SEO Question re: Keyword Cannibalization
-
I know about Keyword Cannibalization, so I understand why it's generally a problem. If you have multiple versions of the same page, Google has to "guess" which one to display (as I understand it, unless you have a SUPER influential page you won't get both pages showing up on the SERP).
To explain why I'm not sure if this applies to our page, we have a blog that we write about employment law issues on. So we might have 20 blog posts over the past year that all talk about recent pregnancy discrimination lawsuits employers might be interested in.
Now, searching the Google Keyword tools, there aren't even close to 20 different focus keywords that would make any sense. "Pregnancy Discrimination lawsuit" is niche enough for us to be competitive, but anything more specific than that simply has very little search activity.
My suggestion is to just optimize all of them for "pregnancy discrimination lawsuit". My understand of how Panda works is that if the content is different on each page (and it is!) then it will only display what it guesses is the most relevant "NLRB" post, but any link juice sent to the other 19 "NLRB" posts would still boost the relevancy for whatever post Google chooses. And it wouldn't get dinged as keyword stuffing because it's clearly not just the same page repeated over and over.
I've found quite a few articles on Keyword Cannibalization but many are pre-Panda. I was CERTAIN I'd seen a post that explained my idea is a totally viable and good one, but of course now I can't find it. So before I go full steam ahead with this strategy I just want to make sure there's nothing I'm missing. Thanks!
-
Well, I will certainly look into that.
Really though, just in the meantime, I'm very curious if someone could at least make a call as to which of these two procedures works better
- Find a way to SEO optimize 20 variations of similar pages covering a similar topic (but different enough that all 20 need to stay)
- SEO optimize each of the 20 pages for the same keyword
I have searched everywhere, I cannot find a cogent answer as to whether cannibalization would happen in option 2, or if it would pretty much work (although again, your idea is way better, I'm not suggesting my procedure would work nearly as well)
-
We won't have time to get new category pages up probably for at least a few months
I try to avoid stopgap work. If I was in your situation, I would plan this well and execute once. I would wait until the site move is over and then do a great job.
As for optimizing the case study pages. I would look at the traffic coming into them now and what keywords might be sending it. I don't think that the optimization of these pages is extremely critical. I would simply give them obvious and relevant names.
-
First of all, thank you for the kind words regarding our content. We've worked hard to build up a good amount of it (and make it quality stuff), now we're just trying to leverage it better.
I immediately see tons of great uses for your idea, we could 301-redirect dead pages back to that even (if we needed to, we're in the middle of a site move and still trying to figure out if we should port over ALL of our content, some of the earlier stuff isn't quite as strong)
Because we're limited on time, let me just get clarification on two things in the meantime:
#1. We won't have time to get new category pages up probably for at least a few months, there's too much other website optimizing stuff to do before our deadline. Would the procedure I outlined work, or would it cause problems? I realize it wouldn't work as well as yours, it's just a stopgap until then.
#2. If we're really going to NEED to do it the way you described (because my way actively hurts us somehow), we would still try to SEO optimize the actual articles that people link to, correct? With a link back to the category page (and appropriate anchor text) I know we'd still be boosting the category page every time someone visits an article page, but if we have to SEO optimize the article too (and if we can't repeat keywords) then we're back at square 1, trying to optimize more-or-less the same keyword 20 different ways.
-
In my opinion, you seem to have an awesome library of content on this subject.
So, what I would do is prepare a special page that will serve as a category page for this topic. I would, at the top of that page, describe the general topic, the background of what employers should know, then explain how you have prepared detailed summaries of many different cases. A summary of your service to this type of client would be included on this page.
Then, I would give a name to each case, a one or two sentence description, and link to the page where the full details of that case can be found. This page will be a gateway to your library and because it links out to lots of resource material on your site it should become your master page on this topic to rank at the top of the SERPs.
I would title this page with a very short title tag, not much more than your keywords and the name of your firm. Then, across the website in persistent navigation I would link to this page.
One problem with blogs is they often don't weave into the topic structure of your website with breadcrumbs or persistent navigation. So if you don't have that, you might want to develop it or at least give links back to the main category page within each blog post with keyword anchor text. I might create a colored box that directs any visitor to each blog post to your full category page.
