Why are these m. results showing as blocked?
-
If you go to http://bit.ly/173gdWK, you'll see that m. results are showing as blocked by robots.txt, but we don't have anything in our robots.txt file that specifies to block m. results. Any ideas why these URLs show as blocked?
-
Yeah, I was testing exactly the same when you posted the response. I even tried crawling a googlebot-mobile and still I get the 301 redirect. Which, for everything that I am seeing it is correct, as no matter what browser I use (desktop, mobile, spider) I always get a 301 to the www. version.
@michelleh, are you sure there's a mobile version not being redirected to the www. one?
-
(Using example.com instead of your domain in case you want anonymity later)
If you try to go to any of these m.example.com URLs on your desktop computer, you're redirected on the server to a www.example.com URL. I'm guessing Googlebot and Googlebot-Mobile cannot access m. pages (unless you're sniffing out Googlebot-Mobile specifically to serve it m.example.com pages). If you're looking at screen resolution for these redirects, you might not be catching Googlebot-Mobile, as I don't think Googlebot-Mobile gives a screen resolution in its user agent. I believe you want Googlebot indexing your www. content, and Googlebot-Mobile indexing your m. content, so you'll need to sniff out Googlebot-Mobile's user agent (see here), and redirect it to m. content.
Also of note is that I think these should be 302 temporary redirects, and not 301 permanent redirects between your www. and m. versions, as they're not really permanent, just getting a given user to the right version of the site. Also, you don't let me switch from the mobile version to the desktop version, which drives me bananas! Let users choose after the initial redirect. If you allow people to switch, but maintain 301 redirects, the browsers may cache some of the redirects which will lead to weird behavior if people hit a page that redirected before.
You don't have a robots.txt file at m.example.com/robots.txt, as that redirects to www.example.com/robots.txt even on my phone. I don't think this is the root of the problem, but once you figure things out, you can set up a robots.txt file on your m. subdomain.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Fetch as Google showing Tablet View, not Desktop View
Hi Mozers, Fetch as Google is showing Tablet view and not Desktop view. Does anyone know why this is? And does that mean that Googlebot is reading the Tablet version instead of the Desktop version (same HTML but different visualization)? Thanks!! Yael
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | yaelslater0 -
Interested ranking results
Hello, I have different pages that are written on the same model. I updated their content 2 weeks ago. Some of those climbed to 1 st page or beginning or 2 nd some didn't move or stayed where they originally were, 3 rd of 4 th page ? My question is whether there is a longer delay for some of them to rank (due to the term being more competitive for example) or if I should look somewhere else in maybe something that I wrote in the content of the pages that ranked versus those than didn't move. Thank you,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seoanalytics0 -
Search Results Pages Blocked in Robots.txt?
Hi I am reviewing our robots.txt file. I wondered if search results pages should be blocked from crawling? We currently have this in the file /searchterm* Is it a good thing for SEO?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BeckyKey0 -
No matter what the keyword, only the homepage shows in the SERP
Hi, wondered if someone could help. My clients website shows up well for terms but its always the homepage rather than the targeted landing page. For example, if you search for "teeth whitening anglesey" they appear http://goo.gl/ohJdua however, its the homepage rather than the tooth whitening page http://goo.gl/uVI8gK Thanks Ade
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | popcreativeltd0 -
What's better ...more or less linking C-blocks?
I'm a little confused about c-blocks, I've been reading about them but I still don't get it. Are these similar to sitewide links? do they have to come from websites that I own and hosted in the same ip? and finally, what's better ...more or less linking c-blocks? Cheers 🙂
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | mbulox0 -
2 pages lost page rank and not showing any backlinks in google
Hi we have a business/service related website, 2 of our main pages lost their page rank from 3 to 0 and are not showing any backlinks in google. What could be the possible reason. Please guide me.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Tech_Ahead0 -
Anyone managed to change 'At a glance:' in local search results
On Google's local search results, i.e when the 'Google places' data is displayed along with the map on the right hand side of the search results, there is also an element 'At a glance:'
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | DeanAndrews
The data that if being displayed is from some years ago and the client would if possible like it to reflect there current services, which they have been providing for some five years. According to Google support here - http://support.google.com/maps/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=1344353 this cannot be changed, they say 'Can I edit a listing’s descriptive terms or suggest a new one?
No; the terms are not reviewed, curated, or edited. They come from an algorithm, and we do not help that algorithm figure it out. ' My question is has anyone successfully influenced this data and if so how.0 -
Help! Optimizing dynamic internal search results pages...
Hi guys, Now I have always been against this, and opted to noindex internal search results pages to stop the waste of link juice, dupe content, and crawl loops... however, I'm in a discussion with somebody who feels there may be a solution, and that the pages could actually be optimized to rank (for different keywords to the landing pages of course). Anybody come across such a thing before? My only solution would be still to noindex and then build static pages with the most popular search results in but that won't suffice in this case. Any recommendations would be much appreciated 🙂 Thanks, Steve 🙂
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SteveOllington0