Why isn't our new site being indexed?
-
We built a new website for a client recently.
Site: https://www.woofadvisor.com/
It's been live for three weeks. Robots.txt isn't blocking Googlebot or anything.
Submitted a sitemap.xml through Webmasters but we still aren't being indexed.
Anyone have any ideas?
-
Hey Dirk,
No worries - I visited the question first time today and considered it unanswered as the site is perfectly accessible in California. I like to confirm what Search Console says as that is 'straight from the horses mouth'.
Thanks for confirming that the IP redirect has changed, that is interesting. It is impossible for us to know when that happened - I would have expected thing to get indexed quite fast when it changed.
With the extra info I'm happy to mark this as answered, but would be good to hear from the OP.
Best,
-Tom
-
Hi Tom,
I am not questioning your knowledge - I re-ran the test on webpagetest.org and I see that the site is now accessible for Californian ip (http://www.webpagetest.org/result/150911_6V_14J6/) which wasn't the case a few days ago (check the result on http://www.webpagetest.org/result/150907_G1_TE9/) - so there has been a change on the ip redirection. I also checked from Belgium - the site is now also accessible from here.
I also notice that if I now do a site:woofadvisor.com in Google I get 19 pages indexed rather than 2 I got a few days ago.
Apparently removing the ip redirection solved (or is solving) the indexation issue - but still this question remains marked as "unanswered"
rgds,
Dirk
-
I am in California right now, and can access the website just fine, which is why I didn't mark the question as answered - I don't think we have enough info yet. I think the 'fetch as googlebot' will help us resolve that.
You are correct that if there is no robots.txt then Google assumes the site is open, but my concern is that the developers on the team say that there IS a robots.txt file there and it has some contents. I have, on at least two occasions, come across a team that was serving a robots.txt that was only accessible to search bots (once they were doing that 'for security', another time because they mis-understood how it worked). That is why I suggested that Search Console is checked to see what shows up for robots.txt.
-
To be very honest - I am quite surprised that this question is still marked as "Unanswered".
The owners of the site decided to block access for all non UK / Ireland adresses. The main Googlebot is using a Californian ip address to visit the site. Hence - the only page Googlebot can see is https://www.woofadvisor.com/holding-page.php which has no links to the other parts of the site (this is confirmed by the webpagetest.org test with Californian ip address)
As Google indicates - Googlebot can also use other IP adresses to crawl the site ("With geo-distributed crawling, Googlebot can now use IP addresses that appear to come from other countries, such as Australia.") - however it's is very likely that these bots do not crawl with the same frequency/depth as the main bot (the article clearly indicates " Google might not crawl, index, or rank all of your locale-adaptive content. This is because the default IP addresses of the Googlebot crawler appear to be based in the USA).
This can easily be solved by adding a link on /holding-page.php to the Irish/UK version which contains the full content (accessible for all ip adresses) which can be followed to index the full site (so - only put the ip detection on the homepage - not on the other pages)
The fact that the robots.txt gives a 404 is not relevant: if no robots.txt is found Google assumes that the site can be indexed (check this link) - quote: "You only need a
robots.txtfile if your site includes content that you don't want Google or other search engines to index." -
I'd be concerned about the 404ing robots.txt file.
You should check in Search Console:
-
What does Search Console show in the robots.txt section?
-
What happens if you fetch a page that is no indexed (e.g. https://www.woofadvisor.com/travel-tips.php) with the 'Fetch as Googlebot' tool?
I checked and do not see any obvious indicators of why the pages are not being indexed - we need more info.
-
-
I just did a quick check on your site with Webpagetest.org with California IP address http://www.webpagetest.org/result/150907_G1_TE9/ - as you can see here these IP's also go to the holding page - which is logically the only page which can be indexed as it's the only one Googlebot can access.
rgds,
Dirk
-
Hi,
I can't access your site in Belgium - I guess you are redirecting your users based on ip address. If , like me, they are not located in your target country they are 302 redirected to https://www.woofadvisor.com/holding-page.php and there is only 1 page that is indexed.
