Has the Humminbird update caused links to be worth less or more?
-
As things move on will links be worth less as recent updates including the hummingbird update are moving further and further in the direction of content and social signals being the important.
On the other hand good links are becoming so hard to find, that may make them become more important than ever.
I'm trying to split my time up between content creation and link building/PR. which area should be focused on most. we have more quality content than we do quality links. our link profile is good but far to small. any suggestions what to focus on?
-
thanks ill look into that.
-
Great to hear that your content is bringing in good results.
One thing that you might consider, if you don't have it already, is a way to give people easy access to your new content. I have a blog where I make very short posts (these are noindex because they are only a sentence or two) about great content in the industry niche. I make five to eight posts per day (you could also do the same but once a week or once a month) and these are sent out to subscribers by feedburner. This has attracted thousands of subscribers. The advantage of this is... when I publish a new article I give it a good position in the feed - and it goes out to 15,000 people. That instantly produces some sharing, maybe some links and a lot of traffic.
Find a way to build your tribe.
-
I should have worded the question differently. More the future of search rather than a specific update.
Moz shows that to our root domain we have 34 domains and 4595 total links. We have been working on content for 6 months and i'm pretty happy with the results. We have a content creation system and the quality just keeps getting better so its all ticking along nicely. I could put more time/money but I feel we are ahead of the pack by a mile in our market. I think Point 2) of your solutions is the way to go as I feel we are just lagging way way behind links wise. So much so that our content just is not bubbling up.
Many of our competitors have 1000's of domains (lots of crap ones I may add) and i think we are just too far behind to ignore it and do the "build it they will come" method.
i'm a massive fan of content driven SEO, however i do wonder where the line should be drawn and where an amount of link building and network making needs to be done to get the content out.
-
I'm trying to split my time up between content creation and link building/PR. which area should be focused on most.
If you are working on an established domain take a look at where your articles will rank without any linkbuilding.
When I toss up a new article (this is something substantive that might have 1000 to 3000 words and several photos or pieces of graphic art) it will rank deep in the SERPs. But, over the next six months to a year it will slowly climb the SERPs and often rank on the first page of google - many of those will eventually go to one of the top three positions.
As an example, I published a new article eight months ago. Right out of the gate it ranked at about position #160. No worries I knew that it would move up. Slowly, very slowly, it climbed the SERPs. It took about five months to make it to the first page of the SERPs. Then, today it is at #4 and pulling nice traffic. No linkbuilding done by me but a bit of a wait for rankings. I don't think this page will get to #1 because wikipedia and a couple very powerful sites with good content are up there, but who knows what will happen.
I am very happy with these results and instead of spending any time on linkbuilding, I am making my next page of content.
If good content on your site does that then in my opinion, linkbuilding is a waste of time - unless your article needs immediate results. Consider spending 100% of your time into building content. Every piece of great content has the ability to attract links, the more you have up the more links you will attract without any effort from you.
If you content on your site does not do that then one (or more) of these three things are holding your back.
-
visitors are not responding well to your content, then could be bouncing, not sharing, not linking. For that to happen you have to honestly look at your content and ask.. "Is this the best article on the web for this topic?" if not that then it must offer a very unique perspective of very high quality that will resonate with readers. If your articles are not that high in quality then I would spend my time making them better. The "no linkbuilding method" will not work unless your content is asskicking good.
-
your site doesn't have enough authority yet to project pages into high rankings, in that case you might need some linkbuilding to get your site strength up
-
you are in an extremely brutal competitive environment and will need to do more linkbuilding.
That's how I decide, and I am 100% on content building for all of my sites. My comments here have nothing to do with hummingbird or any other google update. This is not about Google's algo or updates, this is about building a great website.
-
-
If I may add a quick one "build it and they will come" is a great idea but I still recommend you put it out to your network as people can't find your content by magic this is where social media and even if your niche fits it blogs can be so helpful, it helps you target the people you are aiming your content at.
-
My 2 cents.
Just focus on content and a little bit of outreach/PR. Do not make link building. If you have good content, links will come, "build it and they will come".
I started focusing on posting some great stuff on our blog, including the images; a few days ago we got a link for entrepreneur.com because of an image we posted, couple days later 2 links to an article from SEJ and ahrefs. No outreach or PR was done for any of those links.
