Is there official Link Balance profile advice (anchor text) from Moz?
-
Hi,
We are adjusting our external Link Balance profile, but we're not 100% sure on what we should be adjusting it to in terms of Anchor text balance (branded, exact match etc)
We found this resource:
http://dashburst.com/seo-balanced-link-profile/And closer to home:
http://moz.com/blog/anchor-text-distribution-avoiding-over-optimizationBut has Moz done any actual research they can share on what is the best balance to have?
Thanks.
Rich Talbot -
Great, thank you Lynn
-
HI,
I don't think there is such a thing as a 'best' balance, just safer and less safe balances which can and do shift over time and through different industry verticals and niches. The dashburst article is I suppose a balanced enough approach to try to be safe(ish). Razvan at cognitiveseo has done some interesting case studies along these lines, check out here for example: http://cognitiveseo.com/blog/2522/brand-anchor-text-vs-commercial-anchor-text-ratio/
As far as I know there is no official moz research looking purely at percentage distribution of anchor texts exactly because there is no set numbers that is guaranteed to work in all verticals or for all time. Putting out exact numbers would just encourage people to chase a hypothetical best mix which is probably not the best way to go!
Hope that helps!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Will editorial links with UTM parameters marked as utm_source=affiliate still pass link juice?
Occasionally some of our clients receive editorial mentions and links in which the author adds utm parameters to the outbound links on their blog. The links are always natural, never compensated, and followed. However, they are sometimes listed as utm_source=affiliate even thought we have no existing affiliate relationship with the author. My practice has been to ask the author to add a rel="norewrite" attribute to the link to remove any trace of the word affiliate. I have read that utm parameters do not affect link juice transfer, however, given the inaccurate "affiliate" source, I wouldn't want Google to misunderstand and think that we are compensating people for followed editorial links. Should I continue following this practice, or is it fine to leave these links as they are? Thanks!
Industry News | | Terakeet0 -
Seo audit tool recommendation and advice anyone?
Can anyone recommend a good SEO Audit tool for my site? I have 3 top level domains with duplicate content so am looking for some international advice as well... Thanks advice would be much appreciated.
Industry News | | edward-may0 -
Urgent advice required on price for consulting job
Hello everyone, I have been asked to urgent quote a price for and begin working on the following project. for 2 websites (separate for each one ofcourse). The requirements are as follows. Website Architecture, Features and Structure Mobile Architecture, Features and Structure Social Media Presence and Platforms Search Engine Optimization recommendations, road map and projections Search Engine Marketing recommendations, road map, budgets and projections. Social Advertising recommendations, road map, budgets and projections. Cross platform content marketing Content generation strategies Other digital marketing strategies How much do you think I should charge for the project or per hour.Also... any suggestions you guys can give on resources would be highly appreciated.Regards,Talha
Industry News | | MTalhaImtiaz0 -
Paid links from directory listing and business listing sites are good or bad according to Penguin 2.1 update?
Hi Friends, Recently on October 4<sup>th</sup>, 2013, a new spam filtering algorithm got live named Penguin 21. / Penguin 5. The update goes after sites that may have purchased paid links. I would like to know is it safe, if we submit website details with links in paid directories, eg: https://ecom.yahoo.com/dir/submit/intro/ (yahoo directory) and quality business listing sites provided the categories are related to our website. Our competitor sites having the backlinks from those kind of directories and they are performing (ranking) well in major search engines. May I know how Google treat these kinds of links according to this recent algorithm update?
Industry News | | zco_seo0 -
Duplicate content across external profiles
As a B2B business, a lot of our traffic comes from referrals, especially from profile listings and high quality directories.
Industry News | | hjduck3
I am currently updating all of our listings with content that is relevant and representative of our business. The easiest way to do this is by using one boilerplate/ presaved profile. This would be using duplicate content, would I run the risk of discrediting these backlinks to my website and suffering and Google penalties?0 -
Google Cached "Text Only" version
Is there a way to test what a page would look like in Google "Text Only" version before a page is indexed in Google? Is there a tool out there to help with this?
Industry News | | activejunky10 -
How do I "link" up with USA based SEO's
After 28 long years of wait this year I finally made it to the United States of America. I grew up on "The A Team" , "Knight Rider" and Mcdonalds cheese burgers from 2 years onwards. I am as American as a English person could possibly be. It wasn't until I arrived in Florida and spent two weeks in the great country that I understood the difference in the minds and mentality of people. People were nicer ! People on the whole had a can do mentaily. If your a success people congratulate you for it . Unlike the UK.... Plus people were not scared to make a fool of themselves... (People jumping up and down at traffic lights with advertising boards) Now to my question - I loved it so much I want to go back and I figured me and my wife and 3 year old may have a extended break next time where I can work on vacation maybe over a month or so. I would love to get to know as many SEO's and people based in the USA as possible please and introduce myself etc. Hey who knows maybe SEO Moz can change my future (fingers crossed) Thanks to all the people that get in touch !
Industry News | | onlinemediadirect0 -
Google+ profiles and Rel Author. Extensive question
A bit of a mammoth question for discussion here: With the launch of Google+ and profiles, coupled with the ability to link/verify authorship using rel=me to google+ profile - A few questions with respect to the long term use and impact. As an individual - I can have a Google+ Profile, and add links to author pages where I am featured. If rel=me is used back to my G+ profile - google can recognise me as the writer - no problem with that. However - if I write for a variety of different sites, and produce a variety of different content - site owners could arguably become reluctant to link back or accredit me with the rel=me tag on the account I might be writing for a competitor for example, or other content in a totally different vertical that is irrelevant. Additionally - if i write for a company as an employee, and the rel=me tag is linked to my G+ profile - my profile (I would assume) is gaining strength from the fact that my work is cited through the link (even if no link juice is passed - my profile link is going to appear in the search results on a query that matches something I have written, and hence possibly drain some "company traffic" to my profile). If I were to then leave the employment of that company - and begin writing for a direct competitor - is my profile still benefiting from the old company content I have written? Given that google is not allowing pseudonyms or ghost writer profiles - where do we stand with respect to outsourced content? For example: The company has news written for them by a news supplier - (each writer has a name obviously) - but they don't have or don't want to create a G+ profile for me to link to. Is it a case of wait for google to come up with the company profiles? or, use a ghost name and run the gauntlet on G+? Lastly, and I suppose the bottom line - as a website owner/company director/SEO; Is adding rel=me links to all your writers profiles (given that some might only write 1 or 2 articles, and staff will inevitably come and go) an overall positive for SEO? or, a SERP nightmare if a writer moves on to another company? In essence are site owners just improving the writers profile rather than gaining very much?
Industry News | | IPINGlobal541