High Bounce Rate
-
Hi Mozzers,
I wanted to discuss bounce rates as i am trying to drive my websites down and would appreciate some pointers.
Firstly, the facts.
Ours is an e-commerce website we attract 10000-12000 visitor a month, 8000 of which land on a single page and the other 4000 rest of website.
On a whole the rest of the website has a bounce rate of 48-56% which im fairly comfortable about, but have made small gains with little changes.
The problem is the single page attracting 8000 visitors. The page is an informative article about the various types of a select product and its most common uses. When i started the page had no internal links and was suffering from a 88% bounce rate. I have since inserted products into every sub-section of the post and lots of links to products, category pages etc. This has gone really well and the pages linked from it attracted 1000 more views month 1, and 1500 month 2 with the bounce rate dropping to 76% (small win). However I am still not happy as this is still very high. I would like to work towards dropping it below 60%.
The article attracts traffic from hundreds of longtail keywords around the subject "different types of this product". The average time spent on the page is 4-5 minutes so I know people are reading the article and finding it useful. How else can I look to encourage more click-through?
-
Why don't you sell those products? Is it because those other products are inferior in quality, too expensive for value, etc.? If there are specific reasons like that, it can some times be helpful to state that specifically as a means of helping to educate your customers and potentially sway them into seeing the value of what you do sell.
The other thing to look at is what keywords are driving traffic to the page. Granted, this data is hard to get but you can get a good sense of this in Search Console. Figure out why you are ranking for the things you don't sell. For example, if you have a lot of links pointing to you referring people your way referencing something you don't carry, see if there is a way to change those links to something more specific
Alternatively, if you are getting enough people coming to the site interested in products you don't carry but there isn't a great reason your company doesn't carry them, maybe see if there is a way you can carry the products (or resell them or something like that). I've worked with more than one client who didn't realize so many people may be interested in Product X until they saw the search traffic and that traffic helped them decide to change products offered.
-
I suspect part of the problem isn't that you are getting traffic, but the wrong sort of traffic. You want to sell products, but you might just be getting a causal searcher who gathers the information they want and then move on.
Have you looked into the key phrases you are targeting? You might also want to consider writing another information-rich page that can be linked from within the content but that is very targeted to the page your visitors are on.
There are a number of questions need answering about the page:
- Who are your ideal visitors?
- What are they arriving for?
- What can they do once they have the information they need?
Do look at Feeback Army (linked above) because for not very much money, you can get live users interacting with your page and answering questions you might have.
-Andy
-
Some nice feedback there Matthew, Thank you. I certainly think this could be something i should look more into.
There a certain types of this product we dont cover in the article. Simply because we dont sell them. I know this could account for a number of the bounces simply because of the search terms users enter from this page.
How would you reduce the bounce rate for the attracted traffic and expectation of those products you dont sell?
-
The page in question is
http://www.atp-instrumentation.co.uk/different-types-of-thermometer/
Allow me to add some more context.
The site is going under a content review, as I found many page of thin or poor content when i began. This page will also be updated in-line with new categories and better content that is being injected into those new pages.
When i began in March / April the page wasn't great, but attracted so many visitors I was reluctant to alter it too much. I added the product images, and links into the already existing sub-sections.
The content can be improved upon, but as the average person spend 4-5 minutes reading im fairly sure the content is ok for now.
-
Without looking at the site or this one page, but based on what you are describing, I would suspect the bounce rate is high because of an expectation gap. The people coming to this article sound like they are in the early stages of the buying cycle--they want information about the types of products available and how to use this product. Maybe many of these people aren't quite ready to look at category pages or product pages because it is simply too early in the buying cycle for that to happen. Your links expect one thing (products/shop/buy) but visitors expect another (more info).
In these cases to lower the bounce rate, you need some kind of in-between content. Something that moves people to the next step of the buying cycle. Basically, you need to solve for X in this equation: early pre-purchase research -> X -> product page. To start solving for X, I want to know what questions people have after reading this article. There are several ways to get that, but user testing with targeted customers can usually be a good place to start.
Another place to look is in regards to trust factors. Do the people coming to that informational article trust your brand? It seems like they are because of how long they spend on the page. However, it could be people trust the company enough for information and insight, but maybe not enough to purchase. Again, user testing this page to gauge trust factors could be helpful to clarify what more you can do here to get people to stick around.
