How the hell do you get microformat to show up on google serp?
-
Preface:
- I implemented Microformat aggregate review (http://data-vocabulary.org/Review-aggregate) for our e-commerce website and included only on the homepage. The vote and count are actually coming from real reviews we are getting from our customers, and in the homepage some reviews are shown prominently and a link points to the full list of all the reviews.
- Microformat markup is correct, validated in GWT.
- Have been online for a while (probably a couple of years).
- Our website: http://www.gomme-auto.it
The star rating never showed up. When checking competitors I could see their microformats where not showing up either.
But now things changed, if I check one competitor (the market leader www.gommadiretto.it) searching for it with their brand name “gommadiretto” no star rating is showing, but if I search for tires of a specific manufactured like “pneumatici barum” I can see their result in serp is showing the star rating for that specific internal page (the brand page) where they simply put the website overall aggregate review microformat mark up, they actually put it on every page.
And that make me scratch my head and start asking myself some questions:
- is google showing their microformats because they manually awarded them somehow? no other competitor seems to have got the star rating in serp
- is google showing their microformats because they have so much more reviews than I have? I have around 1700, they have around 11000.
- is google showing their microformats because their reviews are certified by TrustPilot?
- is google showing their microformats because they put it in the product page? well of course since I am not putting it there (in the brand page) it's a factor, but isn't it recommended to put the website aggregate reviews microformat only on one page? and shouldn't we show the brand reviews on the brand page?
- isn't it best practice/recommended to put the website aggregate review microformat only on one page?
- is google showing their microformats because of some other reasons I can't see?
What the hell is google criteria for showing the star rating? Does anyone know?
-
Good luck.
-
Right on! Thanks for the tip. Since most of my clients are service based, I'm wondering if it would work as "http://domain.com/services/specific-service..."
Working on it now and will let you know.
Dino
-
Hi Dino,
yes since I originally posted this question I discovered a couple of things.
First, google loves this schema http://schema.org/Product but stubbornly refuse to show star rating set for http://schema.org/Organization, my competitors where using Product schema on their home pages and landing pages with no relation to any product on the page and getting the stars, so I did the same, and the stars appeared.
So use http://schema.org/Product
Second, google refuse to show star rating for SERP where the search query is for generic common terms keywords, it's showing star rating for branded keywords, and for additional keywords but I have not been able to identify a path/rule, I only realized for branded keywords it show star rating, for common terms it does not.
So if you add star rating http://schema.org/Product markup in a page which is ranking for "Ford Focus" they will appear, but if you put the markup in a page which is ranking for "nice looking cars" google won't show any star.
Hope this helps.
-
Hey Max, did you ever get the stars to show in search? I'm trying to achieve the same thing for my clients, but so far have been unsuccessful. One client has a competitor who has stars for all their pages so been trying to figure it out. I think I have all the right markup, but so far nothing...what a mystery.
Regards, Dino
-
Hi Ken,
that's a very good point. And a big question mark in my head. Because:
- a trustpilot (https://www.trustpilot.com/) sales man repeatedly told me adding their review widget would have made the stars appear, but I can't get any confirmation on this from the web, and sales people from competitors to trustpilot told me that is not true. Trustpilot and others are google partners when it comes to Google Trusted Stores (https://support.google.com/ads/answer/3467841) which means stars showing in AdWords ads (the service is currently not available outside US).
- wherever google talk about rich snippets and stars rating in serp never mentions any 3rd party review authority.
- And here I come again to the Google guideline I mentioned to Everett (https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/146645), they state aggregate review and individual review markup should not be put on the same page, is that information outdated? Or anyone tested and verified in reality is adding SERP benefit like showing up the stars rating if added togheter?
If I may ask what kind of metrics improved using yotpo.com? Did you run a A/B test and found an increase in conversion rate? Or a relevant amount of additional traffic?
Thanks a lot for your time,
Max
-
Hi Max -
I beleive Everett is correct. The Facebook reviews are not marked up with rich snippet code for google, rather they have FB markup. In addition, the review data you have for the site in the footer is marked up as a product. It also probably doesn't help that the reviews are buried down at the bottom of the footer.
As an FYi, we recent;y switched over to a reviews service (Yotpo.com) and that has worked well for us.
Ken
-
Hi Everett, those review on the homepage are not product review, they are website/service review; in other words review from people who bought commenting on the buying process, not the product they bought.
We also have product review, but on product pages, like this one http://www.gomme-auto.it/pneumatici/estivi/riken/maystorm-2-b2/205/55/16/w/91
Also, according to this google guieline: https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/146645 aggregate review and review should not go on the same page, either one or another. Which is why we put aggregate reviews markup on these pages instead of review markup.
In that guideline google is not saying it penalize you if you put both on the same page, but still recommend not to.
Are you suggesting the guideline is outdated and not relevant anymore?
