How many websites in Google Serps
-
Let say you are an electrician. You have a website in Google Serps
After much deliberation you realise that the current domain name is giving the wrong signals to your potential customers. So you decide to rebrand to a new domain name. The new domain will have fresh content (no duplication).
Question
Can you have both instances live in Google Serps and eventually retire the current website via a 301 redirect to the new domain.Thanks Mark
-
Hi Mark,
If there is zero relationship of data between the old site and the new one (such as you've described) you should likely be okay. Regarding blocking bots from crawling the new site until it is ready, this falls a bit outside my area. I expect you could set up the robots.txt file for this, but I recommend starting a new question on this topic to get expert advice from our technical SEO experts. You have to be sure to do this correctly to avoid problems. Hope this helps.
-
Hi Miriam,
Thank you for the advice.
I understand the consequences of Google seeing both live sites and same NAP information. I have a few additional question.
Additional Questions Is there a way to stop Google crawling the new work in development site?
If I do not associate the new work in development site with any NAP information, i.e, info on website, directories, Google Places, etc. will this still effect me?
Thanks Mark
-
Hi Mark,
It sounds like you've determined that re-branding is essential for your business. As we're talking about a local business, I'm going to recommend against having 2 live websites at the same time. Here's why. You local rankings depend on the consistency of your NAP+ W (name, address, phone + website). Should Google begin to see 2 URLs associated with your any part of your business data, they may lose trust in what they've gathered about your business and you may lose rankings because of this.
If you're going to re-brand, I recommend rolling it all out at once and then undertaking the major work of citation cleanup. If this isn't something you've previously handled, I strongly recommend that you consider hiring a professional outfit for this task to ensure that all possible mentions of your NAP have been brought into compliance with the new information. WhiteSpark is a good company for such work and I believe Moz members may get a discount for signing up with Whitespark's citation services.
Hope this opinion is helpful to you.
-
Hi Andy,
Thanks again for all you help. I agree more user input here is needed.
I welcome additional community users to contribute.
-
You are correct Mark, and this is where link networks come from.
However, I can't see any area of what you are trying to do as being a major issue but perhaps someone else who has been in just this situation would like to chip in? I personally would just go ahead and launch the new site, but as I can see a few differences in your situation and my own, perhaps a few precautions would be a good bet.
-Andy
-
Hi Andy,
My new site will be the daddy of all sites. It will provide feature rich content, an A-Z of information, and all things relevant.
My plans are to work towards being an authority and reference point in addition to provide a service.I would like to run both site together for about 6 months. My current old site will be my bread & butter.
Why 6 **Months?**Initially, like all new sites there will be no seo value. When customers send quote requests and ring, I would like to give them an opportunity to see the new site. This will be my way to see how effectively they are able to navigate, add or tweak relevant information, etc.
During the 6 months, customer experience will be key towards perfecting the site based on user site experience and human conversations.
Additionally, with social engagement via the new site, I will be able to gain backlinks from users sharing valuable feature rich content. Upon such time in the 6 month windows, should the new site overtake the old in SERPS then i will make the switch.
Make the Switch: 301 redirect my old site to the new site. Pass all things goods from the old to new.
Concerns I had read a while ago that having more than 1 site in SERPS within the same trading area is a violation of Google policy.
Put simply, anyone with seo knowledge or deep pockets can create untold websites to manipulate SERPS.Thanks Mark
-
I could have sworn I replied to this Mark. My apologies.
From what you say, this sounds like an ideal candidate for a rebrand and there is no problem with having both domains live. Neither is going to be duplicating the other so there will be no problem. As I said, I have 8 currently and Google pretty much loves them all. Unique content throughout.
How long are you thinking before retiring the old site? Will you be relying on that in the SERPs for the time being? You could always noindex the whole site if you wanted Google to stop using it but still be there for people when they land?
-Andy
-
Hi All,
I welcome more information on this subject.
Thanks Mark
-
Hi Andy,
No issues with content.
Current domain name does not represent size of company, portfolio of services or potential market. Rebranding would simply provide greater opportunities and customers.Thanks Mark
-
Hi Mark,
Can I ask if it is the domain name that is causing problems, or the content? Unless there is a real need to rebrand, I would look to explore other possibilities before jumping into a new domain - unless a rebrand is what you really want.
Edit- I forgot to add that there is no problem having a second site in Google either. I have 8 in total, because I use a single page design, and have no issues at all.
-Andy
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Website pages for different cities
HI, Is it ok to have pages on my website that are specifically targeted for one town? Does Google frown on this? is there any thing I should know about doing this, like, does it hurt my seo efforts in anyway? I would be making each page as resourceful as possible to the reader., by Including unique content etc Thanks in advance:)
Local SEO | | MissThumann0 -
Why does Intelligent Personal Assistant (IPA) gives different results than a Google search for a very similar or identical query?
