Local SEO - Do I need it if I don't do business locally?
-
Super confused about this. Our office is located in Los Angeles, but it is not a storefront, and our clients are from all over the country... and our business involves travel to other countries. So there is nothing "local" about us. But everything I read seems to say we should be doing local SEO. How to approach this?
-
Hi there
"never" on my end was a strong word - I apologize. What I am saying that without proper optimization and taking advantage of opportunities like those listed above, you probably won't appear for those search queries here in Chicago.
My point being - you need to invest in associating your brand with these different regions that you provide services in and have representatives in. Whether it is dedicated on-site content or mentions on other sites that are in those regions, you have opportunities to appear for location based searches.
"It seems like what you're saying is that we need to establish locality in every large and small city in the U.S. and order to be found by people who live anywhere in the U.S."
Not at all - I am saying people in these cities do searches for hotels / tours / travel packages for different cities/countries around the world, researching where they want to go on vacation and get a deal. What I am saying is take opportunities to appear on hotels / tours / travel package websites in those cities/countries that are legitimate and relevant to your business.
Two things happen - you appear on sites in different countries and regions that you legitimately do business in and you increase chances of appearing for location based searches because you appear on sites in those countries and regions.
Does this make sense?
-
Thank you.
"here in Chicago, you're never going to pop up for a search I conduct like "horse back riding beach tours in Cancun"
Ok, so if this is true, then this is serious, serious problem for us. And this seems like an awful side effect of the current algorithm. Why wouldn't a successful, well established, 40 year old national business, whose physical headquarters is in Los Angeles, which operates horse back riding beach tours in Cancun show up in search results for horse back riding beach tours in Cancun by a person who lives in Chicago? That makes no sense. Our clients live in New York City or Ft Collins, Colorado or Emeryville, CA or Anytown, USA. It seems like what you're saying is that we need to establish locality in every large and small city in the U.S. and order to be found by people who live anywhere in the U.S. -- I can't imagine that is what the SEOverlords expect businesses like mine to do.
"I am trying to associate your brand to local businesses and tourist packages in different locales/regions you do business in."
As mentioned, we are in international tour operator. We do not operate tours in the United States, therefore, we have no U.S. based local businesses with whom we can be associated with.
"there are still opportunities based on brand mentions and link building via the questions above, meaning you could appear for searches based around locations + the services you are associated with in those areas."
So then, is the solution to try and make it appear to the search engines that we are local to the places we offer tours (such as your example of Cancun), even if we are not? If we did that, and you are in Chicago and you do your search for horse back in Cancun, will we pop up then?
And as far as the brand mentions... I understood that. And the new importance of brand is directly related to the other question I posted in the forum, which has not been answered yet, and is a completely different and unique problem. Maybe you could look at that and see if you have any insight there.
-
Hey Ben
That's totally fine - what I am more or less referencing is brand mentions.
Point being, here in Chicago, you're never going to pop up for a search I conduct like "horse back riding beach tours in Cancun" - I'm not even sure you do that, but let's suspend disbelief.
By asking you the questions above, I am trying to associate your brand to local businesses and tourist packages in different locales/regions you do business in, letting you know there are opportunities out there.
So while not directly "local SEO", there are still opportunities based on brand mentions and link building via the questions above, meaning you could appear for searches based around locations + the services you are associated with in those areas.
So, say that I do do that particular search. If you are somewhere mentioned in tour packages or itineraries, or even as a trusted partner to hotels or tour groups, this can potentially help you appear as a travel agency where people can set up vacations. This could send traffic your way where people could potentially book vacations through you.
Does that make sense? Hope this gives a bit more perspective and reasoning.
Let me know if you have any more questions or comments! Good luck!
-
The Google Service-area businesses looks like it could be helpful. I'll look at that more closely.
As far as your questions go... These are reasonable questions, but I am not certain how this would apply as far as Local SEO goes.
We are a tour operator. So, of course, our site is all about mentioning the locations/countries we provide travel to, and the specific packages, etc.. So we have that covered.
We do partner with hotels, and we have local representative offices in the countries we provide services to. However... if our clients are 100% U.S. based, and they are contacting us because we are a U.S. based business, is it really helpful (SEO wise - or otherwise) for us to get us listed in directories and such as a local business in Aukland, New Zealand (for example)? We're not a local business in Aukland. But we provide services there. And have local reps.
We hired an SEO firm 4 years ago who listed us all over the place (on non-travel related sites and directories, like YellowPages and such) as a local Los Angeles business. They said it would help us, but didn't seem to help us in any way, and in fact ends looks to me like it is confusing to say that we are a Los Angeles tour operator. We're not. We don't do tours in Los Angeles. And people clicking on those links are going to realize that when they get to our site and contribute to a high bounce rate.
