Site Wide Content Analysis
-
Are there tools that can effectively analyze your content site wide and provide recommendations?
-
Hi SpadaMan, did you find a solution that worked for you? Please let us know if this question has been answered for you or not. We are here to help! Thanks, Christy
-
If by "Site Wide Content Analysis" you are referring to internal duplicate content issues, number of words per page, page size, internal linking, broken links check then you may find this tool useful: www.siteliner.com. It was developed by the creators of copyscape.com. There is a free version that scans up to 500 pages from your website. For larger website you will have to go with a paid account.
-
Hey
Set up Moz Campaign OR use ScreamingFrog.
I use both.
ScreamingFrog for a quick assessment of the on site work needed before I agree costs with the client and then Moz.com/Pro Campaigns to manage the rank, link and other performance factors.
HTH
Steve
-
Hi SpadaMan! Have you set up any Campaigns in Moz Pro or Moz Analytics?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Content suggestion
Hello, What is the secret sauce of your content suggestion. How do you consider that a topic is covered. Please explain. Thank you, Flvien
Moz Bar | | seoanalytics0 -
Why doesn't the Keyword Explorer "Explore By Site" work?
Whatever page/domain url I put in here, I get a message coming up saying ""Getting rankings counts failed" Why does his happen? I can't find anything in the Help about this.
Moz Bar | | mfrgolfgti0 -
Are there any tricks for checking duplicate content?
Hello all, My MOZ weekly scan keeps coming back with indication for duplicate content on pages that don't have that much alike. I feel like I must be missing something. Is there any place I can plug in two urls so that it would tell me what the similarities are and figure out how to make it less of a duplicate content? https://www.stage32.com/happy-writers/pitch-sessions/Pitch-Amar-Hansen-Saturday-October-29th-2016
Moz Bar | | stage32
and
https://www.stage32.com/happy-writers/pitch-sessions/Pitch-Will-Raynor-Wednesday-November-16th-2016 OR https://www.stage32.com/webinars/Film-Contracts-101-Everything-You-Need-To-Know
and
https://www.stage32.com/webinars/Breaking-Down-IP-Intellectual-Property-For-Development Any ideas? Thanks in advance.0 -
Alternative to Moz Content?
Hi, Looks like moz content is really gone 😞 Does anyone have an alternative that does sort of the same thing?
Moz Bar | | mikeymosh1 -
New Spam Analysis Tool Results Questions
First off, I am incredibly excited about this tool. Secondly, I have a slew of questions, but the ones that are lingering for me are as follows. There are a few URLS that we used to control which are showing up in our list as spammy. The websites no longer exist as of roughly a week ago and I presume they still show up simply because of the last indexing. That being said, if a website doesn't exist anymore, yet the link is showing up in our GWMT or MOZ, is it still necessary to disavow? Is that overkill? http://alcoholdrugrehablosangeles.com/ is an example of a website we used to control and I have removed. My second lingering question is if there are a handful of links that are registering as spammy, and I presume it is due to lack of content/duplicate content, and I move that content to its appropriate place on another website and 301 that domain to its new home, will the "spam score" carry over?
Moz Bar | | HashtagHustler0 -
Moz Crawler URL paramaters & duplicate content
Hi all, this is my first post on Moz Q&A 🙂 Questions: Does the Moz Crawler take into account rel="canonical" for search results pages with sorting / filtering URL parameters? How much time does it take for an issue to disappear from the issues list after it's been corrected? Does it come op in the next weekly report? I'm asking because the crawler is reporting 50k+ pages crawled, when in reality, this number should be closer to 1000. All pages with query parameters have the correct canonical tag pointing to the root URL, so I'm wondering whether I need to noindex the other pages for the crawler to report correct data?: Original (canonical URL): DOMAIN.COM/charters/search/mx/BS?search_location=cabo-san-lucas Filter active URL: DOMAIN.COM/charters/search/mx/BS?search_location=cabo-san-lucas&booking_date=&booking_days=1&booking_persons=1&priceFilter%5B%5D=0%2C500&includedPriceFilter%5B%5D=drinks-soft Also, if noindex is the only solution, will it impact the ranking of the pages involved? Note: Google and Bing are semi-successful in reporting index page count, each reporting around 2.5k result pages when using the site:DOMAIN.com query. The rel canonical tag was missing for a short period of time about 4 weeks ago, but since fixing the issue these pages still haven't been deindexed. Appreciate any suggestions regarding Moz Crawler & Google / Bing index count!
Moz Bar | | Vukan_Simic0 -
What does the green check mark mean in the KW Difficulty & SERP Analysis Report mean?
Hi, I just generated a Keyword Difficulty and SERP Analysis Report and I find that many of the metrics have a green checkmark besides them. What does that indicate? Similarly, there are many metrics which appear in green. However rest are in grey. Also help what does that indicate? Refer the attached link to the screenshot of the report. I tried looking at a couple of places for the answer but in vain.. Thanks.. DQSlssU
Moz Bar | | Shalin.TJ0 -
Dupe content report showing in 'Errors' section when surely should be in 'Warnings' section ?
Why is the dupe content info showing in errors and not warnings ? Since if dupe content can get your site penalised (as per Panda) or worse banned, surely it should be in that section of reports ? Cheers
Moz Bar | | Dan-Lawrence
Dan0