2 Duplicate E-commerce sites Risk vs Reward
-
Hi guys
I have a duplicate content question I was hoping someone might be able to give me some advice on?
I work for a small company in the UK and in our niche we have a huge product range and an excellent website providing the customer with a very good experience. We’re also backed up by a bespoke warehouse/logistic management system further enhancing the quality of our product. We get most traffic through PPC and are not one of the biggest brands in the industry and have to fight for marketshare.
Recently we were approached by another company in our industry that have built up a huge and engaged audience over decades but can’t logistically tap into their following to sell the products so they have suggested a partnership. They are huge fans of what we do and basically want a copy of our site to be rebranded and hosted on a subdomain of their website and we would then pay them a commission of all the sales the new site received. So 2 identical sites with different branding would exist.
Based on tests they have carried out we could potentially double our sales in weeks and the potential is huge so we are excited about the possibility.
But…..how would we handle the duplicate content, would we be penalised? Would just one of the sites be penalised? Or if sales increase as much as we think they might, would it be worth a penalty as our current rankings aren’t great?
Any advice would be great.
Cheers
Richard
-
Thats great advice, i'll be sure to put it to good use!
And thanks for the Yahoo analogy, i'll keep it in mind!
-
Thanks Rich for the insight, it helps in understanding where you are coming from. My only other point would be that if you do go through with this partnership, there should be some other way to build your brand with all the customers coming through the site you are going to build/maintain. Your contract should make clear that you are allowed to have access to all customer data and can use it for marketing etc from your main product site (not the one you are managing). Your partner should not only promote this new site, but your branded products and main site as well. Leverage this situation to gain awareness of your product so that you can build organic traffic to your site. Set your business plan so that at the end of the contract you have used this relationship to make your reach "huge". Therefore, if at the end of the contract your revenue goes to zero from this project it does not matter. Don't assume that your partner would never start their own e-commerce operation. Once they watch you guys take the lion's share of the revenue, they can do the math really quick to realize that they can afford to build something, pay for it and make even more money.
There was once this massive web portal that ruled the internet called "Yahoo" way back in the last century. Yahoo decided to let this little startup that was founded by a couple of goofy college kids to show branded web search results on the Yahoo website. As Yahoo was the biggest site on the internet at the time, lots of people learned about this really great little search engine called "Google" (you may have heard of it). So many people liked the search results from Google that even after Yahoo stopped using Google for search results, it did not matter as the users were already going to Google directly.
-
Thanks very much for your responses I really appreciate them.
CleverPhd - we wouldn’t be giving total control of the domain away as we would design it, maintain it and add and remove products when we see fit. But I totally agree with you about them gaining a higher volume of organic and direct traffic and potentially doing what they want with it.
If they did decide not to sell our products it would mean ending the contract we have after an allotted time frame and either finding a new partner to design a new website and entering in a similar deal with them or start their own e-commerce operation which logistically is a huge undertaking, its taken us 15 years to build up relationships and offer the amount of products we sell so it’s not a viable option (at the minute anyway).
From the initial meeting they did stress that they didn’t want to run their online shop themselves and were happy to take a commission. They also gave a firm commitment to push the site through various media channels and their reach is huge. You said we would be at a disadvantage if the set up works out good or bad but either way we would be gaining more sales, just not increasing our brand reach through that channel. So in essence wouldn’t you just see it as separate revenue stream we could live without even if it fell apart?
Dimitri – Thanks, it looks like if we go ahead I’ll be insisting on canonical tags!
Don – Cheers for the alternatives and the offer to PM you.
I really appreciate the insight guys!
Rich
-
Hello Rich,
I think giving them a copy of you domain would be a very bad choice. They will likely have the duplicate content problems as I am sure Google would "most likely" recognize you as the source of the content. Since you were around first. Basically, to Google, the site would be relegated to a low quality clone of yours and they would never see respectable SERP results. Ultimately not really helping either of you.
I am of the opinion there is an alternative solution out there, some off the top of my head....
- First, a referral program makes complete sense here, this is exactly the kind of situations in which referral programs were designed for.
- Second, let them build their own website with your products, provide support in the process but be careful to ensure they are in fact building their own site with their own branding and content. If they want your product descriptions make it clear that they must be accompanied by their own description ie (Manufacture Description | Our Description). Let the site evolve on its own, user reviews, testimonials, user images.. ect.