Final thought - it may simply be that this page will always have a high bounce rate. This is where re-targeting ads can be helpful. You know people are interested in your proudct but aren't quite ready to look at products just yet. So, after they visit this page you should re-target an ad to them as they continue their research building up to purchasing the product.
-
Hi there
What I would do is focus on writing content that serves the users search intent. From there, focus on the logical next step that provides a useful and engaging experience for the user. Always think top down for your audience.
- What is the user's intent with their search?
- Does my business goals align with the audience goals?
- What do I need to make sure that intent is met on my site?
- What title tags need to be in place?
- What does my meta description need to say to increase CTR?
- What internal links do I need that are logical in my content if the user is interested?
- What calls to action do I need to ensure the user either a. keeps moving through the site or b. converts if that's the ultimate goal?
- How do I distribute this content in a way that my target audience finds it?
What I suggest doing is going through these questions step by step and find potential pain points. You can even try user testing to get an idea of how users are using your site; this can also be done using Hotjar, both from a recording and survey standpoint. You could even try interviewing your customers to see if the site is providing the information they need, or if they know what the next step is.
There are a ton of opportunities and resources to help you find out how to keep users on and moving through your site. I would focus on all of the questions and resources above. Then, sit down with your team and discuss priority areas.
Hope this helps! Good luck!
-
I think you are on the right track of including links to the products. Maybe try to refine that similar to what Amazon does, "People who view this also view ______".
I also wonder if you have multiple long tail queries, any chance/thought into creating more pages to make them more specific to what the searcher is interested in? Meaning if they are looking for product X, and this one page is talking about products A-Z, it may be too much non-relevant content for them so they bounce out. This could explain the time on page being high and the bounce rate as well. Just a thought without knowing what the page looks like.
-
Hello! Do you have a few strategically placed, non-spammy calls to action?
-
Can you give a link to the page please?
-
Have you had a look at what others in your market are doing? You could always look at using CrazyEgg to do some in-page analysis and see how users are browsing the page. It helps to know how far someone is getting down the page and by using the heatmap, you can see where clicks are happening. Find active areas and set a call-to-action around there.
A little live user analysis might also prove useful by understanding what people may / may not like about what is in place. Feedback Army is great for this.
Enticing internal links can also help with funnelling traffic.
-Andy
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Does this setup meet the ratings rich snippet guidelines?
Hey everyone, I am setting up a few product landing pages and hope to be able to see the star ratings via the search engine. I attached a screenshot of the SCHEMA code included on the page and results from the testing tool. On each landing page there are 3 reviews taken from the product page and the overall rating of the product. There are also 2 links directly to the product page. Google states that: Make sure the reviews and ratings you mark up are readily available to users from the marked-up page. It should be immediately obvious to users that the page has review or ratings content. Do you guys think the landing page set up I described above is sufficient to comply with google's guidelines? yafujZe.jpg
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | TVape0 -
Better for SEO to No-Index Pages with High Bounce Rates
Greeting MOZ Community: I operate www.nyc-officespace-leader.com, a New York City commercial real estate web site established in 2006. An SEO effort has been ongoing since September 2013 and traffic has dropped about 30% in the last month. The site has about 650 pages. 350 are listing pages, 150 are building pages. The listing and building pages have an average bounce rate of about 75%. The other 150 pages have a bounce rate of about 35%. The building and listing pages are dragging down click through rates for the entire site. My SEO firm believe there might be a benefit to "no-index, follow" these high bounce rate URLs. From an SEO perspective, would it be worthwhile to "no-index-follow" most of the building and listing pages in order to reduce the bounce rate? Would Google view the site as a higher quality site if I had these pages de-indexed and the average bounce rate for the site dropped significantly. If I no-indexed these pages would Google provide bette ranking to the pages that already perform well? As a real estate broker, I will constantly be adding many property listings that do not have much content so it seems that a "no-index, follow" would be good for the listings unless Google penalizes sites that have too many "no-index, follow" pages. Any thoughts??? Thanks,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Kingalan1
Alan0 -
Best to Spend Marketing Budget on High Quality Articles OR Link Building Services?
