When do Panda ranking factors apply when Google deindexes a page
-
Here is 2 scenarios
Scenario 1
Lets say I have a site with a ton of pages (100,000+) that all have off site duplicate content. And lets say that those pages do not contain any rel="noindex" tags on them.
Google then decides to de-index all those pages because of the duplicate content issue and slaps me with a Panda penalty.
Since all those pages are no longer indexed by Google does the Panda Penalty still apply even though all those pages have been deindexed?
Scenario 2
I add a rel="noindex" to all those 100,000+ off site duplicate content pages. Since Google sees that I have decided to not index them does the Panda penalty come off?
What I am getting at is that I have realized that I have a ton of pages with off site duplicate content, even though those pages are already not indexed by Google does me by simply adding the rel="noindex" tag to them tell Google that I am trying to get rid of duplicate content and they lift the Panda penalty?
The pages are useful to my users so I need them to stay.
Since in both scenarios the pages are not indexed anyways, will Google acknowledge the difference in that I am removing them myself and lift the panda ban?
Hope this makes sense
-
I have over 800,000 pages total that contain duplicate content "if" that is an issue with my definitions. I would assume that Panda would slap me hard for that, again "if" that is the issue. Since I have never tried to deindex this many pages I am hoping this works and I will take a few coffee breaks waiting because its going to be a while lol
I have nothing to lose and I feel like I have tried a ton. Thanks so much
-
"Google then decides to de-index all those pages because of the duplicate content issue and slaps me with a Panda penalty."
Panda will not deindex pages. It might move them to the supplemental index, but they're not deindexed. Technically, Panda is not a penalty. It's an algorithmic demotion. If you've got a bunch of duplicate content, Google may choose not to index some of that content, or, more likely, to just show users the most appropriate page of that content.
Now, if Panda has affected your site because Google feels that the site consists of mostly duplicate or thin content then you'll need to noindex or significantly change or remove that content in order for Google to see that the quality has improved. You can't say that the content is essentially gone because Google is not showing it. That wouldn't change the factors that caused you to be affected by Panda. (Now, this is assuming that this is what the problem is, because we don't know that.)
"I add a rel="noindex" to all those 100,000+ off site duplicate content pages. Since Google sees that I have decided to not index them does the Panda penalty come off?"
If these pages were the primary reason for Panda to visit your site, then what would happen is that as Google recrawls your site they will start to recognize that the quality is improved. Then, at some point with a future Panda refresh (it may take several if there is a lot of content to crawl), you should see an increase in traffic. If the duplication was the only factor that Panda was concerned about then you'd likely see a dramatic improvement. If it was just one of the factors, you might see a smaller improvement. If you had a lot of factors, you may see very little or just some improvement.
If I understand the question right, I would say that the answer is to go ahead and add the noindex tag to these pages.
-
No offense man, I really want to figure out what the heck happened with my site, I really feel like I was hit from unfortunate circumstances.
My website is http://www.freescrabbledictionary.com/
The duplicate content I am referring too is that I generate my definitions for words from an API provided by https://www.wordnik.com/
I do site the resource on each definition at the bottom of every page (which was required by https://github.com/wordnik), an example is http://www.freescrabbledictionary.com/dictionary/word/testing/
I have never had a manual penalty from Google, I check Google Webmaster Tools all the time. I also use tools like Google analytics as well as moz.com, ahrefs.com and monitorbacklinks.com.
I used to rank for the keyword "scrabble dictionary" in the top 4 spots on average. For a long time I was #2 which was my biggest keyword traffic.
I remember when the first Panda update came out I was not hit. I notice the negative changes in my rankings after the second panda update and so on. Since Penguin was in the mix as well I cant even tell if I was hit with penguin.
I never paid or did black-hat backlinking
Again I never was hit with a manual penalty, this is 100% algorithmic
If you notice with the keyword "scrabble dictionary" my homepage does not rank for that keyword at all. Not anywhere in all the search results, where I used to rank top 4 spots.
Since I have been hit so hard I have nothing to lose so I have "noindex" 100% of each word definition, sentence example's and quotes which even though those are not copied (except for definitions) I did that just in case. This equates for about 90% of my site's pages indexed by Google.
I have changed my site design to equate for the "refresh" ranking factor, I have desperately comb through my site 1,000,000 times trying to figure out what happened, I have disavowed link 10 fold and nothing seems to affect my rankings. At this point I will try anything...I have nothing to lose.
-
Can you describe what happened to your site and why you believe you got a penalty.
make sure Type site:www.example.com in to Google it will show you what is indexed.
Be certain that you do not have a robots.txt file or something similar blocking your website go to https://www.feedthebot.com/tools/ type your domain in and it will tell you if you are blocking anything with your robots.txt do this on the URLs that you think not indexed.
Because if you are affected by a true panda penalty it would be a manual penalty you would receive word inside your Google Webmaster tools account. If you do not have one set one up.
https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/home?hl=en
if you think you've been hit by an algorithm penalty not manual you can check by using tools listed in this URL
http://www.iacquire.com/blog/5-tools-to-help-you-identify-a-google-slap
now obviously because you're talking about duplicate content which it seems like you may have known existed somewhere else may be and please don't take offense you copied it?
In that case Google takes the domain with the most authority and gives it to that domain.
so time.com could probably take your entire site and you would be the one that looked like you stole their content.
remember Google does also consider the first time it was indexed however site authority trumps it.
