Link Placement and Trust
-
Hey all
I am looking at a new SEO campaign and am just starting to have a look at the competition and their links. This is a client in the website design industry who operates in a given city in the UK. Taking a quick look, the competition seems well established and there is plenty of companies ranking on the first page for all of the key terms.
When I start to dig a little deeper though it gets a little more interesting and this maybe relatively unique to this industry but I think it also applies to spam links and any company that supplies white label website based services.
Basically, the competition have lots of links. I have reviewed the top 10 competing sites across various terms and there is no shortage of links and lots of anchor text variations. Here is the stats from open site explorer for the one site that commonly comes up again and again.
Page Level 61 - Page Authority 6.78 - mozRank 6.13 - mozTrust 30,144 - Total Links 30,064 - External Followed Links 33 - Internal Followed Links 325 - Linking Root Domains
Domain Level 53 - Domain Authority 5.13 - Domain mozRank 5.10 - Domain mozTrust 47,969 - Total Links 44,788 - External Followed Links
So, this gives us lots of nice metrics and the new deep analysis tool in keyword research easily allows us to get some more data on what exactly is driving the ranking of this site and the others who all rank in a similar way.
Link Quality
This is where it gets a bit more interesting and this applies to all the sites in the first ten results for the various keywords we are interested in (general keywords for the homepage at this stage).
The links are primarily domain wide and in the footer. They are things like:
website designed by x
web design by x
website design
website design in <area name="">
<area name=""> website design
(you get the picture)Quality vs Quantity
So, whilst the competitors have lots of links, from a reasonable number of sites, they are pretty much all site wide footer links. This is fairly clear when we look at total links 30,000 from only 300 sites.
My thinking here is that the quality of these links is not that great:
- poorly positioned on the page
- domain wide
- narrow anchor text and in some cases no 'click to visit' type links
Content
These sites are pretty much all dull as hell. Service pages, clients, jobs done, maybe a case study but really, nothing I would really class as interesting (hence only links from their clients sites hey).
So, my question is
Has anyone built a campaign with quality vs quantity? Do you have any tips, experience or feedback? Our strategy will be built around great content, promotion of that content and much more (not explored that) but at the foundation it will be a content and promotion strategy.
Really, if I break it down, I am looking at the above as 300 links, from the footers of various sites. If we were to get 300 links from quality sources and then bulk it out with some similar footer style links from the clients clients (they are not 100% keen on this so we may not go that route yet) then... these established big boys really should not be too difficult to topple in my mind given enough time, content and effort.
What are your thoughts people? Anyone conducted a quality vs quantity campaign like this? Any feedback?
Cheers
MarcusP.S. SEOMoz - is there any chance that a link trust or quality metric could be built into the tools at some point in the future as sheer volume, is not always the best indicator and as times goes on I would imagine that to be even more true.
-
Thanks for the great feedback in the P.S. - we really appreciate it!
Did you know we have a feature request forum? It's a great place to share your ideas. Other people can vote on them and it will help us determine priorities. You should check it out: http://seomoz.zendesk.com/forums
Thanks!
Keri
-
This seems to be a useful resource on the different value of links and ties in well with my 300 quality links should outweigh 300 site wide footer links:
Search Engines Valuation of Links http://www.seomoz.org/blog/10-illustrations-on-search-engines-valuation-of-links
I guess I did not phrase the original question all that well and I guess what I am looking for is some kind of metric for footer links and site wides. Is a footer link worth maybe 10% of link in the content of a page? Does a sitewide links value degrade over X links?
I am not even sure it matters and I can guess and will feed back over a period of months, maybe it is a great piece of content / study to publish to the site but the part of my nature just wants some way to make this work on a spreadsheet.
-
Hey Buddy, thanks for the answer.
I guess what I am looking for is some kind of metric to structure my campaign around.
I am thinking the best I can do at the moment is to go for 300 quality links as there are 300 linking sites to the #1's but would love to hear if anyone has put this into practice in anyway and what if any lessons they learned along the way.
Cheers
Marcus -
Hey Sha, yeah, I have read a bunch of that, and I know it's the general consensus, but I was wondering if anyone had any quality vs. quantity experience - that is, have you conducted a campaign to pitch quality against quantity?
These guys rank well, for competitive terms, so the approach works. Equally, the moz tools only look at volume and the overall quality of the linking site and page and in no way asses the value of the link with regards to it's placement on the page or repetition across the site.
