Can't Grasp Why Pages rank Higher?
-
The first result
"Bankruptcy on IRS" is the search term.
Why does the first url rank higher in google. The second one, the IRS.gov page beats them in PA, DA root domains links. The title meta has bankruptcy near the front. unclefed does have the IRS keyword in the title, but an I missing something here?
What are the other factors, that are most obvious.
Sure one can have bad links, and other negative criteria, but these are pretty decent sites that probably don't engage in much in seo, let alone bad SEO. Sure link text and mix of links can help, but am I missing something here?
Actually what I think I really need IS A CHECKLIST OF WHAT TO CHECK IN WHAT ORDER WHEN COMPARING WHY ONE PAGE RANKS BETTER THAN ANOTHER. Appreciate all discussions. Thanks in advance.
http://www.unclefed.com/AuthorsRow/Daily/Fwdcsea.html
http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small/article/0,,id=98701,00.html
-
.edu sites and .gov sites are not necessarily more valued due to the extension, but rather the relevance they have to people looking for their specific content. More people looking for what a particular .edu or .gov site offers will go than random people stumbling around for the kind of info a .com site might offer. Not always, but generally speaking, that's an important concept.
Som of those people, in turn, tend to spend more time on those sites than people do on commercial sites.
Of course, this is only true of high quality .edu or .gov sites, not all just because they've got the TLD. That's why .edu and .gov sites aren't necessarily given automatic higher value for having the TLD. They do have to earn it.
-
Thanks again. 2 things.
1. I thought I read on googles site or matt's page that edu and gov dosn't pass any extra rank because of the extension. In general they may be better but not because of the extension.
'The more links coming from each domain, the weaker the trust factor." I wasn't aware of that. I have some key pages on my site that have a lot of links , like 100's from the same social site. Should I make attempts to remove them? are they hurting my sites ranking?
-
One thing stands out to me. Link to Root Ratio. UncleFed's got an average of 2.17 link for each root domain pointing to it. The IRS's ratio is 5.14 links for each domain. That's more domains pointing fewer links each. The more links coming from each domain, the weaker the trust factor. Sure, it may seem like a minor difference. It's not like sites are sending 40 or 400 links to the IRS site.
Yet again, as in the other factors, it does count. And head to head, it's a 2&1/2 times more refined profile.
Another consideration - among the highest quality sites that link to UncleFed, there are more .edu and more .gov links than compared to the IRS's top link sources.
So again, when looking at the total link profile of each, there's a higher ratio of non-commercial sites in the mix overall than compared to the IRS site.
So as in all the other issues mentioned, it's a David Vs. Goliath thing.
-
google works in mysterious ways.
-
Thanks for clearing that up. However if you can explain a bit further, so i can understand, how is unclefed's inbound linking more refined? I'm not seeing it. It will help me keep mine more "refined" if needed. My site's an excellent example where tens of thousands of links didn't make much difference.Starting to rank much better now, and expect to keep ranking better with the help of SEOMOZ tools and forum.
-
I appreciate the insight. I was getting caught up in the technical parts, and forgetting the rest. I just ran report carts on both pages. Unclefed got a D, and the IRS got an F. So on the report card I can also see the things you bring up. great help!
-
I agree with Alan. There is no mix up.
IRS is the larger site. You feel that because they are the larger site, their page should rank first.
Unclefed is decent sized, but they are nothing compared to the IRS site.
Why does the first url rank higher in google. The second one, the IRS.gov page beats them in PA, DA root domains links.
The first url, the one belonging to unclefed, ranks higher because it is the better article for the search term. The domain rank is one important factor in the overall Google calculation, but so are the other factors mentioned.
-
Great focused reasoning Ryan. A clear case where refined topical focus wins out over competitor size and perceived authority. It's all about matching the search intent. Which shows Google doesn't always get it wrong
-
Actually I don't have them mixed up.
Having authority for an entire site, and having a larger site itself are not always the issue. It's specific search ranking factors for a specific search. This is why it's deceiving to rely on ranking data from any tool, which should always only be used as a general guide.
The refined focus of a particular topic as evaluated by the several Google algorithms is what counts. And this is where my evaluation was focused.
If I've got less pages, but the SEO for them is even a little better than that of a much bigger site, and if the inbound link profile is even a little more refined than for a site with vastly larger inbound link counts, I can definitely outrank the larger site.
Think of it this way. Goliath gets lots of points because he's so big. He gets lots of points because a lot of people think he'll win, so they root for him.
David comes along, and with refined skills in combat, he's able to overcome Goliath's perceived advantages. So to it goes sometimes in SEO.
-
Take a look at both the pages involved.
The unclefed page is a very nice, long article with a lot of content. It has the term "bankruptcy on the IRS" in the content. That is about as close to an exact match as you can hope for with that phrase. The page also has the terms bankruptcy and IRS in the title.