Not sure which country you are actually targeting - but could it be that you're accidentally redirecting Google bot as well?
Check also this article from Google on ip based targeting.
rgds
Dirk
-
Strangely, there are two pages indexed on Google Search.
The homepage and one other
-
I noticed the robots.txt file returned a 404 and asked the developers to take a look and they said the content of it is fine.
Sometimes developers say this stuff. If you are getting a 404, demonstrate it to them.
-
I noticed the robots.txt file returned a 404 and asked the developers to take a look and they said the content of it is fine.
But yes, I'll doublecheck the WordPress settings now.
-
Your sitemap all looked good, but when I tried to view the robots.txt file in your root, it returned a 404 and so was unable to determine if there was an issue. Could any of your settings in your WordPress installation also be causing it to trip over.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
What's the best way for users to upload their images to my wordpress site to promote UGC
I have looked at lots of different plugins and wanted a recommendation for an easy way for patients of ours to upload pictures of them out partying and having fun and looking beautiful so future users can see the final results instead of sometimes gory or difficult to understand before and after images. I'd like to give them the opportunity to write captions (like facebook or insta posts and would offer them incentives to do so. I don't want it to be too complicated for them or have too many steps or barriers but I do want it to look nice and slick and modern. Also do you think this would have a positive impact on SEO? I was also thinking of a Q&A app where dentists could get Q&A emails and respond - i've been doing AMA sessions and they've been really successful and I would like to bring it into out site and make it native. Thanks in advance 🙂
Technical SEO | | Smileworks_Liverpool1 -
How do I redirect old html pages to new site?
Im seeing in my Google search console some of my old html pages. I never redirecting them and now they get 404 errors. Below is my current htaccess file, how would I changed it so that any html page i.e. intercallsystems.com/index.html forwards to my new site intercallsystems.com ? I have about 5 html pages that I want to redirect. Thank you for the help! Rena Currently my htaccess says: BEGIN WordPress <ifmodule mod_rewrite.c="">RewriteEngine On
Technical SEO | | palila
RewriteBase /
RewriteRule ^index.php$ - [L]
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d
RewriteRule . /index.php [L]</ifmodule> END WordPress0 -
Landing pages showing up as HTTPS when we haven't made the switch
Hi Moz Community, Recently our tech team has been taking steps to switch our site from http to https. The tech team has looked at all SEO redirect requirements and we're confident about this switch, we're not planning to roll anything out until a month from now. However, I recently noticed a few https versions of our landing pages showing up in search. We haven't pushed any changes out to production yet so this shouldn't be happening. Not all of the landing pages are https, only a select few and I can't see a pattern. This is messing up our GA and Search Console tracking since we haven't fully set up https tracking yet because we were not expecting some of these pages to change. HTTPS has always been supported on our site but never indexed so it's never shown up in the search results. I looked at our current site and it looks like landing page canonicals are already pointing to their https version, this may be the problem. Anyone have any other ideas?
Technical SEO | | znotes0 -
What coding works for SEO and what coding doesn't?