You had any experience with this? Was wondering about a metric or a way to topple this approach and would love to hear your feedback.
-
I have read many times that footer links hold less value than links mentioned in the content areas of pages and posts, but that does not mean they do not have reasonable value. When coming from a site with a higher value of trust, these links will have even more juice.
If somebody offered me a mixed amount of anchor text from 300 different footer links with differing IP"s, I would take them in a heartbeat(as long as they are from reliable and trust worthy sites of course.)
The great thing is, you know how the link building has been done for your competition, and now the real work begins.
While there are no guarantees as there are many factors beyond links, you most likely have an excellent shot at getting your client to the top if you put in the effort.
-
Hi Marcus,
There is a general belief that Google and probably other search engines can generally identify and ignore credit links and that part of this is attributed to location on the page. Footer links are the most obvious of these.
If you search Google Webmaster Central for references to credit links in footer or footer link value, you will find quite a lot of discussion of this.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Link Building where link building is dead. Latest tactics in a land of content.
Hello, What is your latest link building techniques considering manual link building is basically dead, and you should really build good content to drive results. Link building has really become less important. It seems to be much more 10X content now. What would you recommend for basic link building considering this besides the 50 first Links video by Rand, which is excellent. Thanks, Bob
Link Building | | BobGW0 -
Link Exchange
Is link exchange always bad? What if I want to add a link for other related products on my site which I do not offer, and the other site does the same for me? Will it be better to rather an article for each other product and link to somebody, than have one page with a list of other products to other sites. For example. We do training. Lets say we offer computer training. We search companies that does health and safety training offer to put their course on our site with a link to them, if they do the same.
Link Building | | Heinwest0 -
If you discount a subscription when the client links to you, does that classify as a paid link?
For example, we all subscribe to MOZ, but if we received a 25% discount on our subscription if we linked back, would that be considered by Google as a paid link, or would it be seen as a sales tool / promotion?
Link Building | | JonathanSmith0 -
How much time does it take for the links to be forwarded to redirected link?
Hi there,
Link Building | | MoeezLodhi
Thank you for taking out some time for this question; I have changed the permalinks last week for a website.. I forgot to redirect old permalinks to the new one.. So I did 301 redirection, it has been 4-5 days since I did that but the links are not forwarded to the new Permalink so far.
How much time should I wait for the links to be forwarded to the new permalinks? Secondly, I am sure I have done the 301 redirect correctly, as when I go to the old url / permalink it directs me to the new permalink. So I am sure 301 is done correctly. Do I need to submit the sitemap again?0 -
Link Relevance vs Link Authority ?
Hi guys, I have a quick question regarding some low quality links my site is getting. From the information in Open Site Explorer, the website Im talking about has a page authority of 16 while the domain authority is 11\. These are very low quality scores in my oppinion and Im thinking of removing them with Google Disavow Tool. The thing is that, although the domain is low quality, the links have relevance as they're in the same business sector as us. More exactly, the name of the domain is taxisavona and the company I work for is also a taxi company. So, now I`m thinking, should I disavow the link because of it's low scores or should I leave it because it is relevant to our business ? Thank you in advance! Best regards, Tiberiu Iavorenciuc
Link Building | | Tiberiu0 -
Link Analysis shows no external sites linking to me?
Hi All, I hope you can help. Link Analysis shows no external sites linking to me? but I know for a fact there are. Why is this? I have submitted my site to a few local directories and can see my site is on their site but when I run a Link Analysis it shows that I have no links. Does anyone know why this is? Many thanks, Aidan My site is http://www.theethicalsilkco.com/
Link Building | | aidanlawlor0 -
What to do with some good links I have?
I have some pretty strong links from relevant sources linking to the homepage of a site I deal with. The links are usually from a PR3-5 pages and display specific result about the linking site. Sometimes they come from badges. We offer several services, so sometimes the page is about one service and next time about the other. Currently all of my pages link to the homepage. Would it not be better to link to the specific product page related to the page I have? Also I can do a canonical to the service pages? Which would be best?
Link Building | | Svetoslav0 -
Would you truste this link building buissness ?
http://www.actuallyrank.com/85.php i am working on french site and i don't have a tone of budjet. would you truste this link building buissness ?
Link Building | | martinLachapelle0