Updating old blog posts in Wordpress to appear more recent?
-
I'm doing work for a law firm that has a lot of blog post content from 2010-2011 ranking for long-term keywords. These pages are displaying date snippets in SERPs, but because legal information can change year to year, I don't want the content to appear as though it's 2-3 years old.
The date of the post is in the URL structure, so I can't change the publication date w/o changing the URL. So my question is twofold: is there a way to show an updated date snippet in search results, or block the date snippet from showing, even if the date is in the URL?
Or are there other options - creating pages for each of these posts and 301ing them to the page that has a cleaner URL, etc.?
Thanks in advance for your help!
-
if you think you think you can add more to the topic, then just update it. If the content is very good and has been driving consistent traffic for a long time, i would make it to a static page (same permalinks) then make sure it's very visible throughout the site.
-
If I may suggest, start with stripping the date from your URLs and 301 redirect them to the updated URL.
As for your content, ensure you have headings such as "The definite guide to ..." / "The 2013 guide to ..." to signal to visitors that your content is updated. You can also try " ... (Updated Aug 2013)" in your header. Updates should be summarised and listed on the top of your posts so that visitors immediately know that your content has been regularly updated.
With that, the date snippets in SERPs will not appear to be old, and may in fact help to establish the authority of your post, since the post has been created a few years ago and has been regularly updated.
-
Hey Ron, thanks for the feedback, I'll definitely look into setting up new content that way, seems like a logical organization. I appreciate the help!
-
Mike, looking over my question, I failed to mention that I have updated all these blog posts in the last two months. So for instance, on the sitemap, it says that these certain posts were last modified in July or August.
I'm not concerned with Google - it sees the updates in the sitemap. What I am concerned with is that the user doesn't see the sitemap modifications, so to them, the content still appears a few years old, when really it's been updated recently. I've added "Updated On..." tags here and there, so I'm not trying to play any games w/ the dates, just trying to show users that these pages have been updated.
-
Dustin,
I would not try to game the system in this way as you may have unexpected side effects and actually hurt your rankings. Instead I would look at these subjects and ask the firm if there have been changes or updates relative to these posts. Where there have been changes I would suggest you evaluate the value for each post based on possible revenue if they get a client, search volume and how this positions them against their competitors. I would prioritize this updated content based on this.
I would add in a plug in that shows all the blogs on a subject and sorts them by date. This way you may be able to simply write an update blog and then refer to the previous blog (the prize you should go for is to get comments on both ). If the changes are significant enough I would write a new blog on the subject.
On all the blogs that are out of date I would have someone go in and add a comment in this regard with a reference to the update.
On the blogs that are older and not out of date I would add an amended post simply stating that the blog has been reviewed and that the information is still relevant.
This is not the only way to do things but my experience is that this more labor intensive approach that creates content is always the best approach. With this approach my clients had an average of 45% traffic growth last year while increasing their conversion rate.
Let me know if you have any additional questions,
Ron
-
For the most part, trying to re-post your old content with a newer date in order to make it seem fresh when it isn't is really just an attempt to game the system. It may work somewhat in the short-term but its not a good long-term strategy. New, unique and relevant content would always be better.
-
Hey Mike, thanks for the response. That's my strategy with most of the old content on the site. But there are a handful of posts that have some good links and age behind them and I figured it would be more effective to update those than to create a new page to replace them. I'm tracking the content I have replaced, though, so I'll be able to see if that's been effective so far.
-
Why not write new content about the same topic but from a more current viewpoint including any changes to the law and/or info on recent, publicly available cases that are related to that law?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Meta Description for ALL my Posts is Being Overwritten!
Every single one of my posts meta descriptions are being overritten with the same meta description! I use Yoast and have proper meta descriptions in my posts, but something seems to be overriding them. https://ibb.co/rcgWNXb Any idea what could be causing this? Thank you!!! Mike
Technical SEO | | naturalsociety1 -
Moving site from html to Wordpress site: Should I port all old pages and redirect?
Any help would be appreciated. I am porting an old legacy .html site, which has about 500,000 visitors/month and over 10,000 pages to a new custom Wordpress site with a responsive design (long overdue, of course) that has been written and only needs a few finishing touches, and which includes many database features to generate new pages that did not previously exist. My questions are: Should I bother to port over older pages that are "thin" and have no incoming links, such that reworking them would take time away from the need to port quickly? I will be restructuring the legacy URLs to be lean and clean, so 301 redirects will be necessary. I know that there will be link juice loss, but how long does it usually take for the redirects to "take hold?" I will be moving to https at the same time to avoid yet another porting issue. Many thanks for any advice and opinions as I embark on this massive data entry project.
Technical SEO | | gheh20130 -
Old domain to new domain
Hi, A website on server A is no longer required. The owner has redirected some URLS of this website (via plugin) to his new website on server B -but not all URLS. So when I use COMMAND site:website A , I see a mixture of redirected URLS and not redirected URLS.Therefore two websites are still being indexed in some form and causing duplication. However, weirdly when I crawl with Screaming Frog I only see one URL which is 301 redirected to the new website. I would have thought I'd see lots of URLs which hadn't been redirected. How come it is different to using the site:command? Anyway, how do I move to the new website completely without the old one being indexed anymore. I thought I knew this but have read so many blogs I've confused myself! Should I: Redirect all URLS via the HTACESS file on old website on server A? There are lots of pages indexed so a lot of URLs. What if I miss some? or Point the old domain via DNS to server B and do the redirects in website B HTaccess file? This seems more sensible but does this method still retain the website rankings? Thanks for any help
Technical SEO | | AL123al0 -
Should you claim authorship on guest posts?
Suppose you write a guest post for an authoritative site, is it beneficial to claim authorship of the article by linking to your Google Plus profile and adding the site to your account as a site you contribute to? If yes, would you do this for dozens of sites? (since your contributor list could get really long).
Technical SEO | | ProjectLabs1 -
Sub-domain or sub-folder for a blog?
Traditional thinking suggests sub-domains are treated as separate sites and so don't pass on link juice, but I've heard mixed opinions. I'm very much a believer in sub-folders but I'm interested to hear some other opinions. Thoughts?
Technical SEO | | underscorelive0 -
Wordpress Archive pages
In the SEOMOZ site report a number of errors were found. One of which was no or duplicate meta desctions on certain blog pages. When I drilled down to find these i noticed thosepages are the wordpress autocreated archive pages. When I searched for these through the wordpress control panel through both pages and blogs they were nowhere to be found. Does anyone know how to find these pages or are they not something I need to worry about?
Technical SEO | | laserclinics0 -
WordPress Duplicate Content Issues
Everyone knows that WordPress has some duplicate content issues with tags, archive pages, category pages etc... My question is, how do you handle these issues? Is the smart strategy to use robots meta and add no follow/ no index category pages, archive pages tag pages etc? By doing this are you missing out on the additional internal links to your important pages from you category pages and tag pages? I hope this makes sense. Regards, Bill
Technical SEO | | wparlaman0 -
Which is best blogging platform from SEO POV?
I am curious to find out what is the blogging platform of choice for enterprize level companies (employees more than 500, revenue more tan 150M). What would be the best solution from SEO point of view? I have used Wordpress in the past for small companies and feel that is the best. We are currently using Telligent. Is anybody using it?
Technical SEO | | Amjath0