How the hell do you get microformat to show up on google serp?
-
Preface:
- I implemented Microformat aggregate review (http://data-vocabulary.org/Review-aggregate) for our e-commerce website and included only on the homepage. The vote and count are actually coming from real reviews we are getting from our customers, and in the homepage some reviews are shown prominently and a link points to the full list of all the reviews.
- Microformat markup is correct, validated in GWT.
- Have been online for a while (probably a couple of years).
- Our website: http://www.gomme-auto.it
The star rating never showed up. When checking competitors I could see their microformats where not showing up either.
But now things changed, if I check one competitor (the market leader www.gommadiretto.it) searching for it with their brand name “gommadiretto” no star rating is showing, but if I search for tires of a specific manufactured like “pneumatici barum” I can see their result in serp is showing the star rating for that specific internal page (the brand page) where they simply put the website overall aggregate review microformat mark up, they actually put it on every page.
And that make me scratch my head and start asking myself some questions:
- is google showing their microformats because they manually awarded them somehow? no other competitor seems to have got the star rating in serp
- is google showing their microformats because they have so much more reviews than I have? I have around 1700, they have around 11000.
- is google showing their microformats because their reviews are certified by TrustPilot?
- is google showing their microformats because they put it in the product page? well of course since I am not putting it there (in the brand page) it's a factor, but isn't it recommended to put the website aggregate reviews microformat only on one page? and shouldn't we show the brand reviews on the brand page?
- isn't it best practice/recommended to put the website aggregate review microformat only on one page?
- is google showing their microformats because of some other reasons I can't see?
What the hell is google criteria for showing the star rating? Does anyone know?
-
Good luck.
-
Right on! Thanks for the tip. Since most of my clients are service based, I'm wondering if it would work as "http://domain.com/services/specific-service..."
Working on it now and will let you know.
Dino
-
Hi Dino,
yes since I originally posted this question I discovered a couple of things.
First, google loves this schema http://schema.org/Product but stubbornly refuse to show star rating set for http://schema.org/Organization, my competitors where using Product schema on their home pages and landing pages with no relation to any product on the page and getting the stars, so I did the same, and the stars appeared.
So use http://schema.org/Product
Second, google refuse to show star rating for SERP where the search query is for generic common terms keywords, it's showing star rating for branded keywords, and for additional keywords but I have not been able to identify a path/rule, I only realized for branded keywords it show star rating, for common terms it does not.
So if you add star rating http://schema.org/Product markup in a page which is ranking for "Ford Focus" they will appear, but if you put the markup in a page which is ranking for "nice looking cars" google won't show any star.
Hope this helps.
-
Hey Max, did you ever get the stars to show in search? I'm trying to achieve the same thing for my clients, but so far have been unsuccessful. One client has a competitor who has stars for all their pages so been trying to figure it out. I think I have all the right markup, but so far nothing...what a mystery.
Regards, Dino
-
Hi Ken,
that's a very good point. And a big question mark in my head. Because:
- a trustpilot (https://www.trustpilot.com/) sales man repeatedly told me adding their review widget would have made the stars appear, but I can't get any confirmation on this from the web, and sales people from competitors to trustpilot told me that is not true. Trustpilot and others are google partners when it comes to Google Trusted Stores (https://support.google.com/ads/answer/3467841) which means stars showing in AdWords ads (the service is currently not available outside US).
- wherever google talk about rich snippets and stars rating in serp never mentions any 3rd party review authority.
- And here I come again to the Google guideline I mentioned to Everett (https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/146645), they state aggregate review and individual review markup should not be put on the same page, is that information outdated? Or anyone tested and verified in reality is adding SERP benefit like showing up the stars rating if added togheter?
If I may ask what kind of metrics improved using yotpo.com? Did you run a A/B test and found an increase in conversion rate? Or a relevant amount of additional traffic?
Thanks a lot for your time,
Max
-
Hi Max -
I beleive Everett is correct. The Facebook reviews are not marked up with rich snippet code for google, rather they have FB markup. In addition, the review data you have for the site in the footer is marked up as a product. It also probably doesn't help that the reviews are buried down at the bottom of the footer.
As an FYi, we recent;y switched over to a reviews service (Yotpo.com) and that has worked well for us.
