MOZ vs Ahrefs vs SEMRush vs Spyfu and so on
-
Hello, fellas.
I've been trying to find some type of comparison analysis for online SEO related tools and I couldn't find any, which are fresh and overview more than three.
I'm interested to see if anybody saw good comparison reviews of such tools, as well as your own thoughts (back your thoughts up with more than just "I like it", please
The tools I'm interested in comparing are:
- MOZ
- Ahrefs
- Majestic
- Spyfu
- SEMRush
- Raven
- Wordstream
- whatever else you use or have in mind
-
I've done some research comparing Moz and Spyfu and wrote a post on it here.
I also go over and compare the difficulty to rank according to the two.
Here is an excerpt of the article:
I consider both Moz, Google AdWords, and Spyfu to be excellent tools when I do my research and with most keyword research tools you find online they all have different numbers.
Google AdWords I have always known to wildly inaccurate search volumes and I only use it to get keyword ideas. Rand Fishkin did some tests and wrote about it as well. You can read his post on moz.com “Why Google AdWords’ Keyword Volume Numbers Are Wildly Unreliable – Whiteboard Friday”
I noticed individually the search volume numbers were usually a bit off between Moz and Spyfu so I decided to run a test on some keyword research I did and compared a little over 200 phrases that I would share below.
As I tell my customers I believe Moz to be more accurate for organic search results and I believe Spyfu to be more accurate for pay per click results. Of course, Google AdWords is supposed to be for pay per click results but I never trusted their numbers and only trust them for keyword phrase ideas to add to the list then paste them into Moz’s tool to get volume numbers.
To further complicate things Moz uses ‘Min Volume’ and ‘Max Volume’ while Spyfu uses ‘Local Searches’ and ‘Global Searches’. Can we really compare these two? Did Spyfu use these terms to make their numbers more plausible when compared to other tools like Moz and Google AdWords?
When comparing Moz’s ‘Min Volume’ to Spyfu’s ‘Local Searches’ we find the difference in numbers from 19 to over 49,000. When comparing Moz’s ‘Max Volume’ to Spyfu’s ‘Global Searches’ we find the difference in numbers from 40 to 468,000.
When comparing all of them together in the chart below you would think that the two ‘Difference’ columns would be relatively close from lowest to highest but it isn’t. It jumps around quite a bit.
-
Maybe you should be the one to do so
-
This is a tough question and you will by no means ever find the perfect all in 1 solution. Remember that quite a lot of the date comes from Google Analytics and Webmasters. Some of us are either too lazy or simply dont have the time to sift through all the data, which is why we revert to these tools. I personally use Ahrefs, Monitor Backlinks, Moz and Ranktracr to monitor any spikes in my ranks.
-
Thanks, buddy!
-
Sure:
- The SEMRush blog has a lot of good tutorials.
- There's an ultimate guide written by Refugeeks that is worth reviewing.
- I've written an article on how to use SEMRush's display ad tracking features for non-PPC purposes.
-
Hello, Kane.
I started looking at SEMRush and have several questions about how to get the most out of it. Can you drop some links to articles like guides or something?
-
Thank you all, guys.
I figured I'd need to read reviews for every tool separately and combine them in my head, just was hoping that somebody did that before me and have put it on paper
-
Screaming Frog and Buzzsumo are also some awesome tools to consider.
Screaming Frog is great for crawl/index diagnostics, and much more technical SEO data. Buzzsumo is wonderful for recent content release's social and sharing data.
-
Your best bet would be to read specific reviews of each toolset due to all of the overlap and conflicting focus areas.
If you're just looking for an all around organic toolset, then you're fine with Moz, and you might selectively want to do single paid months on other tools like SEMrush and ahrefs to collect additional data.
But, if you do enough work in a particular function (eg link building, or keyword research, or technical SEO), you'll need more than one of them. I personally use Moz, ahrefs, & SEMRush the most from your current list. Screaming Frog is another one that is a must-have agency side. URLprofiler is a strong choice as well.
