Database driven content producing false duplicate content errors
-
How do I stop the Moz crawler from creating false duplicate content errors. I have yet to submit my website to google crawler because I am waiting to fix all my site optimization issues.
Example: contactus.aspx?propid=200, contactus.aspx?propid=201.... these are the same pages but with some old url parameters stuck on them. How do I get Moz and Google not to consider these duplicates. I have looked at http://moz.com/learn/seo/duplicate-content with respect to
Rel="canonical"
and I think I am just confused.
Nick
-
All of you guys rock! I have never been involved in a community that has had the right answers every time... I used the on all my static pages such as directions, policies, contact, etc... and it removed all the parameters thereby eliminating them from standing out in the MOZ crawl.. I feel like and idiot not knowing about this HTML tag and its importance. My moz crawl now looks so so much better.
When I mean old url parameters, I just meant a few seconds old, meaning the user is on property.aspx?property=1 then when they moved to a static page such as contact, directions, policy we now have another page called contact.aspx?property=1 which if I have 150 properties times 10 static pages I basically just created 150 duplicate content errors just for the contact page alone. Because contact.aspx?property=1 or contact.aspx?property=150 and in between are all the same page... I am sure this has killed my SEO. SO THAT PROBLEM IS NOW FIXED!!
NOW to revisit what zenstorageunits says about URL rewriting which has many different ways to do it using .net, but Miketek I would not have to create subdirectories because it is done in the code... they are more like virtual directories...
zenstorageunits or anyone else for that matter, Is it worth it for me to hire somebody to create a URL rewrite app that can change the following;
http:/www.destinationbigbear.com/property_detail.aspx?propid=202 to
http://www.destinationbigbear.com/big-bear-cabin-rentals/a-true-cabin/details
and
http:/www.destinationbigbear.com/property_photos.aspx?propid=202 to
http://www.destinationbigbear.com/big-bear-cabin-rentals/a-true-cabin/photos
See everyone of my 150 cabins has these pages; info, photos, calendar, video, reviews, rates...and they all have unique cabin names... so it is basically 150 cabins x 6 pages = 900 unique pages with unique content but really only 6 pages dynamically being changed by 150 cabins.
I have been able to dynamically change all the page titles for everyone of these 900 database driven pages such as
Big-Bear-Cabin | A True Cabin Photos or Big-Bear-Cabin | A True Cabin Calendar and so on.
-
Hi Nick,
I think you've gotten some good tips here - I'd agree with Prestashop that the preferred solution would be to find where these parameters are being included in links to this page and remove them.
Failing that, zenstorageunits's advice to use rel="canonical" would be my recommendation - or a 301 redirect from the URLs that include parameters back to the core URL would work.
I wouldn't convert these parameters to subdirectories unless they are integral to the way your site works and pull up unique content - you called them "old parameters" so it sounds like they're not supposed to be there, so probably not a case where you'd want to convert these parameters to subdirectories.
Failing the above, you could utilize the Google Webmaster Tools "URL Parameters" interface to tell Googlebot to ignore these parameters.
Overall, your best course of action is to find and remove the links that include the parameters.
I'd also add that the Moz crawl report is highly sensitive to "duplicate content," and I often find it flags up issues has high/medium priority that are not actually going to have a significant impact on the site. You have to take the crawl report with a grain of salt - while duplicate content can be a serious issue for some sites (ecommerce retailers for example with duplication issues across a wide catalog of products), in most cases it has minimal impact and isn't something I'd hold up your site launch for.
Best of Luck,
Mike -
I agree zenstorageunits about using rel=canonical but one thing I would like to point out is that Moz does not create false errors. It is a simple crawler, not like google. Google will actually try to follow links that people have used before and that show up in your analytics files. moz uses no logic like that, it just jumps from page to page. If it is picking up a page with a query string like that then it is a link on your site. I would find the links and take them off.
-
You have a few options you could do. One thing I would look into is maybe doing some url rewriting to change
contactus.aspx?propid=200
to
contactus/propid/200
look at http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms972974.aspx on how to do that for IIS.
A better option I think if you need to keep the parameters the way they are is to use the rel canocial tag look at moz article
http://moz.com/blog/rel-confused-answers-to-your-rel-canonical-questions
but basicly you would need to add something like this to your contact.aspx page(replace example.com with your website url)
This suggest to the website crawler, like google or moz crawler, that those pages should be assoicated with the contact.aspx page.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Email and landing page duplicate content issue?
Hi Mozers, my question is, if there is a web based email that goes to subscribers, then if they click on a link it lands on a Wordpress page with very similar content, will Google penalize us for duplicate content? If so is the best workaround to make the email no index no follow? Thanks!
