Best practice SEO for images added via WP
-
<label class="setting" data-setting="title">Hi</label>
When adding an image to a post or page using wordpress I have complete 4 fields:
Title
Caption
Alt Text
DescriptionIf the image is of an orange campervan in Cornwall, UK then how best would I complete these fields? Can Title and Alt be the same and can Caption and description be the same?
Thank you for this!
James
-
It doesn't really matter that much if you use the alt text, and title well to describe the image. However, I always recommend (and do it myself) renaming the image to match the title, in your case something like orange-campervan-cornwall-uk.jpg.
Always use dashed to separate words, not underscores
-
One other thing if you have time - what should the image be called in the file it's uploaded from? Would it be 'orange campervan cornwall uk'? Thanks
-
Thank you - it makes sense now!
-
Thanks for a fast and detailed response!
-
Hi James,
Each field is actually intended for something different:
- Title: should be what is the image. In this case: orange campervan
- Caption: Is what shows up under the image describing it to users visiting the page. In this case: orange campervan in cornwall, UK blah blah.
- Alt Text: Should be an image description that appears when the browser can't (for some reason) display the image. In this case can be either "orange campervan", "Image of orange campervan" or whatever you think describes best the image when somebody can't see it.
- Description: Is just that, a short, brief description of the image contents.
Hope that helps.
-
First, I would focus on making the alt tag accessible. If the image didn't load, or a user happened to be visually impaired, could they tell what should be in the images place? So alt="orange campervan in cornwall uk", but only if the context of Cornwall UK is important. Don't write a book, if the image is that of a green apple - then alt="green apple".
Here's more on alt text. *Note, don't use images for a nav, but definitely alt -exactly- if you don't have a choice.
The purpose of a caption is editorial. It should be a little less terse than your alt text. If you're writing about traveling through Cornwall in your campervan something like; "What an adventure I had when driving my orange campervan through Cornwall UK". If you're writing about your trip through Cornwall UK in your orange campervan - then you've successfully given the lizard brain a reason to possibly stick around and read.
The description part really depends on if your theme supports it. More on that here. An example would be; "I really liked this shot of my orange camper van. The sunsets in Cornwall UK are amazing!" (If there's a sunset.) You're really just providing commentary here.
The title is closer in spirit to the alt text. It may also include a CTA. "Click here for more adventures"
But the overall goal should be aimed at being descriptive where appropriate and succinct where necessary. Doing so improves accessibility. If you're remotely talking about the topic, the keywords tend to fall into place.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Embedding videos for SEO
What is the best practice for having videos on a website in terms of increasing SEO? Embedding YouTube videos is probably the easiest solution, but does that help with SEO? The other options would be to use a third party or build one. What have other people found to be the best option? Thanks!
Image & Video Optimization | | STP_SEO0 -
Best Way to Replace Lost Links
We found a particular client that was using a 3rd party backlinker to build links (they were outsourced). The backlinks appeared to be low quality, just basic text and no substantial content surrounding it, usually like a forum profile. The backlinker was swapped out. However, we've been suffering from a big loss of links. We anticipated that quite a few of the links the previous crew were managing would be lost, however, we've lost over 1500. Some of that is due to the former SEO company using sitesays.com as part of their strategy. That site has since removed all listings/links because they were hit by recent algorithm changes. Every week GWT has fewer and fewer links coming from that site. We expect this to continue until GWT has removed all links from that site. We are also losing ground (quickly) on local rankings too. We believe this is due to the high number of links lost. What is best practice when building links to counter this issue? Is there anything that can be done to stem the link purge and, if possible, gain ground on rankings again?
Image & Video Optimization | | AaronHenry0 -
Link building to Google+ profile: any local SEO value?
Has anyone found value in building links to Google+ profile for local seo rankings? My gut tells me that it will, but I am not 100% sure. If it does, then does that mean that all the traditional SEO factors that would go into ranking a site organically also work for ranking locally for certain keywords? So far, I have found that the best thing for moving up rankings is reviews on Google+, but then does that make local SEO (from a high view point) just a race for high reviews and building the most citation? I am feeling like the differentiator for local SEO is UN-structured citations and links to Google+ profiles. Any thoughts? See you at MozCon!
Image & Video Optimization | | tonyflorespsa0 -
Local SEO Best Practice
Hi We currently have 6 showrooms in a geographical area (Scotland,UK) and each showroom covers a specific region within the country encompassing towns and cities. So for example showroom A based in Edinburgh covers a customer area of Edinburgh, Fife, St Andrews while showroom B located in Glasgow covers Glasgow, Livingston etc In google places I have drawn the geographical area on the map that each showroom covers making sure that they do not overlap At present some of which are ranking well in local but one is stating that 'google does not support this location' and after following previous advice on the forum this is still the case. Would I be better setting up another google account for this showroom and submit it again into Google Places or would it be better going into Google+ business pages? or are they the same thing? Finally is it worth using the following in Google Places? KML File and Geo Sitemap generation (these files are needed for Google) Address output in Schema.org format
Image & Video Optimization | | ocelot0 -
Local SEO: Ste vs. Suite vs. #
Hi, I used the spelled out "Suite" in my local NAP, but sometimes it's been shortened to Ste by citation websites. I'm trying to remain consistent here Should I use Ste H, Suite H, or #H? This is a good article on it: http://localsearchforum.catalystemarketing.com/google-local-citations/1605-suite-vs-ste-vs-your-citation-addresses-2.html but I'd still like your opinion.
Image & Video Optimization | | BobGW0 -
What Video Player Format is Best?
What video player and video format is recommended for universal playback on all devices?
Image & Video Optimization | | steelintheair0 -
What is the best youtube SEO strategy?
Ok- I have ten different you tube videos, i have done some article marketing, blog commenting, press releases, bookmarking, web 2.0. My videos are in highly competitive niches and i have some success with my videos for short time period. But it had been very difficult journey so far. Can someone give me the sound strategy for back links for youtube videos?
Image & Video Optimization | | Sajiali0 -
SEO for Explicit / Medical Pictures - Will It Hurt Rankings?
I have a client with page 1 rankings for several keywords. He wants to make some updates to his website. He is offering a new service and wants to show before and after photos of the procedure. He is an OB/GYN, so the before/after pictures are very explicit and have full nudity. How will this affect his rankings? Is there something that I can do to tell Google and other SE's that these photos are medical and not pornographic? Should I host them on another domain? Just looking for thoughts and insight. Thank you in advance!
Image & Video Optimization | | itrogers0