How come www.ifundinternational.com beat us despite that most links seems VERY shady?
-
How can ifundinternational.com with TONS of spammy links rank 70 keywords in TOP20 in the competitive hard money lending industry? They seem to go AGAINS ALL WHITE HAT SEO and all rules by Panda, Penguing and Hummingbird. Just frustrating that they get away with it. What to do about it?
-
If I look at the link profile of my own websites (which have never received linkbuilding services) I am shocked to see links from some awful looking sites. I don't get excited about them because they are links from black hats and spammers who build mashup websites by slapping together information scrapped from other websites, grabbed from business directories and stolen from other sources.
If I look at the link profile of almost any other site that has been on the web pulling reasonable traffic for at least a couple of years I will see the same thing. Even the best sites on the web attract tons of spammy links without doing anything to produce them.
So, I think that it is really hard to assess the links that you see pointing to other websites. If you see stuff that looks like manufactured links... they probably are manufactured links but they are on spam sites of a type that google is not going to penalize you for.
If I was in the lending space I would not be surprised by very many things. And if a website does have really spammy link.... they might have been disavowed a long time ago. Keep in mind that disavow has been around for a couple years or more and tons of people - especially in the lending industry - have disavowed an awful lot of links.
-
Peter,
First and foremost, when you responded to Mike Roberts, you used caps when you thanked him A LOT! for telling you about Googles spam reporting. Then, when you responded to EGOL (Whose avatar/screenname has always been in caps), you use caps again, except it comes off as yelling. (Full disclosure, I respect EGOL very much.)
I am not the smartest SEO professional on this forum, but IMO their site does not violate every rule in the book. It may violate some, I do not know. I was responding honestly in an effort to assist you.I looked at their backlink profile and, while it appears to have a very high link velocity and many of the links appear to be from similar sites in that industry, I do not know that those things alone will meet Google's criteria for actionable link spam. Again, I do not know. I am not screaming that you are wrong; I am stating that I have not given it the required study in order to pass a professional judgement. I thank EGOL for his comments, and I also hope you can realize that what I wrote to you originally had no judgement in it. I have been involved in Internet marketing since 1998/1999 when my first spend on AOL was monthly for banners at a reasonably high cost for the time. I was simply trying to convey to you that my experience has taught me not to waste my time on trying to figure out what someone is doing wrong and why they are getting away with it. The reason is that I can have only one result from it - _I become a victim. _
By focusing on what a competitor is doing right, I begin to learn ways to beat that competitor and others.
I have made a choice in life that I will never be a "pigeon" (I am older and this may not be common in today's lexicon so, for anyone, it means that I will go down swinging before I will resign myself to being a victim to anything.)
By virtue of living a while, I have learned that railing against those who have a better lot in life than I do is a waste of time. Taking action that changes my lot in life brings me peace.
Forever learning, so if I offended you with my original comments or if EGOL offended you with his response to my comments, please accept my apology for the both of us.
Robert
-
Thanks A LOT! I was looking for that. I knew it was some way to report on it. Thanks a lot. Great Karma to you.
-
The question is REALLY, why are their site not totally BLACK FLAGGED by Google, since they seem to VIOLATE EVERY RULE IN THE BOOK, yet their site is ranking? I checked their backlink profile and onsite-SEO and judging the site on that, I would NEVER guessed that the site would rank for anything at all. We're not behind, just doing white hat SEO that takes more effort and kind of surprised that they get away with this - for now anyway.
-
I suggest you ask, what are they doing better than you? It will give you a lot more mileage in addressing what may be keeping you behind.
Wow... that is a great answer. I've seen this same question asked hundreds of times in forums over the past ten years and this response is golden.
Nice focus, Robert.
-
Peter,
Your question is not answerable. You say how are they beating you, but you don't give your domain for a comparison. I will tell you that IMO, the worst thing we can do is to look at a site that is beating us, focus on what they are doing wrong in our eyes, and wonder about it. I suggest you ask, what are they doing better than you? It will give you a lot more mileage in addressing what may be keeping you behind.
Also, take a look at their link profile as opposed to just some of the domains. I am impressed they have gained the authority, etc. they have in right at a year. If you use a tool like Majestic, or ahrefs, you may see their links a bit differently. (I agree they do have some that are not best, but they have some good ones as well.)
I hope this helps, but I know it is probably not what you wanted to hear.
Robert
-
There are many factors besides links that can influence rank. Have you looked at their content or quality of their website for example, how long the website has existed? I sure haven't but it is something to consider. As mentioned above, you can report anything you find to google if you really feel they have shitty links.