Technical SEO | | CalamityJane770 -
GWT Duplicate Content and Canonical Tag - Annoying
Hello everyone! I run an e-commerce site and I had some problems with duplicate meta descriptions for product pages. I implemented the rel=canonical in order to address this problem, but after more than a week the number of errors showing in google webmaster tools hasn't changed and the site has been crawled already three times since I put the rel canonical. I didn't change any description as each error regards a set of pages that are identical, same products, same descriptions just different length/colour. I am pretty sure the rel=canonical has been implemented correctly so I can't understand why I still have these errors coming up. Any suggestions? Cheers
Technical SEO | | PremioOscar0 -
Development Website Duplicate Content Issue
Hi, We launched a client's website around 7th January 2013 (http://rollerbannerscheap.co.uk), we originally constructed the website on a development domain (http://dev.rollerbannerscheap.co.uk) which was active for around 6-8 months (the dev site was unblocked from search engines for the first 3-4 months, but then blocked again) before we migrated dev --> live. In late Jan 2013 changed the robots.txt file to allow search engines to index the website. A week later I accidentally logged into the DEV website and also changed the robots.txt file to allow the search engines to index it. This obviously caused a duplicate content issue as both sites were identical. I realised what I had done a couple of days later and blocked the dev site from the search engines with the robots.txt file. Most of the pages from the dev site had been de-indexed from Google apart from 3, the home page (dev.rollerbannerscheap.co.uk, and two blog pages). The live site has 184 pages indexed in Google. So I thought the last 3 dev pages would disappear after a few weeks. I checked back late February and the 3 dev site pages were still indexed in Google. I decided to 301 redirect the dev site to the live site to tell Google to rank the live site and to ignore the dev site content. I also checked the robots.txt file on the dev site and this was blocking search engines too. But still the dev site is being found in Google wherever the live site should be found. When I do find the dev site in Google it displays this; Roller Banners Cheap » admin dev.rollerbannerscheap.co.uk/ A description for this result is not available because of this site's robots.txt – learn more. This is really affecting our clients SEO plan and we can't seem to remove the dev site or rank the live site in Google. In GWT I have tried to remove the sub domain. When I visit remove URLs, I enter dev.rollerbannerscheap.co.uk but then it displays the URL as http://www.rollerbannerscheap.co.uk/dev.rollerbannerscheap.co.uk. I want to remove a sub domain not a page. Can anyone help please?
Technical SEO | | SO_UK0 -
Advice on Duplicate Page Content
We have many pages on our website and they all have the same template (we use a CMS) and at the code level, they are 90% the same. But the page content, title, meta description, and image used are different for all of them. For example - http://www.jumpstart.com/common/find-easter-eggs
Technical SEO | | jsmoz
http://www.jumpstart.com/common/recognize-the-rs We have many such pages. Does Google look at them all as duplicate page content? If yes, how do we deal with this?0 -
Duplicate Content for Multiple Instances of the Same Product?
Hi again! We're set to launch a new inventory-based site for a chain of car dealers with various locations across the midwest. Here's our issue: The different branches have overlap in the products that they sell, and each branch is adamant that their inventory comes up uniquely in site search. We don't want the site to get penalized for duplicate content; however, we don't want to implement a link rel=canonical because each product should carry the same weight in search. We've talked about having a basic URL for these product descriptions, and each instance of the inventory would be canonicalized to this main product, but it doesn't really make sense for the site structure to do this. Do you have any tips on how to ensure that these products (same description, new product from manufacturer) won't be penalized as duplicate content?
Technical SEO | | newwhy0 -
Duplicate content with same URL?
SEOmoz is saying that I have duplicate content on: http://www.XXXX.com/content.asp?ID=ID http://www.XXXX.com/CONTENT.ASP?ID=ID The only difference I see in the URL is that the "content.asp" is capitalized in the second URL. Should I be worried about this or is this an issue with the SEOmoz crawl? Thanks for any help. Mike
Technical SEO | | Mike.Goracke0 -
Duplicate content
I have just ran a report in seomoz on my domain and has noticed that there are duplicate content issues, the issues are: www.domainname/directory-name/ www.domainname/directory-name/index.php All my internal links and external links point to the first domain, as i prefer this style as it looks clear & concise, however doing this has created duplicate content as within the site itself i have an index.php page inside this /directory-name/ to show the page. Could anyone give me some advice on what i should do please? Kind Regards
Technical SEO | | Paul780 -
Are recipes excluded from duplicate content?
Does anyone know how recipes are treated by search engines? For example, I know press releases are expected to have lots of duplicates out there so they aren't penalized. Does anyone know if recipes are treated the same way. For example, if you Google "three cheese beef pasta shells" you get the first two results with identical content.
Technical SEO | | RiseSEO0