Decision should be made on what you're doing most of the time. Doing tons of keyword research and technical SEO? Your best bet would be Moz, Screaming Frog, and SEMRush, in my opinion. Doing tons of content creation and backlink analysis? You'd be best off with access to Moz, Ahrefs, Majestic, Buzzsumo, and SEMRush. So - everyone will be different.
Here are what I would call the "generally accepted best features" of the ones you did provide:
- MOZ - Good balanced toolset covering content, offsite, and technical SEO considerations. Link database is smaller than ahrefs/majestic but getting larger all the time, and focuses on higher quality links and less "noise" from spam and scraper sites.
- Ahrefs - Very thorough link database, and some of their newer tools are strong.
- Majestic - Very thorough link database.
- Spyfu - Strong for keyword research & discovery - both PPC and organic.
- SEMRush - Strong for keyword research & discovery - both PPC and organic. I use this one daily.
- Raven - One of the best options for reporting. I think they focus on being a balanced toolset.
- Wordstream - PPC-only toolset to my knowledge, aside from keyword research that could be used for SEO.
These are all generalizations, however, and you're going to have to have a tool budget discussion with your agency at some point. $99 or 199 per month isn't going to cut it for an agency of any size. $499 would be a more reasonable budget cap.
-
Thanks for response.
Well, my stumbling block is budget for tools At the moment I use MOZ a lot and free version of ahrefs. The execs won't expand budget for tools, so I have to compromise somehow.
I personally focus on organics, but we have another person for PPC. Plus I also do full internet marketing analysis for clients, including all channels, so I need to know everything. Just trying to ease my life a bit and save some money before buying tools by listening to people who have used them already.
You said "Increasing conversion rates by understanding customer behavior/flow? PPC analysis to understand how to maximize your budget to see a larger ROI for your campaigns?" - what's your recommendations? I assume for PPC is SEMrush? what about conversions? I use GA heavily + inspectlet(free version).
-
As far as links analysis tools go I like aHrefs and Moz over Majestic, but if possible I like to use all three. They all have different indexes which in many cases overlap, but you'll see each bot has found different links pointing to you that the other don't report. Moz seems better from a content standpoint than anything on the list. SEMRush is better than SpyFu for PPC analysis/Keyword research, and I haven't used Wordstream or Raven much.
Basically this is a pretty vague question since there isn't a one "master tool" for all digital marketing (yet...). Each of these are used for a different aspect of digital marketing, so what area do you want to focus on? How to improve organic ranking for your website? Increasing conversion rates by understanding customer behavior/flow? PPC analysis to understand how to maximize your budget to see a larger ROI for your campaigns?
-
Thanks for responding. Well, I work for an Internet Marketing company and we do every type of digital marketing.
I understand that different tools are for different needs, however, nowadays most tools have their "strong" part, but the do have most services, at least on basic level. Example: MOZ is strong on analytical part, KW tracking etc, but backlink part is not the best, because MOZscape index is monthly thing. However, Ahrefs, for instance, is kinda of an opposite. They are all about backlinks, but, at the same time, they do have somewhat basic analytical part and KW tracking.
What I'm trying to achieve here is to see what tool is best for what, preferably in one review article, with pricing, cons, pros etc. I have worked with some tools, but far not every one, at the same time we can't spend resources just on trying tools for couple months.
P.S. I'm a big MOZ fan, but execs are demanding to look into other tools.
-
Many of those tools do very different things. For instance, I believe Raven and Wordstream are the only PPC tools on your list. What is your businesses needs?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Data that shows people who click on paid vs organic listings
Hey Everyone, I've been searching for data on the percentage of people who click on paid vs organic. My last stats which are now outdated show 60% of the people click on organic on average and 40% click on paid. Any help/links would be greatly appreciated.
