General Advice or Strategies on optimizing Non-Plural and Plural
-
Moz,
I was just looking for any insights, advice, personal experiences in optimization for keywords that have Non Plural and Plural variants,
Basically from my keyword and traffic research i have gathered the majority of the search traffic i am looking to gain is coming through the singular spelling of the keyword i am currently optimizing and updating our page for,
From experience with this we have always ranked for the general non plural quantity page and brought traffic from both,
My Example : Our lollipops page which has meta information targeted towards 'Lollipops' rather than the singular 'Lollipop' but links to Singular information pages that are targeting the singular word 'Lollipop'
This way seemed to make sense as it wouldn't be good for user experience to have titles and headers on a page listing multiple products as a single instance, the content of the page would mostly reflect this targeting also,
To make things worse the page language and content is in German where their seems to be many ways of saying the same word from my understanding,
Am i doing the right thing in not sacrificing my user experience to target the singular version of the word ?
Just some advice please? Apologies i struggled to get my question across well,
Thanks
James
-
Thank you both for the feedback,
Yes, I am not looking to have two pages correct,
The theme and topic of the page is currently targeting the plural variant, and i feel this is the best way for it with how our site is laid out,
However i am saying it would be possible for me to change how the content is written to accommodate the singular variant of the word (Where more search traffic is) however i don't think this would be the right thing to do,
If i stick to my guns and the content and page is targeted towards plural, Google would still look after me for ranking for both variants,
I content and translation support from a colleague in Germany, and have as long as it takes
Thanks
James
-
Touche...... Robert..... Touche.....
To address my point more thoroughly, when people are searching for something and include a geo-location, I almost consider that a separate metric. It is adding a very specific term to the search engine then restricts to a location. I don't think most people utilize their browsers capability to it's full potential, and most people don't realize that you could just search for plumber and most likely Google is going to determine the best results for your area. (I could be completely wrong on all of this by the way).
When I look for a plumber in Los Angeles I usually search for "Plumber Who Has The Best Plumbers Crack, Los Angeles, Ca" You don't? I kid. I completely agree with you in this regard. If I am looking for a store/service/restaurant in a specific location then yes I would agree.
In a general sense, if I was just searching for something, coffee, lollypops, turtles, I would never search for something in such a general sense. Now unfortunately I often have to come to terms with the fact that just because I do something, doesn't mean everybody else does, however, even my mother tells me she types full sentences into Google when she searches.
Now I know you are sitting there asking yourself how this all relates to plurals? The point I was trying to make originally was that once the phrase is determined to be most beneficial for SEO purposes, optimize from there. I would bet that regardless there will be enough times where both words have to be used just to make it grammatically correct.
At the end of the day the Lollipop vs Lollipops will lead you to the same place, much like your statement below. Both Lollipop & Lollipops have been used 5 times (well 6 now) in this thread. They both seem pretty optimized to me. I mean, this page alone will probably be #1 on Google for Lollipop & Lollipops! (7)
Regardless I agree with what Robert said below. Robert has drastically more experience than I do, I would defer to what he said in a heartbeat!
Thanks!
Lollipop (8/7)
-
James,
It seems that simplified your question is this: If I have searchers looking for the singular and the plural of the same term, can I have a meta description that is singular or plural instead of having two pages with separate meta descriptions. You are trying to avoid duplicate content, additional work, etc.
I can tell you that we rarely (there are no absolutes to this) have a singular and a plural page. Whether products like electronic cigarette or services like plumbers, electricians, etc. This arrangement works fine for us.
Now, you added German to the mix and that is wholly a different topic. It has been years and years since Herr Knipper was teaching me Deutsch and throwing erasers at me daily. You have to be very careful and you may (if you are not fluent) want to employ a search firm that has that specific expertise. I would not take on a site in German, Swedish, Spanish, etc. unless I had that expertise on board or through a consultant. Yes, we do international sites.
Hope this helps,
Robert
-
I mostly disagree with "People don't use Google/Yahoo/Bing for one or 2 word searches anymore..."
I think it is very dependent on the search and can show data to prove it. Take a term like plumber or smithville plumber; people do not search for toilet clogged plumber in Smithville. They do search for the plumber, plumber smithville, or smithville plumber. NOTE: we are talking not every single human in Smithville but 80% plus.
Also, I do not think it really addresses the plurals issue.
Best
-
James,
Google is smart. Very smart. I would wager that Google is able to identify the difference between the usage of word in plural form, rather than a separate word all together.
When was the last time you searched for one word? People don't use Google/Yahoo/Bing for one or 2 word searches anymore, so my immediate suggestion is optimize for which ever term makes the most sense for the phrase you are optimizing for.
Use the keyword tools. Are people searching for "Green watermelon lollipop" or "cheap, bulk, lollipops" and then optimize from there. As far as it being an other language, you will just have to find out whats the most common term.
