Canonical
-
I have two identical sites with different urls. I placed the canonical tag in the 2nd site. Do I need to make all the internal links in the 2nd site point to the 1st site too?
FIRST SITE: www.aerlawgroup.com
SECOND SITE: www.losangelescitycriminaldefenseattorney.com
So should the internal links in www.losangelescitycriminaldefenseattorney.com point to www.aerlgroup.com? As well as using the canonical tag? Or does the canonical tag make it irrelevant to point the internal links from the 2nd site to the first?
-
Honestly, it depends a lot on the business case. In many cases, consolidating to one site has advantages, but there was some reason you split the sites, and I don't know that history. So, it can be tough to say whether you should abandon one site.
Certainly, if you do, and if you 301-redirect those pages from the abandoned site (which you should, unless that site was penalized), then that content on the stronger site should do well.
-
Wish to the continue the discussion here. Since, its on the same topic.
I have a already established blog which ranks on the 1st to 3rd page the moment I add my content in this particular niche.
I had a website made in the mid 2013. Where I had almost 150+ pages of unique content. But, never ranked for any keywords.
Now, I know that using this content on my new blog will be beneficial. Now, the question is:
1. Should I simply deindex my 2nd OLD website and migrate the content one by one to my new website.
2. Should I add rel=canonical tags and start pointing my new website?
3. Should I simply add 301 redirect for each page and wait for the redirects to get indexed?
Also, once I migrate the content on my new blog. Do you think I will have the advantage of using this content on my blog. Since, the content was already old. And this new blog always has new and fresh content with atleast 1500 words count each page.
-
I endorsed Ade's answer/comments, but I just want to point out something important that people frequently overlook. While rel=canonical and 301 redirects can have a similar impact on SEO, they're completely different for visitors. If a person comes to Site B and there's a canonical tag, they see Site B. Google credits that page to Site A and Site A shows up in search results. If a person comes to Site B and there's a 301-redirect, they go straight to Site A and never see Site B (done properly). These are two completely different experiences with completely different goals. So, set aside the SEO aspect for a minute and ask what you want to have happen to your customers.
-
I also agree with Ade - it's not about a boost so much as it is about a better user experience and clarification to the search engines of where to focus.
-
I agree with Ade, you should more focus on 1 website. Especially if the other one is just for canonical.
You may get two websites for local searchs in some very specific cases.
-
Hi.
Using rel=canonical won't give you any long-term SEO boost and neither will using a 301 redirect. Essentially all that the canonical link does is to tell Google that any relevance and authority for the page on the 2nd site should be attributed to the page on the 1st site. The 301 redirect does the same but it tells Google that you have permanently moved that page to the 1st site and it redirects the site visitor to the 1st site.
When you first set-up the canonical link there will be a brief period when Google will have crawlled and indexed the 1st site but it hasn't yet picked up the canonical link on the 2nd site giving you the situation where you have your pages 'double-indexed' or duplicated. This double indexing may give false boost whereby you have two bites of the cherry in the search results, this duplication is bad but it will resolve itself as Google re-crawls the 2nd site.
Have a look at what is happening with the number of pages in the index by running both of these searches through google as search queries:-
site:aerlawgroup.com
site:losangelescitycriminaldefenseattorney.comYou will see that the 2nd site has far fewer pages indexed and the pages that are there will gradually disappear until there are no pages in the index, all authority and relevance will have been passed to the 1st site.
-
Thank you for your feedback. I really appreciate it.
Honestly, I'm a little confused. Do I get more SEO boost from using Canonical or from 301 redirect? Or will the both provide the same SEO boost?
I used the Canonical tag and on Google Webmaster it doubled my indexed pages for the first site. This "doubling" of my indexed pages appeared to help my Google Rankings for the HIGHLY competitive keywords: "Los Angeles Criminal Defense Attorney".
What do you suggest I do, 301 or canonical, assuming I want to get the biggest SEO boost?
Thanks!
-
As long as you have the canonical links on every page of the 2nd site then you don't need to worry about any of the internal links but do you actually need to have the 2nd site? Why not just 301 redirect the 2nd site to the 1st site?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
I've published my forst infographic and started outreach to get links. Should I use a canonical URL and if so how?
