How can we compete ???
-
Hi Guys,
We are new to MOZ and just getting some data on one of our projects Shottle Hall
This is a wedding venue in Derbyshire and as you can imagine it's quite a competitive niche.
We have been working with them to help build website content and build natural links.
However we are against a lot of sites that have obviously had lots of "questionable" SEO work done in the past and these sites are still ranking above Shottle Hall
One competitor has lots of links from very low quality blogs - that they have obviously made themselves
http://derbyshire-attractions.blogspot.co.uk/
Another site is ranking well and is buying banner links that pass page rank
http://whimsicalwonderlandweddings.com/
This really makes me think should we be doing these tactics ??
We are told by Google that this is not the way to rank but I am very disheartened by these facts!!
-
Hi Marcus,
Thanks so much for adding some more really great suggestions to this post.
The NAP consistency is something I will look into ASAP
Kind Regards
James
-
Hey Karl, Ninja
One quick clarification here from my original post - when I say local I mean folks searching in and about Derbyshire. Important clarification as quite rightly as we want to target everyone looking for a wedding venue in that location.
Your Google+ Local page is actually really nice but a few things jump out at me.
1. Potential issue with page name using 'Wedding Venue' - this is a violation and whilst some folks get away with this it's uneccessary and something I would try changing
2. The rel=publisher tag is not set so I would implement that: https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/1708844?hl=en
3. Reviews - we could always use more reviews from real (and happy) visitors
4. NAP Consistency - from the quickest of looks I see some NAP consistency issues. Different names for the hotel (Shottle Hall Country House Hotel), different phone numbers, address variations. Getting your NAP really consistent is one of the easiest jobs to help overall and will impact in a positive way and remove some negative effects. This ties back into the use of the name on the profile page as 'Shottle Hall Wedding Venue' and 'Shottle Hall Country House Hotel' elsewhere (as they could be two different things entirely).
5. Sites like hitched.co.uk are highly visible and if profiles are well configured they should drive lots of targeted leads. Think beyond the link / citation and consider this a potential source of revenue and ensure you are measuring so can assess the ROI - wedding venues charge a pretty penny so if these sites generated one confirmed sale per month at £1000 PA they are likely providing a strong return on investment and an additional channel.
6. PPC - yep, it's brutal out there but again, it's just another channel and if you can measure it and it does not bite into leads from other channels then in many competitive industries it can be somewhat essential. Even if you only use it for some display / retargeting after organic visits to keep pushing the venue PPC is worth exploring (and measuring).
Hope that helps!
Marcus -
Thanks for the reply
it's a good point about the disavowed links I had not thought of this
Blogger outreach is something we are keen to look at further, however many wedding bloggers will only offer sponsored content or side bar adverts.
Other websites seem to be paying for these do-follow links but I was keen to try and avoid anything that may lead to a future penalty ??
It's annoying that others seems to be doing this and getting away with it!!
Kind Regards
James
-
Thanks for the reply Marcus,
We are increasing our PPC at the moment as we can measure this and it seems to be quite effective so far.
Our site was always ranking first position of Google Maps but has recently dropped so got to try and figure out why ??
The strange thing is we now have a vanity URL on Google+ and out of most of the other local venues we are really the only ones active on Google+ ??
Regarding hitched.co.uk we came off a few of the big directories a few years back as they just just kept pushing the prices up and at last they were trying to get us to pay over £1,000 per year for a listing!! and I assumed as these were no-follow probably not worth the money ??
We have a website refresh planned soon and I am hoping to add some more video content and of course we plan to keep producing high quality blog content.
Thanks agin for your input and advice I was feeling a bit disheartened earlier
-
I would stick to the local SEO strategy but think about contacting influential bloggers from around the area, maybe look at Yorkshire and even Lancashire because people will be willing to drive a couple of hours to a nice hotel. I know you won't be able to target those location keywords onsite but in terms of your outreach, it may be better for you as people in Derbyshire won't necessarily be looking for a hotel there.
Whatever you do, don't go down the black hat road, Google is far too smart for that now and you WILL get penalised. I'm assuming you have done a backlink analysis on the competitors to see what links they have, well don't forget they could have disavowed these links and they would still show up in OSE etc so don't believe everything you see when it comes to backlink analysis.
I'm not a huge advocate of PPC, even with the (not provided) problems we are having, but you it would be interesting to test a PPC campaign out to see the response and you can use these results to help you in your SEO campaign.
-
Hey Blue Ninja
I have had a quick look and it appears that you do well for 'wedding hall derbyshire' so you are doing something right there. Alternatively, if I search for 'wedding venue derbyshire' which is likely the more popular term I don't see the Shottle Hall site but I do see some localised results and a four pack of listings from Google Maps.
That localisation looks like an opportunity to me and one that you can certainly compete in. From the quickest of reviews the sites returned are not really doing anything from a Local SEO perspective and they have not claimed their profiles, encoraged any reviews etc (which would indicate they were going after local search).
How do you compete?
- Well carry on keeping it clean. You have no evidence these bad links are working and if they are they won't for much longer
- Try and add some local SEO into your approach to drive more visibility with local users
- Ensure you are well listed on important industry verticals like hitched.co.uk as they can drive a lot of visibility (and will kick back into your local SEO)
- Consider some GEO targeted PPC to pick up some leads from paid search
- Round out your strategy a bit - try to build social followers, build solid evergreen locally focused content, engage with your social audience, consider some retargeting adverts, social adverts etc
I think there is plenty you could do here with some options being something that can start working straight away (social, hitched.co.uk & PPC / remarketing) and others that will take a little more time (organic & local listings).