Greeting MOZ Community: My site has 400 domains linking to it of which about 180 are toxic and 180 are suspicious according to a site audit from a reputable SEO firm. The SEO firm is offering link removal and link building services to remedy the situation. My question is this: if I can create and post high quality blog articles on a very regular basis, will this in and of itself create high quality links to my site? If the articles are of exceptional quality can I post them elsewhere to earn quality links? Does it make more sense to use my budget on paying a PR agency to create high quality articles and posting them on my blog or elsewhere rather than spending on an SEO link building campaign? Should I do both? I plan on having the SEO firm remove toxic links and optimize content using Yoast. But I want to be careful about not wasting my budget if the links will develop naturally if I post the content online myself. I am more inclined to have an SEO pro work on creating links but why pay if I can do it myself. Any thoughts?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Kingalan1
Alan0 -
Technical Question on Image Links - Part of Addressing High Number of Outbound Links
Hi - I've read through the forum, and have been reading online for hours, and can't quite find an answer to what I'm searching for. Hopefully someone can chime in with some information. 🙂 For some background - I am looking closely at four websites, trying to bring them up to speed with current guidelines, and recoup some lost traffic and revenue. One of the things we are zeroing in on is the high amount of outbound links in general, as well as inter-site linking, and a nearly total lack of rel=nofollow on any links. Our current CMS doesn't allow an editor to add them, and it will require programming changes to modify any past links, which means I'm trying to ask for the right things, once, in order to streamline the process. One thing that is nagging at me is that the way we link to our images could be getting misconstrued by a more sensitive Penguin algorithm. Our article images are all hosted on one separate domain. This was done for website performance reasons. My concern is that we don't just embed the image via , which would make this concern moot. We also have an href tag on each to a 'larger view' of the image that precedes the img src in the code, for example - We are still running the numbers, but as some articles have several images, and we currently have about 85,000 articles on those four sites... well, that's a lot of href links to another domain. I'm suggesting that one of the steps we take is to rel=nofollow the image hrefs. Our image traffic from Google search, or any image search for that matter, is negligible. On one site it represented just .008% of our visits in July. I'm getting a little pushback on that idea as having a separate image server is standard for many websites, so I thought I'd seek additional information and opinions. Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | MediaCF0 -
Star ratings in rich snippets not displaying
Hi all, I have a site where star ratings are being used in rich snippets. Up until about 8 weeks ago these were displaying in SERPs as normal. They have since stopped being displayed in SERPs even though Google's Rich Snippets testing tool says that the markup is correct and they display within the test tool environment. I'm just wondering if anybody else has had the same problem and if there's a solution? Thanks, Elias
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | A_Q1 -
High PR Profile backlinks
High <acronym title="Google Page Ranking">PR</acronym> Profilebacklinks still worth for SEO ?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | innofidelity1 -
Does having a high number of reciprocal links hurt you?
I know reciprocal linking isn't ideal, but does it actually hurt your site? Is there any penalty for having a high number of reciprocal links?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | nicole.healthline0 -
New Domain Name For Site That Ranks Highly on Key Terms
Here's my problem -- which is actually a pretty good problem to have. My client is a speciality service provider in an extremely competitive field. It charges 3 to 5 times what others do for providing a super-premium level of service. It doesn't have -- nor does it want -- many customers. I can't go into details, but let's just say the business model is a bit like the charity or premium newsletter publishing model. It is extremely hard to recruit new members -- but once recruited, members tend to stay for a long time at high price points. Personal referral is key. As result of my efforts over the last 90 days, the client's SEO results have skyrocketed. After a couple of false starts, we have focussed on key terms the target demographic is likely to search, rather than the generic terms others in the industry use. We have also had great success with a social media strategy -- since the few people likely to be interested in paying such high prices know like-minded folks. For the first time, my client is getting "walk in" prospects. They are delighted! But they are not really walk-ins. They have already found the site -- either through SERPs or Facebook or Twitter. Now we need to get to the next level. Here's the problem: the client's domain name sucks. It is short, but combines an acronym with one of the words in its long-version name. It uses the British spelling version of the long name fragment, even though most Canadians now use American spelling. And it is a .ca, rather than a dot.com So I think we have to bite the bullet and change to the long, dot com version of the name, which is available and has the additional benefit of having embedded within it a key search term. I am basically an editorial/content guy and not a tech guy. The IT guys at my firm are strongly encouraging me to make the change...in very "colorful" language. We can certainly do 301 redirects at the page level. But I would like some additional validation before proceeding. My questions are: how much link juice might we lose? I've seen the figure of 10% bandied around. Is it accurate? might we see a temporary dip in results? If so, how long would it last? what questions did I forget to ask? What additional info do you need to offer informed advice ?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | DanielFreedman0