One company - 2 websites
-
One of our clients decided to launch a 2nd website to market specific products and services that they provide. The trouble is, they have the same address, phone number and have a similar name. Whilst we have had some success and both websites are on page 1 for their primary keywords, I have a bad feeling that they may have hit a glass ceiling.
Does anyone have any suggestions on how to perform local SEO?
-
My firm uses several websites. When I first came in house there were a lot of sites, but I took them down because of the content quality at the time. I am slowly building them back up. I find that specific area websites can be very useful for pointing ads or specific campaigns, since many people want to know just about X concept I am very careful not to reproduce content and not to try to hide that the sites are owned by the same company.
I hesitated to bring the sites back up until I got some confirmation from Matt Cutts that having more than one site is fine, as long as you follow good content and other SEO standards. http://www.brafton.com/news/cutts-on-similar-website-content-multiple-domains-duplicate-or-safe
I link between the sites, but in an organic way. I.e. if I have an article on one site that naturally links to another site, I link it. I also don't have a huge number of sites and don't expect to do so.
-
I agree with what you are saying. The issue is that Google still ranks keyword driven domains, and secondary sites very high in their searches. We personally don't engage in the practice, but it is very frustrating to see these types of actions happening when they clearly are against it, and put webmaster articles out saying it's bad.
Most of the secondary sites are created for this reason, to gain a higher rank, with less effort. Local businesses tend to "gain" the most from this, as domain names are usually available for yourcityandservicekeyword.com
I don't think it is a wise long term strategy, but anyone who denies that it still works, and often, is kidding themselves. Not being negative, just trying to voice an opinion. Most of the seos set these type of sites up due to a low budget amount from the client. Trying to create a real seo plan and create ongoing dynamic content is almost impossible for a $300-400 client. The seo knows they can register a keyword-driven domain, and after creating a ton of citations, most likely come out on top (especially since the backlinks coming from these will be an exact match for the keyword they want to rank for.) The clients see this as great, because they get an influx of new leads, but don't understand the damage they do to their brand, or the long term risks involved in a future update.
Don't get me wrong, lol. I'm not arguing with anything you said, and I agree with the items you referenced and quoted 100%. But Google, despite their public perception and webmaster quotes, is not perfect. There is a chance he could get both sites to rank, and rank well. Not with how they are currently set up, but with a lot of work separating the content, and changing one to brand focus and the other to keyword focus, it could work.
Still wouldn't do it tho. She is right. Spend the effort on the main domain you want to rank. You would most likely spend just as much time trying to get both to rank as you would getting one killer site in place, but not have the future risk of a penalty.
-
Hi Mark,
I think you're right to be concerned. The mutli-site approach is one I pretty much never recommend to local business owners. Google's own John Mueller has clearly stated that Google prefers the single site approach (see: http://www.seroundtable.com/google-one-site-locations-15454.html). As far as Google's rules go, it's not permitted to create a second local listing for a set of products a company vends. That's striclty forbidden, in fact (see: https://support.google.com/places/answer/107528?hl=en).
I've had business owners come to me in this situation and I've had to take a hard line with them and leave it up to them to take my advice or not. I tell them that they are a single company and should be running a single website backed up with a single set of citations for the business (unless they have more than one physical location, in which case, they can build out separate citations for each location). Ideally, the client should:
-
Consolidate his sites into a single site
-
Redirect his old URLs to the authoritative one
-
Clean up any citations that have been built as though this were 2 companies instead of one.
Alternatives:
-
The client can found a new business if his products are different enough to merit the effort of doing so. The new business would need a unique name, address and phone number.
-
If he insists on keeping the second site, all NAP (name, address, phone) should be removed from it as well as all references/links to the main site. He could run a blog on it or something about his industry, but he should not attempt to rank locally with this second site in any way. Content should not be duplicated in any way between the two sites. Once you start explaining this to the client, he may say, "Well then what is the point of the second site, if I can't try to promote it as though it were a second business?" That can be a sort of 'bingo' moment that can help you to help him see that he should really think hard about consolidating.
What I've found over the years is that business owners sometimes take this multi-site approach because they feel it will make them look bigger to Google and help them diversify their rankings. In point of fact, in the local business sphere, it only hampers them. Google wants an accurate representation of the business with a single, consistent set of NAP and a clear, authoritative website. This way, everything the business does goes towards strengthening their brand. The stronger their brand becomes, the easier it will be for them to rank for their various products.
Hope these thoughts are helpful. I'm wishing you luck discussing this with the client. I know it's not always easy:)
-
-
Thanks for the reply. The problem is that it is a local business and looking to rank well for local results.
1. Too late, the domains are pretty close to each other.
2. The content is unique on both websites, but some of the categories and product names are similar
3. Both sites need to rank well for local searches. Using this advice means that the 2nd website will not be able to perform well locally. Am I right in saying that the websites can not effectively co-exist with the same details?
As I say, both websites are on page 1 for their primary keywords but are struggling to get near the top of the page. Is there anything I can do or will Google always treat them as duplicates and hold them back?
-
Here is a few things to watch for with this:
1. Domain name are not closely related
2. Each site has its own unique content. DO NOT have matching pages on each, as Google doesnt take to kindly to that. Even if they don't penalize, they will index the newer version, and the older will be very difficult to get to recover.
