Awful ranking after site redesign
-
Hello everyone,
I have a situation here and I’d like to have your opinion about it.
I am working on a site which has been recently redesigned from scratch: in a nutshell, as soon as the new site went live their rankings dropped and, of course, so did their visitors and so on..
The guys who redesigned the site didn’t do any 301 redirect whatsoever, so now the old pages are just 404s and blocked by robots. My question is: if they 301 redirect now, do you think it would be possible they could get their rankings back?
One more thing: when they launched the new site, the indexed pages basically doubled overnight; there were 700 and now there are 1400. Do you think this could affect their ranking as well?
Thank you for you insights
Elio
-
Hello everyone and thank you for your answers. I sincerely appreciate it!
I didn’t follow the redesign phase, I’ve just jumped on board now so I actually have no idea why they didn’t go for the 301 solution.
As Monica pointed out the 404ed pages were actually valuable pages and, at least in my opinion, this is proved by the fact that now their traffic is close to 0. Their traffic literally dropped in a matter of days (kind of scary to see such a steep fall). I agree with Travis when he says that just the valuable pages should be 301ed, but the thing is that they sell their products online, meaning that hypothetically every (product) page is equally important. They were neither old nor poor quality…I guess they just skipped the 301 step. I will do some more research but I guess that, as you guys suggest, the best way to go is 301 all those pages and see what happens.
I have no idea if they did anything on the social side but that’s worth investigating some more.
Thank you very much for now! I will keep you updated
Cheers
-
I would imagine if the pages were previously ranking they had value. The rule of thumb is to discard pages not ranking on pages 1-3. Since there has been such a decrease in traffic it is reasonable to assume that valuable pages have been 404ed when they should have been 301ed.
I have migrated 7 sites over the past 5 years, so I feel reasonably comfortable saying the duplicated pages are causing the influx in indexed pages. Redirecting the 404 pages is the strongest strategy right now. They basically created 700 valueless pages that won't rank until they are fully indexed and gain some value to the engine, which could take months. It is starting over from 0, which is why the 301 redirects are "normally" best practice.
Any 301 will lose a little bit of link juice. It goes from having a strong page rank alone to diluting its value by sharing it with another link. While it will help salvage some of the sites juice, it won't put them on page 1.
You can wait for these pages to start ranking alone, but that could take months based on the level of on page op and if there are any good links pointing at those pages currently. I am not a fan of the wait and see game, therefore, I try to do everything I can up front. The 301 redirects of the old pages would be best practice in this situation.
-
You can recover page authority from a 404 page for a surprising amount of time--I once did a 301 redirect on some pages that had been 404 for a couple of years and they quickly gained rank. What was the thinking behind not redirecting old pages? Were they poor quality? You don't have to redirect all of them at once--you can start with the best pages (and at least some of them must have been good since you had traffic to lose).
-
When a page is a 404, The Googles will come back to it in an undisclosed period of time. This is in order to make sure the page is really gone. Now if the pages that are gone used to receive referral traffic, it would be super handy to get those pages up soon, forget about the search engines. That way, you're recovering links and pages for the right reasons.
What should be your first order of questioning is if those pages were worth anything to begin with. I can rank a site for 'left handed profession city st', overnight. It doesn't mean any of that is going to work for the client.
But if they didn't redirect any of the old pages to their new, relevant, equivalents - I highly doubt they took the time to block those pages via robots.txt. If they did, wow. I'll leave it at that.
The increase of indexed pages could be due to any number of things. Perhaps a site search function is misconfigured? Perhaps the site uses tags in a way I wouldn't recommend? Perhaps the CMS, if there is one, is prone to duplicate content.
That's pretty much the best I can do without a specific example. Anyone with more 'skeelz' than I would be guessing as well. But thanks much for your question.
-
Ugh... I hate when this happens. It is such a pain in the butt to fix.
1st, you absolutely need those 301 redirects. Don't wait any longer to get them done. Those 404s are affecting your rankings considerable at this point. Basically you have 700 of them, whoa.
Secondly, the double index is because you have 700 new pages added to the 700 old pages. You can wait it out if you want to, but I don't recommend it. Get rid of the no follow on those old pages, 301 them so that the rankings might be salvaged. Once the new pages start ranking on their own you can get rid of the 301s. But, for now, get them going.
The 301s add a little bit of juice to the new pages, and that is a good thing. The reason they are important is because they are still ranking and bringing traffic to your site. The new pages will start to get some traffic which in turn will help their rankings.
