Why do YOU blog? What's the point!?
-
From what I can gather blogging serves the following purposes. (Please correct me if I miss an important step) To clarify this is just in reference to a blog on an Internet marketing website so purely from a BUSINESS perspective.
-
Creating fresh, relevant content on a regular basis (around the right keywords) is key for great traffic and rankings
-
Building a following
....... With the intent of turning a % of that following into customers (primarily through affiliate links on your site or consulting of some kind - seo, link building, writing)
- Establishing yourself as an 'authority'
...... This, coupled with your great rankings and traffic from bullet #1 makes it possible to charge a great deal of money and get it because, hey, you are an authority
My intention isn't to make light of any of the AMAZING, talented people who spend a great deal of time and energy giving back to this incredible, dynamic industry via their blogs (and deserve to makes gobs of cash!)
Did I miss a step? Is this the road to success?
Thanks for chiming in! Have a great weekend!
Matthew
-
-
Your first point: creating fresh, relevant content on a regular basis, is the key one. This then hooks into catching long tail searches relevant to your business. The more you talk around the subject and business, providing use-cases, how-to guides, 37 things you never realised about x, the more long tail searches you're likely to catch. It's also far easier to place on the site as a blog post than trying to constantly produce evergreen content for the site and find some suitable place to put it.
It's also the logical place to inject a little opinion or humour - which perhaps will lead to some discussion or following. For the most part that's going to look out of place on the main site in amongst the sales pages.
For many small businesses, in many sectors, building a significant following is unlikely, unless the posts are very far removed from the business: perhaps drain clearing, dentistry or invoice factoring. In such a case you're never, ever going to build the same following as if you were in some entertainment or tech sector discussing the the latest iThing. I'm sure there's one or two exceptional folks out there who've managed to gain following for some dry, dull industry, but that's infinitely more about them, than the topic.
Many of the businesses that blog, highly successfully, are blogging about topics incidental to the business - for many web businesses the topics that catch notice and generate responses are the discussions about programming or some problem they encountered with scaling or the tech they're using, rather than the payment service, or the service they're actually offering. The posts on the actual service they provide getting much less traction and sharing by comparison.
But it's also about getting awareness, so that post on some uncooperative aspect of Wordpress or Apache might introduce new people to your actual service. Of course this perhaps easier in tech, but in any sector there are connected and related sectors where the same can apply, so the wider the topics the better even if not directly related to the business. That's not the same as saying constantly blog about iThings on your dentistry site of course!
Establishing self as authority. Again for many sectors, this is a bit of a stretch. With the best will in the world, the most surprising, enlightening posts on drain clearing are unlikely to get much traction on Google+ and Facebook, yet the engines are taking social success as a clear sign of authority. I've seen several valiant attempts to make "unsexy" businesses succeed on social, and to an extent, they have. As an example a ladder and scaffold rental business spent much effort sharing photos of ladders in silly places, and achieved some success. Up against shares of an iThing, cats and zombies, not so much.
So, yes, it's very necessary, particularly for the very noticeable effect of long tail traffic. For the other factors, treat them as nice-to-haves and blog accordingly.
The other key thing about blogging is nearly everyone gives up far, far too early, so keep at it.
-
I started blogging as a guest blogger as I don’t feel the need of my own blog but then people want me to have a place where they can read my stuff!
I believe Blogging have the following benefits (based on my experience)
- You can get the change to set yourself as an authority within your particular niche.
- You get a chance to build and engage a community around your blog that like your work and share their views on your posts (ideas).
- You can convert a good amount of your fans to convert in to your customers by encouraging and satisfying them enough through your blog pieces.
- Technically, you can target long tail keywords through your blog and make them rank well in Google.
- Relationship Building is one of the key things you get through blogging that later help you getting links, endorsements and much more!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How to rank a keyword?
