If we remove all of the content for a branch office in one city from a web site, will it harm rankings for the other branches?
-
We have a client with a large, multi-city home services business. The service offerings vary from city to city, so each branch has it's own section on a fairly large (~6,000 pages) web site. Each branch drives a significant amount of revenue from organic searches specific to its geographic location (ex: Houston plumbers or Fort Worth landscaping).
Recently, one of the larger branches has decided that it wants its own web site on a new domain because they have been convinced by an SEO firm that they can get better results with a standalone site.
That branch wants us to remove all of its content (700-800 pages) on the current site and has said we can 301 all inbound links to the removed content to other pages on the existing site to mitigate any loss to domain authority.
The other branch managers want to know if removing this city-specific content could negatively impact search rankings for their cities. On the surface it seems like as long as we have proper redirects in place, the other branches should be okay. Am I missing something?
-
Thanks, Kyle. I appreciate the thorough response. These are great points, many of which, I tried to make without success.
Everyone tried to keep the site together, and indeed the majority of the concern is definitely for the defecting office, but this particular branch seems pretty determined to go its own way. Some SEO companies can be so persuasive...top 3 ranking for every keyword under the sun...guaranteed.
So, now the main goal for the group is to ensure that the rest of the branches in the organization to not have any negative SEO impact as a result of this switch.
Thanks again.
-
Thank you for your response. Just to be clear we are pointing all redirects from the deleted pages to the current (original) site, not to the new site.
Thanks
-
As long as you have the redirects in place, I wouldn't expect there to be much effect for the other branches. Depending on how you redirect the pages and how many inbound links they have, you may actually be able to give some other branches a little boost.
The only ways I can think of that there would be a negative effect for the other branches would be if...
- There's some crossover of traffic between branches. So, not getting traffic to the one branch's pages (the one moving) would mean that none of that traffic moves on to other branches.
- If the branch that is moving is particularly good at getting inbound links, then you would lose that ongoing increase of links.
I'd be more concerned for the branch that is moving off site and for the user experience.
Let's call the branch that is moving "Branch A." For the user experience, if you redirect all the pages that are currently hosting Branch A pages to other pages on your parent company site. All those people who are trying to get services from Branch A that would have landed on one of those pages end up on an irrelevant page. That's not good for Branch A (or probably the parent company).
For the Branch itself, assuming they currently are getting traffic to the site and have built some level of authority in the niche/region, they will lose all that if they go setup a new site. They will be starting from scratch. They'll have a new site with no rankings, no inbound links, and no traffic. Maybe in the long-run they can improve on things, but in the short-term. It's going to stink.
For both of these issues, the solution would be to redirect all the Branch A pages on the parent site to the new Branch A site. That way the user experience is good (users land on the pages they expected to) and Branch A has a site that, from the start, already has authority and traffic. The down side to this, is that the loss of authority to the parent site by redirecting all these pages, could hurt the other branches. It's hard to say how much without knowing how many branches there are, how many links are going to the various pages, etc.
Just some things to think about.
Kurt Steinbrueck
OurChurch.Com -
Yes, there is a possibility. If there are links the disconnecting branch, it can impact the juice flow throughout your site. And 301 redirecting to another site will point all the juice over there as well.
Depending on the amount of links and internal linking structure of your site, it can possibly hurt your overall rankings but it depends(as always).
If they must, I suggest linking back to the original company's site just to be sure they are still connected in a way.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Thin Content to Quality Content
How should i modify content from thin to high quality content. Somehow i realized that my pages where targetted keywords didn't had the keyword density lost a massive ranking after the last update whereas all pages which had the keyword density are ranking good. But my concern is all pages which are ranking good had all the keyword in a single statement like. Get ABC pens, ABC pencils, ABC colors, etc. at the end of a 300 word content describing ABC. Whereas the pages which dropped the rankings had a single keyword repeated just twice in a 500 word article. Can this be the reason for a massive drop. Should i add the single statement like the one which is there on pages ranking good? Is it good to add just a single line once the page is indexed or do i need to get a fresh content once again along with a sentence of keyword i mentioned above?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | welcomecure1 -
SEO issues with removing a forum from a site
I'm thinking of adding a Discourse discussion forum to one of my websites. I'm not sure if it's going to be something that works well or not for the site. So I'm thinking ahead and wondering what Google issues I could have if after a few months of having the forum, I decide to remove it. What would Google think about all the then non-existent pages it might have indexed? Would there be a simple wildcard redirect I could do in htaccess that would satisfy that? Or some other thing I should do?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | bizzer0 -
XML Site Validators...Any Good Ones?
Before submitting to Google, I was wondering if anyone had any suggestions for testing sitemaps out before submitting?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | alrockn0 -
301 from one site to another
I have two e-commerce websites and i'm going to remove some products from website as requested by a supplier and sell them only on one site. Is it a good idea to 301 redirect the pages from site 1 to site 2?? Thanks for your help
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Aikijeff0 -
medical site with no unique content
Hi I'm trying to promote an ecommerce site that sells vitamins and health goods. The site owner doesn't want to add texts in the product pages because it is medical material. therefore he Currently has non unique (duplicated) content in each product page' It is the same exact content all others have (taken From the manufacturer)' Any ideas? Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BeytzNet0 -
What's the best way to manage content that is shared on two sites and keep both sites in search results?
I manage two sites that share some content. Currently we do not use a cross-domain canonical URL and allow both sites to be fully indexed. For business reasons, we want both sites to appear in results and need both to accumulate PR and other SEO/Social metrics. How can I manage the threat of duplicate content and still make sure business needs are met?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BostonWright0 -
Is Google taking longer to rank new sites?
We run a lot of "niche blogs" and websites focused on fairly non-competitive keywords. At the start of the year, we used to be able to put up websites and be able to achieve almost instant rankings on these sites. However, recently, it seems to be taking a lot longer for these sites to rank. It also seems to be taking longer for Google to index links. Is this a recent change in Google to protect against spam and help filter out the lower quality sites? Has anyone else noticed this or is it just me?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ukss19840 -
High Ranking Site with tons of junk on the server
Hey All, So to make a long story short, we own a site that has been passed through many hand and many strategies. We are in the financial field and rank high for many relevant search terms. My job is now to audit/optimize and purge out site of the garbage that has collected over the years (since 2002). During the audit I have found many issues, fized them, but I am not sure own how to proceed with the follwing issues. Any advice to solve the following would be greatly appreciated! 9932 orphan files - does just removing them affect my SEO.. I like a clean house, can I somehow use them to my benefit? Hundreds of 404s with many external "follow" links that we are no longer getting juice from 8 Sitelinks in webmaster tools, but only 4 show in our search I am straight n00b so sorry if this is 101 for anyone you but your input would be greatly appreciated!! Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | deuce1s0