Google will only acknowledge a difference if you actually have a manual penalty if you received a manual penalty it would come with instructions on what to do next.
My advice to you is if you have duplicate content that is taken from another website and not yours please remove the content second choice no index that content.
It could be that you have the misfortune of somebody finding out that you took their content and they do digital millennium takedown in many cases would damage or domain beyond repair. You would know if this occurred as well. I'm just letting you know it's not smart to have someone else's content on your site you should write it uniquely to meet your end-users needs and if the current content is very helpful to them I recommend you use that to create your own unique content not spinning it but unique.
please know that if you tell me you didn't take the content I will apologize right away. I do not mean to imply.
respectfully,
Tom
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Ranking for "synonym" terms on separate pages?
(My title says "synonym" but it's not exactly the most accurate word, but works best for the title_) I have a site that ranks #1 for a term, and let’s pretend it’s “cheap phone”. It’s also ranks #1 for “cheap phone service” and #3 for “cheap phone plans”. These are all the home page with those rankings I have a sub page whose natural title would be “Cheap Phone Plans” or “Cheap Phone Service”. I have it named something these and it is not optimized for either of these terms because I think it would be best to not mess with the good rankings I have already for those two terms So here’s my question: what would likely be the outcome if I optimized that subpage for “Cheap Phone Plans” or “Cheap Phone Service”? If Google began to direct searchers of this term to my subpage rather than my home page, would my home page lose some of it’s ranking with it’s main and most popular keyword, “cheap phone? Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | bizzer0 -
Strange ranking occurrences in Google (NL)
Mozzers, I got a question for all of you. Recently (about 3 months ago) I launched a renewed website for a costumer of mine. Since then rankings have been improving and some decreasing a little but overall it went quite allright. _Still, we now have some issues with some new pages and I really don't know what to do any more. _ The Case:
On-Page Optimization | | JarnoNijzing
For starters lets say the company sells vacuum cleaners. We now make pages for specific product ranges e.g. Miele Diamond vacuum cleaners which in turn tells something about this product range and has links to different pages of that series, for instance the Miele Black Diamond Silent Vacuum Cleaner. Why did we do this? We already ranked for specific product pages but also wanted to rank for more general terms and thus product ranges. What happened? We now rank perfectly well for the product pages itself but for some reason the Miele Diamond Vacuum Cleaners page doesn't rank at all or not as it should. Why is this strange? Because we applied the exact same tactic for some other product ranges on the same website and it worked like a charm (part of the reason why we started to do this for all product-ranges). I could really use some help here. If you want I can message you the pagelink in PM but I won't post it here for several reasons. The Vacuum Cleaners in this example or not the real products though but used as an exemplar. I really do hope to hear from you with some advice or request for more information. Regards
Jarno0 -
If a site has https versions of every page, will the search engines view them as duplicate pages?
A client's site has HTTPS versions of every page for their site and it is possible to view both http and https versions of the page. Do the search engines view this as duplicate content?
On-Page Optimization | | harryholmes0070 -
Home page ranking dropped below internal pages
The index page for a site I manage has dropped significantly - internal pages rank above it. It's a new site, 2 months old but was ranking at 1st. Any suggestions as to how I can debug this?
On-Page Optimization | | OptioPublishing0 -
How long would it take for On-Page Optimization to have an effect on Google Rankings?
Hi there, I have a page on our website with an Interview with the author Tess Gerritsen. There has been a reasonable amount of Social Media buzz related to the page and lots of links. According to SEOMoz we are an A grade for the keyword Tess Gerritsen, we currently rank 29th on Google.co.uk for a 'tess gerritsen' search. My question is - how long would it take for any new changes to have an effect? I presume the answer would be whenever the page is crawled again. But is it wise to change one thing, then get crawled and see what the effect is, then the next day change something else and see what the effect is. Or is it wise to change one thing and then leave it a week or so to see the full effect of the change? Apologies for the vague question, if you need any more clarification just let me know. Thanks. Benj
On-Page Optimization | | Benj250 -
Redirect and page ranking
We used to have a good page rank of Google, but now our page rank dropped to zero. A few months ago we did a redirect from our www.???.com to non-www.???.com, because non-www.???.com is now our main website. We also have a number of other domains which we redirect to our main website non-www.???.com Do you think these redirects are causing the problem, and if so what can we do to fix it? Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | poupette0 -
Has anyone with a high number of home page tiles been effected by the panda/farmer update?
One of the sites I'm working on seems to have dropped a few spots in rankings. It has numerous home page tiles, but they are not really advertising; just links to different sections on the site. Does anyone think that might be a factor in the rankings drop?
On-Page Optimization | | J.Marie0 -
SEO Value of Within-Page Links vs. Separate Pages
Title says it all. Assuming that you're talking about similar content (let's say, widgets), which is better: using within-page links for variations or using separate pages? I.e., do we have a widget page and then do in-page links to describe green, blue, and red widgets, or separate pages for each type of widget? In-page pro: more content on a single page, thus more keywords, key phrases, and general appearance of real content. In-page con: Jakob Neilsen says they're confusing. Also, for SEO, you only get one page title, rather than a separate page title for each. My personal bias is for in-page, since I hate creating dozens of short pages for what could be on one page, but my suspicion is that separate pages are better for SEO.
On-Page Optimization | | maxkennerly0