Canonicals in crawling reports
-
The crawling reports gives info about several meta data missing, what about the lack of a canonical tag? This would be nice too... and images without alt tag (or empty).
-
Thanks!
-
excellent points there CleaverPHD just to point our screaming frog is free up to a 500 URLs -great if you want to give it a go before a purchase
-
As Chris points out, if you do not have a canonical link, the crawl points that out. You may need to download the CSV file and open in excel to see what you want to see. There is a column titled "Rel Canonical" and if you have a FALSE response, there was no canonical found and TRUE for versa vice. I find the CSV much more more helpful than what is shown on the web page and PDF report. The new interface has the CSV link at the bottom left of the page and the PDF at the top right. It used to be both were top right (which makes more sense to me) and so it may be a little confusing if you were used to where things you to be.
Just for reference, the canonical tag is not required on a page, and in fact if you DO have one on a page you have to be careful with it. Google considers a canonical link as the same as a 301 redirect (without moving the user). So, if you had a canonical in place and it is pointed to the wrong page, this could have major negative consequences to your site. This is why there is a alert in your Moz crawl if you have a canonical link on a page due to the potential of it causing issues.
You may have the canonicals properly implemented for given pages, but Moz cannot detect if your canonical is achieving the end that you are setting out to accomplish.
Case in point for me. I use the canonical to self technique on a lot of pages to correct for some indexing issues on a site I manage. I get thousands of the "you have a canonical link on this page" alerts from Moz. I ignore them as I know that they are supposed to be there. What I have to do is to import the crawl into excel and then add a column with an EXACT function to make sure that the page url is matching the canonical url (i.e. the canonical link points to the page it sits on). (http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/excel-help/exact-function-HP010062564.aspx) If the EXACT function returns true, I know that my canonical to self links are implemented properly. This is a simple way that I use the CSV file from Moz as a canonical verification tool. If there are pages with canonicals that do not point to self, the EXACT function then shows false for those pages and gives me a short list to manually check from there.
Now that I think about it, I will put this suggestion into Moz as a way to make the canonical information in the crawl more useful. They could show FALSE if canonical is missing, TRUE if it is present and SELF if the canonical points to itself. Would at least be a bit more actionable.
As an aside, if you really want a better crawl report, I would use the Screaming Frog Spider tool
http://www.screamingfrog.co.uk/seo-spider/
It can also help you find all the other things you mention, it is not as user friendly as the Moz spider, but it has more options. You have to pay for it, but I would bet 99% of people would say the cost is worth it.
Cheers!
-
Hiya,
If a page doesn't have a canonical tag and it need's one it would be a duplicate page, Moz currently does point that out for you. The on page grader can help you with many of the alt tag problems too.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Site Crawl 1-page 301 status error but httpstatus.io says its 403
I am trying to run a site crawl for my website and MOZ is only resulting in 1 page crawled with the home page URL Status Code of 301. However when I run it in httpstatus.io it is giving me a 403 status error. Im curious as to why MOZ is saying its a 301 and httpstatus.io is saying 403. Is there anything I can do in MOZ first to get the site crawled before asking my developers to look into the 403 error?
Moz Bar | | JohnConover0 -
Site crawl only shows homepage
Hi everyone, A client of us has a quite new website with a lot of URLs. (Google Search Console indicates around 5300.) However, when I execute a site crawl with screaming frog, or a crawl test in MOZ, it only shows me one URL, the homepage. Does somebody have an idea why the other pages of the website are not showing up? Thanks,
Moz Bar | | WeAreDigital_BE
Jens0 -
I have recently switzed to SSL on ramxpert.dk, now Moz is not able to crawl the site anymore
Hi Moz I have recently switzed to SSL on ramxpert.dk, now Moz is not able to crawl anymore. When I look at the crawl report there is just one fault displayed: "403 : Received 403 (Forbidden) error response for page." How can i solve this issue asap? I was not aware that there would be any issues with moz when activating a SSL certificate on the site. The campaign with the problem is: ramxpert.dk. Regards
Moz Bar | | WebBoost
Jesper Nielsen0 -
Trying to duplicate Screaming Frog report
I am trying to use the crawl report to generate the Screaming Frog report shown below. I want to use it to calculate the internal page rank as Paul Shapiro outlined in this article. Google is not seeing my site the way I want them to and I want to work on the site heirarchy and structure. I am not seeing where: Type, Anchor, and Alt are listed in the crawl report - is it called something else? Is there another report I can run for the whole site to generate the data above? Does the Moz PA already calculate the internal PR of pages? Any additional resources or people that could help me with this? Thanks, SAM
Moz Bar | | SammyT0 -
How can I find duplicate pages from a Moz Crawl?
We have many duplicate pages that show up on the Moz Crawl, and we're trying to fix these but it's very difficult because I can't see a way to isolate the code where the duplicate is found. For instance, http://experiencemission.org/immersion/ is one of our main pages, and the crawl shows one duplicate of http://experiencemission.org/immersion. It appears that one of our staff manually edited the source code in one of our pages but forgot the trailing slash. This would be an easy fix but the problem is that this page is linked to internally on our website 2423 times, so it's next to impossible to find the code that is incorrect. We have many other pages with this same basic problem. We know we have duplicates, but it's next to impossible to isolate them. So my question is this: When viewing the Moz Crawl data is there any way to see where a specific duplicate page link is located on our website? Thanks for any and all help!
Moz Bar | | expmission0 -
Crawl Test Takes Long Time
Hi Moz, I have submitted our website for a crawl test. Usually it would only take a few hours to do the crawl. However this time, it takes quite long time and the result still shows in progress 😞 This is a small website which only contains less than 10 pages. Just wondering if this is our website setting issue or it is a technical issue at your end? Many thanks in advance. sFjAERG.png
Moz Bar | | russellbrown0 -
404 Crawl Diagnostics Report MOZ
Hi, I keep getting 404's appear in the Crawl Diagnostic error warnings. How do I find out which pages are linking to these 404 pages? How is MOZ finding them? thanks Ben
Moz Bar | | bjs20100 -
Moz reporting reliable?
I have been working with our MIS department on addressing our errors on duplicate content and titles caused by parameter URLs. MIS insists that they have solved the problem with canonical tags, which are in place. They said they were getting warnings from Google and Bing, but that after they put the canonical tags in place, those went away. They are questioning the Moz reports, suggesting that I instead rely on SEO Toolit by Microsoft. (As an aside, we are using SharePoint 2010, crossing our fingers for an upgrade to 2013, which presumably will make a lot of the issues we’re having go away). So my questions are: 1) Why are these Moz reports reporting all of these errors that have supposedly been rectified (in 2011)? Do I disregard the duplicate content/title errors on the Moz report and defer to SEO Toolkit, as MIS suggests?
Moz Bar | | SSFCU0