Removing pages from index
-
Hello,
I run an e-commerce website. I just realized that Google has "pagination" pages in the index which should not be there. In fact, I have no idea how they got there. For example, www.mydomain.com/category-name.asp?page=3434532
There are hundreds of these pages in the index. There are no links to these pages on the website, so I am assuming someone is trying to ruin my rankings by linking to the pages that do not exist.The page content displays category information with no products. I realize that its a flaw in design, and I am working on fixing it (301 none existent pages). Meanwhile, I am not sure if I should request removal of these pages. If so, what is the best way to request bulk removal.
Also, should I 301, 404 or 410 these pages?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Alex
-
yes the no content page thing is a big problem. If you have a "view all" option, and it's more than a dozen, fifteen or maybe 20 products, that should be paginated, with full indexing. Maile Oyhe even talked about that specific scenario of "view all" being good.
In my experience, all of the no-content pages should, ideally, be 301 redirected in a way that they point to the most relevant highest level category page on your site.
Since there's so many, there's no easy way to get them removed from the index other than doing the 301 then being patient as Google recrawls then re-confirms.
-
Ah - that's definitely better, if you don't go too wide. 2009 - 2010's concept of not having too many links went too far with too many people. Sites became too flat.
Categories and pagination are best served with having enough categories to cover the highest level groups, with sub-categories as appropriate, but not to the the point where there's only a few products in any single sub-category. So if you've got more than a dozen or fifteen products in a category or sub-category, pagination is perfectly valid.
Having more than six, eight or maybe ten categories at most, is also not good.
-
Alan, I think I misspoke. I meant to say that a categorically structured set of your products would be better to index than a paginated version. For example :
http://www.sunglasses.com/mens/black/productx
as opposed to http://www.sunglasses.com/products?page=233
Is it still considered wise to index both paginated results along with categorized results in this case?
-
Hi Alan,
Thanks for the info. I was going to set my page 2+ to "noindex,follow", however your reply makes sense. I will leave them indexable. I do see some competitors "rel=canonical" pagination to "view all" pages. I think I will keep my pages as is.
However, as my reply to Ryan stated, my issue is still the INDEX.
Google has thousands of "no content" pages indexed. They contain links to other "no content" pages making my site look thin. This may be the reason we lost so much ranking/traffic with Panda update.
How do I get these pages removed from the index? And do I return 301, 404 or 410 when Google comes back to reindex them?
Thanks for your help!
Alex
-
Hi Ryan,
I crawled the site, and did not find links to these pages, however it made me realize another HUGE issue. Since the paging is dynamically created, it has links to the "back" & "forward" no matter what page you are on. So, if page # 5000 is displayed, it will have links to page # 4999 and 5001. Although in my website I do not have links to pages that do not exist, all it takes is someone link to my site with "page=10000" and Google to index that page. From this point on, G will index all the PAGEs that do not exist.
Thanks again for getting me a step closer to resolving my problem.
However, the problem is still the INDEX. Google has (now realizing that its in the thousands) pages indexed with no content. These pages just contain links to other PAGING pages that have no content and my main menu/categories.
How do I get these pages removed from the index?
Thanks again!
Alex
-
For the record, that link that SSCDavis referenced includes Matt Cutts discussing faceted navigation, not pagination. Faceted navigation is different than pagination by leaps and bounds. So he (SSCDavis), with all due respect, is absolutely incorrect in his claim of what Matt said.
Maile Ohye, Senior support engineer at Google, definitely recommends allowing pagination to be indexed, if implemented properly. She even discussed this at length this week up at SMX Advanced in Seattle. Vanessa Fox, head of Nine by Blue, and former Googler (the creator of Google Webmaster Tools) agrees.
And so do I.
When performed properly, pagination (with quality optimization of paginated pages) can lead to dramatic increases in individual products indexed, higher quality visits from people further along in the buying process, and more people finding the site through an exponentially greater number of keyword phrases.
Consider this - in pagination (X number of products on the initial page, with X additional DIFFERENT products on page 2, and x additional still more and different products on page 3,etc. - by not wanting those pages indexed, you're communicating to Google - hey - we don't care about these other products enough to include them." Which means they get a false and negative understanding of how many products you have in your catalog. And THAT drives the overall strength of your catalog down.
Now, if, on the other hand, you already show ALL of your products on a top level page that is linked from the main navigation, then sure, pagination should be killed. But only if that's the case.
-
Alex,
I would highly recommend crawling your website and examining the crawl report. If Google is indexing these pages, then they got to them on your site at some point. I would proceed with the idea in mind this is a web design issue, not someone trying to ruin your rankings, as you suggested.
The crawl report will show the referrer page which can help troubleshoot the issue. When you have pages generated by a CMS or other software, there can easily be issues like the one you are experiencing. In my experience this is the most likely cause of your issue.
You mentioned there are 100s of these pages in the index. If you can determine a pattern they match, it is possible you can 301 all of them with a single rule, sending the user to your main category page or where ever you feel is best.