Ken
-
Hi Everett, those review on the homepage are not product review, they are website/service review; in other words review from people who bought commenting on the buying process, not the product they bought.
We also have product review, but on product pages, like this one http://www.gomme-auto.it/pneumatici/estivi/riken/maystorm-2-b2/205/55/16/w/91
Also, according to this google guieline: https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/146645 aggregate review and review should not go on the same page, either one or another. Which is why we put aggregate reviews markup on these pages instead of review markup.
In that guideline google is not saying it penalize you if you put both on the same page, but still recommend not to.
Are you suggesting the guideline is outdated and not relevant anymore?
-
The Facebook reviews don't appear to have any micro-data markup in the code. They're there, but not marked up. What is marked up is listing your website as the item reviewed instead of the product from what I can see, and the itemscope isn't filled out:
div class="sub-footer" itemscope="" itemtype="http://data-vocabulary.org/Review-aggregate">
gomme-auto.it|
votato
9.81
su
10
da
1704You should mark up each of the FB reviews with this schema:
And the aggregate of those reviews with this schema:
http://schema.org/AggregateRating
What they are reviewing is the product on the page, not the website itself. Therefore, you'll be using this schema to mark up the thing that is being reviewed:
You may want to hire a developer to do this. Schema can be kind of tricky sometimes. Let us know how it goes!
-
Hi Ken, thanks for your time.
those "facebook" reviews are "the" reviews, we ask customers for permissions to post on their facebook wall, and show their review along their picture and facebook profile to get additional trust.
Best,
Max
-
Hi-
Here are a coupe of quick thought for you:
-
I don't actually see the ratings on your home page. I can see that they are in the code but I didn't see them appearing on the page. The only reviews I see are the FB reviews.
-
I read somewhere that Google will sometimes not show the rich snippet data if they think you are light on content. I will find the reference and post it when I do, but that could be a problem for you as well.
Good Luck
Ken
-
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Can Google read this code?
I'm working on some basic on-page SEO content for a website within my company and I need some guidance as far as 1. whether Google can read the small amount of existing text (not optimized) and if it isn't spiderable, then 2. what code should be there instead. Here is the site: https://www.le-velgear.com/store/catalog The text I'm referring to is toward the bottom of the page (isn't it always?) and says this: Designed for a Thriving Lifestyle The Le-Vel Gear store is an extension of the LV Life, the Thrive product line, and the world's largest health and wellness Movement, which you helped create. Living a life you deserve includes looking good while showing the world your pride in being a Thriver...Check out all the new and incredible gear and tools and take your Thriving lifestyle to the next level!!! When I "View Source," I cannot see the text, however, the text is highlight-able with my cursor and I can see it when I "Inspect Element" in a container that says Thanks in advance for any help!
On-Page Optimization | | lizzyr0 -
Google rendering mobile to the right
So the website is displaying correctly in mobile devices and online tools. However, when using Google Page Speed Insights mobile or fetch as mobile in Search Console the page always loads as if it has moved 50% of the screen to the right - so whitespace on the left then 50% of the page in on the right side. I've been ignoring this. The site loads fine in devices and i've put it down to a glitch in Google, but at the same time it's been bugging me. Has anyone else seen this and should I ignore?
On-Page Optimization | | MickEdwards0 -
Google is showing product rating of 1-star in search results when average rating is 3.7 - 4 stars
When searching for the brand name "SteriPEN", the #3 listing on the SERP is for one of SteriPEN's "Adventurer Opti" product at REI.com, On the SERP for this search, the REI listing for Adventurer Opti product displays showing the product as 1-star based on a product review from 2010. What we don't understand is the fact that the product history has a 3.7 to 4.2 rating on most websites. Why would a product with so many reviews and established history have 1 review that drives the 1-star rating from such a prominent retailer? Makes no sense. Any suggestions as to whom we might be able to contact for help with this is greatly appreciated. edit?usp=sharing
On-Page Optimization | | ReachMaineAgency0 -
Does Rel=canonical affect google shopping feed?
