301 Redirect to add juice from Keyword A to Keyword B
-
Here's our situation:
Our company sells Employee HANDBOOKS (the book that explains to employees how the company itself is run, more or less). That's the technically correct term for them. However, many people use this term interchangeably with Employee MANUALS. Employee MANUALS are actually slightly different. (they're more specific, usually a list of common office policies and procedures and how to do them)
When doing Keyword research, we learned that many, many people search for Employee MANUALS when they actually are interested in an employee HANDBOOK. We've got our page optimized for the Keyword Employee HANDBOOKS, because in our copy we always refer to it as such.
Here's my question: Would it be "cloacking" or some other blackhat nonsense if we did this:
#1. Take a copy of the current page, and make a second page for it with a slightly different URL, but optimize the SEO-relevant parts for the phrase Employee MANUAL.
#2. That page will also include a 301-redirect towards the original page, which is identical except the SEO bits are optimized for Employee HANDBOOKS.
My understanding here is that we'd get the SEO juice from the phrase Employee Manual, without actually having to do the upkeep on two different pages. We also avoid having to have a random page SEO optimized for an improper term just because of the general confusion about what the product is called.
Are we on the right track here? Or is this going to annoy Google, or not have the result I'm predicting? Any insight is appreciated!
-
Exactly this. Thanks Richard for explaining it in this way as well.
-
It looks like Google is aware of and has made this connection already. If you Google "employee manual" you will see that it actually bolds the term "handbook" as well. This usually indicates they can be used almost interchangeably in the content.
-
I would create the 301 redirect for the old pages to the most applicable new pages or home page, and create a custom 404. Those are always good to have and could also help explain the transition to your current strategy.
-
Fantastic, thank you sir. I've marked the question as answered and really appreciate your quick response. Could I trouble you for one more thing?
We'd already researched this, but since I may have failed to catch something important I want to make sure I'm not setting up a bad result.
We're currently migrating from one web design to another. It's all in WordPress but it's a new theme, templates, and all of that.
We have several links to content that is no longer particularly relevant or aligning with our current strategy. At first we felt it would be better to just not move them over, and design a friendly but generic 404 page that would alert people they may have tried to access something that's no longer there.
I suggested that instead of 404 (which I feel look bad, no matter how well they're designed) we should just transfer over the web page, but have them 301-redirect to our home page. I think that will be a slightly less jarring experience for them than seeing a 404 page. Either way, it will be a very small number of people who might still have access to a link for content so old/bad we don't really want it on our site anymore.
So in your opinion, is 404ing out or 301ing back to the home page the better option in our scenario? Or perhaps some third option I'm unaware of.
-
Right. Even though your business is technically about handbooks, doesn't mean you can't create some sort of campaign or widget or app or some sort of engagement piece that uses the term 'manual' instead and is targeted at individuals instead of corporate users.
You'll notice when you run some Google searches that they'll tag a result with synonyms as well as results missing certain precise search terms. This is due to the ability of Google to correlate meaning, intent, links, and more to such a high degree. The more you engage the higher you'll rank for both handbook and manual.
-
I'm not sure I followed your suggestion for an alternative, but thanks for your quick answer.
You're suggesting we simply try to obtain links to our site with anchor text mentioning both manuals and handbooks? I understand SEO value for the words in the anchor text will transfer that juice to the site it links to, but we are still in the process of building awareness, so a lot of our links back to our site are actually made by us. (When we submit content to various sites for them to post, we have the link to our site in the Author Bio section. When we post on social media, we're usually forced to use a bit.ly link due to Twitter character constraints.)
So if we advertise a "Free Handbook Review" program, we'd want to have SOME of the links back to our site have "manual" somewhere in the anchor text, in other words.
-
Hi Paul. Yes, this bit of work would be more gray/black than other straightforward methods, plus its benefits would be pretty minimal. What would be better is gaining links that use the terms interchangeably from outside sources. If people are searching for these terms as synonyms they will likely link in the same way. There would be several ways to go about this, like a "Make Your Manual" campaign that generates some links, PR around such, and so on. Cheers.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
301 Redirect Url Within a Canonical Tag
So this might sounds like a silly question... A client of mine has a duplicate content issue which will be fixed using canonical tags. We are also providing them with an updated URL structure meaning rwe will be having to do lots of 301 redirects. The URL structure is a much larger task that than the duplicate content so i planned to set up the canonicals first. Then it occurred to me id be updating the canonical tags with the urls from the old structure which brings me to my question. Will the canonical tags with the old urls redirect credit to the new urls with the 301? Or should i just wait until we have the new url structure in place and use these new urls in the canonicals? Thanks!
