Help with a Sticky Site
-
Hey Everyone -
I work for a company that is just getting into SEO. We have had some successes, but one project lately has got us stumped. We have been working hard, but have been unable to make an impact in Google rankings with the following site:
http://stoneycreekinn.com/locations/index.cfm/DesMoines
We are trying to optimize for the keyword phrase, "des moines hotel"
This hotel is a branch location of a hotel chain in the Midwest.
*Note we've already moved up some other branch locations for this hotel chain successfully.
We've used several tools including the SEOmoz tool and seem to have higher marks than those sites that rank above us in Google surprisingly.
Any idea what we're missing?
Thanks!
-
It all really depends I guess. Is Johnston a city or suburban community? If I sent something to your address and put Des Moines on it, would it arrive?
How many people search for hotels in Johnston versus Des Moines?
Either one you choose, you'll have to get everything to match.
-
Thanks for the suggestions! Like I said we are just getting our feet wet with SEO so anything is helpful at this point. One point of frustration for us is the fact that this hotel's actual physical location is in a suburb of Des Moines. So I know there are links out there that list the address as Johnston, IA (the suburb and actual location) and those that list the address as Des Moines, IA. We have tried to convert everything to Des Moines address knowing that consistency is key in search engine ranking, but some directories are smart and can tell the actual location is not Des Moines. Any suggestions here? Should we just list the address as Johnston and optimize the content to include Des Moines as a keyword?
-
This is only a cursory look so it's only going to touch on some of the most obvious, important factors.
1. Just because we can get rankings for some pages does not automatically mean we'll get them for others. Each phrase set needs to be evaluated as a unique topical focus, in it's own competitive landscape.
2. While your site architecture might work for the locations you've got ranking for, it's upside down site architecture.
You have
http://stoneycreekinn.com/locations/index.cfm/DesMoines
http://stoneycreekinn.com/locations/rooms/index.cfm/DesMoines
http://stoneycreekinn.com/locations/amenities/index.cfm/DesMoines
http://stoneycreekinn.com/locations/gallery/index.cfm/DesMoines
etc.
Ideal site architecture would be something like:
http://stoneycreekinn.com/locations/DesMoines/
http://stoneycreekinn.com/locations/DesMoines/rooms/
http://stoneycreekinn.com/locations/DesMoines/amenities/
etc.
This method helps search engines understand content relationships much more clearly.
3. When drilling down into Packages and Specials, clicking on an individual special goes to
http://stoneycreekinn.com/locations/specials/view.cfm?locationid=6&specialid=4
This page has no Des Moines topical emphasis (page Title, URL, content, etc.) So this entire section is lacking in its ability to be recognized as relevant, and in turn, can not properly support the larger Des Moines focus.
4. OpenSiteExplorer.org only shows 20 links pointing to the top level Des Moines page. From 2 domains. That's hardly any indication that this is an authoritative set of content for an inner section of a site
5. The photo gallery has no descriptive paragraph based text, and no Des Moines specific seeding (title, URL, content area, etc...
Any of these will help, however you may need all of them, to get significant rankings.
-
While Des Moines may not be a metropolis, I'd imagine that the keyword "hotel" and city modifier is competitive in any/every market. It may not be New York or Las Vegas, but well established sites who have spent a bit of time optimizing their sites would have a leg up. In addition, the larger chains with their 1000's of backlinks and power PR's would also be tough to get ahead of.
The listing/description is lacking, as there is not much information on the page you are trying to optimize for. This could be greatly improved with better copy speaking about Des Moines, the attractions, location, and that specific hotel.
Backlnks are a must, and my analysis would revolve around that, including where the higher ranking competition is listed. You need to be there too. In the meantime start building them in reputable directories.
Make SURE that your name, address, and phone number are EXACTLY the same everywhere in all of your listings. Not having this together can create serious problems.
Make sure you are registered properly in the local search engine areas: Google Place, Bing Local, Yahoo Local.
Familiarize yourself with the new edition of:
Local Search Ranking Factors Vol. 4 by David Mihm
Best of luck.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Sitewide links and owned site
Hi everyone, I need the community opinion on something. I am webmarketer and SEO for a pure player who runs a couple of e-commerce sites. On one side we have bigsite.com. It makes all our revenue. I have been in charge for years. Results are good. We have smallsite.com. It is starting. But small revenues for the moment. We have a new SEO working on this. My question is : We always had a banner on bigsite.com's homepage, sending valuable traffic to smallsite.com.T he new SEO, has footer sitewide links from smallsite.com to bigsite.com homepage. Considering both sites share same ssl, server and company name, I am quite sure this is out of google's guide lines and would hurt bigsite.com. Do you agree that this is wrong from the new SEO, and that it could hurt my work and the search results for bigsite.com and smallsite.com, as well as team work ? Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Kepass0 -
Only the mobile version of the site is being indexed
We've got an interesting situation going on at the moment where a recently on-boarded clients site is being indexed and displayed, but it's on the mobile version of the site that is showing in serps. A quick rundown of the situation. Retail shopping center with approximately 200 URLS Mobile version of the site is www.mydomain.com/m/ XML sitemap submitted to Google with 202 URLs, 3 URLS indexed Doing site:www.mydomain.com in a Google search brings up the home page (desktop version) and then everything else is /m/ versions. There is no rel="canonical" on mobile site pages to their desktop counterpart (working on fixing that) We have limited CMS access, but developers are open to working with us on whatever is needed. Within desktop site source code, there are no "noindex, nofollow, etc" issues on the pages. No manual actions, link issues, etc Has anyone ever encoutnered this before? Any input or thoughts are appreciated. Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | GregWalt0 -
Spammy sites that link to a site
Hello, What is the best and quickest way to identify spammy sites that link to a website, and then remove them ( google disavow?) Thank you dear Moz, community - I appreciate your help 🙂 Sincerely, Vijay
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | vijayvasu0 -
Large Site - Complete Site URL Change and How to Preserver Organic Rankings/Traffic
Hello Community, What is your experience with site redesign when it comes to preserving the traffic? If a large enterprise website has to go through a site-wide enhancement (resulting in change of all URLs and partial content), what do you expect from Organic rankings and traffic? I assume we will experience a period that Google needs to "re-orientate" itself with the new site, if so, do you have similar experience and tips on how to minimize the traffic loss? Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | b.digi0 -
Real Estate Site Question
I'm working on this site: www.aldodavico.com - who is a real estate agent in Miami. Any ideas/best practices for SEO for a site like this one? It's got about 500 pages. I've never deal with such a huge site before.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | mrodriguez14400 -
Removing A Blog From Site...