You can also set up a parameter specific instructions in Google WMT. I would avoid doing this until after you have reviewed your crawl report. From your Google WMT dashboard > Site Configuration > Settings > Parameter handling tab > find or add your parameter and adjust the setting as you deem fit.
-
**Edit: Please see alans answer
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Pillar pages and blog pages
Hello, I was watching this video about pillar pages https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Db3TpDZf_to and tried to apply it to my self but find it impossible to do (but maybe I am looking at it the wrong way). Let's say I want to rank on "Normandy bike tou"r. I created a pillar page about "Normandy bike tour" what would be the topics of the subpages boosting that pillar page. I know that it should be questions people have but in the tourism industry they don't have any, they just want us to make them dream !! I though about doing more general blog pages about things such as : Places to rent a bike in Normandy or in XYZ city ? ( related to biking) Or the landing sites in Normandy ? (not related to biking) Is it the way to do it, what do you recommend ? Thank you,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seoanalytics0 -
Impact of Removing 60,000 Page from Sites
We currently have a database of content across about 100 sites. All of this content is exactly the same on all of them, and it is also found all over the internet in other places. So it's not unique at all and it brings in almost no organic traffic. I want to remove this bloat from our sites. Problem is that this database accounts for almost 60,000 pages on each site and it is all currently indexed. I'm a little bit worried that flat out dumping all of this data at once is going to cause Google to wonder what in the world we are doing and we are going to see some issues from it (at least in the short run). My thought now is to remove this content in stages so it doesn't all get dropped at once. But would deindexing all of this content first be better? That way Google would still be able to crawl it and understand that it is not relevant user content and therefore minimize impact when we do terminate it completely? Any other ideas for minimizing SEO issues?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | MJTrevens1 -
Do I need to remove pages that don't get any traffic from the index?
Hi, Do I need to remove pages that don't get any traffic from the index? Thanks Roy
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | kadut1 -
Does it make sense to create new pages with friendlier URLs then redirect old pages to new?
Hi Moz! My client has messy URLs. does it make sense to write new clean URLs, then 301 redirect all old URLs to the new ones? Thanks for reading!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | DA20130 -
More Indexed Pages than URLs on site.
According to webmaster tools, the number of pages indexed by Google on my site doubled yesterday (gone from 150K to 450K). Usually I would be jumping for joy but now I have more indexed pages than actual pages on my site. I have checked for duplicate URLs pointing to the same product page but can't see any, pagination in category pages doesn't seem to be indexed nor does parameterisation in URLs from advanced filtration. Using the site: operator we get a different result on google.com (450K) to google.co.uk (150K). Anyone got any ideas?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | DavidLenehan0 -
Our login pages are being indexed by Google - How do you remove them?
Each of our login pages show up under different subdomains of our website. Currently these are accessible by Google which is a huge competitive advantage for our competitors looking for our client list. We've done a few things to try to rectify the problem: - No index/archive to each login page Robot.txt to all subdomains to block search engines gone into webmaster tools and added the subdomain of one of our bigger clients then requested to remove it from Google (This would be great to do for every subdomain but we have a LOT of clients and it would require tons of backend work to make this happen.) Other than the last option, is there something we can do that will remove subdomains from being viewed from search engines? We know the robots.txt are working since the message on search results say: "A description for this result is not available because of this site's robots.txt – learn more." But we'd like the whole link to disappear.. Any suggestions?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | desmond.liang1 -
Can a home page penalty cause a drop in rankings for all pages?
All my main keywords have dropped out of the SERPS. Could it be that the home page (the strongest) page has been devalued and therefore 'link juice' that used to spread throughout the site is no longer doing so. Would this cause all other pages to drop? I just can't understand how all my pages have lost rankings. The site is still indexed so there's no problem there.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SamCUK0 -
Adding Orphaned Pages to the Google Index
Hey folks, How do you think Google will treat adding 300K orphaned pages to a 4.5 million page site. The URLs would resolve but there would be no on site navigation to those pages, Google would only know about them through sitemap.xmls. These pages are super low competition. The plot thickens, what we are really after is to get 150k real pages back on the site, these pages do have crawlable paths on the site but in order to do that (for technical reasons) we need to push these other 300k orphaned pages live (it's an all or nothing deal) a) Do you think Google will have a problem with this or just decide to not index some or most these pages since they are orphaned. b) If these pages will just fall out of the index or not get included, and have no chance of ever accumulating PR anyway since they are not linked to, would it make sense to just noindex them? c) Should we not submit sitemap.xml files at all, and take our 150k and just ignore these 300k and hope Google ignores them as well since they are orhpaned? d) If Google is OK with this maybe we should submit the sitemap.xmls and keep an eye on the pages, maybe they will rank and bring us a bit of traffic, but we don't want to do that if it could be an issue with Google. Thanks for your opinions and if you have any hard evidence either way especially thanks for that info. 😉
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | irvingw0