If I start a website that sells glasses I'm not gonna call it SpectacleShop.com, unless I want to target the geriatric community. Regardless, find what the most common term for lollipop is, and then optimize for the phrase that works for what you are selling. For what people are searching. Google is in the business of providing information. You need to make it as easy as possible for Google to provide YOUR information.
Also this is a good Moz thread on this same topic http://moz.com/community/q/singular-vs-plural-seo
Hope this helps!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
What place does plural versions of keywords have in keyword research?
Working on doing a massive keyword research project for my sites, one of the things I am trying to figure out is if I should be including plural versions of keywords. For example, should you include yoga mat as well as yoga mats?
Keyword Research | | ShockoeCommerce0 -
Any recommendations on how to find non-branded keyword phrases revealing searcher’s intent with high volume and CPC?
-Most of the organic keywords driving traffic to our website are branded. -I’ve used UberSuggest, but those keyword phrases tend to have low CPC and low volume -Thus, the UberSuggest keywords usually produce a low benefit & K.O.B score. -Andrew
Keyword Research | | Todd_Kendrick0 -
Penalty for on-page optimizing too many pages?
Hey in the process of building a new site in the fitness niche - targeting keywords such as: <colgroup><col width="387"></colgroup>
Keyword Research | | monster99
| how to get a flat stomach |
| how to get rid of belly fat fast |
| how to get rid of belly fat for women |
| how to get rid of love handles fast |
| how to get skinny |
| how to have more energy |
| how to loose weight fast |
| how to lose love handles |
| how to lose love handles fast |
| how to lose lower belly fat | All these keywords get decent search volume. My question, alot of the content for these keywords would be similar for example - "how to get a flat stomach", "how to lose love handles" and "how to get skinny" would pretty much have similar content. I could build a single page for all these keywords but i loose all the ranking benefits from doing on-page optimization such as creating a page for each of these keywords and optimizing it for each of these keywords (e.g. putting the keyword in the URL and Title) But if i build individual pages, to me it doesn't look natural optimizing multiple pages for the keyword terms, plus i loose the benefits of building a single page (e.g. less costly, not as much outreach activity required, etc) You could argue however that if you create individual pages for each of these keywords you are addressing the query directly as theres a slight difference between "how to lose love handles and how to get a flat stomach. But i guess thats up to google to decide. So how would you approach this? Cheers, Chris0 -
Is it considered spammy to have multiple pages on the same site optimized for the same keyword?
Is it OK to keyword-optimize multiple pages for the same keyword? Is it beneficial, hurtful, or not a major factor either way?
Keyword Research | | 406lucy0 -
SEO Strategy for a Small Budget
Hi Everyone, I have a considerable amount of clients that have a relatively small budget for SEO and was formulating a new strategy for them. Generally their sites are small < 10 pages, so to get them ranking I was thinking of doing the following: work with the client to choose up to 3 key phrases to target check the competition level of those phrases if they are fairly easy to rank for, pound those phrases to get them ranked. I would still include some variations of the text to get the long-tail phrases or plurals of words, but I was wondering if this would harm their overall rankings. Thanks Eric
Keyword Research | | MLTGroup0 -
Over 20 Categories, No Keyword Strategy, Can someone help?
Hello Friends, I have recently built a big site with nearly 300 pages (to begin with) and there are around 20 categories on the website. I want to get 3-4 keywords ranked for each category but I don't know how and where to begin. My site revolves around wedding industry but does not have a "Main Keyword" - not yet at least. A couple of "Main Keywords" (these keywords actually describe my website) that I thought of have ZERO traffic but I have few good keywords for each category. Can someone please suggest how do I begin with? Regards, Naimath
Keyword Research | | Sizmic0 -
Best Keyword Research Tool / Strategy / Approach?
Currently, I list every root word (one word) I can think of for the client. Then start a 2 word keyword section, making every possible connection with my root words. Then move to 3 word, 4 word, and so on. I do this all in a word document and by hand. Does anybody have ANYTHING (tool/strategy) that does something similar? I'm looking for anything that can expedite this process. My manual method makes me feel like I'm always forgetting certain combinations of words.
Keyword Research | | MichaelWeisbaum0 -
Which is best for keywords; plurals vs singular
Hello! This is my first question so I hope it will be a good one and everyone finds it useful; I have found many conflicting views and need some clarification. Question: When it comes to optimising for specific keywords, which is best; plurals or singular? Example: Should I optimise for 'conveyor' with medium competition and a larger local [exact] traffic volume, or go for 'conveyors' with a higher competition and a slightly smaller local [exact] volume of traffic? Obviously this example is a bit of no brainer as I would tend to sway towards the lower competition with a good volume of traffic to be more competitive, but when the terms are so closely linked, would it be wise to cover both grounds now and go for 'conveyors'? What is general consensus out there? Thanks in advance! Richard
Keyword Research | | BlandyDoes0