So, ultimately, the question of Local SEO that I keep reading as being important to have, just doesn't feel like it applies to us, yet, we don't want to close a door that could be helpful in search results -- which is really the only thing we are concerned about in this regard. We are a 40 year old business and have had a web presence for a long time, and we just want to stay relevant in search results.
Thank you.
-
Hi there
You do have the opportunity to take advantage of Google Service-area businesses through Google My Business, so keep that in mind. I would also make sure that your website mentions the areas you provide travel for.
A few questions:
- Do you have any local/regional businesses you have partnered with to provide travel options?
- Any international businesses or agencies you work with?
- What about hotels? Are there any hotels that you work with or provide packages through?
- Are you a certified agency of any kind? Can you be listed on those sites?
- Are you able to create testimonials for clients/hotels that have you used your service?
- Are you able to mention (in your About Us or Services pages) different locations/countries you provide travel opportunities to? Even beyond that, are you able to mention specific businesses/touristy packages you provide mentioning landmarks or tours?
Keep in mind, while you are a national business, you do have opportunities at the local level to mention or be mentioned by specific hotels or businesses in certain areas that can loosely associate you with different locales or regions. It's just something to keep in mind.
Hope this helps! Good luck!
-
I think what you are interpreting - is take the "beach head" principle first. Which I believe in. Like the invasion of Europe in World War II - we started with a tiny beach - Normandy and then expanded to conquer the whole of Europe. But we made ensure we owned Normandy first.
It is unusual if your space does not have competitors. If it doesn't then you may not have to change anything.
However if it does have strong competitors - it is easiest & often best to own or rank well or at the top at least in your suburb, then build out to your town then State and slowly the Country. That said it depends on every business model. So if yours is a global business and niche it may be best to skip the "beachhead" principle.
I think it is a tactical decision you need to consider. 60% of your customers may come from Alabama and you know there is more there - so it may be best to focus there... even though your office is LA. Not sure if that helps but a good glass of red may clarify the tactical choices you have!
There are alot of business that do not focus on Local so do not run with the tide if it is not in your companies interests.
-
This is a topic I have struggled with as I have a client who sells digital products to a national audience. As if it could not get any worse my client sells a digital product in the very competitive fitness industry.
So how do you start a campaign where the client wants to have national legs but has yet to make a name for himself? Answer: Locally.
You need to start somewhere. The competitive nature of a national campaign can be overwhelming. Though my client had the grand vision of promoting his product nationally to start, he did not have a bankroll to reach that kind of audience. National campaigns require onsite and offsite seo as well as large advertising campaign to produce buzz about a product.
So we started locally here in New Jersey optimizing the site to attract local customers from the state creating new content as we moved along. Building links and reaching out to influencers beyond our local reach has now produce a regional campaign.
We can only grow from here but at every level the work load gets greater and greater.
If you do not prefer the slow build from local grass roots you could use sub domains to create region based sites that you could optimize. Rember that original content is preferred so this process could become a burden.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
If a the site doesn't have a true folder structure, does having subdirectories really help with hierarchy and passage of equity?
If a website doesn't have a true folder structure, how much does have the page path structured like
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SearchStan
/shoes/rain-boots/ actually help establish hierarchy and flow of equity?
Since /rain-boots/ doesn't actually live in the /shoes/ folder? Will you simply have to use internal linking to get the same effect for the search engine?1 -
Crawl and Indexation Error - Googlebot can't/doesn't access specific folders on microsites
Hi, My first time posting here, I am just looking for some feedback on a indexation issue we have with a client and any feedback on possible next steps or items I may have overlooked. To give some background, our client operates a website for the core band and a also a number of microsites based on specific business units, so you have corewebsite.com along with bu1.corewebsite.com, bu2.corewebsite.com. The content structure isn't ideal, as each microsite follows a structure of bu1.corewebsite.com/bu1/home.aspx, bu2.corewebsite.com/bu2/home.aspx and so on. In addition to this each microsite has duplicate folders from the other microsites so bu1.corewebsite.com has indexable folders bu1.corewebsite.com/bu1/home.aspx but also bu1.corewebsite.com/bu2/home.aspx the same with bu2.corewebsite.com has bu2.corewebsite.com/bu2/home.aspx but also bu2.corewebsite.com/bu1/home.aspx. Therre are 5 different business units so you have this duplicate content scenario for all microsites. This situation is being addressed in the medium term development roadmap and will be rectified in the next iteration of the site but that is still a ways out. The issue
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ImpericMedia
