Google Places - Overcoming a geographical disadvantage
-
We have done some work on the Google Place entry for this website:
http://www.royalhoteliow.co.uk/
We have spent a lot of time ensuring we have consistent address information, to make sure we have a good number of citations, and have worked with the staff at the hotel to ensure that there is a regular stream of reviews coming into a variety of websites that we know are used by Google.
However....
Our target searches are 'Isle of Wight Hotels' and 'Isle of Wight Hotel'.
If you do a Google map search for 'Isle of Wight', it drops a pin in the middle of the Island, which is 30 miles by 20!
The main areas for hotels on the Isle of Wight (dictated by tourism), are about 15 miles from where Google percieves the Isle of Wight is, in the coastal towns.
So it seems that no matter how hard we try, in terms of citations and reviews, GP is always going to prioritise those close to the middle of the area.
Anyone got experience of a similar issue, or got any suggestions?
-
One of the often overlooked factors in local ranking in customer reviews. Implementing a simple email marketing program to request positive customer feedback can boost rankings and expand the geographic area your citation is "relevant" for. Couldn't hurt to buy adwords for your target keywords and include your places listing as an ad extension.
-
This is one of the more difficult challenges. Here are a few things we have done to help with the Geo challenge on maps.
You may notice that the top ranked sites have huge domain scores, but the third place does not. Look at that site and the first thing you will notice is the address is the first title. Add you address on main pages. Maybe on top. It's very difficult to find an actual address on the site. This is very important.
Encourage your reviewers to use the term Hotel on the Isle of Wright, in the first paragraph or title.
Do you sue the term in your meta title and description?
Do you have a page with that title and URL?
Have you run a keyword report on your home page to grade its optimization grade for that term.
Have you built strong quality citations and links. You are competing against of t some well optimized sites.
And last thing for this post. Look at top sites and ask your self, why are these showing up?
We have been successful in overcoming the geo marker challenge, but you do have to stay at it!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Getting indexed in Google Scholar
Hi all! We have a client who publishes scholarly research as a highly regarded non-profit. Their Publications aren't being indexed in Google Scholar 50% of the time and when they are, Google is pulling random stuff from a PDF vs. from the html page. Any advice on best practices is enormously appreciated
SERP Trends | | SimpleSearch1 -
Sitelink (meta) descriptions in Google SERP
Hi, I am probably not the only one having this question regarding the quality of sitelinks in organic results. When your search returns sitelinks, I know the only thing you can do to avoid certain sitelinks to appear is to demote it for that search result. But what can you do about the description. For the main result you are pretty much able to create an appealing description, but when the sitelinks appear, all sitelinks display these crappy 'composed' descriptions. I've read Google did some tests a couple of years ago with multiple descriptions and multiple titles, but this doesn't cover the issue I just described. Is there a way to create 'sitelink descriptions'? Thanks in advance for your thoughts.
SERP Trends | | ConclusionDigital0 -
Cant find link google are saying is inserted
Guys, one of my sites are coming up as "hacked in Google". I have looked for the link they are suggesting but cannot find it in the database. I have tried to resubmit but they are saying It is against the terms of service.
SERP Trends | | Johnny_AppleSeed0 -
Google News query
Hi Moz community! I have a client who have been rejected for inclusion in Google's news results. This is their web site: www.irishracing.com they are not a gambling/gaming web site, but they do advertise gambling on the site, and I am thinking that this may be an issue for them. We asked Google and obviously got a generic 'see our guidelines' response, with no actual specific feedback. Any ideas anyone? Kind regards. Gavin
SERP Trends | | IrishTimes0 -
Google Street View For Business
Does anyone know if there are any statistics that prove Google Street View For Business is worth a company investing in it? Any feed back would be much appreciated. Thanks Christina
SERP Trends | | ChristinaRadisic0 -
Using the same Google Analytics account for two sites
I have a friend who is concerned that his competition is trying something funny to show high traffic. The competition has two sites using the same GA tracking code. What impact would this have on his actual traffic. One site has high traffic 7500 daily the other site has 150 daily but gaining momentum
SERP Trends | | polarking0 -
Google EMD algo hurt my site pls give me suggestion to out come from this penalty
Guys i have site and its EMD , but google yesterday update the algo and my all keyword ranking goes out of 100....in some keyword its not showing and rest of the keyword are out of 100-200 position..i have quality copy scape content ...also i have very stable link building is going on...my purchase this domian before 3 month ..again guys i m not geting any msg in webmaster. site:www.eacnecream.com Keyword:Acne cream , Best acne cream , Acne treatment Pls guys give me suggestion.i always trust this community.. Thanks
SERP Trends | | Brayvez0 -
Google Merchant Center Feed Disapproved - Data Quality Good - No Warnings
I have noticed Google Merchant Center has been making many changes of over the last month. Feeds can now be optimized for certain product attributes. The dilemma currently is that I have a Google Merchant Center Data feed that shows zero warnings and that the data quality is good. Unfortunately, the entire feed has been disapproved. Across many other websites that I noticed the same issues, I have been able to fix all warnings and the feeds are taken perfectly. This one sites issues are eluding me. Anybody have any suggestions or experience dealing with this problem? Possible issues I have looked into but could be affecting feed. Merchant Center Guidelines have been reviewed multiple, multiple times and here is what I have found. 1. Website has limited duplicate content taken from distributors product listings (I have fought a unending battle with site owner to make all product content original) 2. Refurbished Products Issue: The sites feed has listed all products as "new". I found some of the product content in the site had "refurbished" listed. The guidelines state that products must be listed & marked as refurbished in the feed. To overcome this issue I disabled all refurbished products and resubmitted the feed. This did produce a good approved data feed.
SERP Trends | | SEMCLIX0