I've published my first infographic and started outreach to get links. I've also submitted it to several infographic directories. Should I use a canonical URL and if so how?
Link Building | | roadhaulageservices0 -
Reversing Canonical URLs?
A few months back, we set up canonical URLs on some pages with duplicate content to give some newer pages more link juice. Now, we need to do the opposite and give that same juice to some of the original pages. If we set up canonical URLs on the newer pages to point back to the original pages, are we losing the juice we've been building all along? Sorry for all this convoluted juice talk. Hopefully, my point is getting across here.
Link Building | | frankmassanova0 -
E-commerce canonicals on other sites
Hi, I have a client with a new e-commerce site which is poorly ranked. Besides his e-commerce, he offers his products in a local site which very similar to Amazon. The description and HTML structure of his products, is the same on both pages. What do you think? Should I add canonical tags to the Amazon-like site? Or do I just need to change both contents to avoid duplication?
Link Building | | guillermoga0 -
Url variables, page rank and canonical question
Hello.
Link Building | | adrianTNT
I am having some back-links to my site that look like: http://site.com/page.html**?source=a**
http://site.com/page.html**?source=b** I assume these two will have two different ranks, is this issue fixed if I use canonical on the landing page? Thank you.0 -
Consolidating many external blogs onto main website: canonicals or 301s
Hi Everyone, Presently I have many blogs across a range of domains, each one targeting the client/type of user interested in that product (or service in this case). I originally set up this strategy to use the content of each blog to create a "link juice farm" (our products are educational courses so have a COMPLETELY DIFFERENT target market depending on the course area), which in turn links to the related page/course on our main site. My plan is to move all the content from those external blogs into subcategories on my main website blog in order to increase its traffic, authority etc. Originally, I was going to cut and paste the content, then put in appropriate 301 redirects from the external blogs to the main site. However, I then thought about copying all the content to my main site, setting it as the canonical version, and leaving all the external blogs intact and running. The idea being, I still get the benefit of all those external links pointing back at my main website. Which would be the better strategy for me to pursue? Thanks in advance for your insights, I really appreciate you taking the time to help me out with this question.
Link Building | | love-seo-goodness0 -
Same Page, Multiple URLS- Canonical tag? Redirect?
I just read this article about how google views multiple versions of the same page as different pages of duplicate content. My website, www.telikin.com currently has many versions of the home page. There is: www.telikin.com
Link Building | | Telikin
www.telikin.com/index
www.telikin.com/index.php
www.telikin.com/index.php/ All of these seem to be their own URLS, If i use the open site explorer tool to search for links pointing to these URLS, the www.telikin.com domain shows about 700 links, and the www.telikin.com/index.php shows about 63 links. My questions: Is my SEO suffering as a result of having these different pages? Does google realize that links pointing to www.telikin.com/index.php should count towards the seo of the www.telikin.com page? If this is hurting my company's website, how do I solve this problem? I am not versed as a webmaster, so I don't understand what the best course of action would be. Should I request that our webmaster somehow redirects all traffic from the other URLS to the main www.telikin.com URL? Should I be using canonical tags on all important pages? If i do, for example, use a canonical tag on the www.telikin.com page, will Google then know to send all link juice from the www.telikin.com/index.php page to the www.telikin.com page? We also have a Joomla blog that seems to duplicate pages many times over, but that is a problem that I will have to address another time. Any comments/suggestions are more than welcome. Thanks, Dave0 -
Rel="canonical" or text link?
Lets say I have a commercial website that nobody will link to so I create a non commercial website with some awesome content that is highly linkable. I then get 30 - 40 quality links pointing to this site which I then either rel ="canonical" back to my main site to the page with the replica content or do I simply add a text link from the new site to the old sites homepage. Which would benefit my commercial site most? We are seeing the strategy of building a non commercial site for links becoming more and more popular. The second question is is it worth the effort for in effect one backlink?
Link Building | | fazza470 -
Can I use canonical links outside of the head section?
I been implementing a Joomla site and my site has different ways of accessing several links therefore I need to use the canonical tag. Now I'm using Joomla 1.6, and most of the extensions that I've seen until now don't provide me the expected or they do other things that I just don't want. Therefore other than modifying the code or creating an extension myself I've decided to look into placing the canonical elements in the page.
Link Building | | jcmoreno0
