What's better ...more or less linking C-blocks?
-
I'm a little confused about c-blocks, I've been reading about them but I still don't get it.
- Are these similar to sitewide links?
- do they have to come from websites that I own and hosted in the same ip?
- and finally, what's better ...more or less linking c-blocks?
Cheers
-
More is best.
C Block refers to the "group" that an IP address links to. Lots of domains linking from the same C Block might suggest related sites or a network. Having your links coming from a wider spread of C Blocks is generally seen as good.
Like with most things in SEO it is not just a case of "more wins". the C Block of a site that links to you is just one factor amongst hundreds, maybe thousands that influence rankings. Most importantly an unusually low number compared with linking root domains can be a sign of something odd.
-
This is a very useful article which I hope you find of help - http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/what-is-a-c-block-ip-address
-
Hello there!
When you read an IP address it is something like 45.452.456.77 - this is the actual "address" on the internet where your website lives. It is like your phone number. When you put a domain on top of it the domain "maps" to the IP, it is an alias (like speed dial), they type in the name and you are sent to the right number.
The IP address has sections separated by periods. In my example above it would be aa.bbb.ccc.dd The "C-block" (and dont confuse that when you are at a bar and your buddy cuts in on a conversation you might be having with a cute young lady), is the 3rd group of numbers in an IP address starting from the left, or in my example 456
Usually, when the "c-block" section of the IP address of two different websites is different, that means that the websites are hosted on separate servers. Why does this matter? It is very easy for sites to share an IP address or even to share C-blocks. Kind of like houses. You can share the same IP address, would be the equivalent of a lot of people in the same apartment complex, the street address is the same. Having the same C-block is more like you live on the same street. Having different C-blocks is like being on different streets, or even in different zip codes or cites etc. Not a perfect analogy, but you get the idea. Sites with different C-blocks are seen as more "separate" than those that share a c-block.
Why does this matter?
If you get a ton of links from sites that all share a c-block - it looks like a link farm or link scheme and Google may ignore those links or could penalize them for you. Back in the day (not that I ever did this) you would setup a bunch of sites quickly and cheaply and they would share IPs or even be on the same c-block of IPs. You could generate a bunch of links that way. This was obviously spammy and Google cracked down.
Note that this could be one link per website linking to you, but if all the websites were in the same c-block it looks suspicious.
So, you can get links from the same c-block - it is not like an automatic penalty, but if ALL your links are from 1 or 2 c-blocks - it looks suspicious. If you host websites that are truly different from each other, they all produce original content and it makes sense to cross link, I would talk to your hosting company and make sure that each site is on a separate c-block - just to be safe. You could be "linking properly" from one site to the other, but the c-block issue could make your link pattern look suspicious.
Your host might say, "Well we cant control what IP we give you", blah blah blah. They do use different ones over time. What we have done is had one site setup on an IP, then wait a while (few months) then get a new IP for the next one etc. Naturally over time, your host will be getting new IPs all the time and so you can work it that way. You will need to update your DNS settings etc, so you need to be technically astute to change IPs, again if you think you need to (it may be that you do not).
Usually, worrying about c-blocks for links is not an issue assuming that you are getting links naturally, so this conversation may become old hat, but if you are hosting sites and linking them together, it is just something to consider.
One more, you can actually do a lookup of what sites share the same c-block. If you find a bunch of p0rn sites on that c-block or other questionable sites, that could cause an issue with your site as you are seen in the same neighborhood. Most hosts today you do not have to worry about and/or they keep those sites on separate blocks anyway, but just something to consider.
-
C-blocks basically refer to where an IP address is located. C-blocks are like the neighborhood and sites that share it are basically your neighbors. More linking c-blocks is better.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Does redirecting a duplicate page NOT in Google‘s index pass link juice? (External links not showing in search console)
Hello! We have a powerful page that has been selected by Google as a duplicate page of another page on the site. The duplicate is not indexed by Google, and the referring domains pointing towards that page aren’t recognized by Google in the search console (when looking at the links report). My question is - if we 301 redirect the duplicate page towards the one that Google has selected as canonical, will the link juice be passed to the new page? Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Lewald10 -
Should you 'noindex' Checkout Pages?
Today I was reviewing my Moz analytics and suddenly noticed 1,000 issues with pages without a meta description. I reviewed the list and learned it is 1,000 checkout pages. That's because my website has thousands of agency pages from which you can buy a product, and it reflects that difference on each version of the checkout. So, I was thinking about no-indexing (but continuing to 'follow') these checkout pages, but wondering if it has any knock-on effects I may be unaware of? Any assistance is much appreciated. Luke
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Luke_Proctor0 -
What's the best way of crawling my entire site to get a list of NoFollow links?
