Scrolling Javascript News Ticker messing up Anchor Text.
-
I have a javascript scrolling news ticker on my site but it seems to play havoc with my anchor text.
I like it because it scrolls through showing a new set of pages. I set it to the ones I've just uploaded and it seems to help them get followed and indexed.
However when I use site explorer I can see the recorded anchor text for a link to a page is incorrect and it's taking the text from the news ticker. Even when a link has come from the news ticker url it seems to take anchor text from the ticker order list before or after.
It's as if it records the anchor text and then when it follows the link to the page the ticker has changed to a new link
Is this ticker bad for seo? it certainly jumbles up my anchor text, could that be a good thing?
Is there an SEO friendly news ticker for newly added products?
-
Yes it is the News Ticker you provided the link to.
To be fair I don't understand what is happening with my anchor text and it may have had nothing to do with the news ticker now I look at it.
All my anchor text within my site now seems to be "HOME" at the moment!
However, I am very grateful you pointed out the ticker is OK.
-
If it this News Ticker then I can't see a problem as it just uses your existing html markup - in which case you have control over your anchor text.
However when I use site explorer I can see the recorded anchor text for a link to a page is incorrect and it's taking the text from the news ticker. Even when a link has come from the news ticker url it seems to take anchor text from the ticker order list before or after.
I don't really understand the above - are you saying it is ignoring the anchor text you have set in your news ticker and using some other text?
Mixing up your anchor text to a page is good, so long as it is natural and relevant.
-
(function(a){
a.fn.webwidget_slideshow_common=function(p){
var p=p||{};var ste=p&&p.slideshow_transition_effect?p.slideshow_transition_effect:"fly";
var m=p&&p.slideshow_time_interval?p.slideshow_time_interval:"2000";
var q=p&&p.slideshow_window_width?p.slideshow_window_width:"400";
var r=p&&p.slideshow_window_height?p.slideshow_window_height:"400";
var sbst=p&&p.slideshow_border_style?p.slideshow_border_style:"solid";
var sbs=p&&p.slideshow_border_size?p.slideshow_border_size:"1";
var sbc=p&&p.slideshow_border_color?p.slideshow_border_color:"#000";
var sbr=p&&p.slideshow_border_radius?p.slideshow_border_radius:"5";
var sbgc=p&&p.slideshow_background_color?p.slideshow_background_color:"#FFF";
var sps=p&&p.slideshow_padding_size?p.slideshow_padding_size:"2";
var v;
var w=-1;
var x=a(this);
var cu;
var y=x.find("ul:first").children("li").length;
if(x.find("ul").length==0||x.find("li").length==0){
x.append("Require content");
return null
}
init();
play();
function init(){
x.find("ul:first").wrap('');
x.css("width",q+"px").css("height",r+"px").css("border-style",sbst).css("border-width",sbs+"px").css("border-color",sbc).css("-moz-border-radius",sbr+"px").css("background-color",sbgc);
x.find(".slides_box").css("width",q+"px").css("height",r+"px");
x.find("ul:first").css("width",qy+"px").css("height",r+"px").css("margin","0px").css("padding","0px").css("list-style","none").css("position","absolute");
x.find("ul:first").children("li").css("width",(q-sps2)+"px").css("height",(r-sps*2)+"px").css("margin","0px").css("padding",sps+"px").css("float","left");
x.hover(
function(){
stop();
},
function(){
v=setTimeout(play,m);
}
);
x.find(".slides_box").children("ul").children("li").hide();
}
function play(){
cu = w;
clearTimeout(v);
w++;
if(w>=y){
w=0
}switch(ste){
case "slide_left":
x.find(".slides_box").children("ul").children("li").css("float","left");
x.find(".slides_box").children("ul").children("li").show();
x.find(".slides_box").children("ul").animate({
left:-(wparseInt(q))
},600);
break;
case "fade_in":
x.find(".slides_box").children("ul").children("li").css("left","0px");
x.find(".slides_box").children("ul").children("li").hide();
x.find(".slides_box").children("ul").children("li").eq(cu).show();
if(cu == -1){
x.find(".slides_box").children("ul").children("li").eq(w).fadeIn("slow");
}else{
x.find(".slides_box").children("ul").children("li").eq(cu).fadeOut("slow",function(){
x.find(".slides_box").children("ul").children("li").eq(w).fadeIn("slow");
});
}
//x.find(".slides_box").children("ul").children("li").eq(w).fadeIn("slow");
break;
case "slide_down":
x.find(".slides_box").children("ul").children("li").css("float","none");
x.find(".slides_box").children("ul").children("li").show();
x.find(".slides_box").children("ul").animate({
top:-(wparseInt(r))
},600);
break;
}v=setTimeout(play,m)
}
function stop(){
clearTimeout(v);
}}
})(jQuery); -
I guess it depends upon how the news ticker has been built... do you have a link to your site, or a link to the news ticker you are using?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Async JavaScript page load times affect on ranking.