Hi: I recently learned about inline styles and that Google started penalizing sites for that in October. Then I was told that Wix and Flash don't work (or work well) either for SEO as the engines won't crawl them (I think). Does anyone know of a blog that goes over everything that doesn't work so that I could recognize it when I look at someone's code. Anyone know of such a resource? Cheers, Wes
Technical SEO | | wrconard0 -
Page Indexing increase when I request Google Site Link demote
Hi there, Has anyone seen a page crawling increase in Google Web Master Tools when they have requested a site link demotion? I did this around the 23rd of March, the next day I started to see page crawling rise and rise and report a very visible spike in activity and to this day is still relatively high. From memory I have asked about this in SEOMOZ Q&A a couple of years ago in and was told that page crawl activity is a good thing - ok fine, no argument. However at the nearly in the same period I have noticed that my primary keyword rank for my home page has dropped away to something in the region of 4th page on Google US and since March has stayed there. However the exact same query in Google UK (Using SEOMOZ Rank Checker for this) has remained the same position (around 11th) - it has barely moved. I decided to request an undemote on GWT for this page link and the page crawl started to drop but not to the level before March 23rd. However the rank situation for this keyword term has not changed, the content on our website has not changed but something has come adrift with our US ranks. Using Open Site Explorer not one competitor listed has a higher domain authority than our site, page authority, domain links you name it but they sit there in first page. Sorry the above is a little bit of frustration, this question is not impulsive I have sat for weeks analyzing causes and effects but cannot see why this disparity is happening between the 2 country ranks when it has never happened for this length of time before. Ironically we are still number one in the United States for a keyword phrase which I moved away from over a month ago and do not refer to this phrase at all on our index page!! Bizarre. Granted, site link demotion may have no correlation to the KW ranking impact but looking at activities carried out on the site and timing of the page crawling. This is the only sizable factor I can identify that could be the cause. Oh! and the SEOMOZ 'On-Page Optimization Tool' reports that the home page gets an 'A' for this KW term. I have however this week commented out the canonical tag for the moment in the index page header to see if this has any effect. Why? Because as this was another (if not minor) change I employed to get the site to an 'A' credit with the tool. Any ideas, help appreciated as to what could be causing the rank differences. One final note the North American ranks initially were high, circa 11-12th but then consequently dropped away to 4th page but not the UK rankings, they witnessed no impact. Sorry one final thing, the rank in the US is my statistical outlier, using Google Analytics I have an average rank position of about 3 across all countries where our company appears for this term. Include the US and it pushes the average to 8/9th. Thanks David
Technical SEO | | David-E-Carey0 -
Google couldn't access your site because of a DNS error
Hello, We've being doing SEO work for a company for about 8 months and it's been working really well, we've lots of top threes and first pages. Or rather we did. Unfortunately the web host who the client uses (who to recommended them not to) has had severe DNS problems. For the last three weeks Google has been unable to access and index the website. I was hoping this was going to be a quickly resolved and everything return to normal. However this week their listing have totally dropped, 25 page one rankings has become none, Google Webmaster tools says 'Google couldn't access your site because of a DNS error'. Even searching for their own domain no longer works! Does anyone know how this will effect the site in the long term? Once the hosts sort it out will the rankings bounce back. Is there any sort of strategy for handling this problem? Ideally we'd move host but I'm not sure that is possible so any other options, or advice on how it will affect long term rankings so I can report to my client would be appreciated. Many thanks Ric
Technical SEO | | BWIRic0 -
Duplicate Meta Descriptions From Pages That Don't Exist
Hi Guys I am hoping someone can help me out here. I have had a new site built with a unique theme and using wordpress as the CMS. Everything was going fine but after checking webmaster tools today I noticed something that I just cannot get my head around. Basically I am getting warnings of Duplicate page warnings on a couple of things. 1 of which i think i can understand but do not know how to get the warning to go. Firstly I get this warning of duplicate meta desciption url 1: / url 2: /about/who-we-are I understand this as the who-we-are page is set as the homepage through the wordpress reading settings. But is there a way to make the dup meta description warning disappear The second one I am getting is the following: /services/57/ /services/ Both urls lead to the same place although I have never created the services/57/ page the services/57/ page does not show on the xml sitemap but Google obviously see it because it is a warning in webmaster tools. If I press edit on services/57/ page it just goes to edit the /services/ page/ is there a way I can remove the /57/ page safely or a method to ensure Google at least does not see this. Probably a silly question but I cannot find a real comprehensive answer to sorting this. Thanks in advance
Technical SEO | | southcoasthost0 -
My site was hammered by this last update -- I'm freaking out -- what now
I looked at my seomoz report yesterday, almost all my money keywords went to hell. When I was looking at the graph for one of my keywords it looked so depressing I don't think I can look at it again. The funny thing is that my competitors have bunch of low quality links on unrelated websites and they haven't been touched. How to approach this problem, I'm scared to do anything at this point.
Technical SEO | | Tolod0