcrawlers to say we are the source? Or do we simply need to start hosting all of the images on our own servers? Thanks!
Social Media | | tennisexpress0 -
Best place to have blog reside
So... I have a fairly new wordpress blog at myblog.com, but the ultimate goal is to drive traffic and increase rankings for mysite.com. With the rise of twitter/facebook influences do you think best to migrate the blog to a directory within www.mysite.com aka www.mysite.com/blog and then 301 direct all the existing pages to the new pages created or is it better to keep the 2 domains seperate and then just have links in the navigation of both sites to each other? My initial thoughts are to incorporate it within www.mysite.com/blog but not 100% sure? Quick follow up question.. Is there an easy code snipit to add to the .htaccss file to 301 direct myblog.com to mysite.com/blog? Thanks for any help and thought on this! John
Social Media | | JohnHerrigel0