The IRS page is very weak. The page does not mention "IRS" even once in the content, although it is mentioned in the URL and sidebar. The IRS page has less then 10% of the content when compared to the unclefed page.
It is a very good thing the unclefed page ranks higher on this particular search, as it should. It is a well organized page written by someone with authority and great subject knowledge. Furthermore, there doesn't seem to be any apparent effort from the IRS towards SEO at all. There isn't even a meta description for their page.
Bottom line, you are asking to investigate the lesser factors while ignoring the big one. CONTENT IS KING. It doesn't always work out that way, but it should. It did in this case. No reason to look any further.
-
I might be wrong, but I think you have the two mixed up. Unclefed ranks first. The second one (irs.gov) has much more authority, and is the larger site.
-
My quick hit take is it's just the right kind of authority. 70,000 page site. As for links, even though there's hardly any, it's a very tight link to root domain ratio. Many of those are from very authoritative sites including .edu (not junk edu links, but real, valid links).
Of course, without a comprehensive audit, that's just an assumption, though it's pretty strong. And shows the power of focusing on quality SEO vs. junk SEO.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
What factors are effecting our rank?
Can anyone shed some light on why this might be? Our website has a higher DA and PA yet the competition rank higher for some keywords. Even though our on page grader is higher or marginally different. **Our Website ** DA - 13 PA - 20 Keywords - 390 Linking Domains - 24 Total Inbound - 37 Follow - 14 Competitor DA - 8 PA - 15 Keywords - 640 Linking Domains - 12 Total Inbound - 79 Follow - 65
Competitive Research | | Jesssherl1 -
What To Focus On SEO / Link Building for this campaign to rank again..
Hi All; I recently joined Moz and I am really starting to learn a lot here. I am still finding it difficult to figure out what to focus on the most to improve my rankings (although I do have some page 1 ranks) I have one strong competitor who has a SOLID spot in the top 5 of google for the past few years for the keyword I would like to be ranked for again. (as they have always been a competitor of mine either 1 spot above or 1 spot below). then i fell off google in January and finally made it back to page 1. But their links are thousands higher than mine. What parts of my SEO Link Building should I focus on the MOST to improve my ranking to move up a few spots? Followed links vs No Followed Links Followed Linking Root Domains vs NoFollowed Linking Root Domain Any help would so greatly be appreciated; also please explain why you would focus on that part of my campaign so I can better understand as well. Thanks again
Competitive Research | | Circa
(there are 3 images total) t4klvWZ,I9R9BsC,fbDoF3L#20 -
Another how the *%#^ is this site ranking question
I saw a question posted by someone a while back asking how a certain (in their opinion crappy) site was ranking in the top then. It happened that there were some good reasons for that site ranking. Well.... I have stumbled on a site that seems to be ranking for (almost) no reason at all: relatively low DA/PA very few inbound links (none seem to be that special) thin content The only thing I can think of, is that the site has the keyword in the domain name. But looking at the search results, there are other domains with exact match keyword in URL and somewhat stronger metrics that don't rank.
Competitive Research | | inhouseseo0 -
Competitor Keyword Rankings
Is there a way within SEOMoz to uncover the keywords your competitors rank for and their respective SERPs? Thx
Competitive Research | | qiherbs.com1 -
Analyzing Back Links - Says site A has back link to Site B but when I look at site B I can't find any back link to Site A. Why?
I am new to SEO Moz - It looks like incredible technology. I was playing around with different websites to see where they had back linked to see how it works. Looked at a site called racingsecretsexposed [dot] come and it said that it had dozens of links to www.ndesignstudio.com such as: ndesign-studio.com/blog/best-wordpress-sites?replytocom=893 with link anchor text "laying horses" but when I do a search for the company name, or the anchor text "laying horses", or the owner of the company's name on ndesignstudio.com - nothing appears. Why not? Isn't the back link anchored by the text laying horses, which should link back to the racing secrets website? Thanks
Competitive Research | | NewtoSEO900 -
How can I get meaningful competitive analysis when I blog on Wordpress?
The competitive analysis data I get on my blog heartspm.wordpress.com is Wordpress domain data. That doesn't help me much. I know Wordpress has a lot of domain authority. Can I get comparitive information based solely on heartspm.wordpress.com?
Competitive Research | | GerryWeitz0 -
Why do some websites that have hardly any backlinks, poorly optimised get placed above sites that are doing all they can with SEO?
For example take these two websites. www.rfasecurity.co.uk is a site that Iam working on and have had some success with yet snifferdogs.org.uk seems to be poorly optimised with little backlinks and still gets place higher. is it due to the key word in the domian name? The key search word is sniffer dogs New at this so any help would be appreciated regards Dave
Competitive Research | | ThePod0 -
What metrics are you using to build profiles of competitors Google Places pages?
Hi, I am attempting to put together a set of procedures to undertake when optimizing Google Places pages. Does anyone have a good list of metrics and methods for determining them in order to build profiles of competitors' Places pages? Thanks
Competitive Research | | networkelites0