Questions on Paid Directory Links...
-
Hi Moz Community!
We have a client in the manufacturing industry that is listed in Thomasnet.com for a about 75 different terms. For those that might not know, this is a paid directory site that ranks extremely well and has a very high DA at just under 90. These 75 different terms have spanned about 9,000 "dofollow" links on Thomasnet.com around 4 months back, right about the same time as the Penguin 2.0 update.
The link profile for this client had around 2,000 links prior to the 9,000 additional links, and our team is unclear if we should be concerned about these paid directory links. The organic rankings have dropped a bit, but that might be because of a more general Penguin update and not be directly tied to this paid directory.
I'm looking for some general guidance and recommendations in this paid directory space and help with Thomasnet.com if available.
Should these links be requested as changed to "nofollow"?
Will Google see this domain as one major domain link?
What other recommendations/experience with "quality" paid directories can be expected?Thanks much and look forward to your comments and discussion.
Dario
-
Hi All -
Doug and Dennis, you guys nailed the part that was throwing me off. Specifically, that a "good" site should not hurt the rankings of another "good" site, but the dis-proportionate amount of links just has my "gut" telling me to get this corrected ASAP.
Rob and Omid, I really appreciate you sharing your real-world client stories! This helps me confirm my suspicions to jump on this right away.
Love the moz community, thanks a ton everyone!
Dario
-
Here's another thing to consider:
One of my clients who is amazingly a control freak even when it comes to matters like SEO of which he knows next to zilch, has this old directory and multi-website-brands system setup that he swears gets him calls and customers consistently. Well, turned out on of the updates they did to the directory THEY own... they put up a banner ad on every single page of this directory to his own website without a no_follow. you can imagine the rest of story.
We insisted he contact his webmaster to do something about these and make then no follow, which did not happen as the webmaster had not been paid by the guy properly at the time for the retarded banner links...
We immediately disavowed that domain, took 1 ranking drop from pos 1 to 2 for literally a couple of weeks and were back to normal top position in no time. he got to keep his ads and not pay his webmaster (he is a total douche i know) and i got to save his butt from getting burned in long run.
so look at the long game, and your numbers, if that directory is the bread and butter, you may not want to remove these links or anything, but rather disavow the whole thing. you can bet 9000 links from a single domain, do follow, will only get you in trouble, so save the SEO and let them have the rest. catching up to 9000 links from 2000 existing profile to dilute back the link profile is a horrible idea imho as if you do it fast it will further signal spamminess and anyway how on earth will you be able to come up with so many different quality and valuable backlink opportunities before you lose out all your ranking edge over competitors. so just dont ignore it and dont try to play catch up with it (at least not fast) and play it safe for their SEO. they may like the calls now and the cash flow, but they can turn around and fire you in 6 months when they realize they are on page 13 or something
-
Dario,
I can speak from experience regarding a similar event with a new client. We took them on April 1. The previous firm (I refuse to call them SEO's) then submitted them to a few paid directories thinking they could "win back the business." One of our SEO's saw a link spike on 4/17 (they had 5,200 on 4/16 and 7000 on 4/17). Over the next 6 weeks that grew to ... 28,000 links from a single directory. We went into crisis mode on 4/17. We sent emails, etc. to the offending directory (knowing they would not respond, etc.) we wanted proof for later. We watched to see the first time a link from there appeared in GWMT and the day the first couple showed, we immediately correctly did a domain disavow using the disavowal tool. Note, at the time of the penguin update in mid June, their site's ranking pages fell off page one immediately.
Due to the quick action we had most back on page one within a month.I would suggest you be very vigilant with this. I will not give you direction on whether or not you should remove it other than to show you what we did. There is no way a spike of the proportions we saw will ever be viewed as natural IMO, especially if it is all from the same domain.
Best and good luck,
Robert
-
Lots of things to consider here as not all directories are created equal!
- How important is the directory in your niche?
- Do your customers use the directory and would they expect to find you listed there?
- Do your competition have listings too?
- If you weren't concerned about the seo impact, would you still want a link?
- Does the directory exist to provide more than just a link to people who are prepared to pay?
- Do you get any referral traffic from the directory?
- How is the directory performing in the search results itself?
- What does the directory's backlink profile look like?
- What's the barrier to entry, what quality control do they have on listings?
I've only had a quick glance at Thomasnet, but my initial, gut-reaction is that it's not something I would worry too much about. It looks like a reputable site to me with a real purpose. While your links are followed so are everyone else's. With so many categories, and so many outbound links on each page the individual value of these links is going to be low.
Looking at SEMRush, Thomasnet are ranking highly for a shed-load of keywords... if they're getting the traffic you're interested in, then you'd want to be in their directory wouldn't you?
As Dennis said, as long as you've got a diverse link profile then I don't think that being listed on this directory would be a problem.
The real value a good directory should provide is good qualified leads!