My client Dr. Harris ranks #1 in SERPs and Local results for many terms, including "hair transplant surgeon Denver" However, when I did a voice search w Siri ""find me a hair transplant surgeon in Denver" Siri said she could find no results. A similar search for a clinic returned 2 competitors, but not my client. How do I ensure we are served up in voice queries? This surgeon deserves it, he invented most of the technology in use in the world today.
Local SEO | | CalamityJane770 -
Two websites, same business name, same NAP
Hi, A client of mine offers loft conversions and wants to make a go of it. So he has a website dedicated to loft conversions. He is also a joiner/carpenter and has another old website which offers general joinery work and insurance work. Both websites have the same business name and same address and phone number. There is only one Google place page for the loft conversions website. The loft conversions website is not ranking as well as we would like locally. Could it be due to the same NAP? What are the best options? Redirect the old website to the loft conversions one (he might not like that idea) Change the address and phone number on one website?(and all subsequent citations?) Would love some help on this!
Local SEO | | AL123al0 -
Google's Geo Search Setting Gone Cuckoo!
Hey Everybody! I thought I'd post about this because pretty much all of our members who do Local SEO are bound to run into this. Last week, when I was in the middle of training someone, I ran into something bizarre. Using Google's search settings to set my location to a remote locale, the local packs were returning me results for the correct city, but the organic results accompanying the pack were showing me results that appeared to be based on my own IP address instead ... in other words, Google was overriding my designated geolocation in favor of where it knows I'm actually located. I was relieved to see Mike Blumenthal post on this (helped me realize I wasn't going crazy - haha) and I recommend that everyone who does Local for a living take a look: http://blumenthals.com/blog/2015/05/24/google-location-results-still-screwy/ I also recommend checking out this G+ convo going on between John Mueller and others: https://plus.google.com/u/0/+TerrySimmonds/posts/1BZ6guvy9mE John's initial thought was that nothing has changed ... but something has definitely changed. Do some of your own searches and see what you come up with. Main takeaway here is that if you are trying to approximate clients' rankings in cities not your own, the results you are seeing may be very weird right now. Not sure if this is a temporary glitch or the forerunner to some change coming our way. This is a story to stay on top of, for sure. What do you you all see?
Local SEO | | Moz.HelpTeam0 -
Has anyone any experience of Google pulling through random meta descriptions.
If you search "venn digital" then the correct meta description is pulled through, but if you search "venndigital" then it pulls through our twitter feed from the bottom of the page. My only suggestion is that it is doing it because there is no mention of " Venn Digital" in the body of the copy, so it is going to the twitter feed at the bottom of the page where Venn Digital is mentioned to pull this info through.
Local SEO | | AndrewAkesson0 -
Dynamic websites & SEO
Hello Mozzers, I would love some advise from some seasoned SEO people PLEASE. The company I work for are replacing their static website for a new dynamic website which affectedly serves blocks of generic content based on the users activity. Currently we rank really well, especially for local long tail terms - however I am very unsure and apprehensive as to how this new approach will affect our rankings. Can Google index content pulled together on the "fly"? Can anyone recommend an article, website, white paper - explaining how to limit the change to SEO? Kind regards Ben
Local SEO | | Bendall0 -
Google's rel=publisher tag question
Hi, i have a question about the use of rel=publisher tag on a large retail website with multiple local stores. There is 1 e-commerce website where i want to put the rel publisher tag from the main Google + businesspage. There are also 60 local google+businesspages, And on the main website every store has his own store-page. Is it good to put on all the 60 storepages their own rel=publishertag connected with the localbusinesspages on google? Or should i Stick at the main rel=publisher tag connected with the main google+page? Thanx, Leonie
Local SEO | | Leonie-Kramer0 -
Content Across International Websites
I am wondering if anyone could clear up some questions I have regarding international SEO and how to treat the content placed on there. I have recently launched several websites for a product internationally, each with the correct country domain name etc and I have also followed the guidelines provided by webmaster tools on internationalisation. All the websites are targeted towards English speaking countries and I have rewritten most of the of the content on there to suite the English style of the targeted country. This is being said however I am finding mixed bags of information on what to do in treating large chunks of potential duplicate content. For example my main .com website which has been running several years (and is targeted to the UK) has a lot of well written articles on there which are popular with the visitors. I am needing to find out if duplicating these articles onto the international versions of the websites, without rewriting them, would have a detrimental effect on SEO between all the sites. I have done a site search for each domain name to see if they are cropping up in other local Google versions (e.g .ca site in Google.com.au etc) and they are not. Does this mean Google is localised to its results regarding duplicate content or is it treated at the root level? Any information to point me in the right direction would be a big help.
Local SEO | | Rj-Media0