Hope that helps!
MarcusP.S. UK based?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
We have a site with a lot of international traffic, can we split the site some way?
Hello, We have a series of sites and one, in particular, has around 75,000 (20%) monthly users from the USA, but we don't currently offer them anything as our site is aimed at the UK market. The site is a .com and though we own the .co.uk the .com is the primary domain. We have had a lot of success moving other sites to have the .co.uk as the primary domain for UK traffic. However, in this case, we want to keep both the UK traffic and the US traffic and if we split it into two sites, only one can win right? What could do? It would be cool to have a US version of our site but without affecting traffic too much. On the other sites, we simply did 301 redirects from the .com page to the corresponding .co.uk page. Any ideas?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | AllAboutGroup0 -
How many links can you have on sitemap.html
we have a lot of pages that we want to create crawlable paths to. How many links are able to be crawled on 1 page for sitemap.html
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | imjonny0 -
Can I leave off HTTP/HTTPS in a canonical tag?
We are working on moving our site to HTTPS and I was asked by my dev team if it is required to declare HTTP or HTTPS in the canonical tag? I know that relative URL's are acceptable but cannot find anything about HTTP/HTTPS. Example of what they would like to do Has anyone done this? Any reason to not leave off the protocol?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Shawn_Huber0 -
Can I use content from an existing site that is not up anymore?
I want to take down a current website and create a new site or two (with new url, ip, server). Can I use the content from the deleted site on the new sites since I own it? How will Google see that?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | RoxBrock0 -
Google admits it can take up to a year to refresh/recover your site after it is revoked from Penguin!
I found myself in an impossible situation where I was getting information from various people that seem to be "know it all's" but everything in my heart was telling me they were wrong when it came to the issues my site was having. I have been on a few Google Webmaster Hangouts and found many answers to questions I thought had caused my Penguin Penalty. After taking much of the advice, I submitted my Reconsideration Request for the 9th time (might have been more) and finally got the "revoke" I was waiting for on the 28th of MAY. What was frustrating was on May 22nd there was a Penguin refresh. This as far as I knew was what was needed to get your site back up in the organic SERPS. My Disavow had been submitted in February and only had a handful of links missing between this time and the time we received the revoke. We patiently waited for the next penguin refresh with the surety that we were heading in the right direction by John Mueller from Google (btw.. John is a great guy and really tries to help where he can). The next update came on October 4th and our rankings actually got worse! I spoke with John and he was a little surprised but did not go into any detail. At this point you have to start to wonder WHAT exactly is wrong with the website. Is this where I should rank? Is there a much deeper Panda issue. We were on the verge of removing almost all content from the site or even changing domains despite the fact that it was our brand name. I then created a tool that checked the dates of every last cached date of each link we had in our disavow file. The thought process was that Google had not re-crawled all the links and so they were not factored into the last refresh. This proved to be incorrect,all the links had been re-cached August and September. Nothing earlier than that,which would indicate a problem that they had not been cached in time. i spoke to many so called experts who all said the issue was that we had very few good links left,content issues etc.. Blah Blah Blah, heard it all before and been in this game since the late 90's, the site could not rank this badly unless there was an actual penalty as spam site ranked above us for most of our keywords. So just as we were about to demolish the site I asked John Mueller one more time if he could take a look at the site, this time he actually took the time to investigate,which was very kind of him. he came back to me in a Google Hangout in late December, what he said to me was both disturbing and a relief at the same time. the site STILL had a penguin penalty despite the disavow file being submitted in February over 10 months ago! And the revoke in May. I wrote this to give everyone here that has an authoritative site or just an old one, hope that not all is lots just yet if you are still waiting to recover in Google. My site is 10 years old and is one of the leaders in its industry. Sites that are only a few years old and have had unnatural link building penalties have recovered much faster in this industry which I find ridiculous as most of the time the older authoritative sites are the big trustworthy brands. This explains why Google SERPS have been so poor for the last year. The big sites take much longer to recover from penalties letting the smaller lest trustworthy sites prevail. I hope to see my site recover in the next Penguin refresh with the comfort of knowing that my site currently is still being held back by the Google Penguin Penalty refresh situation. Please feel free to comment below on anything you think is relevant.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | gazzerman10 -
Can someone hep me on writing a letter to google reconsideration
Can someone hep me and charge for it on writing a letter to google reconsideration in native english? I did everything on this last year to respect google guidelines, and i as site owner always did on generating good content and usability to my site althoung a seo company had generate unnutural links that i manage to remove almost of them. i did all and more contacting webmasters to solve it. But i am not a english native speaker, i am just a content generator with a webmaster account. I is my last try to save my domain. Can someone help me on write a good google last letter? thanks
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | maestrosonrisas0 -
How can I recover from an 'unnatrual' link penalty?
Hi I believe our site may have been penalised due to over optimised anchor text links. Our site is http://rollerbannerscheap.co.uk It seems we have been penalised for the key word 'Roller Banner' as the over optimised anchor text contains key word 'Roller Banner' or 'Roller Banners'. We dropped completely off page 1 for 'Roller Banner', how would I recover from this error?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | SO_UK0 -
Can you set up a Google Local account under a PO Box?
I have a client that wants a Google local listing in a town he serves but does not have a physical location. Is it an issue to share an address with an existing company? Is is it better to use a P.O. Box? or is there a forwarding address company? Is this considered a black hat Local SEO tactic?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | BonsaiMediaGroup0