Penguin hit Website - Moving to new domain
-
Hey!
I am working on a Penguin hit Website. Still ranking for all brand keywords and blog articles are still being returned in Google SERPs, but the website is showing up for only 3 or 4 money keywords. It is clearly a penguin hit as it was ranked 1st page for all money keywords before latest update (3.0). We already did a link cleanup and disavowed all bad backlinks. Still, the recovery process could take over 2 years from previous experience, and in 2 years, the site will suffer a slow death.
Solution: We own the .com version of the domain, currently being served on the .net. We bought the .com version about 6 years ago, it is clean and NOT redirected to the .net (actual site).
We were thinking about moving the whole Website to the .com version to start over. However, we need to make sure Google doesn't connect the 2 sites (no pagerank flow). Of course Google will notice is the same content, but there won't be any pagerank flowing from the old site to the new one.
For this, we thought about the following steps:
- Block Googlebot (and only googlebot) for the .net version via robots.txt.
- Wait until Google removes all URLs from the index.
- Move content to the .com version.
- Set a 301 redirect from .net to .com (without EVER removing the block on googlebot).
Thoughts? Has anyone went over this before? Other ideas?
Thanks!
-
Thanks so much for listening my tweet and coming in here to drop a few lines Marie
I think i'll do a mix of both techniques. First, an extensive link cleanup. Then follow my first post's steps (adding the noindex meta tags in all pages as you suggested below) and then do the 301 redirect.
Will also add to the mix a redesign, just so the site looks renewed for both users and SE.
Will share insights once we complete the migration.
Thanks again!
PS: will keep an eye for the article on SEW
-
This is risky. The problem is that you can't guarantee that you've cleaned up 100% of the bad links. I personally think that this is one of the reasons why some sites are not recovering from Penguin...because there are unnatural links hidden that none of the backlink checkers can find. I have sites for which I do monthly backlink cleanup and every month I find old links from as far back as 2006.
You may see improvement and then run the risk of seeing a decline with a future Penguin update.
-
Keep an eye on Search Engine Watch this week. I have an article coming out, probably Wednesday that answers your question perfectly. What you are planning to do really should work though. It's important that you wait until the old site is completely out of the index before starting the new.
Rather than just blocking by robots though what I would do is put a noindex tag on all of the pages, do a url removal request for each page and then put the block on. Otherwise, the pages may still remain in the cache and then Google may see the .com as a duplicate of the .net.
-
Thanks Matt. Do you mind if I PM you with some insight questions, just to make sure I get the idea, don't wanna end up burning the other domain.
Thanks!
-
Correct - just do a cleanup, 301 the domain, and treat the new domain like you would a brand new one (but with more authority.)
Be careful not to do much that is negative in the first (month? 3 months? year) after a 301. It has a lot of authority but not as much (there's no word for it) "native" juice of its own so any bit of spam seems to be accentuated.
-
I'm sure this is a Penguin hit, 100%.
Very bad link profile, some cool links, but 90% junk. The traffic drop happened the day Penguin 3.0 was released and the site is not being outranked, it is just not ranking for those money keywords. Content is still working great, lots of hits to the blog and ranking places of the best pieces are steady and haven't change at all. Branding still doing strong too.
-
Thanks Matt,
So you say no robots disallow and no disavow file on new domain and just a 301 after a FULL link cleanup?
-
Are you sure this was Penguin and not Panda? Did you actually get a penalty? I would really make sure you are dealing with a penalty before you put all of this work into something that it doesn't necessarily need.
If you are experiencing a loss in traffic and impressions and keyword rankings without an actual penalty I would run a new SERP analysis and find out what kind of competition is kicking you out of your top spots. With two major updates just rolling out in Sept/Oct there is a chance that your site was not penalized but being outranked by better sites. With the way that Penguin works, you can be suffering from another sites Penguin 2.0 recovery.
Do you update your content regularly? Is what you have on the site truly unique and informative? You said you are going through a disavow right now, that could definitely effect the rankings and search traffic.
Before you decide to completely abandon ship and jump on a whole new site, make sure you are truly dealing with a Penguin penalty and not just mediocre on page SEO coupled with a weak link profile.
If you truly feel moving domains is the solution, then I would select a domain completely unrelated and unattached to any webmaster property that might have a Penguin penalty. Select a domain with some age and that is clear of any nefarious link profiles. Use OSE or Ahrefs to investigate before you buy. Keeping things unrelated will be the best way to ensure you have no negative link juice following you around.