Did you do anything on social with the site redesign? If you send out a post you might be able to salvage some traffic from you followers. Social signals will also help the rankings of the new pages.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Subdomain Ranking Question
Hi All - Quick question that I think I know the answer to, but I feel like I've been going around in circles a bit. My client is launching a new product and wants us to build a microsite for it (product.clientname.com). My client really dislikes their brand website, and wants to use paid media to push their audience to this new microsite. However, they also said want it to rank well organically. I feel uneasy about this, because of the subdomain vs. subfolder argument. I believe that the product will also be listed/featured on their main brand website. What is the best way forward? Thanks!
Technical SEO | | AinsleyAgency0 -
Ranking and Indexing Issue
We have an established site www.getinspired365.com that previously wasn't SEO optimised. We are currently in the process of testing out some new pages to see if we can get them to rank in Google, however we are seeing huge fluctuations in where they rank. Within the first few days we saw our page rank on the first or second page, however it has now dropped out of the top 250 search results. We are wondering if we have made any mistakes with our optimisation ? Example Page : Keyword to target - "If you laugh, you think, and you cry, that's a full day. That's a heck of a day. You do that seven days a week, you're going to have something special." URL : http://www.getinspired365.com/if-you-laugh-you-think-and-you-cry-thats-a-full-day-thats-a-heck-of-a-day-you-do-that-seven-days-a-week-youre-going-to-have-something-special We can see it has been indexed by Google but is now not ranking in the top 250 search engine results. We have run the On Page Grader from SEOMoz and it ranks the page as an "A" so we suspect that we are doing the SEO ok on the page, but can't work out why it isn't ranking, despite ranking on the first or second page after a few days ? We have other pages that aren't SEO optimised that rank better than our newly SEO optimised pages e.g. Keyword - "THE BEST LOVE IS THE KIND THAT AWAKENS THE SOUL AND MAKES US REACH FOR MORE, THAT PLANTS A FIRE IN OUR HEARTS AND BRINGS PEACE TO OUR MINDS. AND THAT'S WHAT YOU'VE GIVEN ME. THAT'S WHAT I'D HOPED TO GIVE YOU FOREVER" URL: http://www.getinspired365.com/20130528 Any advice you could offer would be great. Thanks ! Mike
Technical SEO | | MichaelWhyley0 -
Switching site from http to https. Should I do entire site?
Good morning, As many of you have read, Google seems to have confirmed that they will give a small boost to sites with SSL certificates this morning. So my question is, does that mean we have to switch our entire site to https? Even simple information pages and blog posts? Or will we get credit for the https boost as long as the sensitive parts of our site have it? Anybody know? Thanks in advance.
Technical SEO | | rayvensoft1 -
Site Redesign: 302 Query
Hi there, We'll be redesigning our website www.example.com and as such want to 302 users from www.example.com and all other pages to a new URL www.example.com/landingpage while we go through the redesign. The new landing page will have copy and a sign up form on it and once the redesign is completed, we plan on removing the 302 and sending all traffic back to the original url www.example.com. I'd just like to check that a 302 is the most relevant option here? Obviously, once redesign is completed we'll 301 any old URLs to their new locations once completed.
Technical SEO | | Hemblem0 -
Link removal from search rank checking sites
I'm going through the link removal process for unnatural links to a site. While I'm able to identify the obvious link profile and seo-article links that Google wants removed, what should we do about the links that are generated by the various seo link investigation and ranking services? Example: http://www.seoprofiler.com/analyze/allamericanfencing.com This site (seoprofiler) automatically creates these links to web sites when it generates its reports. Are those links that need to be removed or disavowed, or will Google not care? I want to err on the side of caution, but don't know how to treat these types of pages. The site didn't ask for or lobby for those links, so it's "natural" in that sense, but they're not editorially earned either (except for happen to be ranking for a similar term). Does anyone have experience on this aspect of the unnatural link grooming process?
Technical SEO | | CHarkins0 -
Is 301 redirecting all old URLS after a new site redesign to the root domain bad for SEO?
After a new site redesign ...would it hinder our rankings if we 301 redirected all old URLS that are returning 404 error codes to the root domain (home page) ? Would this be a good temporary solution until we are able to redirect the pages to the appropriate corresponding page? Thanks so much!
Technical SEO | | DCochrane0 -
When doing the ranking report I see my site showing up on google with out the www in front. So the report is not picking it up how do I fix that?
The ranking report is not picking up my site even though it's there. It would seem that the www. Is missing from the site on google so it's not registering in the report. How do i fix this?
Technical SEO | | ursalesguru0 -
How to setup tumblr blog.site.com to give juice to site.com
Is it possible to get a subdomain blog.site.com that is on tumblr to count toward site.com. I hoped I could point it in webmaster tools like we do www but alas no. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Technical SEO | | oznappies0