This will be a hand-built category page targeted at your main keyword. This is what I use when I am mounting a massive content attack on a difficult keyword.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Keyword Ranking Fluctuations
Hi Guys I am currently working on a website where one of the keyword targets is fluctuating. The keyword is fluctuating between page 2 and page 5. What makes this strange is that we are not experiencing the issue with any other keyword targets. They are all ranking fine. It is only 1 keyword. The keyword target happens to be the main homepage keyword target - not sure if this makes a difference? The homepage targets 2 keyword e.g. Business Offices & Accessories. The homepage ranks perfectly fine for e.g. Business Accessories but is fluctuating for e.g. Business Offices! Very strange. What makes it even stranger - the keyword variations of the fluctuating keyword e.g. office for business - these variations are all fine and not fluctuating. Its only 1 keyword. If anyone has any ideas or feedback that would be great! Thanks, Duncan
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | CayenneRed890 -
Questions About Link Detox
Greetings: In April of 2014 an SEO firm ran a link removal campaign (identified spammy links and uploaded a disavow). The overall campaign was ineffective and MOZ domain rank has fallen to 24 from about 30 in the last year and traffic is 20% lower. I purchased a basic package for Link Detox and ran a report today (see enclosed) to see if toxic links could be contributing to our mediocre rankings. As a novice I have a few questions for you regarding this the use of Link Detox: -We scored a domain wide detox risk of 1,723. The site has referring root domains with 7113 links to our site. 121 links were classified as high audit priority. 56 as medium audit priority. 221 links were previously disavowed and we uploaded a spreadsheet containing the names of the previously disavowed links. We had LinkDetox include an analysis of no-follow links as they recommend this. Is our score really bad? If we remove the questionable links should we see some benefit in ranking? -Some of the links we disavowed last year are still linking to our site. Is it worthwhile to include those links again in our new disavow file? -Prior to filing a disavow we will request that Webmaster remove offending links. LinkDetox offers a package called Superhero for $469.00 that automates the process. Does this package effectively help with the entire process of writing and tracking the removal requests? Do you know of any other good alternatives? -A feature called "Boost" is included in the LinkDetox Super Hero package. It is suppose to expedite Google's processing of the disavow file. I was told by the staff at Link Detox that with Boost Google will process the disavow within a week. Do you have any idea if this claim is valid??? It would be great if it were true. -We never experienced any manual penalty from Google. Will uploading a disavow help us under the circumstances? Thanks for your feedback, I really appreciate it!!! Alan p2S6H7l
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Kingalan10 -
Specific KW question...
Hi, I have this site: http://www.aerlawgroup.com. It's ranking very well overall for all targeted KWs. However, I have seen a drop for one main KW: "Los Angeles criminal defense attorney." It currently ranks #8 (it used to be as high as #2). What's interesting is that for similar (yet slightly less competitive KWs, he ranks much better - "Los Angeles Criminal Defense Lawyer." I'm not trying to be greedy with rankings, but I would love feedback and/or tips regarding any issues that could be contributing to this drop. Thanks.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | mrodriguez14400 -
Social Buttons Help SEO, 2 Questions...
Howdy Guys, I noticed a weird thing over the weekend - our main keyword has been hit pretty hard by penguin and we had dropped down to #79. On Friday I decided to change some on-page optimisation and changed the title tag and some tags. When I've ran my rank tracker this morning we have jumped up to #62... Has anyone else noticed just a simple change boosts rankings? Second Questions We took all our social buttons off the website back in January as no-body was using them but from a few recent reports I've seen having the buttons on the site help organic rankings... Is this true? Scott
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ScottBaxterWW0 -
Advanced Squidoo Question
Hi, I am looking for someone with a lot of experience with building links to your money site using Squidoo. I have a ton of squidoo lenses set up, i recently created back linking reports for a number of squidoos to see if the squidoo was appearing as a link. They were not. Only one out of my 53 lenses is appearing. Tons of them are already featured lenses ( Not work in progress) What does it take to get a squidoo to become an active link in a link profile? Thanks guys
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | danielblinman0 -
Is it worth re-doing SEO for all existent products
We have a website and when we started, we had no clue about SEO, nor did we really understand the full extent of CRO amongst other things. We have slowly learnt that there are many changes that need to happen to our site; however...do we need to re SEO all the content that is already on the website or can we purely start a fresh with the new products we feed through? The website is: www.onlineforequine.co.uk if you need to take a look at the kind of platform we are working with.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | onlineforequine0 -
Canonical URL Question
Hi Everyone I like to run this question by the community and get a second opinion on best practices for an issue that I ran into. I got two pages, Page A is the original page and Page B is the page with duplicate content. We already added** ="Page A**" />** to the duplicate content (Page B).** **Here is my question, since Page B is duplicate content and there is a link rel="canonical" added to it, would you put in the time to add meta tags and optimize the title of the page? Thanks in advance for all your help.**
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | DRTBA0