A campaign ghost keeps returning to my Google Analytics - Help!
-
A couple of campaign tracking links were created on my homepage (leading to internal pages), these were removed a few weeks ago (100% removed from the site).
I understand there is a 6 month window and as long as a user returns (no matter from which source) they will be counted as a session against that campaign.
Since these campaign links were set-up in error, I hoped creating a fresh new view within Google Analytics would stop them appearing.
However they are still showing as sessions even in the new view (created after removing the campaign links in question).
Is there anyway to stop this happening!? I want to be able to report on sessions correctly.
Thanks,
Sam
-
Thanks Kristina,
I set-up the filter in the following way:
Filter type - Custom
Search and Replace
Filter field - Campaign nameSearch string - 'nameofmycampaignimremoving'
Replace string -
I figured by adding in the campaign name but not replacing it with anything, Google Analytics should now pick this traffic up as direct.
The campaign is no longer showing in my traffic, so I assumed it's worked.
Is there a better way of doing this?
Sam
-
Good luck!
-
Very interesting Kristina.
I think I've figured out what's going on.
Our product is a browser based CRM hosted on a secure server, so I believe someone has previously visited our site and clicked on one of the old campaigns and then is either returning directly to our /login page or is clicking on the ? buttons within our browser-based CRM which leads to our website support articles and since our browser-based CRM is on a secure server this would count as direct traffic not referral.
So as you mentioned I will set-up a filter to have these campaigns show up as direct.
Hallelujah!
Sam
-
Hi Sam,
First, to be clear, campaigns will be overwritten if visitors come from any other source, it's just direct traffic that the campaign parameter holds on to. Here's Google's direct quote from its article on campaigns and traffic sources:
Existing campaign or traffic source data for a particular user will be overwritten by new campaign or traffic source data, regardless of the configured timeout period.
If you look at the flowchart a bit below that quote, you'll see that Google starts by looking for new campaign data, then looks for traffic source data, then, if it doesn't find either of those, uses existing campaign data.
That means your theory could still be correct, but only if all of the visits you're still seeing come in are just from direct visits. You can check this theory by using the % New Sessions column - if it's 0%, you're right, these are just returning visitors, and the best I can recommend is that you set up filters to make these show up as "direct." If it's not, though, (and I'm suspecting it's not, because I doubt this would make a large enough number for you to be concerned and reach out for help), you've still got some of those campaign URLs floating around for the public.
Here's how I'd go looking for them:
- Use a third party tool like Screaming Frog or DeepCrawl to triple check that there are no internal links on your site with those old campaign parameters. CMSs can easily miss things like this, so using an outside tool that just tries to find everything helps.
- Search for the original URLs + parameters in Google to see if any affiliates or coupon sites are using those links.
- Check your old emails - did you ever send out these URLs? It's possible that people are still accessing old emails.
- Was this a campaign that could have been shared in any other way? I know that my company often shares shortened URLs, which redirect to URLs with parameters appended. Have you shared any bit.ly or other aliased URLs that are appending those parameters you've tried to get rid of?
I hope this helps! Let me know if you still have any questions, or if anything stumps you along the way.
Best,
Kristina
-
I know it's too obvious, but what about just creating a segment, filtering out that campaign traffic?
-
Thanks, bounce rate is in the early 90% so high but not 100%, exit pages also differ.
Interesting note on the tracking code.
Since if any visitor revisits (whom orginally clicked on one of the campaign links) counts as a session against the old campaign I don't think it's as complicated as people visiting through bookmarks or browser history.
Is there really nothing I can do about these old campaigns coming back ot haunt me!?
-
Hi there.
New view wouldn't help anyhow, because it's tied to the same tracking code. My guess is that either users are getting to those pages through bookmarks or browser history, or those links were indexed somehow and now you're getting hit by bots and crawlers.
Go to campaigns, see what source/medium those sessions are coming from, also check how long those sessions are and the bounce rate. If it looks like it might be crawlers - look into ghost and referral spam filtration. here is the link on how to implement - https://moz.com/blog/stop-ghost-spam-in-google-analytics-with-one-filter
Hope this helps
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google Search Console Block
Am new to SEO. My clients site was completed using Yoast premium and then used Google search console to initiate the crawl. Initially setup an http:// property and all seemed good. Then i removed that under search console an created an https:// did the render and it appears google has put a block and placed their own robots.txt file which basically has rendered the site useless. Feedback most appreciated.
Web Design | | BoostMyBiz0 -
Https pages indexed but all web pages are http - please can you offer some help?
