Keyword rich internal linking - problem?
-
Had an interesting situation today..
We write daily news articles on our site. In each article we link out to two sources that we are writing about (credible sources) and we do one or two internal links.
For example..
'Today McDonald's have announced that they are purchasing more blue widgets in order to increase their opportunity to appeal to a larger market.'
So in that sentence you can see one outbound link and one inbound to blue widgets on our site.
I got an email today from a large company who we have written an article about in the industry and they have asked me to remove the link to their site..
I actually asked them why and this was their response.
'We're concerned because of the number of keyword-rich internal links in the article, and are worried that being included alongside them might be misinterpreted by Google as an artificial link.'
Fristly, do they really have anything to be worried about?.. but more importantly, with our internal linking, do we have anything to be worried about?.
-
On the subject of articles and pages that list headings of articles.. any idea on minimum text needed before something is regarded as 'thin content'?
I have a site with pages like that and was producing to thirty to forty pages per week (news items). I had thousands of those pages and would delete old ones about once a year. That site got hit in one of the first Pandas. I noindexed those pages right away and the site recovered within a few weeks. Now I continue doing the same. The anchor text is two to six words that are perfectly descriptive of the content or something snarky. Since the pages are not indexed I don't think that they are a problem.
I have had some slight panda problems that I think was caused by some pages that I added to a site almost ten years ago. It was a lot of photos with two to three sentence descriptions. So, I noindexed them and will beef all of them up to a couple hundred words and the really good ones up to 1000 word articles with several photos. But, I think that a couple hundred words would be adequate - but nobody knows for sure.
-
Thanks EGOL - You have been answering my questions since 2006 on SEOchat so appreciate you know your stuff on articles/blogs etc.
Nobody is paying us for links, there is no dodgy reciprocal or paid arrangement at all. We are writing news articles and linking out to relevant sources for that article (about 50% relevant to our industry, but 100% related to the article)
I think your point about the 2 and 2 is a valid point. Its a long job as our articles go back to 2007
On the subject of articles and pages that list headings of articles.. any idea on minimum text needed before something is regarded as 'thin content'?
-
In each article we link out to two sources that we are writing about (credible sources) and we do one or two internal links.
This sounds kinda systematic. If anybody is payin' you then you could have a problem. If nobody is payin or doing any favors back then just stop linking to these other sites. You don't have to. Or, if you worry about it then nofollow the links.
I got an email today from a large company who we have written an article about in the industry and they have asked me to remove the link to their site.
Did you write the article without them asking you or paying you? If that is the case then just take the link down.
If you are publishing articles for others with links to them on request, for a fee, or as an article exchange then there could be a problem.
Fristly, do they really have anything to be worried about?..
If nobody is payin' or doin' favors then there is probably not a problem. But get out of the habit of linking to two internal and two external...two internal and two external...two internal and two external...two internal and two external...two internal and two external...two internal and two external...
See what it looks like?
but more importantly, with our internal linking, do we have anything to be worried about?.
Look at wikipedia. On my site, I do the same thing. If I have relevant article about widgets I link to it in the text of the article.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Rel=canonical and internal links
Hi Mozzers, I was musing about rel=canonical this morning and it occurred to me that I didnt have a good answer to the following question: How does applying a rel=canonical on page A referencing page B as the canonical version affect the treatment of the links on page A? I am thinking of whether those links would get counted twice, or in the case of ver-near-duplicates which may have an extra sentence which includes an extra link, whther that extra link would count towards the internal link graph or not. I suspect that google would basically ignore all the content on page A and only look to page B taking into account only page Bs links. Any thoughts? Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | unirmk0 -
H1 tags and keywords for subpages, is it best practice to reuse the keywords?
