Should I remove 'local' landing pages? Could these be the cause of traffic drop (duplicate content)?
-
I have a site that has most of it's traffic from reasonably competitive keywords each with their own landing page. In order to gain more traffic I also created landing pages for counties in the UK and then towns within each county. Each county has around 12 towns landing pages within the county. This has meant I've added around 200 extra pages to my site in order to try and generate more traffic from long tail keywords.
I think this may have caused an issue in that it's impossible for me to create unique content for each town/country and therefore I took a 'shortcut' buy creating unique content for each county and used the same content for the towns within it meaning I have lots of pages with the same content just slightly different page titles with a variation on town name. I've duplicated this over about 15 counties meaning I have around 200 pages with only about 15 actual unique pages within them.
I think this may actually be harming my site. These pages have been indexed for about a year an I noticed about 6 months ago a drop in traffic by about 50%. Having looked at my analytics this town and county pages actually only account for about 10% of traffic.
My question is should I remove these pages and by doing so should I expect an increase in traffic again?
-
Yea I found a folder and in it was not just the towns from that county but folders for each county which were also up a folder level (where they should be). I don't use PPC for the Top 10 site listed in my profile. I use it for the site I've had the issue with here (a separate site not listed in my my profile). It's a white label site but I'm struggling to make the PPC profitable to be honest. Any tips appreciated!
-
Typically, I counsel moving slowly on changes rather than quickly. With that, I would remove the duplication you mention and then watch it for a while. Then begin removing the duped pages county/city.
Now, when you say a subdirectory on your server which duplicated the whole site, I will assume you are clear that is what you were doing. I suggest being sure that was what was happening. Also, I still recommend checking the links given the timing and severity of the drop you saw. You did not see a Panda type drop over time. You saw a dramatic drop at a fixed point.
As to the PPC, the question was different. I know a lot about the dating vertical as I did lead brokerage years ago in that industry when there were a lot more players. My concern, given the top ten variety of site, was that if you are doing any markets where your client is also doing PPC, you risk getting your entire site in a ton of trouble. I sensed you might not be as seasoned as some others and it can be a real problem to recover from.
LMK if I can assist.
Robert
-
I do use PPC but no index my PPC pages.
-
Thanks Robert. I've just found out to my horror whilst browsing files on my server that within one off my subdirectory folders was an entire copy of my site meaning every single page was duplicated! I'm not a pro web designer/SEO and looks like I've made an expensive mistake!
I definitely need to remove the folder I've found which duplicated the entire site but do you think I should also remove the county/town pages as a precaution or leave them and hope it was the error I've just found that was causing the problem?
-
SamCUK
You are harming your site (who knows how much) and given your topic I do not think you are going to get as laser like (longtail is a laser) as you want. The first question when I see "landing pages" is are you also doing PPC using this technique? If your drop was in and around October of 2013 (8 months) it is more likely the drop is due to links (penguin) especially given the timing and severity.
As to your question on will traffic return if you remove the pages, there is no answer available other than trying it. If you are concerned, pick out some of the pages with known traffic loss and return to where you were before with 20 or 30% of them. Check it over 30, 60, and 90 days. But, also check your link profile.
Best,
-
Yeah unfortunately there is no easy answer to this :o(. If there is no traffic then 404 would be cool. But if you have a few winners in the lot then I would build those out (build a new unique page and create rich content) and 301 them.
-
Thanks for your reply. I don't have the time to write significantly different content for these pages and I don't think the amount of traffic available for these long tail keywords warrants it. (I was just after an easy win which clear doesn't exist!) If I remove these pages perhaps it will give a boost to my main pages as any penalty should be removed by the algorithm? Would you agree? I could probably make up the 10% loss in traffic I'd get by removing the pages by at the same time receiving a traffic boost to my main pages due to any penalty being removed.
Should I 301 all the pages if I remove them? If so where to as I understand redirecting to the home page is not the best thing to do? There are very few links pointing to these pages so should I just let them 404? Won't they eventually be removed from the index?
-
Yea I have seen this before. You need to put some more work into describing each page to distinguish a difference to search engines. If a bulk of the pages on your site have the same basic content it could cause trouble. At a minimum your Counties should be very different from the sub city pages. Also if nobody is really searching for the Counties and Your Service I would eliminate that page. Also if you change anything don't forget your 301's.
-
Hi,
No the text is identical for each town within a county so 'Lincolnshire' and all the towns within it have the same text (except for the town name) but another county such as 'Suffolk' will have completely different text (however the towns within Suffolk all share the same text as the parent county).
The site is structured like:
/lincolnshire/
/lincolnshire/lincoln
/lincolnshire/grimsby
etc....
These pages account for less than 10% of my traffic but I think could be causing me more harm than good.
