WMT semantics...
-
Wondering if anyone could help out here please. Cut a long story short, took on a client before Christmas last year and all was going well re seo until about June when the site got hit by a penguin problem. Search traffic went down 60% over night and a warning appeared in WMT saying we have penalised your site for spam links. Not good. Digging about more it appears that the old seo company, during their contract and what appears a few months after we took it, we engaging in some heavy forum spam.
When I say heavy forum spam, it was impressively heavy. They had spammed the message board of a country and western singer 17,000 times, for example. We removed as much of the article spam as we could but the blog commenting and the forum spam was too vast to do much about - what are you going to do if someone emails and says can you delete our link from 17,000 pages of your website!! We did a reconsideration request from Google and got denied, that was fine, to be expected. We did some more clearing and got rejected again. Upon the third reconsideration request things changed in our WMT.
Google messaged to say that we still have issues with your links, however in the warnings in WMT the message has changed from the one about having an penalty on the site to _'Google has detected a pattern of unnatural artificial, deceptive, or manipulative links pointing to pages on this site. Some links may be outside of the webmaster’s control, so for this incident we are taking targeted action on the unnatural links instead of on the site’s ranking as a whole.' _
We are reading this one of two ways...google has just changed the way they word the message, OR, they have reviewed our request and accept that we cannot remove all the spam links and so are advising us that they are ignoring the links themselves rather than penalising the site itself. Rankings, of course, still haven't come back, but are going up slowly. This is very much to be expected, without the spam links the site wouldn't have been there in the first place, so we are perhaps back to where we should be.
Does this line of thought make sense to anyone else or have I spent too long looking at country and western forums trying to find our backlinks!!
Many thanks,
Carl
-
Thanks for the reply, Tom.
The statement you make about the rankings not magically appearing is great to hear. Have been trying to explain this to the client for a while so always good to see someone else agreeing with me.
For now will continue the strategy of trying to clear up the links as best we can and looking at keywords which were not being spammed to death before and trying to rank for those.
-
Hi Carl
Just a quick clarification - receiving a manual penalty message in GWT does not necessarily mean you've been hit by an algorithmic update. You could be penalised by both of course, but the warning means there is a manual penalty on the site and, as such, should be able to be removed with link removal, use of the disavow file and reconsideration requests.
I see your train of thought there. My interpretation is that the site is still being penalised for the anchors and search terms that those unnatural links are attempting to rank.
"Taking targeted action on the unnatural links instead of on the site’s ranking as a whole." to me means that the site is still being penalised on the pages and/or terms the links are pointing to or optimised for - however for other terms, and specifically your brand terms, you would be able to rank again for.
If you wish to rank for the terms you've been penalised for, I would continue to submit reconsideration requests. Try to document your process in as much detail as possible - detail dates and responses of when you've outreached webmasters (on multiple occassions), create an excel sheet describing the work done so far. Show how, as a last resort to no positive response, you've added the URLs and domains to a disavow file and uploaded it in WMT - feel free to disavow whole domains by using - domain:example.com - rather than just individual URLs. That should help speed up the process.
And it's worth remembering that, should your reconsideration be successful, it does not mean that rankings will reappear. Odds are, and you've already alluded to this, the spam links were boosting your site and so you will need to replace the links lost - this time though with high quality and contextual links of course.
In short: I think a penalty is still present on the site, but narrowed down to the terms the spam links were trying to rank for. In order to rank for them again, you should carry out further link removal, disavowing and reconsideration requests.
Hope this helps.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Looking strategy for Backlinks
Hi, I'm a new bee here, Just wondering if we have some good but easy strategies to get a higher rank in PA and DA?
Link Building | | BeriCollection
My Store URL is [https://bericollection.com].
We are selling Shoes, Watches and smart gadgets.
We do shipping worldwide but need help from the community.0 -
How To Increase DR/DA Fast(in Month)?
i am a freelancer and doing SEO for 3 years, and i have many clients that want to increase their low DA site to like DA 80+, i've explained the concept of DA etc, but still they are intreseted in doing this, and i know the White HAT SEO only, so i am looking for a person that know how to incresease website fast like in month or even in weeks, this is my happy magazine that i like to increase DA.
Link Building | | mohammadrehanseo0 -
How to create link from google redirect?
I have seen redirect links from google but not sure how to create one. Please guide if anyone knows the answer. Example: https://images.google.cv/url?q=https://moz.com
Link Building | | Melissacarter3 -
Why My Domain Authority Dropped
Hello sir i noticed that my DA is Dropped From 27 to 26 Of this website https://www.mytechtalk.org/. What is the reason I don't i try a lot to find a solution but not get . But I notice that in google webmaster tool the domain linking increased every time but on the Moz.com, not domain added even my DA Dropped. Even When i checked my site on https://ahrefs.com/ he shows approx 350 domain with high da and pa. help me i am getting frustrated. Is that Moz is crawling All domain Fairly or not ??
Link Building | | rishu57814 -
How to Reduce the spam score of the website?
My website is www.naturesouq.com,it is a E-commerce Portal and Moz shows a spam score of 8,may i know why my site spam score is high and how can i reduce it,after all it is a dubai store portal.
Link Building | | offilery67 -
Best way to filter out the nofollowed links from WMT?
When I'm downloading links from WMT to audit them for my unnatural links clients I generally check each individual link. If it is a nofollowed link I make a note that it is nofollowed and move on. I'm thinking that there has to be a quicker way to find all of the nofollowed links so that I can filter them out from the beginning. How would I do that?
Link Building | | MarieHaynes1 -
Bing and Google Showing Different Backlinks In WMT
I'm trying to get my head around this one as I have been diligently building good quality backlinks to my website over the past 8 weeks. I'm particularly proud of the several PR7s and PR8s I got through credible service reviews, however I notice some of these links show up in Google and others in Bing WMT - but not both!! Clearly I would like credit from both SE for all the links I have achieved. Is it just a waiting game for one to catch up with the other (Bing is ahead on the higher PRs)? Is there a way to submit the list of backlinks to the SEs so I can get the credit from both? Any insight would be appreciated...
Link Building | | Ubique0