- Third, give them an incentive program. If they want to partner with you and it is beneficial then make it work for both of you. The exact details would need your input. My thinking is to offer their community an exclusive offer (5%-10%) off their first purchase of $X or more. Then pay your partner $X amount for each discount claimed, + X% of the next non-discounted sale. Obviously you would need to cross check that they are in fact a user of your partner's community which would involve some data exchange. You don't want people just posting the discount on the internet for anybody to use.
The actual solution I would recommend would require more information from both sides of the situation, The good thing here is you are in the power seat and nothing really can get done with out your say-so. I would recommend caution with giving anybody direct access to your content, if somebody wants it that means you are doing something right.
I hope this input helps you. I have had personal experience with duplicating a retail website for business to business sales. If you would like more thoughts feel free to PM me.
Don
-
Hi there.
Duplicate content = problems. That's for sure. If website does get penalized, it would be the website, which will be considered scraper by Google. In your case (if your current website is indexed, ranking and don't have any penalties) it would be your partners. So, in theory you can bring a penalization to your partner
Or if sales increase as much as we think they might, would it be worth a penalty as our current rankings aren’t great?
Penalty is never good. It might seem ok in the beginning, but when you get hit, you gonna get screwed.
Now, my suggestion would be to go with partnership and give them a "copy" of your website, but put canonical links to every single page, linking back to your original one. Then it'll be win-win combination. Just make sure it's one of required and clear conditions to your partner.
Cheers.
-
The duplicate content issue could be as simple as having them setup canonical links from their site to the same pages on your site so that Google would see where they originated from on your site.
I would not be concerned as much about the SEO implications, what about your business implications? If the other site can sell all your products and controls the domain they are on, what happens when this other site now has all this great organic and direct traffic and decides to NOT to sell your products? They can just take that subdomain traffic and direct folks to wherever and whatever product they want.
I am sure there are other reasons that you cannot mention here on why you all are considering this, but at face value, this agreement makes no sense to me. If your product is so great and the other site has a great audience, they should just buy the product from you and sell it like any other wholesale type vendor relationship.
It sounds like they do not want to take the risk and would rather have your company take the risk. Then, if this all works out ok, they have all the leverage to control the traffic. You are at a disadvantage if this setup works out good or bad.
Good luck!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
M.ExampleSite vs mobile.ExampleSite vs ExampleSite.com
Hi, I have a call with a potential client tomorrow where all I know is that they are wigged-out about canonicalization, indexing and architecture for their three sites: m.ExampleSite.com mobile.ExampleSite.com ExampleSite.com The sites are pretty large... 350k for the mobiles and 5 million for the main site. They're a retailer with endless products. They're main site is not mobile-responsive, which is evidently why they have the m and mobile sites. Why two, I don't know. This is how they currently hand this: What would you suggest they do about this? The most comprehensive fix would be making the main site mobile responsive and 301 the old mobile sub domains to the main site. That's probably too much work for them. So, what more would you suggest and why? Your thoughts? Best... Mike P.S., Beneath my hand-drawn portrait avatar above it says "Staff" at this moment, which I am not. Some kind of bug I guess.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | 945010 -
SEO implications of serving a different site on HTTPS vs. HTTP
I have two sites: Site A, and Site B. Both sites are hosted on the same IP address, and server using IIS 7.5. Site B has an SSL cert, and Site A does not. It has recently been brought to my attention that when requesting the HTTPS version of Site A (the site w/o an SSL cert), IIS will serve Site B... Our server has been configured this way for roughly a year. We don't do any promotion of Site A using HTTPS URLs, though I suppose somebody could accidentally link to or type in HTTPS and get the wrong website. Until we can upgrade to IIS8 / Windows Server 2012 to support SNI, it seems I have two reasonable options: Move Site B over to its own dedicated IP, and let HTTPS requests for Site A 404. Get another certificate for Site A, and have it's HTTPS version 301 redirect to HTTP/non-ssl. #1 seems preferable, as we don't really need an SSL cert for Site A, and HTTPS doesn't really have any SEO benefits over HTTP/non-ssl. However, I'm concerned if we've done any SEO damage to Site A by letting our configuration sit this way for so long. I could see Googlebot trying https versions of websites to test if they exist, even if there aren't any ssl/https links for the given domain in the wild... In which case, option #2 would seem to mostly reverse any damage done (if any). Though Site A seems to be indexed fine. No concerns other than my gut. Does anybody have any recommendations? Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | dsbud0 -
Regional and Global Site
We have numerous versions of what is basically the same site, that targets different countries, such as United States, United Kingdom, South Africa. These websites use Tlds to designate the region, for example, co.uk, co.za I believe this is sufficient (with a little help from Google Webmastertools) to convince the search engines what site is for what region. My question is how do we tell the search engines to send traffic from other regions besides the above to our global site, which would have a .com TLD. For example, we don't have a Brazilian site, how do we drive traffic from Brazil to our global .com site? Many thanks, Jason
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Clickmetrics0 -
My site is always in the top 4 on google, and sometimes goes to #2\. But the site at #1 is always at #1 .. how can i beat them?
