Blogpost Authorship. Should we give credits or not?
-
We have been paying for getting the content written from writers. Is it a good move to give authorship to writers for writing the articles in terms of SEO. Some writers now have started to demand for authorship from the articles they have written. Should I give them authorship credits from each & every blog post they have written or it will be just a bad move to do so?
-
If they are professional writers and do excellent excellent work I might do it as a reward. Be strict with this.
Also, you need to review their Google+ profile to be sure that it does not contain content that is disagreeable for any of your visitors who might go there. Reserve the right to remove the link and be very clear about reserving that right.
This will require some administration work from you, and some traffic loss. So you got to be getting value from it. Overall, if it keeps content quality very high, I would not have a problem linking to a google+ page at the bottom of the article. I have done this. I have also linked to faculty members university page if they write an article for my site. They enjoy this and often link back to my site to share their article with others.
-
How about a link just to their Google+ profiles? No links or Google+ profiles link which one will be better?
-
If you have worthy authors who produce great content then giving them credit as a reward for excellent work will make them feel acknowledged. If their name is on their work and they are good people then they will work harder than if their name is not mentioned. Maybe if their name is on the article they will share that on their blog or on facebook. That can be helpful for you. Their parents might share it and say... "my son wrote this". That is good for you.
Putting the authors name on the page costs you nothing, however, it can make a huge difference in the mind of some authors. This has the potential to bring you better content.
Now, if those authors demand links to their websites and their friends' websites that will not be good. Your traffic will leave through those links. If those websites are not nice websites, now or in the future, then you might be linking to manipulative websites or bad websites which google does not like.
If they are writing low quality content and demand links, then they are trying to use you. Stop their employment.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Crediting a second website when I have 2 setup depending on location
Hello Moz Community! I'm a bit stuck with this one and have read a few varying answers! Basically I have an eCommerce website on a .com domain name selling to the UK and Europe currently. I have recently created a very similar selling the same products but solely to the US with a .US domain name. What is the best practice with this, will the 2 separate sites be okay left as they are, or do I need to credit the UK site from the US site as they are incredibly similar? The sites are: www.rhinox-group.com www.rhinox-group.us Thanks in advance!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | josh.sprakes0 -
Putting rel=canonical tags on blogpost pointing to product pages
I came across an article mentioning this as a strategy for getting product pages (which are tough to get links for) some link equity. See #21: content flipping: https://www.matthewbarby.com/customer-acquisition-strategies Has anyone done this? Seems like this isn't what the tag is meant for, and Google may see this as deceptive? Any thoughts? Jim
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | jim_shook0 -
Can changing G+ authorship on a well-ranking article drop its search ranking?
We have an article that ranks #1 in Google SERP for the keyword we want it to rank for. We decided to revise the article because although it's performing well, we knew it could be better and more informative for the user. Now that we've revised the content, we're wondering: Should we update the article author (and the G+ authorship markup) to reflect that the revisor authored the content, or keep the original author listed? Can changing G+ authorship on an article impact its search ranking, or is that an issue that's a few Google algorithm updates down the road?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | pasware0 -
Can Wordpress plugins like WPLeadMagnet and PopUp Domination damage SEO? | Please give thumbs up here ➜
Hello guys, Can Wordpress plugins like WPLeadMagnet and PopUp Domination damage SEO? http://wpleadmagnet.com/ http://www.popupdomination.com/ I don't know what Googles thinks about using for example wpleadmagnet.com in order to catch exit & bounce traffic. What are you guys think? If i use wpleadmagnet.com can i expect to maintain my good positions in SERP or not?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | EestiKonto0 -
How do you achieve Google Authorship verification on a site with no clearly defined authors?
Google Authorship seems to be the current buzz topic in SEO. It seems perfect for people who write lots of articles of blog posts, but what about sites where the main focus isn't articles e.g. e-commerce sites? Can the website as a whole get verified?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | statman870 -
Do EMD's give the boost everyone says they do?
Hi, I have used a few myself and if I was targeting UK search with a [emd] .co.uk, every time the domain has hit page 1 with little effort. I have done this maybe 4-5 times, my moz stats show 0 but I rank above results on page 1 with moz stats of DA:45+. Can I now say basically any EMD I buy will rocket through the serp's?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | activitysuper0 -
Is it possible to Spoof Analytics to give false Unique Visitor Data for Site A to Site B
Hi, We are working as a middle man between our client (website A) and another website (website B) where, website B is going to host a section around websites A products etc. The deal is that Website A (our client) will pay Website B based on the number of unique visitors they send them. As the middle man we are in charge of monitoring the number of Unique visitors sent though and are going to do this by monitoring Website A's analytics account and checking the number of Unique visitors sent. The deal is worth quite a lot of money, and as the middle man we are responsible for making sure that no funny business goes on (IE false visitors etc). So to make sure we have things covered - What I would like to know is 1/. Is it actually possible to fool analytics into reporting falsely high unique visitors from Webpage A to Site B (And if so how could they do it). 2/. What could we do to spot any potential abuse (IE is there an easy way to spot that these are spoofed visitors). Many thanks in advance
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | James770 -
Googles Now Giving More Power To Ranked #1?
Not sure if this has been discussed before, but if you make certain searches in google i.e. "sports authority" you will find that the site ranked #1 has extra links below it like a "library" into their site. How do you get this "library" to appear on your site when your site is in #1? Attatched is a URL to flickr with a screenshot of the search. http://www.flickr.com/photos/65949972@N07/6006729328/in/photostream/
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | HCGDiet0