Hi all, hope somebody can help. I want to crawl my site to export an audit showing: All nofollow links (what links, from which pages) All external links broken down by follow/nofollow. I had thought Moz would do it, but that's not in Crawl info. So I thought Screaming Frog would do it, but unless I'm not looking in the right place, that only seems to provide this information if you manually click down each link and view "Inlinks" details. Surely this must be easy?! Hope someone can nudge me in the right direction... Thanks....
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | rl_uk0 -
Link Types For Link Building
Hi i have a SEO agency we work with who are building quality guest post links for us, however they are also building forum, profile, blog comments
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | spyaccounts14
and directory based links. 60% of their links they are building are high quality, relevant guest posts while the other 40% are the other link types. The 40% seem to be relevant directories, forums, blog comments, etc. They said they build other link types because it diversifies the link building and profile rather then just building high quality guest posts. As just building one link type can leave a footprint. What are your thoughts on this? Cheers.0 -
Do 404s really 'lose' link juice?
It doesn't make sense to me that a 404 causes a loss in link juice, although that is what I've read. What if you have a page that is legitimate -- think of a merchant oriented page where you sell an item for a given merchant --, and then the merchant closes his doors. It makes little sense 5 years later to still have their merchant page so why would removing them from your site in any way hurt your site? I could redirect forever but that makes little sense. What makes sense to me is keeping the page for a while with an explanation and options for 'similar' products, and then eventually putting in a 404. I would think the eventual dropping out of the index actually REDUCES the overall link juice (ie less pages), so there is no harm in using a 404 in this way. It also is a way to avoid the site just getting bigger and bigger and having more and more 'bad' user experiences over time. Am I looking at it wrong? ps I've included this in 'link building' because it is related in a sense -- link 'paring'.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | friendoffood0 -
What's the deal with significantLinks?
http://schema.org/significantLink Schema.org has a definition for "non-navigation links that are clicked on the most." Presumably this means something like the big green buttons on Moz's homepage. But does anyone know how they affect anything? In http://moz.com/blog/schemaorg-a-new-approach-to-structured-data-for-seo#comment-142936, Jeremy Nelson says " It's quite possible that significant links will pass anchor text as well if a previous link to the page was set in navigation, effictively making obselete the first-link-counts rule, and I am interested in putting that to test." This is a pretty obscure comment but it's one of the only results I could find on the subject. Is this BS? I can't even make out what all of it is saying. So what's the deal with significantLinks and how can we use them to SEO?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | NerdsOnCall0 -
Silo Architecture - need an expert's advice
I understand the concept of silo architecture. What I don't understand is how to build the site navigation. I see experts talking about silos, but their sites have pervasive top level navigation. In theory, your top level nav breaks your silos. If I have 20 pages of supporting content all linked to my silo page, and the top nav is on the supporting content pages, then those pages all link to the pages in the top nav - silo broken, and link juice diluted. it would seem to me that the only way to build a true silo is to strip out all of the navigation on a supporting page, and only have it link to: 1. The silo landing page 2. Other supporting pages in the silo. is this what Bruce Clay does? I've seen Rand's lectures on silos as well. Is this what he is doing? I recently saw a video by the Network Empire team, and they'd also have a pervasive nav. Can someone please explain this?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | CsmBill0 -
Do I need to use canonicals if I will be using 301's?
I just took a job about three months and one of the first things I wanted to do was restructure the site. The current structure is solution based but I am moving it toward a product focus. The problem I'm having is the CMS I'm using isn't the greatest (and yes I've brought this up to my CMS provider). It creates multiple URL's for the same page. For example, these two urls are the same page: (note: these aren't the actual urls, I just made them up for demonstration purposes) http://www.website.com/home/meet-us/team-leaders/boss-man/
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Omnipress
http://www.website.com/home/meet-us/team-leaders/boss-man/bossman.cmsx (I know this is terrible, and once our contract is up we'll be looking at a different provider) So clearly I need to set up canonical tags for the last two pages that look like this: http://www.omnipress.com/boss-man" /> With the new site restructure, do I need to put a canonical tag on the second page to tell the search engine that it's the same as the first, since I'll be changing the category it's in? For Example: http://www.website.com/home/meet-us/team-leaders/boss-man/ will become http://www.website.com/home/MEET-OUR-TEAM/team-leaders/boss-man My overall question is, do I need to spend the time to run through our entire site and do canonical tags AND 301 redirects to the new page, or can I just simply redirect both of them to the new page? I hope this makes sense. Your help is greatly appreciated!!0