Dear Moz Community, Please could you see what you think and offer some definite steps or advice.. I contacted the host provider and his initial thought was that WordPress was causing the https problem ?: eg when an https version of a page is called, things like videos and media don't always show up. A SSL certificate that is attached to a website, can allow pages to load over https. The host said that there is no active configured SSL it's just waiting as part of the hosting package just in case, but I found that the SSL certificate is still showing up during a crawl.It's important to eliminate the https problem before external backlinks link to any of the unwanted https pages that are currently indexed. Luckily I haven't started any intense backlinking work yet, and any links I have posted in search land have all been http version.I checked a few more url's to see if it’s necessary to create a permanent redirect from https to http. For example, I tried requesting domain.co.uk using the https:// and the https:// page loaded instead of redirecting automatically to http prefix version. I know that if I am automatically redirected to the http:// version of the page, then that is the way it should be. Search engines and visitors will stay on the http version of the site and not get lost anywhere in https. This also helps to eliminate duplicate content and to preserve link juice. What are your thoughts regarding that?As I understand it, most server configurations should redirect by default when https isn’t configured, and from my experience I’ve seen cases where pages requested via https return the default server page, a 404 error, or duplicate content. So I'm confused as to where to take this.One suggestion would be to disable all https since there is no need to have any traces to SSL when the site is even crawled ?. I don't want to enable https in the htaccess only to then create a https to http rewrite rule; https shouldn't even be a crawlable function of the site at all.RewriteEngine OnRewriteCond %{HTTPS} offor to disable the SSL completely for now until it becomes a necessity for the website.I would really welcome your thoughts as I'm really stuck as to what to do for the best, short term and long term.Kind Regards
Web Design | | SEOguy10 -
Fetch data for users with ajax but show it without ajax for Google
Hi, We have a thematic footer which shows similar pages links relevant to the search criteria made on a page. We want to fetch those footer similar links through ajax when users search on site but the links will be shown without using ajax when Google fetches those pages. We want to do this to improve our page load time. The links content & count will be exactly same in both cases whether Google fetches the search pages or user fetches those pages. Will this be treated as negative by Google, Can this have any negative affect on our rankings or traffic. Regards,
Web Design | | vivekrathore0 -
URL Help
Will the following urls will be considered as two different urls? 1. www.example.com/key=value1& key2=value2 2. www.example.com/key2=value2 & key=value1
Web Design | | prsntsnh0 -
Why is Google Webmaster suddenly started showing hundreds of HTML Improvements
Why is Google Webmaster suddenly started showing hundreds of HTML Improvements I mean to ask, my hundreds pages are been shown as duplicate - despite canonical marked correctly Below are sample url - which are been crawled in own way. I have rechecked canonical tag - which is correct as URL - 1, in all 3 url Do i need to worry about anything or shall i presume its a flaw from search engine to report this as an issue (This only pertain to Forum section) http://www.mycarhelpline.com/index.php?option=com_easydiscuss&view=post&id=1683&Itemid=78 http://www.mycarhelpline.com/?id=1683&Itemid=78&option=com_easydiscuss&view=post http://www.mycarhelpline.com/index.php?option=com_easydiscuss&view=post&id=1683 ps - i know these are dynamic url and not sef friendly url, but its been 3 yrs and , due to our ignorance and site builder took advantage of this. now - nothing can be done much to make them sef friendly as site has several thousand pages and touchwood - these dynamic url are not impacting much
Web Design | | Modi0 -
Did i got hit from some google updates.
Hello everybody, i got a problem and i hope someone can clear it up for me. my root domain authority is 42 and home page is 52 (jumped there only yesterday) ,while my google page rank is still PR2 (same for 3 month already). 1 month ago i changed my home page design (not the text) and since then my home page just disappeared from the search engines. can somebody look on my website www.kspiercing.com , and tell me if i got hit by some panda ,koala,penguin or some other sweet Google animal . thank you very much.
Web Design | | kspiercing0 -
Given the lastest Google update, should I rewrite my Flash site or try to present an alternative HTML/CSS site?
I have a site that was created using Flash. The reasoning behind this was, at the time, that I didn't care if the site ranked or not (portfolio site). Now I would like to drive traffic to the site from SE's. Given the Penguin update, should I rewrite my Flash site in HTML/CSS or present an alternative site for bots and browsers that don't support Flash? My concern is that by presenting an alternative site to bots and non Flash supporting browsers that the SE's will see potentially see this as cloaking. Thoughts and advice would be much appreciated.
Web Design | | mj7750 -
What is the new Google SERP highlighting?
My question is with the new Google SERP. I posted a pic of it at http://www.hortonwebdesign.com/images/new-google-page.gif. If you mouse over the arrows to the right of a result on the SERP, it pops up a preview of the page. On some results it also highlights a section of the page with a red box. What does this represent? Does it represent a key area that they are looking at in determining the positioning? I have some clients that are asking me and it doesn't make a lot of sense. In my example above I searched for "seo expert in georgia" and on my result (I'm #2), it shows a preview, but the part it has chosen to highlight with a red box is just, um, ...useless. It's highlighting a Recent Post sidebar on the right halfway down the page. Surely this can't be what they're looking at as what they view as "useful" to that search. This simply can't be what they're using to determine positioning. Or is it? Just please explain what I'm seeing here. new-google-page.gif.
Web Design | | GeorgiaSEOServices0