3. Link to the local listing only off of one site. I think you will be ok displaying the address on both sites, but get creative with it. Instead of displaying live text, have the address and phone be a jpeg or png. That way, it will not be "crawlable". This isnt the most...legit way of doing it, but if you need to display it on both sites, it will work without fail. This will allow your vistors to see the contact info, and avoid an issue with Google.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google My Business: Company listing is showing in search instead of division address - similar names/same city
Hi! I have a client whose company name is very similar to one if their company divisions. This division has multiple locations but its main location is in the same city as the parent company. The problem is that when you search for the division, the parent company shows up. The parent company has a physical address, but most users searching need to be going to the division address which takes customers. They are having problems with customers coming to the parent company address instead. I have made the Google My Business parent company page to show service areas instead of their business address. Yet, their listing still comes up first when searching for the division location. This is because of part of the parent company name is in the division name. My client wants users to be able to find the division more so than the parent company. Anyone had this issue before? Any tips would be great!
Local Listings | | agrier0 -
Is having two websites with the same NAP equal to the local search visibility issues?
My company works in two directions: printing and website design / development. I have one website for both printing and website development but it doesn’t have “printing” in domain name (velvdesign.com) I would like to rank higher for printing related keywords. Do you think I should have two separate websites, one for printing (velvprinting.com), another for website design /development (velvdesign.com)? If yes, am I going to get into NAP’s issue because my company has only one location? I can get the second phone number to improve local search visibility. Thank you very much in advance for your time!
Local Listings | | VELV0 -
Can having a google business listing harm a company selling services globally?
Hi, We are a SAAS platform offering cloud based solution for educators. We had a google business listing in India and recently added one for US as well. Our keywords rank significantly better in India than in US. Is it a good idea to remove these business listing? Also, what could be other factors that impact GEO SEO rankings for a online company like ours?
Local Listings | | WizIQMarketing0 -
Bad Google Reviews - Should I Remove the Map From My Website?
I have a Google map on a website. Currently, there are only two 1-star reviews — which show next to the company name on the map. We added the map for local SEO reasons, but I’m thinking I should take it down because customer experience supersedes local SEO. Why boost search rankings if the content will drive people away from converting? So basically, customer experience > local SEO. Question: Do you all agree, or do any of you have any evidence that I should leave it? For example, it’s below the fold, so it isn’t the first thing they see, and we really need to boost their local SEO.
Local Listings | | BlueCorona1 -
Local SEO Tasks When Closing One Branch of Multilocation Business
I would appreciate the opinions of my fellow SEOs on this one. I haven’t seen any other threads on this exact subject and others that touch on it are somewhat older so I am hoping this also proves to be a good resource for others going forward. I have an existing client that I did local SEO for about a year ago. They are a propane service provider and they had multiple locations. So we did local SEO for the company primarily by updating NAPs and creating more individual content for each of the branches such as specific landing page for each branch on their website and individual listings in citations for each branch. Now they have sold one of the branches to a competitor and they need to remove all listings for it. I am trying to develop a comprehensive list of actions to take and I would appreciate any feedback on the best way to go about accomplishing this task. Here is what I have so far: Remove all mention of sold branch on client website, including specific landing page Delete any branch-specific social media accounts Some specific areas I have questions about are: What do I do with Google My Business listings for the sold branch? Do I try to delete/unregister/close them? Or should I just leave them be with an updated link to our website homepage? Should I even bother contacting the main NAP listing sites to remove the old listing or just leave it to fall off on its own? Thank you again for all your help!
Local Listings | | Ayres-SEO0 -
How to tell Google My Business what area is local to my company?
Hello Mozers I've been stumped by the changes in the interface with Google My Business. I used to be able to set up the area for which I wanted a business to cover. Now I can't find anyway to tell Google. The company I work for is in St Albans and our main workload is London. It would be helpful if I could actually control what Google Local sees as Local for my company, i.e. to encompass central London which is only 19 miles away. Can someone give me an idiots guide has to how to tell Google the area I'd like our local listing to cover? Thanks
Local Listings | | Catherine_Selectaglaze0 -
1 company, 2 shop locations, 3 Google+ pages - help!
Hello, I work for a furniture retailer and I'm doing an audit of our digital presence and need a hand with our G+ pages. Thanks for reading! We are one company but with two shops, located about 10 miles apart. One shop has been established over 10 years, the other is roughly a year old. The shops are called: 'Our Company' and 'Our Company, Second Location' Each shop has its own website (which is confusing and we'll hopefully shortly revert back to just one) We currently have three Google+ profiles: the first G+ was set up a number of years ago and was set up as a personal page, not a business and it links to both shop's websites. The other two G+ pages appear to have been created when we created a Google Local listing for each shop. My questions are: What is the best tool to handle all this info across the web? Bright Local looks good. Should I junk the original G+ profile? If I do, how will I know I won't remove any important stuff from Google? Should I keep 2 G+ profiles, one for each store or have 1 G+ profile and put both store's details in there. Or should I have 3 G+ profiles: 1 for our company name, and 1 for each of our 2 locations? When I search for 'Our Company', I only ever get our original company to show in the Google Local listing on the right hand side of search results. Our second shop is shown in 'People also search for'. Is this the best I can hope for? Is there any way to control this? Both of the G+ profiles that are linked to our Google Local listings have the original G+ URL. Should I customise this and if so, are there any naming conventions I should follow? What should we do with the (2?) G+ profiles for each shop? Both have currently got no content on them. Thanks in advance for any tips and advice.
Local Listings | | Bee1590 -
Google Local: When moving locations, is a new website/content needed?
I've effectively moved companies before, but I've heard that ranking locally in a competitive market after an address move it is necessary to redesign the entire website/content/domain as Google associates the old website/content/domain with the old location. Is this true? Does anyone have any direct experience with this? NOTE- I have updated citations across the internet and have regular social signals going to the new location, and this has been the case for almost 6 months now.
Local Listings | | mgordon0