My competitor has158 ranking keywords but has only 30 anchor texts on his all backlinks. i am only ranking for 2 keywords , how do i increase ranking keywords? whats the strategy?
Whiteboard Friday | | calvinkj0 -
What is the importance of anchor text in seo? And how does it relate to a ranking keyword?
i have one dilema if i put targeted keyword in the anchor text(backlink), is that how i am gonna rank for that keyword? i am new to the community. need help and lets say if thats true what will happen in these given cases? case1 site:a has 100 linking domains from 1000 backlinks and they have 100 anchor texts which are all same case 2 site:b has 100 linking domains from 1000 backlinks and they have 50 anchor texts which are all same which one will rank better?
Whiteboard Friday | | calvinkj1 -
Who is gonna rank better in this case?
site:a has 1500 linking domains and 20000 backlinks site:b has 1500 linking domains and 5000 backlinks does good ratio between linking domains and backlinks works? i am asking only in terms of backlink profile, i know there are more things than backlink.
Whiteboard Friday | | calvinkj0 -
Domain and Sub-Domain Question
Hi, My company owns the domains www.NYSTATEMLS.COM and www.MYSTATEMLS.COM both of these sites are already on there way with a lot going on. I did just review video 5 on technical SEO and Rand was talking about how much harder it is to rank two websites. So i'm wondering what could be done in this area? Should something be done? The website nystatemls.com is necessary because it's dedicated to the state of new york & has been around for a long time. mystatemls.com came later because the business grew and we opened up to the national market. Looking for some insight. Thanks so much, Chris Farcher
Whiteboard Friday | | Cfarcher0 -
Targeted Keyword in the document
Hi, I write long articles 3k and 5k words my question is that I read in Moz article not use your keyword more than 15 times is also apply for 3k articles ??? and if yes than my second question is that I used my targeted keyword in heading also include in 15 times ???
Whiteboard Friday | | Frozen_Fry0 -
Internal linking: Global Nav Bar obscuring link authority?
I was watching Rand's whiteboard on how links in the headers/footers can impact SEO: moz.com/blog/links-headers-footers-navigation-impact-seo If I understood correctly: 1) Google will use the first link in the html that it sees for a given page. Additional links will not be considered for passing weight. 2) Text links in body (carry more weight than) > image links > nav links > footer links If we want to use a global nav bar, is there a simple solution for not obscuring the links in the body content? (It seems very awkward to load the header nav last (and bring it up via css after the page loads), and this also goes against Google wanting people to load above-the-fold content quickly.) If I internally link to a page that was not important enough to get a spot in the global nav, but I include this link in the body as a text link (for example, an accessory specific to that item), is this internal link really getting more weight in Google's eyes because it wasn't in the nav? This seems strange to me. Thanks!
Whiteboard Friday | | HalfPriceBanners0 -
Refreshing old blog content with dates in the URL
In today's Whiteboard Friday (Keyword Targeting, Density, and Cannibalization), Rands makes a comment about updating content on pages that have dated URLs and states: "If I were advising him on SEO, I'd urge him to maintain a single page called "Best Seattle Coffee" or "Best Seattle Espresso" and update that annually (changing the title to 2012, 2013, 2014, etc but leaving the URL the same). I'd also urge him to take the prior year's content and put that on a new URL like "/coffee-from-2012" (or the like)." What are the opinions from an SEO perspective to update pages that have dates in the URL to reflect new content? Does this confuse the search engines if they see one date in the URL but another in the page copy? If this content is from a blog and they are listed / displayed based on chronological order, this fresh content would be buried. Obviously internal links and other ways to promote the content would be beneficial but Is it a bad UX to move this page to the top of the "list" when it clearly has an older date associated with this fresh content?
Whiteboard Friday | | Your_Workshop0 -
How do you do your video transcriptions on Whiteboard Friday's?
How do you do your video transcriptions on Whiteboard Friday's? Are they done manually or with software?
Whiteboard Friday | | inetteam0