Technical SEO | | NickG-1230 -
Is there anyway to automatically find complete urls for 301 redirects?
Hello all, I'm working on a large site that is being prepared for a migration. After scraping on screaming frog, WMT, and deepcrawl, and deduping I have a list of 404 pages that need redirected. Many of these URLs are just incomplete URLs. For example the incomplete URL would be: "https://moz.com/beginners-guide-to" when it should be "https://moz.com/beginners-guide-to-seo" I have been finding the correct page manually searching google. With hundreds more to go, I am looking for a way the would be a little less laborious. Thanks! https://moz.com/beginners-guide-to-seo
Technical SEO | | AdamBohr0 -
Can I Get Penalized for 301 Redirects (Too Many or In Any Scenario)?
A client of ours owns several domain names that are keyword similar to the domain they actually use to run their site. They are asking us if we should 301 redirect all of these websites to the domain they use. However, I don't want this to work against them and their site get penalized later for this. I have heard buying out competitors and redirecting their domain to yours is frowned upon and penalized when you get caught (they did not do this). We are also wondering if there is a limit as to how many domains you can 301 redirect and what type (keyword similar, misspellings, .net's, etc.) and if you are penalized after too many (i.e. >50). All of the domains in question are keyword/brand name similar only and do not exist as actual websites. We just want to do the right thing. Thank you for your help.
Technical SEO | | JCunningham0 -
302 to 301 redirect confirmation
Hi guys, Fairly sure of the answer from what I've read so far, but I just wanted to doublecheck I have it right. Page A gets a significant amount of referring, followed traffic, and also ranks in Google. Page A uses a 302 redirect to Page B (on a completely different domain), which means that 0% of Page A's link juice is being passed on to Page B. If I were to change the 302 redirect to a 301 redirect, then the link juice passed on to Page A from the followed, referring traffic will be (mostly) passed on to Page B. Is that correct? Cheers, Jez
Technical SEO | | jez0000 -
Is my 301 redirect working?
Very simple question here . I've redirected a bunch of older pages with decent ranking to some newer pages on my site, using the Thesis theme's built-in redirect function. However, in the SERPS, the older pages (and, importantly, older titles) still show up. When clicked on, they redirect to the new page, but it's still irritating because the older titles make the site look out of date. Is this Working As Intended, or have I or my theme done something wrong? And if it's the latter, what's the best way to achieve a redirect, preferably with a Wordpress plugin?
Technical SEO | | Cairmen0 -
Redirects
Hello, My question is: how important is it to wait for the a redirect to get seen and cached before you take down the old page? More in depth: my old platform has seriously limited my ability to add sitemaps and make edits to htacces. I just want to change nameservers (which will delete everything on there) and upload the htaccess is that alright? Another way of saying it: when redirecting a page, is it necessary for google to see the old page before it is deleted? Thanks Tyler
Technical SEO | | tylerfraser0 -
During a site platform transition, should we 301 redirect all URLs or only those with inbound links?
We have an ecommerce client transitioning to a new platform. Due to the nature of the platform, all the pages will have different URLs. There are between 7000-8000 total pages on the website. We wrote 301 redirects for all URLs which are showing inbound links. Unfortunately, automating this process is pretty difficult and hand writing URLs for 8000 links is unfeasible. Is it worth investing the time to 301 redirect all 8000 URLs, or are we safe with only doing those with inbound links? One other option would be to implement a generic redirect for all the rest of the old URLs that sends them to the homepage. Would this be a good compromise?
Technical SEO | | outofboundsdigital0 -
301 Redirect vs Domain Alias
We have hundreds of domains which are either alternate spelling of our primary domain or close keyword names we didn't want our competitor to get before us. The primary domain is running on a dedicated Windows server running IIS6 and set to a static IP. Since it is a static IP and not using host headers any domain pointed to the static IP will immediately show the contents of the site, however the domain will be whatever was typed. Which could be the primary domain or an alias. Two concerns. First, is it possible that Google would penalize us for the alias domains or dilute our primary domain "juice"? Second, we need to properly track traffic from the alias domains. We could make unique content for those performing well and sell or let expire those that are sending no traffic. It's not my goal to use the alias domains to artificially pump up our primary domain. We have them for spelling errors and direct traffic. What is the best practice for handling one or both of these issues?
Technical SEO | | briankb0