-
Does each page have significantly different content describing the geographic areas? Also how did you structure the content? Are the towns sub indexed behind the counties?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Hi i have a few pages with duplicate content but we've added canonical urls to them, but i need help understanding what going on
hi google is seeing many of our pages and dupliates but they have canonical url on there https://www.hijabgem.com/index.php/maxi-shirt-dress.html has tags https://www.hijabgem.com/maxi-shirt-dress.html
On-Page Optimization | | hijabgem
has tagshttps://www.hijabgem.com/index.php/quickview/index/view/id/4693
has tags
my question is which page takes authority?and are they setup correct, can you have more than one link rel="canonical" on one page?0 -
When Content creation isn't an option...
I currently work as an SEO/SEO in training. Oftentimes I get projects that require me to look at well established websites of big brands, the kind one would assume put a lot of effort into their sites, and make SEO changes. Additionally they want "actionable" changes that can be made on the fly so content creation, and most linkbuilding, is usually out of the question. Does this limit me to just changing meta titles and descriptions? What if all that seems alright too?
On-Page Optimization | | Resolute0 -
Identifying Duplicate Page Title
Moz weekly reports, among other things, the "Duplicate Page Title". How can I identify which two urls/pages have duplicate page titles? Is there any simple way to trace?
On-Page Optimization | | Sequelmed0 -
Duplicate Content - Blog Rewriting
I have a client who has requested a rewrite of 250 blog articles for his IT company. The blogs are dispersed on a variety of platforms: his own website's blog, a business innovation website, and an IT website. He wants to have each article optimised with keyword phrases and then posted onto his new website thrice weekly. All of this is in an effort to attract some potential customers to his new site and also to establish his company as a leader in its field. To what extent would I need to rewrite each article so as to avoid duplicating the content? Would there even be an issue if I did not rewrite the articles and merely optimised them with keywords? Would the articles need to be completely taken by all current publishers? Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
On-Page Optimization | | StoryScout0 -
80% Drop in Organic Traffic
Hi I have a small private blog on wine which, on Monday of this last week, took an overnight tumble and lost all its first page rankings for wine terms. The blog used to be housed at blogspot but in October I moved to self hosted wordpress. The original site was: wine90.blogspot.com and this now has a redirect to wine90.com. I paid for a professional to port the site from blogger to wordpress and to set up a 301 redirect. Firstly, is there anything wrong with the move? Could I have lost my rankings for this reason? Secondly, I haven't added a new blog post in nearly 3 months, would this cause such a drop? Thirdly, I have noticed that the hosting (I host with the same man who ported the site from blogger) has been poor and the website has been down a couple of times on the rare occasions I checked it recently. I'm looking for some help, although this is not a money making site, its only a hobby that I add to when I have time, but it is a shame to have written 200 articles and now to face this slap from Google. There are no messages in WMT and I do not actively seek links so nothing dodgy there. Any ideas? When I asked the guy who is hosting it he told me that this week there has been a big SEO update but I haven't heard of it?
On-Page Optimization | | xoffie0 -
Duplicate content on partner site
I have a trade partner who will be using some of our content on their site. What's the best way to prevent any duplicate content issues? Their plan is to attribute the content to us using rel=author tagging. Would this be sufficient or should I request that they do something else too? Thanks
On-Page Optimization | | ShearingsGroup0 -
Dupelicate content home page and custom page question
I am working on a website that got hit by the penguin update. Didn't get hit terribly bad, but dropped from number one to number 9. As I'm going through the pages, the theme and content is a mess. To give an example, say the site is about custom colored marbles. The main page content covers custom colored marbles, custom promotional marbles, custom glass marbles, etc. Custom colored marbles is mentioned and covered on all pages, which I am going back and trying to make each page theme specific. There is also a custom page, so I am at a cross roads on how best to employ the focus of the custom page and the home page. I am thinking the home page should emphasize colored marbles, and the custom page should emphasize custom colored marbles. My fear is that making such a drastic change will bounce the site completely off front page and that it will take time for the custom page to come up in rankings. AS it stands now I am confused as to how it even ranks on first page as there's two pages with custom colored marbles emphasis. Id like to clean this up as much as possible so there are no big hits with future google updates, but I don't want the site to drop off either as that would be hard to explain to the owner. Yeah, we are cleaning up your site and making it google compliant and in so doing you no longer rank on first page. That won't put food on the table. Thanks for any advise on this.
On-Page Optimization | | anthonytjm0 -
Is rel=canonical used only for duplicate content
Can the rel-canonical be used to tell the search engines which page is "preferred" when there are similar pages? For instance, I have an internal page that Google is showing on the first page of the SERPs that I would prefer the home page be ranked for. Both the home and internal page have been optimized for the same keyword. What is interesting is that the internal page has very few backlinks compared to the home page but Google seems to favor it since the keyword is in the URL. I am afraid a 301 will drop us from the first page of the SERPs.
On-Page Optimization | | surveygizmo0