-
The Facebook reviews don't appear to have any micro-data markup in the code. They're there, but not marked up. What is marked up is listing your website as the item reviewed instead of the product from what I can see, and the itemscope isn't filled out:
div class="sub-footer" itemscope="" itemtype="http://data-vocabulary.org/Review-aggregate">
gomme-auto.it|
votato
9.81
su
10
da
1704You should mark up each of the FB reviews with this schema:
And the aggregate of those reviews with this schema:
http://schema.org/AggregateRating
What they are reviewing is the product on the page, not the website itself. Therefore, you'll be using this schema to mark up the thing that is being reviewed:
You may want to hire a developer to do this. Schema can be kind of tricky sometimes. Let us know how it goes!
-
Hi Ken, thanks for your time.
those "facebook" reviews are "the" reviews, we ask customers for permissions to post on their facebook wall, and show their review along their picture and facebook profile to get additional trust.
Best,
Max
-
Hi-
Here are a coupe of quick thought for you:
-
I don't actually see the ratings on your home page. I can see that they are in the code but I didn't see them appearing on the page. The only reviews I see are the FB reviews.
-
I read somewhere that Google will sometimes not show the rich snippet data if they think you are light on content. I will find the reference and post it when I do, but that could be a problem for you as well.
Good Luck
Ken
-
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Old DMOZ description showing up in SERP meta description.
I have a client whose home page meta description on the SERPs is not matching the description n the meta data. The SERP description is from an old DMOZ description. Any idea about the best way to update this?
On-Page Optimization | | bdcseo0 -
How does Google handle read more tags in Wordpress
Hi Everyone I am wondering how Google handles the read more tag in Wordpress. I pasted the link to a blog post on Google and found nothing (domain.com/post#readmore). Then I paste the version without #readmore (domain.com/post) and found that Google indexed the page but with the option to click "read more" to read it. The full blog post is not in their index, just the version asking you to read more. Is this because Google hasn't gotten to it or is Google ignoring it. I am not sure but ideally I rather have the full blog post indexed, not the read more version. I am curious to whether this will cause duplicate content issues. What are your experience with this and is it advisable to use an alternate method for read more. Maybe with a Wordpress plugin. Thanks in advance.
On-Page Optimization | | gaben0 -
Problem with getting a site to rank at all
We pushed this Word Press site live about a month ago www.primedraftarchitecture.com. Since then we've been adding regular content, blog posts 3 times a week with social posts on facebook, twitter, G+ and LinkedIn. We also submitted via Moz Local about 3 weeks ago. Yext about two weeks ago and have been adding about 5 listings to small local directories a week. Webmaster tools shows that the site map is valid and the pages of the site are getting indexed and it shows links from 7 sites, mostly directories. I'm just not seeing the site ranking for anything. We're getting zero organic traffic. I though we did a good job not over optimizing the pages. I'm just stymied trying to figure out what's wrong. Usually we push a site live and see at least some low rankings after just a couple of weeks. Can anyone see anything that looks bad or where we've gone wrong?
On-Page Optimization | | DonaldS0 -
Google Treating these URL's as diff, but they are same. please help
Google is treating, below URL's as two different URL's when they are same. How to solve this. Please help. Case 1:/2570/Venture-Capital-and-Capital-Markets/2570/venture-capital-and-capital-marketsCase 2: /xxx/Java-Programming//xxx/Java-ProgrammingPlease help, how to solve this. Thanks in advance
On-Page Optimization | | AnkammaRao0 -
Google is NOT showing up the right META DESCRIPTION
Hi, Recently I changed titles and meta descriptions of some pages. The problem is that google have updated the titles but not the meta descriptions.. Ive also checekd the source code of the google cached version of the pages crawled and the meta description reflect the changes i did...but the changes don't appear in google. Do you have some solution/advice for the issue? Tx so Much
On-Page Optimization | | tourtravel0 -
How do I get rid of crawl errors?
I recently revamped all my category pages to make them Google friendly. I did a lot of keyword research and ended up deleting categories and renaming categories. Now Google Webmasters is showing a ton of 404 errors. How can I get rid of them? Do I have to remove the URL one by one with Google Webmasters? Is it something that won't hurt my rankings and will go away in time?
On-Page Optimization | | dealblogger0 -
Getting 403 error in forum
Hi all, I am getting 403 error for my site where it is throwing error for the following url http://www.topuniversityforum.in/members/member id/ignore and it is showing 7 similar url for 7 user ids. I want to know how can i resolve it and if it is going to have any negative effect on its ranking.
On-Page Optimization | | akhilendra0 -
Does Google still see masked domains as duplicate content?
Older reads state the domain forwarding or masking will create duplicate content but Google has evolved quite a bit and I'm wondering if that is still the case? Not suggesting that a 301 is not the proper way to redirect something but my question is: Does Google still see masked domains as duplicate content? Is there any viable use for domain masking other than for affiliates?
On-Page Optimization | | TracyWeb0