So i'm sure this is a very generic question.. of course everyone wants to be #1. We are an ecommerce web site. We have all sorts of products, user ratings, and are loved by our customers. We sell over 3 million a year. So let me give you some data.. First of all one of the sites that keeps taking the #2 or #3 spot is amazons category for what we sell.. (i'm not sure if I should say who we are here.. as I don't want the #1 spot to realize we are trying to take them over!) Amazon of course has a domain authority of 100. But they never take the #1 spot. The other site that takes the #2 and #3 spot is not even selling anything. Happens to be a technical term's with the same name wikipedia page! (i wish google would figure out people aren't looking for that!) Anyways.. every day we bouce back and forth between #4 and #2.. but #1 never changes.. Here are the stats of us verse #1 from moz: #1: Page Authority: 56.8, Root Domains Linking to page: 158, Domain Authority: 54.6: root domains linking to the root domain 1.42k my site: Page Authority: 60.6, Root domains linking to the page: 562, Domain Authority: 52.8: root domains linking to the root domain: 1.03k So they beat us in domain authority SLIGHTLY and in root domains linking to the root domain. So SEO masters.. what do I do to fix this? Get better backlinks? But how.... I can't just email GQ and ask them to write about us can I? I'm open to all things.. Maybe i'm not using moz data correctly.. We should at least be #2. We get #2 every other day.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | 88mph0 -
E-commerce category page optimization - filters vs. categories
Hi, We currently have a site where there are several subcategories for every main category. So this means that visitors will have to click through 3-4 subcategories before reaching products that they could have easily found if the site would be using filters on category pages. My question is - if a subcategory page with 4 products is currently a category page (optimized heading, description) and I'd want this category to be available through filters, how do I still keep it optimized for search engines? So under a category "Cleaners", we have all cleaning products. There are 8 "Cable cleaners" under this category. This is currently a subcategory, but I'd just solve this with a filter in the "Cleaners" screen. Not sure what's right from an SEO standpoint here.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | JaanMSonberg0 -
Merging Sites: Will redirecting the old homepage to an internal page on the new site cause issues?
I've ended up with two sites which have similar content (but not duplicate) and target similar keywords, rather than trying to maintain two sites I would like to merge the sites together. The old site is more of a traditional niche site and targets a particular set of keywords on its homepage, the new site is more of an authority site with a magazine type homepage and targets the same set of keywords from an internal page. My question is: Should I redirect the old site's homepage to the relevant internal page on the new website...
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | lara_dar
...or should I redirect the old site's homepage to the new site's homepage? (the old site's homepage backlinks are a mixture of partial match keyword anchor text, naked URLs and branded anchor text) I am in two minds (a & b!) (a) Redirecting to the internal page would be great for ranking as there are some decent backlinks and the content is similar (b) But usually when you do a 301 redirect the homepage usually directs to the new homepage and some of the old site's links are related to the domain rather than the keyword (e.g. http://www.site.com) and some people will be looking for the site's homepage. What do you think? Your help is much appreciated (and hope this makes sense...!)0 -
E commerce
Hi there. I'm currently optimizing ecommece websites for my company. The problem is, we have a duplication module whereby we duplicate sites accordingly to other countries. The on page analysis shows about 2,000 of duplicated content. How do i resolve this issue? I was planning to instruct the writers to write different content across different countries. Any suggestion on this? thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | k3zuya0 -
Duplicate page content and duplicate pate title
Hi, i am running a global concept that operates with one webpage that has lot of content, the content is also available on different domains, but with in the same concept. I think i am getting bad ranking due to duplicate content, since some of the content is mirrored from the main page to the other "support pages" and they are almost 200 in total. Can i do some changes to work around this or am i just screwed 🙂
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | smartmedia0