Removing blog posts with little/thin content
-
We've got quite a lot (I'd say 75%) of our blog posts which I'd consider as low quality. Short content (500 words or less) with few shares, no backlinks & comments; most of which gets 0-2 unique views a day (however combined this adds up).
Will removing these pages provide an SEO benefit greater than the reduction in traffic from the removal of these pages?
I've heard the likes of Neil Patel/Brian Dean suggest so, however I'm scared it will provide the opposite as less content is indexed and I'll actually see traffic fall.
Sam
-
Sam,
If you can safely assume that the pages are not hurting you, let them stay. It's certainly not ideal to have a website loaded with thin content. But, as is the case with most small sites, the posts are likely to do you more good than harm, provided you're willing to show them some attention.
Here's a good strategy to deploy:
-
Find the top 10 posts, as judged by analyzing GA and against the topics you hope to rank for, then beef them up with additional text and graphics.
-
Republish the posts, listing them as "updated."
-
Share the posts via social, using a meaningful quote from each piece to draw interest and invite re-shares.
-
Continue sharing the posts in the following weeks, each time with new text.
-
Gauge the performance of each social share, then use this information to create additional headlines for new posts, in addition to using it to inform you of what content might draw the most interest.
-
Repeat the process with the next 10 posts.
When you have thin, poorly performing content on your site, you aren't able to learn enough about what you're doing right to make a sound call. So to create more content, even "better" content, is likely a mistake. The wise approach is to use the content you have to investigate additional content ideas that would better serve your audience. Through social media and additional traffic to your site, you should be able to better discern what pieces of content will provide the greatest benefit in the future.
Additionally, the old content is likely to perform much better as well.
RS
-
-
It's difficult to talk in terms of truevalue. Someone of them may provide some value, but they pale in comparison to the new blog posts we have lined up and in my opinion bring the blog down; personally I wouldn't be sad to see them go.
I think it's time to exterminate.
Sam
-
Do the contents of these blog posts provide any value at all to the reader? Are they written well, and would you actually be sad to see them go? If yes, then refer to my previous response on re-purposing them to create even better content with more SEO value.
If not, and you're just worried about SEO, I'd say be rid of them. Based on those stats.
-
Thanks all, from my analysis:
In the last twelve months:
376 pages (although I'd estimate 70 of these aren't pages)
104 pages have bounce rate of 100%
307 pages have less than 20 unique views (for the previous 12 months) but the total count for this would be 1,374
which is a sizable sum.So the question is, is it worth pulling all the pages below 20 unique views and all the 100% bounce rate pages from the site? Will it actually benefit our SEO or am I just making work for myself?
I'd love to hear from people who've actually seen positive SEO movements after removing thin pages.
-
It's a waste of good content to remove it because it's considered "thin". In your position, I would consider grouping these under-performing/thin blog posts into topical themes, compile and update them to create "epic content" in the form of detailed guides or whatever is most suitable to the content. Add to the long post so that there's some logical structure to the combining of the little posts (and so it doesn't just read as if you stuck multiple posts together), then redirect the old post URLs to the newly created relevant posts. Not only do you have fresh content that could each provide a ton of value to your readers, but the SEO value of these so-called "epic" posts should in theory be more impactful.
Good luck, whatever you decide to do!
-
My rule of thumb would be:
Take all pages offline, which have under 30 organic sessions per month.
Like Dmitrii already mentioned, check your past data for these posts and have a look at average sessions durations / bounce rates / pages per sessions, with which you can valdiate the "quality of the traffic". If there are posts which have decent stats - don't take them offline. Rather update them or write a new blog post about the topic and make a redirect. In this case have a look in GWT for the actual serach queries (maybe you find some useful new insights).
-
Hi there.
Are those blogs ranking anywhat for any related keyphrases? At the same time, how about bounce rate and time on page for those 2 visits a day? Are you sure those visits are not bots/crawlers?
We have done similar reduction about 6 months ago and we haven't seen any drop in rankings. The share of traffic to thin pages was pretty small and bounce rate was high, as well as time on page was very short. So, why to have anything which doesn't do any good?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Excluding Cookieless Static Content Sub-domain from GA/GTM
For the purposes of this question our ecommerce site url is www.ecommerce.com Our TLD is ecommerce.com We have, following advice from Yslow, Pagespeed and others, moved our static content to a subdomain - static.ecommerce.com We have Google Analytics and Enhance Ecommerce installed, fired from GTM. The cookieDomain setting in GTM is 'auto' At present cookies are being attached to our static resources. What changes do I need to make to to prevent this happening? Many thanks Julian
Reporting & Analytics | | jdeb0 -
I have a WP site which uses categories to display the same content in several locations. Which items should get a canonical tag to avoid a ding for duplicate content?
So...I have a Knowledge Center and press room that pretty much use the same posts. So...technically the content looks like its on several pages because the post shows up on the Category listing page. Do I add a Canonical tag to each individual post...so that it is the only one that is counted? Also...I have a LONG disclaimer that goes at the bottom of most of the posts. would this count as duplicate content? Is there a way to markup a single paragraph to tell the spiders not to crawl it?
Reporting & Analytics | | LindsayiHart0 -
I am tracking my domain e.g www.xyz.com to an existing google analytics account . I want to track www.xyz.com/blog separately in the google analytics account. How can I do that?
I am tracking my domain e.g www.xyz.com to an existing google analytics account . I want to track www.xyz.com/blog separately in the google analytics account. How can I do that?
Reporting & Analytics | | Windlass0 -
Links from PA/DA of 1
My immediate thought is that a link from a website that has a PA/DA of 1 for both or either metric would be absolutely worthless, but I just wanted to make sure. Could this also be from it being recently indexed? Also is there a rule of thumb that anybody knows, or tries to follow at least? Obliviously the higher the better, but for example; A PA/DA of 15 and below is SPAM A PA/DA of 30 and above is GOOD A PA/DA of 50 is GREAT PA/DA of 80 is AMAZING PA/DA of 100 is GODTIER
Reporting & Analytics | | HashtagHustler0 -
Google Analytics Content Experiments - Experiment Conversions and Goal Figures Don't Match
Hi, I set up a new content experiment 6 days ago, the experiment says there have been 2 conversions but the goal associated with it says 5. The experiment is set to target 100% of traffic, distributed evenly among the variations, the goal is a destination URL goal. I've doubled checked the goal set up and everything seems fine. How can the content experiment report a different figure to the goal associated with it? Has anyone else noticed the same problem? Is this a bug? Is there a workaround available? Or is there a setting I need to be aware of when creating content experiments to prevent this from happening? I need to know I can trust the results the content experiments provide.
Reporting & Analytics | | UNIT40 -
When to note Keyword improvement/decline?
Every report we have fluctuations in our rankings, but the majority of them are only a few places up or a few places down. Other than first page and top 3, when do you all start noting fluctuations (good or bad)? Would you start at 5, 10, 20 etc? Thanks, Ruben
Reporting & Analytics | | KempRugeLawGroup0 -
Blog Post Analytics
Does anyone know of a Wordpress plugin that has similar functionality to the post analytics SEOmoz blog posts include?
Reporting & Analytics | | David_ODonnell0