I have a client who gets a good portion of their sales (~40%) from Google Product Feeds, and for those they want each (Product X Quantity) to have it’s own SKU, as they often get 3 listings in a given Google shopping query, i.e. 2,4,8 units of a given product. However, we are worried about this creating duplicate content on the search side. Do you know if we could rel=canonical on the site without messing with their google shopping results? The crux of the issue is that they want the products to appear distinct for the product feed, and unified for the web so as not to dilute. Thoughts?
On-Page Optimization | | VISISEEKINC0 -
Google Map Marker not showing up when using HTML Embed Code
Hi community, For several clients, when embedding the Google Maps, the Marker DOES NOT appear. I am copying straight from Google Maps, it appears fine in Google Maps. Is there HTML I can add or is there something wrong with the map marker to begin with? These are verified listings. Help! Thank you! Priscilla
On-Page Optimization | | FullMedia900 -
Why Google did not index exactly these 2 pages? Any ideas?
Dear Community, on 27th of July I relaunched my own website and submitted the sitemap as well I send the index-page to crawl it including all linked pages. Already the next day the new pages have been indexed. Today I checked them manually if they have been indexed. The result is that 2 of 13 pages have not been indexed, here marked in bold: http://inlinear.com/
On-Page Optimization | | inlinear
http://inlinear.com/suchmaschinenoptimierung-online-marketing.php
http://inlinear.com/design/
http://inlinear.com/design/printmedien-gestaltung.php
http://inlinear.com/design/corporate-design-und-corporate-identity.php
http://inlinear.com/design/corporate-raum-design.php
http://inlinear.com/webentwicklung/
http://inlinear.com/virtueller-rundgang-360grad-fotografie.php
http://inlinear.com/business-atlas-online-verzeichnis.php
http://inlinear.com/baudokumentation-bauueberwachung.php
http://inlinear.com/ueber-uns.php
http://inlinear.com/blog/
http://inlinear.com/kontakt/ The page "/design/" (which is the index.php of this folder should be the main-page because its about WEB DESIGN.
Should I create a copy and call it /design/web-design.php? May be Google prefers a meaningful URL than the index.php? So I put then a rel=canonical to web-design.php in my index.php? design/corporate-design-und-corporate-identity.php
The URL is a little long, but this should not be the reason? Or might be a reason that another page which is still in the index, but not online anymore (even redirecting to /design/) is still more dominant? Strange.... orshould I simply wait a little or try submitting these to sites manually to google? When checking Google Webmasters Tools Google tells me that just 3 pages have been indexed.
When I was checking which page is indexed or not I checked each URL with the site-search option:
site:inlinear.com/pageX.php ... when Google shows this page, it was a sign that it was indexed but why webmasters tools show up only 3 pages? (see screenshot) Do you have any ideas?
Thank You 🙂 indexed.png0 -
Why has my site gone from 3rd to 21st in Google...HELP
Hi there, Web Address: www.websitedesign-miltonkeynes.com Okay I stared my own web development business about 8 - 9 months ago and decided that I was going to target a small number of local keywords that were relevant to my business and geographical area. So I decided to target the keywords below and and started to get good traffic, I never have bought links and have not copied any content although I know i should try and add more content to my website. mk web design, software Milton Keynes, web design Milton Keynes, web design mk, web designer Milton Keynes, web designers Milton Keynes & website design milton Keynes However recently my website has dropped massively in the SERP's and wanted to know what has caused this (i know Penguin) and what I can do to improve. I have listed below my rankings to show you the drop: 24th April 2012 15th May 2012 mk web design 3 11 software milton keynes 1 8 web design milton Keynes 12 50 web design mk 5 53 web designer milton keynes 10 0 web designers milton keynes 6 37 website design milton keynes 3 21 I decided to change my homepage Page Title a week ago to make sound less spammy but this has made no difference and wanted some help on what has happened so i do not do this again and what I can do to improve. Thanks in advance. Darren Bowden
On-Page Optimization | | Tarqs0 -
Almost all pages showing under Notices Rel Canonical - why???
Hi, I'm just going through my latest crawl since my new site launch and havce noticed almost all of my websites pages are listed under the notices rel canonical section, Why is this? All pages have the unique pages titles followed by the site name in the title, for example: Product | Site name All pages have unique meta descriptions and content (although we only offer lots of differt varients of the same product). Is this something I should be worried about?
On-Page Optimization | | EclipseLegal0