-
Hi Dario,
I can't speak for everyone because a lot will definitely tell you to jump ship and nofollow it or remove it. My take is just to leave it and continue with your diverse link building. I've seen that happen a lot, local or not and I've never seen a good site like that hurt another site.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Question about audience targeting in Google Ads
I am setting up a test campaign where rather than structuring my campaigns by the normal ad group>keywords with no targeting. I am making duplicates of my ad groups and targeting each duplicate to a different audience so I can target the ads better. But I also want my non targeted ad group to remain to pick up people who are not in my targeted ad groups. In the non targeted ad group, should I exclude all the audiences that I have targeted in the targeted ad groups to avoid any cross over? Thanks
Paid Search Marketing | | pinder3251 -
Campaign Tagging (Medium) for Paid Social
If we tag our paid social links with medium=cpc, will that traffic and conversions rollup under social or paid search in the channel reports? The other option we're considering is tagging with medium=social. Thanks,
Paid Search Marketing | | SDLOnlineChannel
Greg0 -
A Call From Google (Not a Question but the Moderators said to Put this Here)
This is not going to be a long post but I wanted to get something out there that a lot of other business owners might not understand. I have several different PPC campaigns that my business partner and I personally run. The campaigns are all doing quite well with a high rate of return. Never has Google contacted me (other than for surveys, which I did wind up receiving 5 blue gym bags with the Google insignia on them) and never did I think they would. The campaign they called me on wasn’t a particularly large campaign. Right now the PPC spend is around 3000/month. I understand this isn’t a little bit of money, but at the same time it’s not in the millions like most of Google’s top sites. The thing that concerned me most was the reason for their call. A nice woman introduced herself and said that the campaigns were nicely run except for a few changes. She went on to tell me of a couple of updates in the PPC realm (this happened to me yesterday – Feb 28). She said within the past few months they were rolling out a new way to target their content network and for most people they were able to save 35% (that was a number she mentioned) with the tactics she was going to suggest. My background lies in mathematics and finance (somewhat related) and I tend to know when I am either being sold or being tricked into being sold. Through the whole list of things she mentioned that would help as she was walking me through she mentioned that it was a good idea to up the bid on the content network. That way we would have more chances of being seen and it would help with out conversions. This by itself seems like decent advice, but our bid for the content network is not cheap. If they are calling every small – medium business and telling them to up their bids, we are going to have a dilemma on our hands. The dilemma being that the AdWords placement is going to cost a heck of a lot more. She said that even if we up our bid, we are not likely to pay the full amount. She wants us to have a repeat conversation on Monday. One side of me was a little upset after the conversation but all they are doing is simply up-selling. They are raising the rates through what I guess are fair business practices. A lot of business owners might just take the advice of a Google representative and not think twice about it. This means we have thousands to hundreds of thousands of people at this very moment upping the bid on their content network. If they can even get a small proportion of people to increase their bids - let's say 10% - the other 90% will start getting less shows and eventually increase their bids. Also, the people that have higher bid amounts in but aren't paying the full amount will start getting closer and closer to the amount they put in as their maximum bid. This wouldn’t be alarming to me but this is the first and only time I have ever heard from a Google representative. I can’t say I didn’t see this coming but at the same time I was definitely taken aback. I am curious to know what the MOZ community has to say.
Paid Search Marketing | | JacobEdward0 -
Adwords linking to analytics
Hi there if i have my adwords for a website of mine on a different account to the one i use for google analytics on it, is there anyway to import the data? currently it will only let me link the adwords data in the analytics account if it is on the same Google account - is there a way to give permission for the data from another Google account?
Paid Search Marketing | | tdigital0 -
Is High PageRank Quality Related But Paid Directory Listing Still Work?
Hi, We are a local cleaning company in Singapore specialising in all types of home and office cleaning service. My question is after the Google Penguin, does high PR but paid directory still working?
Paid Search Marketing | | chanel27
Or it will be considered a toxic links. It is getting harder to do backlinking now so we really need to be very careful here.0 -
PPC question for the experts
I know this is paid search but since Moz had a section for it, I thought it would be ok to ask. 🙂 According to: http://support.google.com/adwords/answer/2497836?hl=en Broad match modifier +tennis +shoes Ads may show on searches for tennis shoes
Paid Search Marketing | | MattAntonino
buy tennis shoes
best shoes for tennis Ads won't show on searches for running shoes
tennis sneakers I'm using (for a client) +wedding +photographer. It should show on wedding photographer hire a wedding photographer best wedding photographer in dallas It should not show on photographer in Dallas become a photographer dallas pictures But it is. Why would this happen? Isn't that exactly what it says it won't show up on? Also, Google writes: Don't leave space between the plus sign (+) prefix and the word you're modifying! •Correct: +leather +shoes
•Incorrect: + leather + shoes
•Incorrect: +leather+shoes Yet the client was told by Google the opposite. "I spoke with Google and they confirmed that the space after the plus and before wedding (“+ wedding”) would notrequire “wedding” to show up." How on Earth does this reconcile or make ANY sense? ETA: This is fairly clear to me: Be sure there are no spaces between the + and modified words, but do leave spaces between words. The right way to do it: +formal +shoes. The wrong way to do it: +formal+shoes. http://www.google.com/ads/innovations/bmm.html0 -
Same term and landing page, very different bounce paid vs organic
Hi guys, I have an 85% bounce rate on a ppc term and ad, vs a 51% bounce rate for the same term via organic. Same term, same landing page. Any thoughts why? Cheers, Jez
Paid Search Marketing | | jez0000 -
What's your favourite blog on Paid Search?
Of course, SEOmoz rules big in the world of SEO. However, I'm not sure which blog on Paid Search is currently worth following, so I'm looking for tips here. Which blog do you think provides decent content on AdWords / PPC?
Paid Search Marketing | | DeptAgency0