Competitive Research | | JohnSammon0 -
Ahrefs Much Higher Than Competitors But Competitors Doing Significantly More Traffic?
Hey guys, I'm baffled by checking my Ahrefs ratings lately. It looks like our rating just went up considerably... from over 1 million to now around 500k. One of my main competitors, however, has a much lower Ahrefs rank (over 3 million) but he does a considerable more amount of traffic than we do... how is this? My domain rating is higher than his by a lot. Very curious how this works.
Competitive Research | | jfishe19880 -
Link vs Subdomain Language redirect
Hi all, I'm managing a website that uses a redirect to show different languages to the users. I mean when a user access the site from any country it sees the full domain but when it access it from Italy, France or Germany it goes to domain.com/lang=FR or IT. I see that other sites use a technique to redirect to it.domain.com or fr.domain.com but I have doubts about which one is better. We do an aggressive link building strategy and we have a lot of links to the root domain across the various languages. Is it better to do the link building to the it.domain.com and fr.domain.com, depending on the language source of the link instead of the root? I'm seeing that some of our competitors are doing this but I'm afraid is going to spread the link juice across many subdomains and lose power to the root. Thanks in advance
Competitive Research | | nunob.staredition0 -
Good moz rank and trust, terrible page and domain authority
I have this happening both for page and domain. For domain the rank and trust are 5.2 and 5.51 but domain authority is only 48. My competitors with trust and rank between 5.5 and 6 have their domain authority in the 70-80 range. The same happens for home page metrics and the metrics are about the same. What can cause this authority discrepancy?
Competitive Research | | adrianmn0 -
Subdomain vs Root Domain Metrics
My site has everything in the root - test.com. www.test.com is redirected to test.com and all content is in the root; there are no subdomains. So I'm completely confused as to how the mozrank and moztrust are different. They have the same number of links yet: Subdomain: MozRank - 3.72
Competitive Research | | Optimise
MozTrust - 3.23 Root Domain: MozRank - 3.05
MozTrust - 2.79 This seems consistent with all my competitors too so just wondered if someone could explain why the root domain is usually/often lower? Surely the root domain numbers should always be equal to or higher than the subdomain?0 -
Ranking for long tailed keyword vs shorter keyword phrase?
I have a webpage http://freightmonster.com/free-freight-quote that currently ranks 19th in the Google SERP's for the keyword free freight quote. The keyword gets 59 exact match searches a month. Competition is high for this keyword. The keyword freight quote gets 8625 exact match searches a month and my home page http://freightmonster.com/ ranks 26th in the Google SERP for it. Competition is high for this keyword. Would I be better off creating another page http://freightmonster.com/freight-quote and doing a better job of on SEO optimization for it in the hopes of getting on page one, or given the fact that freight quote is such a highly competitive term should I just go after other long tailed keywords in my market like flatbed trucking freight quote, heavy haul trucking freight quote, RGN freight quote, etc? We have just started on SEO for organic keywords after spending over $500,000 on PPC in the last 5 years, which in our market niche is the norm. Thank you in advance!
Competitive Research | | FreightBoy0 -
Page quantity vs no crawl errors.
Which one is better: Have a ton of pages but accept crawl errors or; Have a lot less pages with no crawl errors. Let's say I have a product catalogue with 10 regular pages and 500 product pages (same page with content and title defined by url parameter like 'id'). It seems that even with a different product name, product description, price, color etc, I get dupplicate content crawl errors. I also know I could use a link tag with cannonical rel attribute to fix the crawl errors but I would lose indexing on 499 pages. In this case is it better SEO wise to have: 510 pages with 499 dupplicate content crawl errors or; 11 pages with 0 crawl errors?
Competitive Research | | escteam0 -
.biz vs .com
searching for a domain for a new branch of business, the original .com domain was no longer available yet the same domain with a .biz was. Question, how does google treat and rank .biz vs .com, same? less?
Competitive Research | | AmazingUniverse560