Our company plan to use in our product page a live chat support app. But I concern about the page load time. The script is loading asynchronous and in the inner tests increase the average page load time with around one sec. Previously the load time was between 2.5-3.3 sec after the chat support increased to 3.8-5 sec, but sometimes there was extreme +10 sec worse results. My question is how much can this impact to our search engine rankings?
On-Page Optimization | | laszlo_muhi0 -
Question Re Cornerestone Page And Anchor Text For Internal/External Links
Suppose I create a cornerstone page with the targeted keyword "Dog Collars". I write a dozen articles on various dog collars and point a link from each article to my cornerstone page. Should the anchor text for the links from each of those articles to the cornerstone page be "Dog Collars" or should they vary, but still be relevant to "Dog Collars" for best SEO? Should half of them be "Dog Collars" and the other half various? Also, if I have 12 articles and all of the anchor text is already "Dog Collars", should I go back and change them so that they all don't say the same thing? If hope my question makes sense ... thanks in advance. I will give thumbs up for helpful responses and suggestions 😉
On-Page Optimization | | Humanovation0 -
Is thumbnail text crawlable/lists of product names considered as normal copy in terms of keywords?
On a page that lists products (thumbnail text repeating the same word when you sell variations of the same thing) and also has copy at the bottom, are the product names crawlable? Is it better to avoid repeating the keyword in the copy? Can you get penalised for it?
On-Page Optimization | | LawrenceNeal0 -
Is Googlebot seeing text in my 'Read More' bar and could they even be penalising me for it?
Hi guys. Our web developers have put a read more bar that contains the on page SEO text for our webpage. By default, the read more bar is not expanded and you cannot see the text within. If you click 'Read More', the box expands and the text is shown on the page. I was wondering if googlebot is seeing this text at all - it's really important that it does because it contains all the on-page SEO text. I also wondered if this type of approach is still considered 'white hat'? If it's not, could google be penalising us for it? Thanks,
On-Page Optimization | | CarlDarby0 -
Any opinions about the common anchor text?
Hey guys so I was reviewing my website to make sure there are no exact anchor texts repeated throughout the site. But I was wondering what are your thoughts about the common (and useless) anchor text like "read more", "learn more", "see more information", "contact us", and things of that nature. These are usually repeated across the majority of sites out there, how does Google differentiate between over optimized anchor text and these common anchor texts?
On-Page Optimization | | nrv0 -
Anchor Texts on Internal Links on my Site Question
[Hey folks, Anchor text question for internal links on my site. We all know that proper anchor text is important for rankings, both in links pointing to your site and links on your site. Google webmaster tools is showing my top internal anchor text links to be letters. This is because of navigation on the site which is in a global footer on hundreds of thousands of pages. Do you think that this dilutes or minimizes the relevance of the real anchor texts that we are targeting which trail behind these, or if this went away it would have no effect on the rest of the anchor texts on the site. How would you handle this, we can just get rid of this navigation because it's passing PR and helping the pages get spidered. Thanks in advance. Anchor text 1. g 2. q 3. d 4. v 5. k 6. t 7. o 8. u 9. a 10. p 11. m 12. r 13. e 14. x 15. y 16. l 17. i 18. z 19. c 20. j 21. s 22. b 23. f 24. h 25. w 26. n](mailto:acaldarea@hotmail.com)
On-Page Optimization | | irvingw0 -
Does it matter what text you wrap in an H1 tag?
Typically H1 tags are reserved for page headings, i.e. on a blog post the blog post title is very often the pages H1, or top-level heading as the W3C puts it. On the SEOmoz home page they currently have "SEO Software." as their H1 tag, which seems perfectly reasonable and to me fits the W3C criteria. However, what if the primary keyword for SEOmoz was "seo community" so they decided to wrap just those two words in the sentence that follows on their home page and maintain the existing style of the words "seo community" with CSS. (see attachment) Are there any arguments against doing that? Would Google be able to detect this? If so, would Google care? I do believe the overall importance of the H1 tag has lessened to a degree, however I still believe they are valuable to an extent and would love to hear anyone's thoughts. 7NZcD.png
On-Page Optimization | | TakeLessons1 -
Image alt attribute vs. plain text in link?
I'm building a product category browsing page for a high-falutin' jewelry retailer where we display only product photos linking to individual product pages, without any text in the links. From an SEO and link-juice-passing perspective, is it most effective to embed the product titles as the alt attribute in each image, or to leave alt="" and use text substitutions (i.e. an inner which is css'd to display: none) within the <a>to help search engines accept my product titles as the link text with the most credibility?</a>
On-Page Optimization | | cadenzajon0