About 6 weeks ago we noticed a drop off in search rankings for two of our microsites (bu1.corewebsite.com and bu2.corewebsite.com) over a period of 2-3 weeks pretty much all our terms dropped out of the rankings and search visibility dropped to essentially 0. I can see that pages from the websites are still indexed but oddly it is the duplicate content pages so (bu1.corewebsite.com/bu3/home.aspx or (bu1.corewebsite.com/bu4/home.aspx is still indexed, similiarly on the bu2.corewebsite microsite bu2.corewebsite.com/bu3/home.aspx and bu4.corewebsite.com/bu3/home.aspx are indexed but no pages from the BU1 or BU2 content directories seem to be indexed under their own microsites. Logging into webmaster tools I can see there is a "Google couldn't crawl your site because we were unable to access your site's robots.txt file." This was a bit odd as there was no robots.txt in the root directory but I got some weird results when I checked the BU1/BU2 microsites in technicalseo.com robots text tool. Also due to the fact that there is a redirect from bu1.corewebsite.com/ to bu1.corewebsite.com/bu4.aspx I thought maybe there could be something there so consequently we removed the redirect and added a basic robots to the root directory for both microsites. After this we saw a small pickup in site visibility, a few terms pop into our Moz campaign rankings but drop out again pretty quickly. Also the error message in GSC persisted. Steps taken so far after that In Google Search Console, I confirmed there are no manual actions against the microsites. Confirmed there is no instances of noindex on any of the pages for BU1/BU2 A number of the main links from the root domain to microsite BU1/BU2 have a rel="noopener noreferrer" attribute but we looked into this and found it has no impact on indexation Looking into this issue we saw some people had similar issues when using Cloudflare but our client doesn't use this service Using a response redirect header tool checker, we noticed a timeout when trying to mimic googlebot accessing the site Following on from point 5 we got a hold of a week of server logs from the client and I can see Googlebot successfully pinging the site and not getting 500 response codes from the server...but couldn't see any instance of it trying to index microsite BU1/BU2 content So it seems to me that the issue could be something server side but I'm at a bit of a loss of next steps to take. Any advice at all is much appreciated!0 -
Incorrect Spelling Indexed In Meta Info - Can't Change It
Hi,It would be great if a member of the community could help me to resolve this issue.Google is indexing an incorrect spelling on of our key pages and we can't identify the reason why.- The page in question: https://newbridgesilverware.com/jewelleryAs you can see from the attached image, the Meta Title is rendered to contain the keyword "jewelry" (the American spelling.) We want this to read as "jewellery" - the British-English spelling. Yet in the page source the word is given in the meta title as "jewellery". Nowhere in the page source or on the page itself does the American spelling appear - yet Google still renders it in the Meta Title.Can anyone identify why this is happening and offer any possible solutions?Much appreciatedDhqJp
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Johnny_AppleSeed1 -
'?q=:new&sort=new' URL parameters help...
Hey guys, I have these types of URLs being crawled and picked up on by MOZ but they are not visible to my users. The URLs are all 'hidden' from users as they are basically category pages that have no stock, however MOZ is crawling them and I dont understand how they are getting picked up as 'duplicate content'. Anyone have any info on this? http://www.example.ch/de/example/marken/brand/make-up/c/Cat_Perso_Brand_3?q=:new&sort=new Even if I understood the technicality behind it then I could try and fix it if need be. Thanks Guys Kay
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | eLab_London0 -
Should I delete 'data hightlighter' mark-up in webmaster tools after added schema.org mark-up?
LEDSupply.com is my site, and before becoming familiar with schema mark-up I used the 'data-highlighter' in webmaster tools to mark-up as much of the site as I could. Now that Schema is set-up I'm wondering if having both active is bad and am thinking I should delete the previous work with the 'data highlighter' tool. To delete or not to delete? Thank you!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | saultienut0 -
What can you do when Google can't decide which of two pages is the better search result
On one of our primary keywords Google is swapping out (about every other week) returning our home page, which is more transactional, with a deeper more information based page. So if you look at the Analysis in Moz you get an almost double helix like graph of those pages repeatedly swapping places. So there seems to be a bit of cannibalizing happening that I don't know how to correct. I think part of the problem is the deeper page would ideally be "longer" tail searches that contain the one word keyword that is having this bouncing problem as a part of the longer phrase. What can be done to try prevent this from happening? Can internal links help? I tried adding a link on that term to the deeper page to our homepage, and in a knee jerk reaction was asked to pull that link before I think there was really any evidence to suggest that that one new link made a positive or negative effect. There are some crazy theories floating around at the moment, but I am curious what others think both about if adding a link from a informational to a transactional page could in fact have a negative effect, and what else could be done/tried to help clarify the difference between the two pages for the search engines.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | plumvoice0 -
'Nofollow' footer links from another site, are they 'bad' links?
Hi everyone,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | romanbond
one of my sites has about 1000 'nofollow' links from the footer of another of my sites. Are these in any way hurtful? Any help appreciated..0 -
My Google title isn't showing what is entered
Help! On Yahoo and Bing, if you search "Chant Real Estate" the full title that I've entered appears in the search listings: Chant PA Real Estate | Real Estate PA | Pennsylvania: Find PA Homes for Sale But in Google it only shows "Chant PA Real Estate". This title was what the original developer used for their site and it's been almost a year now that it's been under our control. Any suggestions? The URL is www.chantre.com.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | gXe0