Is it possible that one of your link sources suffered a Penguin Penalty? That could really effect your rankings. 3.0 really targeted link neighborhoods. You could have back links that have terrible link profiles and are now causing you grief. Use OSE or Ahrefs to kind of check your link profiles back links. I would start here if you have no actual penalty.
-
Do a thorough link clean up & disavow on the .net, then 301 redirect over to the .com - you will keep the majority of traffic, get rankings back quickly and when Google connects the two, you're only redirecting a cleaned up domain to your new .com - happens every day.
So clean up first - then do your redirects. We've done this for hundreds of clients and had very quick recoveries that have survived multiple Penguin updates now. Google wants it clean so do it right and don't worry about having to start from scratch.
-
Thank you for your response.
Although starting from scratch kind of hurts, here I think is not a good option. The site is very well known in its niche, with over 100K customers and 20K regulars, so we are trying to keep the same name (also trademarked, DBA, LLC, etc).
Building a new image for the site and new content isn't the problem, however, I wonder how far Google may take their "penalty-flow" if we start a new Website just using the same name, going from domain.net to domain.com (content and design will be different), but a 301/302 or javascript redirect will be placed in domain.net after all pages are deindexed and there are no traces of the new site.
I must add this is an algorithmic penalty, not a manual. There are no manual actions applied.
-
I was hit by penguin years ago due to a company that was not doing the think the right way without my knowlege. All the content were made by me and were a very good content so i was raking first for almost everything.
When i got hit i did not know how and did not understand until i discovered what the company i had contracted were doing due to personal cuts.
I immediatly stop working with them, i tried to recover from the penalty. From more than one year i was sending and recieving email from webmaster tools.
After removing almost every known link i still recieved email from webmaster that there were bad links. And some of them were from competitors that directly copy pages of mine, with my link included on them.
That was when i sadly decided to give up (i had worked personaly on that domain for more then 10 years) was a reference and the first one on the sector.
That was the best decisión. What i did was a litle bit diferent:
1-º I started a new domain with new fresh and added value content (not coping directly from old website, has it had lots of content copied from competitors and i did not want relation)
2- I still mantain for 6 months old website to give me time to create new content and start raking new site (I it very difficult to give up something that you loved and were proud).
The condition of not placing any link from old domain to new domain. And new site were in another server. In the old site i just placed a picture without any link saiyng that the company had a new website.
3- completly prohibited to do any redirection from old domain to new domain, as if i do that you will also pass bad links that you havent discovered or that you dont know that are bad
4- in about one year i manage to achive almost same positions with the new domain that i had before
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Penalized domain, starting over. 302 or just add a link that site has moved?
Hello, our .com domain got a fred update and to be honest we need to start over. Now my first idea was to 302 the domain as the penalty should not come with this. Other option is just to have a landing page saying, we have a new address its www.example.es . What would be better?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | advertisingtech1 -
Should I revive the old domain or just redirect all the juicy links to my new site?
I'm about to acquire a domain with a lot of great/highly authoritative backlinks. The links pointing to the domain are quite powerful and the domain is an exact match TLD. I have two options (that I know of 😞 1. I could redirect all the links to their new home(s) on my new site which offers the same resources the old site used to offer. or 2. I could rebuild the tools/content on this site. Ideally, I'd transfer to my new site as all those powerful links could help all my rankings. However, I'm worried that some of the powerful links will de-link once they see the site redirects elsewhere, even though it's offering the same content. Also, option one isn't an exact match domain. Which, I know, shouldn't make a difference now-a-days but regardless of what people say, it still seems to help out some sites in less competitive niches. One more thing to note: The domain that I'm purchasing is about 25 years old. I'm leaning toward option one. I want to make sure I put my best foot forward on this investment and thought it wise to consult the SEO gods.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ninel_P0 -
Why this site is not hit by google penguin only experts answer please
Hello I know a site which has the following things and it is not hit by google penguin at all and is ranked on first page first link in google.com.pk it has 1.3K total backlinks its has 34 referring domains according to ahrefs the exact match keyword which is ranked in google.com.pk as first position is used in 1.2 K backlinks its DA is 18 and PA is 31 its citation flow is 19 trust flow is 13 targeted exact match keyword is present in Title and description also. Now tell me what is happening here.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | tanveerayakhan0 -
Two websites (Domains) with same content for more than 4 years which one to choose now?