So, if you ask me, just focus on content, not only the words, images, video, presentations, etc. Links will come. 1 link from a good site, an earned link, is much better than links you may get by doing guest posting for example.
-
I'll pint out he following post :
http://moz.com/blog/hummingbird-unleashed
and say again Hummingbird has not resulted in the drop of rankings its only optimized the way people search.
Nothing has changed good links have always been hard to find and they have always been valuable.
SEO wise for some time we've had to split our time (now more over more things). Keep writing good content and keep getting good links with it. Keep your brand in the social spotlight and interact with customers. There is no one thing to focus on or one strategy that works better than another. Some sites have one way that may not work on another.
The best way which has always been the good way is to make your site for the user, make the site really helpful for the user make that user want to not only come back to the site but share it with their friends. Everything from this will fall into place, just don't blame hummingbird as it's not hummingbird!
Hope that helps a bit and good luck. There are some really good blog articles here on Moz that you can pick some tips on too!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Should I disavow these links?
Hi all, I have a site that is a year old, we have been building backlinks organically - probably around 50 or so - then almost overnight we had100s of spammy links. Screenshot here: https://ibb.co/cijiub My questions: Should I disavow these? What happens if I don't disavow these? Can I work out where they came from? If I disavow a few of them, is this a token offering to the Google Gods that will lower my risk of being penalised? Thank you. cijiub
Link Building | | Bee1591 -
A link with "return false"- OSE sees as a No Followed Link
Hello, I couldn't find a clear answer to the impact on SEO for a link written in this way: [" class="expert_info" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">](w</span>ww.yourwebsite.com<span style=) [Does the "return false" act as a "no follow"? I came across this in our link data in Open Site Explorer which lists these links all as "no follows." However, an engineer I spoke to said that it shouldn't impact search engine behavior. Any ideas? Thank you in advance! -Sarah K.](w</span>ww.yourwebsite.com<span style=)
Link Building | | OneMedical0 -
When does Google Webmaster update your links to site??
Hi everyone We removed a load of links from a site over 2 months ago but they still show in Google webmaster tools. I understand Google will not be reading this links as they were removed so long ago. However I just was interested when Google might update these as not showing as linking to us anymore. I like to try and keep things tidy and its a bit frustrating it would be good to be 100% sure what Google is counting at any given time. Cheers James
Link Building | | tempowebdesign0 -
Dodgy link profiles?!?!
Just started working on a new pharma based client in the UK. I have been carrying out some link profiling on page one results for several key terms and have discovered that almost all of the sites ranking in top positions appear to have all kinds of rubbish links (links in irrelevant content / articles, links in forum signatures, single page blogs and sites that appear to have little association with their products). These links seem to be about the only links some of them have yet they rank top! It seems a very difficult prospect to build a decent white hat link profile if everyone else is STILL capitalizing on the sort of rubbish links that Google is supposed to be getting tough on. Are online pharmacies the world that Google forgot or is this a really common issue?
Link Building | | nicc19760 -
Why does my website have 2,000+ links, but only 16 linking root domains?
Why does my website have 2,000+ links, but only 16 linking root domains?
Link Building | | thestudio40 -
Building Links
Hi everyone, I am new to SEO and in the process of building links the clean way. Any suggestions on how exactly I can find websites that are linking out to quality websites already? I went thru most of my competitors link building strategy - and 90% of their links are done either thru link exchange or paid links. So looking at my competitors strategy does not really help. So I need to find websites/blogs/forums that are ready to link to me if I can show them some useful content. How do I find these websites first? Please help! Cheers! Arjun
Link Building | | ArjunRajkumar0 -
Link building and directory links to a new site
I have three new sites all hosted on the same server in the same public html folder and each site is in a different folder inside the public html folder. These sites are a listing of live music venues in different cities in Texas. Should I link these sites together to increase page rank to each other and also put key search phrases in the anchor text and place these links in the text in the center of each page of each site to make the links more effective? Also, because the sites are about a year old they don't have many inlinks yet. If i submit them to about 50 directories will Google not like this because there are way more directory links than natural links? I've been told that it is trouble to have more than about 50% directory links compared to natural links. Thanks in advance for your answers! Take care,
Link Building | | Ron10
Ron0 -
Do links from a Tumblr blog count as inbound links?
That's it. I'm thinking of making a Tumblre blog (s) for inbound links. Is it worthwhile?
Link Building | | Spreader73760