Moving to https
-
Hi all and thanks for taking the time to read my question.
We are going to migrate a very small website from http to https, its a roughly 9 page site with 5 of those being product pages.
I figured I would have to set a canonical and permanent 301 redirects for each page.
But our tech guys suggested just doing a binding to https so any traffic hitting our site with a http url would automatically get redirected to the https version.
So if someone land on http://mydomain, it would automatically return https://mydomain
Does this sound correct or would we need to do additional tasks even if we go down the binding route?thanks again for looking.
-
Here's the step-by-step right and easy way:
-
1. Sign-up for Google Webmaster Tools and create individual sites for 4 variants of your website:
-
http non-www
-
http www
-
https non-www
-
https www
-
2. Set the preferred domain among the above four.
-
3. Add an canonical URL for all pages for either https://www. or https://.., whichever you choose.
-
4. Add 301 redirect from http:// to https:// via htaccess using mod_rewrite.
-
5. Use Google Webmaster Tools "Fetch as Google", under "Crawl" in your http:// sites to confirm that http://.. gets redirected and optionally submit those redirects to be indexed by Google (just to make sure).
-
6. Build and submit a sitemap for your preferred domain site (one of the https://..) via Google Webmaster Tools.
-
7. Optionally, connect your Google Analytics property with your preferred domain site in Google Webmaster Tools.
-
-
This sounds odd to me - in my experience, if you want to load one page by a server sends you another, that's a redirect. It doesn't matter how the technology works on the server side as long as the initial URL returns a 301 before the server returns a different page.
It's possible that you and your tech guys aren't really talking about different things, you're just coming at it from different angles. Could you ask them to implement the solution they're suggesting, then use http://httpstatus.io/ to test an http:// URL to see what server code it returns? That might be a good way to communicate what you're looking for. The important thing here is to stress that your tech guys can code the server however they want, as long as it has the right output (301 redirects).
And, of course, use canonicals.
-
I would suggest migrating the whole site, and 301 redirecting all the http pages to the https versions. Without a proper redirect you risk the possibility of losing any link juice that would be directed at that page. A canonical should technically cover that, but the hard 301 leaves no room for robot interpretation.
Also, why leave the http version when you have a secure version available?
-
We have been considering switching to https as well, what are the pros and cons of doing this that you have heard on your end?
Make sure you have proper redirects as well.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Http v https Duplicate Issues
Hello, I noticed earlier an issue on my site. http://mysite.com and https://mysite.com both had canonical links pointing to themselves so in effect creating duplicate content. I have now taken steps to ensure the https version has a canonical that points to the http version but I was wondering what other steps would people recommend? Is it safe to NOINDEX the https pages? Or block them via robots.txt or both? We are not quite ready to go fully HTTPS with our site yet (I know Google now prefers this) Any thoughts would be very much appreciated.
Technical SEO | | niallfred0 -
Blog RSS behind https
Hi, I'm finding our blog's RSS feed won't be recognized by various websites. The feed is on a https url. Is this the most likely problem? Thanks!
Technical SEO | | OTSEO0 -
Does having a page (or site) available on HTTP and HTTPS cause duplication issues?
Say I've got a site that can be accessed using either protocal (i.e. HTTP and HTTPS), but most (if not all of the links) are pointing to the HTTP versions. Will it cause a problem if I start link building to HTTPS versions? In other words does google see http://mysite.com as the same page as https://mysite.com? Thanks
Technical SEO | | PeterAlexLeigh0 -
Disallowing https URLs
It there a problem disallowing all https URLs to be indexed in order to avoid duplication? This is the article recommending this practice - http://blog.leonardchallis.com/seo/serve-a-different-robots-txt-for-https/ Thanks!
Technical SEO | | theLotter0 -
How do you disallow HTTPS?
I currently have a site (startuploans.org) that runs everything as http, recently we decided to start an online application to process loan apps. Now, for one certain section we configured ssl to work (https://www.startuploans.org/secure/). If I go to the HTTPS url for any of my other pages they show up...I was going to just 301 everything from https but because it is in a subdirectiory I can't... Also, canonical URL's won't work either because it's a totally different system and the pages are generated in an odd manor. It's really just 1 page that needs to be disallowed.. Is there any way to disallow all HTTPS requests from robots.txt while keeping all the HTTP requests working as normal?
Technical SEO | | WebsiteConsultants0 -
Google cached https rather than http
Google is using a secure version of a page (https) that is meant to be displayed using only http. I don't know of any links to the page using https, but want to verify that. I only have 1 secure page on the site and it does not link to the page in question. What is the easiest way to nail down why Google is using the https version?
Technical SEO | | TheDude0 -
URL length - Moving from 6 folder deep to 3 folder deep
I have a website with friendly URL, My product page are generated from a database. When I click on the product, I go 6 folders deep. (ex. nameofthesite/courses-and-seminard/blablabla-catalog/information-technology/blablabla-window/blabla-server/active-directory-with-windows-server-2008.html I'm thinking about moving the product page to the thrid folder, so it would become nameofthesite.com/courses-and-seminars/course-catalog/active-directory-with-windows-server-2008.html I want to know, would it be a major element in my SEO. Is URL length is a really important factor. Because I need to move 450 pages. Second, if I move the page, do I only need to add redirect 301 or I need to do something else. I suppose I also need to change my breadcrumb navigation also.
Technical SEO | | Adviso0 -
Https redirect
Hi there, a client of mine is asking me if Google would penalize to redirect from all the http urls to https (they want to change the security protocol). I assume it is going to work as a classic 301, right? so they might lose some authority in they way, but I am not 100% sure. Can anyone confirm this? does anyone has a similar experience? thanks a lot!
Technical SEO | | elisainteractive0