Hi, I need help with this decision, thanks in advance. My client has 2 websites but they have the same content: one has 4 years http://radiocolombia.com.co/ and the the other one 7 years: http://radiocolombiainternacional.com/web/ This content has been duplicated for years, how do I know which website is more relevant for google? we have to pick one. Please any advice? Thanks, David
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seoweb330 -
Process for moving existing articles to new structure (URLs, titles, etc)
I am in the midst of a major redesign of my site, including revamping existing articles . I have a couple of hundred articles and I am reviewing all aspects of these articles, including titles, URLs, content, etc. I am putting together a process as I move each article across to the new site and have SEO very much in mind. I'd appreciate any feedback on this. First off, let me be clear that I consider the quality of the content paramount. Anything suggested below is considered "supporting" (that content) from an SEO perspective. But, since I am moving this content across, I may as well take the opportunity to clean things up. The existing articles don't have particularly good SEO-related attributes, in terms of their titles, URLs, use of keywords and so on. So, I plan to do the following for each article. For illustrative purposes (our site serves the wedding industry), I will use an article about how to involve children at a wedding. Questionsunder each bullet. Use the "Keyword Difficulty" feature on Moz Pro to research a specific keyword for each article. In the example case I used "involving children in our wedding". Honestly, I am not really sure what to do with this feature 🙂 I've read everything from "focus on the long tail" to "don't fear highly competitive keywords". So, my current thinking is merely to use it as interesting information for they keyword I choose but not actually make any specific decisions from that ie. make sure the keyword is relevant to the article as the first priority and use the tool to check out search volume. Not sure what I should read into a zero for recent Bing searches. Is that really an important factor? I'm assuming the Google information is not available from Google (it would be displayed here otherwise, I'm guessing) Use a title that uses these keywords. In this case, I simply went with "Involving children in our wedding". Same for URL - /wedding-guests/involving-children-in-our-wedding If I have a reasonable, short and human-friendly term like this (I can do this with virtually every article quite easily), is there any reason why the URL and the title should not be the same? In short, the title and URL are both a relatively concise "mini-sentence" Make sure the meta description of the article is easy-to-read (for humans) and uses the keyword (sentence) Make sure that the theme (we are moving to WordPress) uses H1 for the page header/title and H2 for sections within the document Implement 301 redirects from the old URL (old site) to the new URL This seems like a pretty obvious approach for articles where the URL has changed (which will be most of them). But what do I do with articles that I am going to remove. Should I redirect (301) to a related article (so at least the visitor ends up on a page that is generally relevant) or just let this "fall through" as a non-existent page (401)? As I say, I have 200+ articles to go through I want to make sure I am taking this advantage to clean things up. Anything leaping out as missing/problematic? Thanks in advance Mark
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | MarkWill0 -
A new website issue
Hello everybody,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | mtmaster
I have started a new website 22 days ago at the beginning of this month and i have long articles. I think this should make the site appear in search results for long tail keywords even if they are not very relevant but as you can see in the attached image from my webmaster tools the impression count has suddenly increased to 100 then significantly decreased again. Even when i cancel "filter" option. Is this normal for a 3 weeks old website? or there is something i have to check? thanks. cLMa04l.jpg0 -
301 many smaller domains to a new, large domain
Hi all, I have a question regarding permanently redirecting many small websites into one, large new one. During the past 9 years I have created many small websites, all focusing on hotel reservations in one specific city. This has served me beautifully in the past, but I have come to the conclusion that it is no longer a sustainable model and therefore I am in the process of creating one large, worldwide hotel reservations website. To not loose any benefit of my hard work the past 9 years, I want to permanently redirect the smaller websites to the correct section of my new website. I know that if it is only a few websites, that this strategy is perfectly acceptable, but since I am talking about 50 to 100 websites, I am not so sure and would like to have your input. Here is what I would like to do: (the domain names are not mine, just an example) Old website: londonhotels.com 301 to newdomain.com/london/ Old website: berlinhotels.com 301 to newdomain.com/berlin/ Old website: amsterdamhotels.com 301 to newdomain.com/amsterdam/ Etc., etc. My plan is to do this for 50 to 100 websites and would like to have your thoughts on if this is an acceptable strategy or not. Just to be clear, I am talking about redirecting only my websites that are in good standing, i.e. none of the websites I am thinking about 301'ing have been penalized. Thanks for your thoughts on this.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | tfbpa0 -
How can I tell which website pages are hosted on the root domain vs the www subdomain?
One of the SEOmoz help desk professionals told me this today regarding some of my website pages. "it looks like you have pages hosted as separate pages on both the root domain and the www subdomain, which means that these pages are competing for rankings and authority. You may want to consider a 301 redirect or the use of rel=canonical tags.". Can anyone help me understand this? How can I tell which pages are which?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | webestate0