-
If they are, in fact, breaking guidelines that Google should be penalizing them for then there is always the spam reporting tool. https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/spamreport (you need to log in/be logged in to webmaster tools in order to use it).
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Links
Hi, im wondering if links that is not exact anchor links gives any boost for rankings? Example if lets say somebody links to my site http://domain.com/category/article with anchor: domainname or url link.
Link Building | | Rob_I0 -
Root Domain Link for Affiliate's Link
It seems my affiliate link: http://www.hrmsplugins.com?partners=21 is not being considered as a "root domain" backlink when this link is used on their website. Is there a reason for this?
Link Building | | delphia0 -
Http://www.linkshare.com anybody using it???
Is it ok to use services like: http://www.linkshare.com I do eCommerce. http://www.furnacefilterscanada.com/ http://www.furnacefilterscanada.com/ Thank you, BigBlaze
Link Building | | BigBlaze2050 -
Disavow and link analysis
I am trying to work up a list of Domains to disavow from old SEO black hat (long time ago) and I think some recent bad SEO against the site. I found a few good articles here and started the process. Very daunting even on a site that never had a lot of link work done on it. One particular issue has my attention and need advice on what to do with it. I find 100s of backlinks that all resolve to the same IP 72.215.225.9 . Has anyone else seen this one. These are sites such as mengems.com or http://www.downey-realestate.com . I am using NetPeak Checker to grab stats on the backlinks after gathering backlinks for 5 different sites. These site all seem to come from Majesticseo and sure enough if I ping any of them they return 72.215.225.9 on at first and then go not found. They return a 200 in NetPeak . I was hoping not open thousands of backlinks to see if they existing before I create my Disavow list. Couple of questions. 1. Any harm in putting these on the disavow if in fact they really don't exist anymore? Do the disavow police not like your list being longer than it needs to be ? I am leaning to just leaving all of them off my list. Seems I read something that says dont ask google to disavow something that no longer exists because they are not penalizing you for it. 2. If I start with the most egregious Bad and ex-black hat domains and submit them, wait 3 weeks and the Penguin hit rankings do not recover at all then how to add to the list. Do I leave all the original disavows on the list, add to it and resubmit ? 3. My first thought was to simple send a list of all domain that have no Google indexed pages regardless of return status code. Basicly saying please clean the slate of this crap.....thoughts on this? Thanks jw
Link Building | | freestone0 -
Is there a software to help me check whether the sites that i give link to, also place my link on their site (reciprocal link)?
When i exchange links with others, i usually put their link on my site hoping that they'll do the same. Since it's impossible to check all sites whose link i have placed on my page to see if they have put a link back to me, i was wondering whether there is a kind of software to help me do that!
Link Building | | isidora0 -
Does the ratio of external nofollow links to external "do follow" links matter in terms of SERPs ranking?
My site has an external link nofollow:dofollow ratio of approximately 1:1 That is, there are about as many nofollow external links as "do follow" external links. I have an impression that the ratio of no-follow to "do follow" links is a factor in the way that our website shows up in SERPs. I have the impression from reading a variety of sources, and from looking at Seomoz, that calculate "trust" factors as if they mattered (in SERPs), that seem to value a relatively low nofollow:dofollow ratio. Am I correct about that? Thanks,
Link Building | | tcolling
Tim PS - I don't know whether or not this matters, but our website is at: www.trustworthycare.com - Tim0 -
Link credit www vs non-www?
I have noticed that when I run the open explorer on my website that I get a different list of linking domains depending on if the back link used www or not. I always ask and specify to use the non-www but many people do not pay a lot of attention to that? I have set up 301 from www to the non-www as the non-www is my primary URL. How do i get credits for the 50+ that are pointing to the www?
Link Building | | jgmayes0 -
Etsy.com --Getting link juice through other pages on search results?
My sister has a store page on etsy.com where she sells home made crafts. And I want to help her rank higher on google with some of the other etsy stores. So i started to look at the other etsy store pages that are ranking well on google and found that they have a page authority between 48 to 52. So i looked at the backlinks of the ones ranking well on google with high page authority and found that many of their best links came from the internal search results page on etsy.com, and some only had one link from just an arbitrary etsy.com search page. I'm thinking this is because another product being listed on the seach page has a high page authority which then passes some of its link juice onto every other product on the page. But what is interesting is products are always being sold or getting added so even though you are on a search results page that happens to benifit from the link juice of another product the next time the page gets crawled you will be on a different search page. So i am thinking in order to maintain high page authority to you just have to have a lot of products listed so that there is a greater likely hood that you will find yourself on the same search page as another high authority page. I have not been doing SEO very long so i would love to hear what others think. I really have no idea, am i on the right track with this? (edited post) Thanks
Link Building | | doug5650