So let's say I have a parent page for shoes, and I have subpages for dress shoes, work shoes, play shoes, then inside each of those pages I have dress shoe cleaning, dress shoe repair, same for work and play shoes. Would it be ok to use h1 tags like this: Shoes > Dress Shoes > Dress Shoe Cleaning Dress Shoe Repair Work Shoes > Work Shoe Cleaning Work Shoe Repair Play Shoes > Play Shoe Cleaning Play Shoe Repair Would these be considered duplicate h1 tags since cleaning and repair are used for each subpage? In certain niche companies, it's rather difficult to use synonyms for keywords. Or is it ok to just keep things simple and use Shoes > Dress Shoes > Cleaning and so on? Especially since we have urls and breadcrumbs that are structured nicely using keywords, for this example both breadcrumbs and urls read like sitename.com/shoes/dress-shoes/cleaning. Any advice?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Deacyde0 -
Lower quality new domain link vs higher quality repeat domain link
First time poster here with a dilemma that head scratching and spreadsheets can't solve! I'm trying to work out whether to focus on getting links from new domains or to nurture relationships with the bigger sites in our business and get more links. Of the two links below which does the community here think would be more valuable a signal to Google? Both would be links from within relevant text/post copy. Link 1. Site DA 30. No links currently from this domain. Link 2. Site DA 60. Many links over last 12 months already from this domain. I suspect link 1 but given the enormous disparity in ranking power am I correct?! Thanks for any considered opinions out there! Matthew
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | mat20150 -
International SEO Question
_The company I work for has a website www.example.com that ranks very well in English speaking countries - US, UK, CA. For legal reasons, we now need to create www.example.co.uk to be accessible and rank in google.co.uk. Obviously we want this change to be as smooth as possible with little effect on rankings in the UK. We have two options that we're talking through at the moment - Use the hreflang tag on both the .com and the .co.uk to tell Google which site to rank in each country. My worry with this is that we might lose our rankings in the UK as it will be a brand new site with little to no links pointing to it. 301 redirect to the .co.uk based on UK IP addresses. I'm skeptical about this. As a 301 passes most of the link juice, I'm not sure how Google would treat this type of thing - would the .com lose ranking? So my questions are - would we lose ranking in the UK if we use option 1? Would option 2 work? What would you do? Any help is appreciated._
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | awestwood0 -
Unpaid Followed Links & Canonical Links from Syndicated Content
I have a user of our syndicated content linking to our detailed source content. The content is being used across a set of related sites and driving good quality traffic. The issue is how they link and what it looks like. We have tens of thousands of new links showing up from more than a dozen domains, hundreds of sub-domains, but all coming from the same IP. The growth rate is exponential. The implementation was supposed to have canonical tags so Google could properly interpret the owner and not have duplicate syndicated content potentially outranking the source. The canonical are links are missing and the links to us are followed. While the links are not paid for, it looks bad to me. I have asked the vendor to no-follow the links and implement the agreed upon canonical tag. We have no warnings from Google, but I want to head that off and do the right thing. Is this the right approach? What would do and what would you you do while waiting on the site owner to make the fixes to reduce the possibility of penguin/google concerns? Blair
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BlairKuhnen0 -
Are footer links important?
We currently display a list of links in the footer of our site to help boost SEO. They were put in place years ago and in a recent discuss with our UX team they requested we remove them from the site. Do footer links have any value? Or is this an old dated practice that no longer works? If we remove the footer links should we expect to see if have an impact on our SEO traffic?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Mivito0 -
How should i best structure my internal links?
I am new to SEO and looking to employ a logical but effective internal link strategy. Any easy ways to keep track of what page links to what page? I am a little confused regarding anchor text in as much as how I should use this. e.g. for a category page "Towels", I was going to link this to another page we want to build PA for such as "Bath Sheets". What should I put in for anchor text? keep it simple and just put "Bath Sheets" or make it more direct like "Buy Bath Sheets". Should I also vary anchor text if i have another 10 pages internally linking to this or keep it the same. Any advise would be really helpful. Thanks Craig
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Towelsrus0 -
Link anchor text: only useful for pages linked to directly or distributed across site?
As a SEO I understand that link anchor text for the focus keyword on the page linked to is very important, but I have a question which I can not find the answer to in any books or blogs, namely: does inbound anchor text 'carry over' to other pages in your site, like linkjuice? For instance, if I have a homepage focusing on keyword X and a subpage (with internal links to it) focusing on keyword Y. Does is then help to link to the homepage with keyword Y anchor texts? Will this keyword thematically 'flow through' the internal link structure and help the subpage's ranking? In a broader sense: will a diverse link anchor text profile to your homepage help all other pages in your domain rank thematically? Or is link anchor text just useful for the direct page that is linked to? All views and experiences are welcome! Kind regards, Joost van Vught
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | JoostvanVught0