Hi Everyone, One of my clients I am doing marketing consulting for is a big law firm. For the past 3 years they have been paying someone to write blog posts everyday in hopes of improving search traffic to site. The blog did indeed increase traffic to the site, but analyzing the stats, the firm generates no leads (via form or phone) from any of the search traffic that lands in the blog. Furthermore, I'm seeing Google send many search queries that people use to get to the site to blog pages, when it would be much more beneficial to have that traffic go to the main part of the website. In short, the law firm's blog provides little to no value to end users and was written entirely for SEO purposes. Now the law firm's website has 6,000 unique pages, and only 400 pages of the site are NON-blog pages (the good stuff, essentially). About 35% of the site's total site traffic lands on the blog pages from search, but again... this traffic does not convert, has very high bounce rate and I doubt there is any branding benefit either. With all that said, I didn't know if it would be best to delete the blog, redirect blog pages to some other page on the site, etc? The law firm has ceased writing new blog posts upon my recommendation, as well. I am afraid of doing something ill-advised with the blog since it accounts now for 95% of the pages of the website. But again, it's useless drivel in my eyes that adds no value and was simply a misguided SEO effort from another marketer that heard blogs are good for SEO. I would certainly appreciate any guidance or advice on how best to handle this situation. Thank you for your kind help!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | gbkevin0 -
This site got hit but why..?
I am currently looking at taking on a small project website which was recently hit but we are really at a loss as to why so I wanted to open this up to the floor and see if anyone else had some thoughts or theories to add. The site is Howtotradecommodities.co.uk and the site appeared to be hit by Penguin because sure enough it drops from several hundred visitors a day to less than 50. Nothing was changed about the website, and looking at the Analytics it bumbled along at a less than 50 visitors a day. On June 25th when Panda 3.8 hit, the site saw traffic increase to between 80-100 visitors a day and steadily increases almost to pre-penguin levels. On August 9th/10th, traffic drops off the face of the planet once again. This site has some amazing links http://techcrunch.com/2012/02/04/algorithmsdata-vs-analystsreports-fight/
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | JamesAgate
http://as.exeter.ac.uk/library/using/help/business/researchingfinance/stockmarket/ That were earned entirely naturally/editorially. I know these aren't "get out of jail free cards" but the rest of the profile isn't that bad either. Normally you can look at a link profile and say "Yep, this link and that link are a bit questionable" but beyond some slightly off-topic guest blogging done a while back before I was looking to get involved in the project there really isn't anything all that fruity about the links in my opinion. I know that the site design needs some work but the content is of a high standard and it covers its topic (commodities) in a very comprehensive and authoritative way. In my opinion, (I'm not biased yet because it isn't my site) this site genuinely deserves to rank. As far as I know, this site has received no unnatural link warnings. I am hoping this is just a case of us having looked at this for too long and it will be a couple of obvious/glaring fixes to someone with a fresh pair of eyes. Does anyone have any insights into what the solution might be? [UPDATE] after responses from a few folks I decided to update the thread with progress I made on investigating the situation. After plugging the domain into Open Site Explorer I can see quite a few links that didn't show up in Link Research Tools (which is odd as I thought LRT was powered by mozscape but anyway... shows the need for multiple tools). It does seem like someone in the past has been a little trigger happy with building links to some of the inner pages.0 -
Need help or explanation on my site!
My site has suffered greatly since the recent Google update. I have done everything as suggested. I have had all bad links removed over 2 months ago. I have lowered keyword density (not easy since the keyword is in our company name!). I have rewritten various content and bolstered our existing content. What gives? What can I do? As an example the keyword, "maysville plumber" - I rank about 40th for this keyword. The first three pages are filled with websites with literally NO content or no added value. Maysville is a town of about 1k residents - there is no competition. Before the update I was #1 for years on this particular keyword. And this is the case with 35 other cities (mostly small cities, but a few larger ones). Please help me understand or suggest what I can possibly do at this point. We have hundreds of pages of unique content on each and every page. We have zero duplicate content (I have ran tests and crawlers). We have no fishy links. I have not gotten any messages from google on Webmasters. PLEASE HELP!! I asked a similar question a little while back and fixed all of the suggestions. My site is www.akinsplumbing.net.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | chuckakins0